This is a Global Warming Metric Dashboard (Diamond) Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Global Warming KPI. With this software you can also design your own scorecards, KPIs and metrics.


Global Warming Scorecard

Report includes: 2 day(s), from 19.03.2009 to 20.03.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Global Warming Scorecard  39 % 47,57 % + 8,57 %
R&D (Research and Development) Perspective(48,8%, -1,87%Down)
Education and Outreach Perspective(38,8%, 17,76%Up)
Ecological Solutions Assessment(55,7%, 14,7%Up)
Performance Evaluation Perspective(50,7%, 4,33%Up)

Graph for Global Warming Scorecard

Graph for Global Warming Scorecard

Data for Global Warming Scorecard

DatesValue
19.03.200939
20.03.200947,57


R&D (Research and Development) Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root R&D (Research and Development) Perspective SLYellow 50,72 % 48,85 % -1,87% Global Warming Scorecard
Indicators
% Rise in R&D Share
Average Research Duration
Focus Scaling
Number of Research Projects Underway *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of parameters is to have a peep into the way the R&D activities are proceeding in the organization.

Graph for R&D (Research and Development) Perspective

Graph for R&D (Research and Development) Perspective

Data for R&D (Research and Development) Perspective

DatesValueWeight
19.03.200950,723
20.03.200948,853


% Rise in R&D Share

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % Rise in R&D Share UpGreenSLRed 17,195 17,66 + 0,465 % Maximize R&D (Research and Development) Perspective
Description This is an important pointer to know the volume of funds that are going into R&D. The value can be had on yearly basis.

Graph for % Rise in R&D Share

Graph for % Rise in R&D Share

Data for % Rise in R&D Share

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.2009352017,195
20.03.2009352017,66


Average Research Duration

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Average Research Duration UpGreenSLYellow 8,855 10,445 + 1,59 yrs Maximize R&D (Research and Development) Perspective
Description This indicator is to have the time period for which the research was carried out. This gives an estimate about the time that was devoted by the organization in studying the factors that led to 'unnatural heat generation on the planet'. It is a significant reflector of the understanding that was developed by the organization in gaining a good grasp on the subject.

Graph for Average Research Duration

Graph for Average Research Duration

Data for Average Research Duration

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.200935208,855
20.03.2009352010,445


Focus Scaling

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Focus Scaling DownRed 2,665 2,512 -0,153 Score Maximize R&D (Research and Development) Perspective
Description A general idea about the how focused the R&D activities are will be helpful in guessing the success of the attempts. Scaling method can be used for this.

Graph for Focus Scaling

Graph for Focus Scaling

Data for Focus Scaling

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.200921102,665
20.03.200921102,512


Education and Outreach Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Education and Outreach Perspective SLYellow 21,05 % 38,81 % + 17,76% Global Warming Scorecard
Indicators
Number of Journals Published
Number of Grants or Fellowships
Media Coverage
Number of Educational Institutions Roped-in *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is for evaluating the organizational attempts of being in the 'educational circle'.

Graph for Education and Outreach Perspective

Graph for Education and Outreach Perspective

Data for Education and Outreach Perspective

DatesValueWeight
19.03.200921,053
20.03.200938,813


Number of Journals Published

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Journals Published  UpGreenSLYellow 10,34 11,586 + 1,246 # Maximize Education and Outreach Perspective
Description This KPI is to know the number of journals that were circulated to spread awareness among the masses regarding the ill-effects of global warming and how they can reduce the environmental damage. (over a period of 1 year)

Graph for Number of Journals Published

Graph for Number of Journals Published

Data for Number of Journals Published

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.2009362010,34
20.03.2009362011,586


Number of Grants or Fellowships

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Grants or Fellowships UpGreenSLYellow 20 44,4 + 24,4 # Maximize Education and Outreach Perspective
Description This KPI is equal to the number of grants or fellowships that were provided by the organization for helping in R&D activities.

Graph for Number of Grants or Fellowships

Graph for Number of Grants or Fellowships

Data for Number of Grants or Fellowships

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.20092106020
20.03.20092106044,4


Media Coverage

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Media Coverage UpGreenSLRed 3,061 3,7 + 0,639 Score Maximize Education and Outreach Perspective
Description This indicator captures the degree to which the organization managed to be in the ‘media eye’. It is important to know this as media does the job of spreading the word in efficient and complete manner. The value can be had using scale numbered from 1-10.

Graph for Media Coverage

Graph for Media Coverage

Data for Media Coverage

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.200931103,061
20.03.200931103,7


Ecological Solutions Assessment

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Ecological Solutions Assessment SLYellow 40,96 % 55,66 % + 14,7% Global Warming Scorecard
Indicators
Average Success Anticipation
Side-Effect Index
Predictability Degree
Ineffectiveness Analysis *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description The indicators brought together under this category will go into judging a given technique in the light of factors that matter.

Graph for Ecological Solutions Assessment

Graph for Ecological Solutions Assessment

Data for Ecological Solutions Assessment

DatesValueWeight
19.03.200940,962
20.03.200955,662


Average Success Anticipation

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Average Success Anticipation DownRed 3,664 2,629 -1,035 Score Maximize Ecological Solutions Assessment
Description The value of this indicator is to know the average chances of projects being successful in their aims. It is an important reflector of how well the organization is proceeding with the job entitled to it. A scale numbered from 1-10 can be used for this.

Graph for Average Success Anticipation

Graph for Average Success Anticipation

Data for Average Success Anticipation

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.200921103,664
20.03.200921102,629


Side-Effect Index

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Side-Effect Index UpGreenSLYellow 6,454 7,264 + 0,81 Score Maximize Ecological Solutions Assessment
Description This parameter is to have a guess at the degree of 'side-effect' that might arise out of the technique. For instance, using 'reflective balloons' can prove to be immensely dangerous for the wild-life of the planet. Again a scale labeled from 1-10 is helpful in this case.

Graph for Side-Effect Index

Graph for Side-Effect Index

Data for Side-Effect Index

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.200931106,454
20.03.200931107,264


Predictability Degree

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Predictability Degree UpGreenSLYellow 4,24 8,524 + 4,284 Score Maximize Ecological Solutions Assessment
Description Every approach has its own set of problems pertaining to 'control' and 'prediction' that the outcomes will be the ones that are ought to be there. For instance, 'climate modelling' is not an exact science even when it is used in the most 'predictable' situations.

Graph for Predictability Degree

Graph for Predictability Degree

Data for Predictability Degree

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.200931104,24
20.03.200931108,524


Performance Evaluation Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Performance Evaluation Perspective SLYellow 46,39 % 50,72 % + 4,33% Global Warming Scorecard
Indicators
Cost: Benefit Ratio
Number of Projects Handled Successfully
Network Expansion Ratio
Involvement Rise *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of metrics is for calculating the extent to which the efforts were fruitful.

Graph for Performance Evaluation Perspective

Graph for Performance Evaluation Perspective

Data for Performance Evaluation Perspective

DatesValueWeight
19.03.200946,392
20.03.200950,722


Cost: Benefit Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Cost: Benefit Ratio DownGreenSLYellow 0,382 0,1932 -0,189 # Minimize Performance Evaluation Perspective
Description This is to compare the costs that were incurred in the task of 'making' and 'implementation' of the technique with the benefits that were brought by the technique.

Graph for Cost: Benefit Ratio

Graph for Cost: Benefit Ratio

Data for Cost: Benefit Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.2009200,40,382
20.03.2009200,40,1932


Number of Projects Handled Successfully

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Projects Handled Successfully DownRedSLYellow 8,831 6,906 -1,925 # Maximize Performance Evaluation Perspective
Description In order to have the degree to which the struggle in the direction of lowering down the global warming down, one needs to know the number of assignments that were tackled successfully. It also shows, in usual sense, the potential of the team members at the organization.

Graph for Number of Projects Handled Successfully

Graph for Number of Projects Handled Successfully

Data for Number of Projects Handled Successfully

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.200933108,831
20.03.200933106,906


Network Expansion Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Network Expansion Ratio UpGreen 0,5904 0,7616 + 0,171 # Maximize Performance Evaluation Perspective
Description This KPI is equal to the spread that occurs in the network of which the organization is a part. Such an act is needed to have an idea about the efforts being made to get more and more people together in the aim of decreasing global warming. The value can be had on yearly basis.

Graph for Network Expansion Ratio

Graph for Network Expansion Ratio

Data for Network Expansion Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
19.03.200920,210,5904
20.03.200920,210,7616
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 15.03.2009 16:34:33

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.