This is a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Metric Dashboard (Diamond) Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Greenhouse Gas Reduction KPI. With this software you can also design your own scorecards, KPIs and metrics.

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

Report includes: 2 day(s), from 09.01.2009 to 10.01.2009

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Contains

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

48,15 %

58,63 %

+ 10,48 %

Research and Technological Development Perspective	(53,3%, 22,6%)
Efforts Perspective	(65,9%, 1,48%)
Internal Processes Perspective	(60,8%, 25,5%)
Emission Control Perspective	(53,4%, -9,22%)

Graph for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

Data for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

Dates	Value
09.01.2009	48,15
10.01.2009	58,63

Research and Technological Development Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Research and Technological Development Perspective

30,75 %

53,35 %

+ 22,6%

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

% increase in GHG-reduction innovative solutions and equipments

% R&D Expenditures on renewable resources and energy conservation

% increase in Financial Support from Government and other associates

Research Amount *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This perspective talks about the research and technolgical development expenditure and activities regarding Green House Gases in an ecological organization.

Graph for Research and Technological Development Perspective

Data for Research and Technological Development Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
09.01.2009	30,75	3
10.01.2009	53,35	3

% increase in GHG-reduction innovative solutions and equipments

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% increase in GHG-reduction innovative solutions and equipments	17,6	26,69	+ 9,09	%	Maximize	Research and Technological Development Perspective

Graph for % increase in GHG-reduction innovative solutions and equipments

Data for % increase in GHG-reduction innovative solutions and equipments

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	2	5	35	17,6
10.01.2009	2	5	35	26,69

% R&D Expenditures on renewable resources and energy conservation

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% R&D Expenditures on renewable resources and energy conservation	20,44	21,4	+ 0,96	%	Maximize	Research and Technological Development Perspective

Description This KPI talks about the R&D

Graph for % R&D Expenditures on renewable resources and energy conservation

Data for % R&D Expenditures on renewable resources and energy conservation

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	3	10	40	20,44
10.01.2009	3	10	40	21,4

% increase in Financial Support from Government and other associates

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% increase in Financial Support from Government and other associates	23,725	26,275	+ 2,55	%	Maximize	Research and Technological Development Perspective

Graph for % increase in Financial Support from Government and other associates

Data for % increase in Financial Support from Government and other associates

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	3	15	40	23,725
10.01.2009	3	15	40	26,275

Efforts Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Efforts Perspective

64,43 %

65,91 %

+ 1,48%

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

Social Responsibility Rating

'Average Efficiency level' of solutions

Number of Partners

Number of projects handled *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is to evaluate the attempts being taken by organizations.

Graph for Efforts Perspective

Data for Efforts Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
09.01.2009	64,43	3
10.01.2009	65,91	3

Social Responsibility Rating

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Social Responsibility Rating	4,46	4,728	+ 0,268	Score	Maximize	Efforts Perspective

Description The ecological organizations are included in various indices depending upon their contribution to social, environment and economic performance. Some of these are- DJSI (Dow Jones Sustainability Index), CDP (Carbon Disclosure project) and Goldman Sachs global energy environmental, social and governance index. The value of this KPI can be had by knowing the number of indices of which the organization is a part.

Graph for Social Responsibility Rating

Data for Social Responsibility Rating

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	2	1	5	4,46
10.01.2009	2	1	5	4,728

'Average Efficiency level' of solutions

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	'Average Efficiency level' of solutions	56,85	71,9	+ 15,05	%	Maximize	Efforts Perspective

Description This is to have a guess of how 'practical' and 'realistic' the way outs provided by the organization are.

Graph for 'Average Efficiency level' of solutions

Data for 'Average Efficiency level' of solutions

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	3	30	80	56,85
10.01.2009	3	30	80	71,9

Number of Partners

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Partners	7,472	6,784	-0,688	#	Maximize	Efforts Perspective

Description This is to assess the 'collaboration' the organization is trying for. For instance, to tackle the issue of deforestation, one can establish partnerships with landowners, land trusts etc.

Graph for Number of Partners

Data for Number of Partners

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	2	2	10	7,472
10.01.2009	2	2	10	6,784

Internal Processes Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Internal Processes Perspective

35,33 %

60,83 %

+ 25,5%

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

Number of areas in which positive effects are experienced

% increase in use of 'agreed alternatives'

Average reduction achieved

Hurdles overcoming potential *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This KPI set is to know the way the operations of the organization proceed.

Graph for Internal Processes Perspective

Data for Internal Processes Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
09.01.2009	35,33	2
10.01.2009	60,83	2

Number of areas in which positive effects are experienced

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of areas in which positive effects are experienced	6,968	5,12	-1,848	#	Maximize	Internal Processes Perspective

Description The value of this indicator can be had by considering that there are a number of issues involved in providing 'eco-friendly solutions'. The organization should try to have positive effects on maximum of these like 'water', 'Land', 'Air', 'Flora and fauna', 'Employment' and 'Human Health'.

Graph for Number of areas in which positive effects are experienced

Data for Number of areas in which positive effects are experienced

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	2	2	10	6,968
10.01.2009	2	2	10	5,12

% increase in use of 'agreed alternatives'

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% increase in use of 'agreed alternatives'	48,24	47,68	-0,56	%	Maximize	Internal Processes Perspective

Description This reflects the growth of the organization in terms of 'pre-set objectives'.

Graph for % increase in use of 'agreed alternatives'

Data for % increase in use of 'agreed alternatives'

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	3	20	100	48,24
10.01.2009	3	20	100	47,68

Average reduction achieved

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Average reduction achieved	13,06	95,77	+ 82,71	%	Maximize	Internal Processes Perspective

Description This gives the extent to which the organization has succeeded in its aim of obtaining reduction in greenhouse gasses emission. The value can be had on yearly basis.

Graph for Average reduction achieved

Data for Average reduction achieved

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	3	10	100	13,06
10.01.2009	3	10	100	95,77

Emission Control Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Emission Control Perspective

62,67 %

53,45 %

-9,22%

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

Carbon dioxide Reduction

Drop in Methane volume

Hydrofluoro Carbons emission

Nitrous Oxides *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category of KPIs is to have the amount or decrease in emmision of gases attained.

Graph for Emission Control Perspective

Data for Emission Control Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
09.01.2009	62,67	2
10.01.2009	53,45	2

Carbon dioxide Reduction

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Carbon dioxide Reduction	4,048	8,536	+ 4,488	million tonnes	Maximize	Emission Control Perspective

Description This KPI is to have the dip in emission of gas, on yearly basis.

Graph for Carbon dioxide Reduction

Data for Carbon dioxide Reduction

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	3	2	10	4,048
10.01.2009	3	2	10	8,536

Drop in Methane volume

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Drop in Methane volume	9,667	6,526	-3,141	%	Maximize	Emission Control Perspective

Description This is to have the dip in the volume of methane, on per year basis.

Graph for Drop in Methane volume

Data for Drop in Methane volume

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	3	1	10	9,667
10.01.2009	3	1	10	6,526

Hydrofluoro Carbons emission

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Hydrofluoro Carbons emission	6,71	31,505	+ 24,79	tonnes	Minimize	Emission Control Perspective

Description This indicator gives the amount of yet another harmful component i.e. HFCs, on yearly basis.

Graph for Hydrofluoro Carbons emission

Data for Hydrofluoro Carbons emission

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
09.01.2009	2	5	50	6,71
10.01.2009	2	5	50	31,505

Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 05.01.2009 21:32:55