This is a Data Integrity Metric Dashboard (Diamond) Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Data Integrity KPI. With this software you can also design your own scorecards, KPIs and metrics.


Data Integrity Scorecard

Report includes: 2 day(s), from 13.03.2009 to 14.03.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Data Integrity Scorecard  44,46 % 44,05 % -0,41 %
Data Loss Prevention Perspective(36,2%, -11,87%Down)
Technical Competence Assessment Perspective(42%, -12,37%Down)
Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective(40%, 21,28%Up)
Failure Assessment Perspective(62,9%, 13,02%Up)

Graph for Data Integrity Scorecard

Graph for Data Integrity Scorecard

Data for Data Integrity Scorecard

DatesValue
13.03.200944,46
14.03.200944,05


Data Loss Prevention Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Data Loss Prevention Perspective SLYellow 48,08 % 36,21 % -11,87% Data Integrity Scorecard
Indicators
Number of Back-ups Used
Number of Security Mechanisms Adopted
User-Interface Capability Value
Software Ability for Error Detection and Correction *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category of indicators is to have an idea about the structure that has been constructed for preventing data loss.

Graph for Data Loss Prevention Perspective

Graph for Data Loss Prevention Perspective

Data for Data Loss Prevention Perspective

DatesValueWeight
13.03.200948,083
14.03.200936,213


Number of Back-ups Used

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Back-ups Used DownRedSLYellow 4,224 3,848 -0,376 # Maximize Data Loss Prevention Perspective
Description This gives the attempts being taken by the management in ensuring that files are copied at other locations to avoid the chaos at times of losing data.

Graph for Number of Back-ups Used

Graph for Number of Back-ups Used

Data for Number of Back-ups Used

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.20093154,224
14.03.20093153,848


Number of Security Mechanisms Adopted

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Security Mechanisms Adopted UpGreenSLYellow 2,054 3,17 + 1,116 # Maximize Data Loss Prevention Perspective
Description This gives the number of mechanisms that are used for ensuring security of data.

Graph for Number of Security Mechanisms Adopted

Graph for Number of Security Mechanisms Adopted

Data for Number of Security Mechanisms Adopted

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.20092252,054
14.03.20092253,17


User-Interface Capability Value

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root User-Interface Capability Value DownRedSLRed 7,858 2,431 -5,427 Score Maximize Data Loss Prevention Perspective
Description Often, user interfaces are such that these keep a check on the data being entered. Consequently, automated blocks to invalid data occur. The number for this KPI can be had by using a scale labeled from 1-10.

Graph for User-Interface Capability Value

Graph for User-Interface Capability Value

Data for User-Interface Capability Value

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.200931107,858
14.03.200931102,431


Technical Competence Assessment Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Technical Competence Assessment Perspective SLYellow 54,38 % 42,01 % -12,37% Data Integrity Scorecard
Indicators
'Inaccurate or Inconsistent Data' Index
Capability Score of Tools and Techniques used to Access Data
Techniques' Syncing with Organizational Operations
Implementation Timeframe *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This is needed to ensure that the procedures for maintaining data are occurring as per the desired manner and levels.

Graph for Technical Competence Assessment Perspective

Graph for Technical Competence Assessment Perspective

Data for Technical Competence Assessment Perspective

DatesValueWeight
13.03.200954,383
14.03.200942,013


'Inaccurate or Inconsistent Data' Index

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root 'Inaccurate or Inconsistent Data' Index UpRedSLYellow 0,0182 0,147 + 0,129 # Minimize Technical Competence Assessment Perspective
Description This KPI shows the instances when the data retrieved was not accurate or was inconsistent in nature with regard to the requirements.

Graph for 'Inaccurate or Inconsistent Data' Index

Graph for 'Inaccurate or Inconsistent Data' Index

Data for 'Inaccurate or Inconsistent Data' Index

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.2009300,20,0182
14.03.2009300,20,147


Capability Score of Tools and Techniques used to Access Data

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Capability Score of Tools and Techniques used to Access Data DownRedSLYellow 8,47 7,795 -0,675 Score Maximize Technical Competence Assessment Perspective
Description Not only is the implementation of the technology important but also it must be apt enough to fulfill the needs it was supposed to. This indicator is to know the latter. Positioning the KPI on a scale of 1-10 can be used to have the value.

Graph for Capability Score of Tools and Techniques used to Access Data

Graph for Capability Score of Tools and Techniques used to Access Data

Data for Capability Score of Tools and Techniques used to Access Data

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.200921108,47
14.03.200921107,795


Techniques' Syncing with Organizational Operations

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Techniques' Syncing with Organizational Operations UpGreenSLRed 3,007 4,006 + 0,999 Score Maximize Technical Competence Assessment Perspective
Description This gives the level at which the integration between the techniques and organizational systems occur. For instance, the solutions have to be well understood by the employees. Scale numbered from 1-10 can be used for this.

Graph for Techniques' Syncing with Organizational Operations

Graph for Techniques' Syncing with Organizational Operations

Data for Techniques' Syncing with Organizational Operations

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.200931103,007
14.03.200931104,006


Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective SLYellow 18,7 % 39,98 % + 21,28% Data Integrity Scorecard
Indicators
Competence of the Data Model used
Unification Level with Stakeholders
Cost: Benefit Ratio
Fraction of Infrastructure Covered by Security Mechanisms *
Vulnerability Ratio *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is for judging the structure of database.

Graph for Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective

Graph for Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective

Data for Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective

DatesValueWeight
13.03.200918,72
14.03.200939,982


Competence of the Data Model used

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Competence of the Data Model used DownRedSLYellow 3,367 2,917 -0,45 Score Maximize Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective
Description This KPI shows the extent to which the data model that has been adopted is immune to the 'loss of data integrity'. Scale of 1-10 can be used for this.

Graph for Competence of the Data Model used

Graph for Competence of the Data Model used

Data for Competence of the Data Model used

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.200921103,367
14.03.200921102,917


Unification Level with Stakeholders

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Unification Level with Stakeholders UpGreen 0,8026 0,991 + 0,188 # Maximize Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective
Description This indicator gives the extent to which the data integrity solutions are compatible with those of stakeholders.

Graph for Unification Level with Stakeholders

Graph for Unification Level with Stakeholders

Data for Unification Level with Stakeholders

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.200920,810,8026
14.03.200920,810,991


Cost: Benefit Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Cost: Benefit Ratio DownGreenSLRed 0,2781 0,2049 -0,0732 # Minimize Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective
Description The amount invested in bringing the required technologies in the organization can be huge. So, it is necessary to evaluate the cost borne in the light of benefits experienced.

Graph for Cost: Benefit Ratio

Graph for Cost: Benefit Ratio

Data for Cost: Benefit Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.2009200,30,2781
14.03.2009200,30,2049


Failure Assessment Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Failure Assessment Perspective SLYellow 49,91 % 62,93 % + 13,02% Data Integrity Scorecard
Indicators
Proportion of Unauthorized Accesses
Number of Issues that Come-up in one Year
Time that goes into Fixing the Problems
% Drop in Resolution Time *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category helps in analyzing the failure aspect of the whole subject of Data integrity.

Graph for Failure Assessment Perspective

Graph for Failure Assessment Perspective

Data for Failure Assessment Perspective

DatesValueWeight
13.03.200949,912
14.03.200962,932


Proportion of Unauthorized Accesses

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Proportion of Unauthorized Accesses UpRedSLYellow 0,0196 0,1064 + 0,0868 # Minimize Failure Assessment Perspective
Description This is to know the fraction of accesses that was found to be ‘illegal’. It reflects the potency of the technological solutions.

Graph for Proportion of Unauthorized Accesses

Graph for Proportion of Unauthorized Accesses

Data for Proportion of Unauthorized Accesses

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.2009200,20,0196
14.03.2009200,20,1064


Number of Issues that Come-up in one Year

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Issues that Come-up in one Year DownGreenSLYellow 6,62 0,16 -6,46 # Minimize Failure Assessment Perspective
Description One must keep a check on the number of data security issues that have come up in the last one year. The management should also aim at increasing the time lapse that goes into two successive 'problem emergence' incidents.

Graph for Number of Issues that Come-up in one Year

Graph for Number of Issues that Come-up in one Year

Data for Number of Issues that Come-up in one Year

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.200930106,62
14.03.200930100,16


Time that goes into Fixing the Problems

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Time that goes into Fixing the Problems UpRedSLYellow 35,839 41,621 + 5,782 hr Minimize Failure Assessment Perspective
Description This is to have an idea about the time period that is needed, on an average basis to bring the things back in place.

Graph for Time that goes into Fixing the Problems

Graph for Time that goes into Fixing the Problems

Data for Time that goes into Fixing the Problems

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.03.2009315035,839
14.03.2009315041,621
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 09.03.2009 23:08:23

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.