This is a 6 Sigma Metrics Metric Dashboard (Diamond) Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for 6 Sigma Metrics KPI. With this software you can also design your own scorecards, KPIs and metrics.


6 Sigma Metrics

Report includes: 1 day(s), from 28.10.2008 to 28.10.2008

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root 6 Sigma Metrics 51,66 % 51,66 % 0 %
Financial perspective(14,4%, 0%)
Customer Perspective(78,7%, 0%)
Employee Perspective(43,5%, 0%)
Sigma Perspective(48,6%, 0%)
Process Perspective(73,1%, 0%)

Graph for 6 Sigma Metrics

Graph for 6 Sigma Metrics

Data for 6 Sigma Metrics

DatesValue
28.10.200851,66

Financial perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Financial perspective 14,4 % 14,4 % 0% 6 Sigma Metrics
Indicators
Cost of poor quality (COPQ)
Activity Based Costing (ABC)

Graph for Financial perspective

Graph for Financial perspective

Data for Financial perspective

DatesValueWeight
28.10.200814,41

Cost of poor quality (COPQ)

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Cost of poor quality (COPQ) 39,82 39,82 0 Score Minimize Financial perspective
Description The number of defects per period of time multiplied by the average unit cost to fix a defect (labour and materials)
Target description [USD*1000]

Graph for Cost of poor quality (COPQ)

Graph for Cost of poor quality (COPQ)

Data for Cost of poor quality (COPQ)

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.20082204039,82

Activity Based Costing (ABC)

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Activity Based Costing (ABC) 20,86 20,86 0 % Minimize Financial perspective
Description Cost accounting that includes the costs of performing specific functions (processes, activities, tasks, etc.)
Target description [USD*1000]

Graph for Activity Based Costing (ABC)

Graph for Activity Based Costing (ABC)

Data for Activity Based Costing (ABC)

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.20081152520,86

Customer Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Customer Perspective 78,67 % 78,67 % 0% 6 Sigma Metrics
Indicators
Customer Satisfaction
On Time Delivery

Graph for Customer Perspective

Graph for Customer Perspective

Data for Customer Perspective

DatesValueWeight
28.10.200878,671

Customer Satisfaction

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Customer Satisfaction 94,16 94,16 0 % Maximize Customer Perspective
Description The number of satisfied customers divided by the total number of surveyed customers, multiplied by 100

Graph for Customer Satisfaction

Graph for Customer Satisfaction

Data for Customer Satisfaction

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.200826010094,16

On Time Delivery

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root On Time Delivery 86,08 86,08 0 % Maximize Customer Perspective
Description The number of units delivered on time divided by the total number of units, multiplied by 100

Graph for On Time Delivery

Graph for On Time Delivery

Data for On Time Delivery

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.200816010086,08

Employee Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Employee Perspective 43,53 % 43,53 % 0% 6 Sigma Metrics
Indicators
Total Trained in Six Sigma
Number of Projects Completed
Lessons Learned *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Employee Perspective

Graph for Employee Perspective

Data for Employee Perspective

DatesValueWeight
28.10.200843,531

Total Trained in Six Sigma

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Total Trained in Six Sigma 71,7 71,7 0 % Maximize Employee Perspective
Description The number of employees trained in 6 Sigma divided by the total number of employees, multiplied by 100

Graph for Total Trained in Six Sigma

Graph for Total Trained in Six Sigma

Data for Total Trained in Six Sigma

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.200815010071,7

Number of Projects Completed

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Projects Completed 71,2 71,2 0 % Maximize Employee Perspective
Description The number of projects completed in 6 Sigma divided by the total number of developed projects, multiplied by 100

Graph for Number of Projects Completed

Graph for Number of Projects Completed

Data for Number of Projects Completed

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.200826010071,2

Sigma Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Sigma Perspective 48,64 % 48,64 % 0% 6 Sigma Metrics
Indicators
Sigma Level
Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)
Defects per million opportunities (DPMO) *
First Time Yield (FTY) *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Sigma Perspective

Graph for Sigma Perspective

Data for Sigma Perspective

DatesValueWeight
28.10.200848,641

Sigma Level

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Sigma Level 5,072 5,072 0 Score Maximize Sigma Perspective
Description The statistical term that measures how much a process varies from perfection, based on the number of defects per million units
Target description [Sigma Level]

Graph for Sigma Level

Graph for Sigma Level

Data for Sigma Level

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.20083465,072

Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY) 8,6433E-5 8,6433E-5 0 Score Minimize Sigma Perspective
Description The average number of defects and reworks per unit observed during an average production run divided by the number of units.
Target description [Defects]

Graph for Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)

Graph for Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)

Data for Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.200823E-69E-58,6433E-5

Process Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Process Perspective 73,07 % 73,07 % 0% 6 Sigma Metrics
Indicators
Cycle time
Lead Time
Mean time to repair (MTTR) *
Capacity *
Rework Hours *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Process Perspective

Graph for Process Perspective

Data for Process Perspective

DatesValueWeight
28.10.200873,071

Cycle time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Cycle time 26,89 26,89 0 Score Minimize Process Perspective
Description The total elapsed time to move a unit of work from the beginning to the end of a physical process
Target description [Hours]

Graph for Cycle time

Graph for Cycle time

Data for Cycle time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.20082254026,89

Lead Time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Lead Time 12,508 12,508 0 Score Minimize Process Perspective
Description The amount of time that is required to meet a customer request or demand.
Target description [Hours]

Graph for Lead Time

Graph for Lead Time

Data for Lead Time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.2008181512,508
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 20.11.2008 17:31:23

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.