This is a Identity Theft Risks Metric Dashboard (Diamond) Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Identity Theft Risks KPI. With this software you can also design your own scorecards, KPIs and metrics.


Identity Privacy Risks

Report includes: 1 day(s), from 28.10.2008 to 28.10.2008

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Identity Privacy Risks 62,79 % 62,79 % 0 %
Computer protection (88%, 0%)
Identity information structure(49,5%, 0%)
Process efficiency(55,1%, 0%)
Staff effectiveness(40,4%, 0%)
Financial Perspective(80,9%, 0%)

Graph for Identity Privacy Risks

Graph for Identity Privacy Risks

Data for Identity Privacy Risks

DatesValue
28.10.200862,79

Computer protection

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Computer protection 88,05 % 88,05 % 0% Identity Privacy Risks
Indicators
System compliance
Incident Forensics

Graph for Computer protection

Graph for Computer protection

Data for Computer protection

DatesValueWeight
28.10.200888,051

System compliance

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root System compliance 76,64 76,64 0 % Maximize Computer protection
Description Number of users and network devices that are security policy compliant, divided by the total number of users/devices on the network, multiplied by 100

Graph for System compliance

Graph for System compliance

Data for System compliance

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.20081109076,64

Incident Forensics

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Incident Forensics 10,04 10,04 0 % Minimize Computer protection
Description The number of incidents attributable to policy failures divided by the total number of incidents, multiplied by 100

Graph for Incident Forensics

Graph for Incident Forensics

Data for Incident Forensics

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.2008157510,04

Identity information structure

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Identity information structure 49,48 % 49,48 % 0% Identity Privacy Risks
Indicators
Identity repository size
Secured objects
Provisioning process coverage *
Identity assurance *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Identity information structure

Graph for Identity information structure

Data for Identity information structure

DatesValueWeight
28.10.200849,481

Identity repository size

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Identity repository size 2,444 2,444 0 % Maximize Identity information structure
Description The total number of accounts, groups, and other objects of interest clustered by the identity provider or relying party
Target description 1-small, 2-medium, 3-large

Graph for Identity repository size

Graph for Identity repository size

Data for Identity repository size

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.20081132,444

Secured objects

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Secured objects 27,01 27,01 0 % Maximize Identity information structure
Description The number of accounts, groups, and other objects
of interest with a sufficient level of security divided by the total number of accounts, groups, and other objects of interest clustered by the identity provider or relying party, multiplied by 100

Graph for Secured objects

Graph for Secured objects

Data for Secured objects

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.200811010027,01

Process efficiency

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Process efficiency 55,12 % 55,12 % 0% Identity Privacy Risks
Indicators
Provisioning process efficiency
Authorization claims
Sensitive claims *
Provisioning geodesics *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Process efficiency

Graph for Process efficiency

Data for Process efficiency

DatesValueWeight
28.10.200855,121

Provisioning process efficiency

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Provisioning process efficiency 75,67 75,67 0 % Maximize Process efficiency
Description The length of time from the initial request to the time the subject is
provisioned or terminated in the identity repository, compared with the industry best practices

Graph for Provisioning process efficiency

Graph for Provisioning process efficiency

Data for Provisioning process efficiency

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.200811012075,67

Authorization claims

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Authorization claims 6,15 6,15 0 % Minimize Process efficiency
Description The number of rejected claims for authorization, divided by the total number of authorization claims, multiplied by 100

Graph for Authorization claims

Graph for Authorization claims

Data for Authorization claims

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.200810756,15

Staff effectiveness

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Staff effectiveness 40,42 % 40,42 % 0% Identity Privacy Risks
Indicators
User account statistics
Identity proofing strength
Audit system usage *
Policy compliance *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Staff effectiveness

Graph for Staff effectiveness

Data for Staff effectiveness

DatesValueWeight
28.10.200840,421

User account statistics

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root User account statistics 335,85 335,85 0 % Minimize Staff effectiveness
Description The number of accounts associated with all users, divided by the total number of users, multiplied by 100

Graph for User account statistics

Graph for User account statistics

Data for User account statistics

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.20081150600335,85

Identity proofing strength

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Identity proofing strength 1,16 1,16 0 % Maximize Staff effectiveness
Description The strength of secrets used for each user authentication
Target description 0-low, 1-medium, 2-high

Graph for Identity proofing strength

Graph for Identity proofing strength

Data for Identity proofing strength

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.20081021,16

Financial Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Financial Perspective 80,85 % 80,85 % 0% Identity Privacy Risks
Indicators
Return on Security Investment
Collateral damage potential (CDP)

Graph for Financial Perspective

Graph for Financial Perspective

Data for Financial Perspective

DatesValueWeight
28.10.200880,851

Return on Security Investment

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Return on Security Investment 97,48 97,48 0 % Maximize Financial Perspective
Description The financial benefit of security investment divided by the cost of the investment, multipled by 100

Graph for Return on Security Investment

Graph for Return on Security Investment

Data for Return on Security Investment

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.200811010097,48

Collateral damage potential (CDP)

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Collateral damage potential (CDP) 1,935 1,935 0 % Maximize Financial Perspective
Description The quantification of potential damage in physical assets, property as a result of a security breach
Target description 0-None, 1-low, 2-medium, 3-high

Graph for Collateral damage potential (CDP)

Graph for Collateral damage potential (CDP)

Data for Collateral damage potential (CDP)

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
28.10.20081031,935
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 20.11.2008 17:16:53

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.