This is a Intrusion Prevention Metric Dashboard (Diamond) Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Intrusion Prevention KPI. With this software you can also design your own scorecards, KPIs and metrics.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

Report includes: 2 day(s), from 27.02.2009 to 28.02.2009

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Contains

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

45,38 %

0 %

Selection Criteria perspective	(58,6%, 0%)
Functional Perspective	(37,6%, 0%)
Operational and Results Perspective	(24,8%, 0%)
System Assessment perspective	(57,8%, 0%)

Graph for Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

Data for Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

Dates	Value
27.02.2009	45,38
28.02.2009	45,38

Selection Criteria perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Selection Criteria perspective

58,56 %

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

Indicators

Reliability Ratio

Scalability Index

Interoperability Ratio

Compatibility Index *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is to get a 'measurable' and 'calculative' way to filter from the options that are available. Also, this category gives an idea of how well the management of the Intrusion system is progressing. One can use this to evaluate the management aspect also.

Graph for Selection Criteria perspective

Data for Selection Criteria perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
27.02.2009	58,56	3

Reliability Ratio

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Reliability Ratio	0,9086	0,9086	0	#	Maximize	Selection Criteria perspective

Description The security system has to be very reliable in nature to 'get from it what it is supposed to do'.

Graph for Reliability Ratio

Data for Reliability Ratio

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	3	0,8	1	0,9086

Scalability Index

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Scalability Index	4,564	4,564	0	Score	Maximize	Selection Criteria perspective

Description Scalability gives the extent of expansion in the security system. One can assign value to this metric using a scale numbered from 1-10.

Graph for Scalability Index

Data for Scalability Index

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	2	1	10	4,564

Interoperability Ratio

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Interoperability Ratio	0,9181	0,9181	0	#	Maximize	Selection Criteria perspective

Description This parameter shows the degree to which the system is 'interoperable' in nature.

Graph for Interoperability Ratio

Data for Interoperability Ratio

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	3	0,7	1	0,9181

Functional Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Functional Perspective

37,6 %

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

Indicators

Response Time

Fraction of Events in which Action was taken within the Claimed Timeframe

Drop in 'Frequency of Attacks'

'Accuracy of Alerts' Ratio *

Functions' Fulfilling Ratio *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This set of KPIs enables in gaining an insight into the way the system is functioning.

Graph for Functional Perspective

Data for Functional Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
27.02.2009	37,6	3

Response Time

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Response Time	0,992	0,992	0	hr	Minimize	Functional Perspective

Description This KPI reflects the time-lag that occurs in 'occurrence' and 'reporting' of an unfavorable incident.

Graph for Response Time

Data for Response Time

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	2	0	2	0,992

Fraction of Events in which Action was taken within the Claimed Timeframe

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Fraction of Events in which Action was taken within the Claimed Timeframe	0,8536	0,8536	0	#	Maximize	Functional Perspective

Description This KPI is to cross-check the efficiency of the security system.

Graph for Fraction of Events in which Action was taken within the Claimed Timeframe

Data for Fraction of Events in which Action was taken within the Claimed Timeframe

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	2	0,6	1	0,8536

Drop in 'Frequency of Attacks'

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Drop in 'Frequency of Attacks'	64,72	64,72	0	%	Maximize	Functional Perspective

Description This is a useful way of knowing how well the Intrusion Detection and Prevention system is working. The value can be obtained by comparing the situation prior- and post- situations of system deployment.

Graph for Drop in 'Frequency of Attacks'

Data for Drop in 'Frequency of Attacks'

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	2	60	100	64,72

Operational and Results Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Operational and Results Perspective

24,81 %

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

Indicators

Number of Technologies Deployed

Integration Degree

Pre-set Aims Meeting Ratio

Cost: Benefit ratio *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This collection of indicators is for obtaining the way the operations are taking place and also in evaluating the outcomes.

Graph for Operational and Results Perspective

Data for Operational and Results Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
27.02.2009	24,81	2

Number of Technologies Deployed

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Technologies Deployed	2,204	2,204	0	#	Maximize	Operational and Results Perspective

Description This indicator has its value equal to the number of types of technologies that are deployed. Some of the types of software that can be used are- 'network-based', 'wireless', 'network behavior analysis' and 'host-based'.

Graph for Number of Technologies Deployed

Data for Number of Technologies Deployed

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	2	2	6	2,204

Integration Degree

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Integration Degree	0,8251	0,8251	0	#	Maximize	Operational and Results Perspective

Description There are various systems with which the working of 'Intrusion Detection and Prevention system' needs to be aligned with. One of these can be the 'information flow system'. This integration plays an important role in making the systems work as a single entity.

Graph for Integration Degree

Data for Integration Degree

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	3	0,7	1	0,8251

Pre-set Aims Meeting Ratio

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Pre-set Aims Meeting Ratio	0,6444	0,6444	0	#	Maximize	Operational and Results Perspective

Description The implementation of an Intrusion system should be started with only after proper aims for doing so have been established. This eases out the process of selecting the one that is most suitable out of the lot available.

Graph for Pre-set Aims Meeting Ratio

Data for Pre-set Aims Meeting Ratio

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	2	0,6	1	0,6444

System Assessment perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

System Assessment perspective

57,84 %

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

Indicators

Success Ratio

Up-grading Frequency

Service Grade

Interface- Friendliness Index *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description These indicators are to gauge the quality of service being provided by the Intrusion detection and Prevention System.

Graph for System Assessment perspective

Data for System Assessment perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
27.02.2009	57,84	2

Success Ratio

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Success Ratio	0,9368	0,9368	0	#	Maximize	System Assessment perspective

Description This is the fraction of total events that were successfully wrapped-up.

Graph for Success Ratio

Data for Success Ratio

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	2	0,6	1	0,9368

Up-grading Frequency

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Up-grading Frequency	1,012	1,012	0	year	Minimize	System Assessment perspective

Description This KPI enables the assessing of the system's up-dation requirements. The value is equal to the number of years after which an up-grading is needed.

Graph for Up-grading Frequency

Data for Up-grading Frequency

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	3	1	4	1,012

Service Grade

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Service Grade	4,708	4,708	0	Score	Maximize	System Assessment perspective

Description These indicators are to gauge the quality of service being provided by the Intrusion detection and Prevention System. The value can be obtained on a scale of 1-10.

Graph for Service Grade

Data for Service Grade

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
27.02.2009	2	1	10	4,708

Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 23.02.2009 21:45:56