|
This is a ITIL Asset Management Metric Dashboard (Diamond) Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for ITIL Asset Management KPI. With this software you can also design your own scorecards, KPIs and metrics. |
Report includes: 2 day(s),
from 02.01.2010 to 03.01.2010
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Contains | |||||||||
| ITIL Asset management | 60,35 % | 53,44 % | -6,91 % |
|
| Dates | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 60,35 |
| 03.01.2010 | 53,44 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Software Costs |
56,13 % | 52,56 % | -3,57% | ITIL Asset management |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.01.2010 | 56,13 | 3 |
| 03.01.2010 | 52,56 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Cost Of Software To Customer |
76,834 | 1,792 | -75,04 | scale | Minimize | Software Costs |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 3 | 1 | 100 | 76,834 |
| 03.01.2010 | 3 | 1 | 100 | 1,792 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Software Support Personnel Cost |
36,838 | 77,329 | + 40,49 | scale | Minimize | Software Costs |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 2 | 1 | 100 | 36,838 |
| 03.01.2010 | 2 | 1 | 100 | 77,329 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Software Development Cost |
15,058 | 73,963 | + 58,9 | scale | Minimize | Software Costs |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 4 | 1 | 100 | 15,058 |
| 03.01.2010 | 4 | 1 | 100 | 73,963 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Procurement Prespective |
50,68 % | 66,52 % | + 15,84% | ITIL Asset management |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.01.2010 | 50,68 | 3 |
| 03.01.2010 | 66,52 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Mean Time To Procure |
10,514 | 16,478 | + 5,964 | number | Minimize | Procurement Prespective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 4 | 1 | 72 | 10,514 |
| 03.01.2010 | 4 | 1 | 72 | 16,478 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Quality Of Product |
2,782 | 9,379 | + 6,597 | Score | Maximize | Procurement Prespective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 2,782 |
| 03.01.2010 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9,379 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Business Compliance Issues |
9,2 | 15,64 | + 6,44 | scale | Minimize | Procurement Prespective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 9,2 |
| 03.01.2010 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 15,64 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Hardware asset value |
72,94 % | 64,5 % | -8,44% | ITIL Asset management |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.01.2010 | 72,94 | 2 |
| 03.01.2010 | 64,5 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Cost Of Hardware Required |
14,662 | 25,354 | + 10,69 | scale | Minimize | Hardware asset value |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 2 | 1 | 100 | 14,662 |
| 03.01.2010 | 2 | 1 | 100 | 25,354 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Cost Of Hardware Maintenance |
1,64 | 3,48 | + 1,84 | scale | Minimize | Hardware asset value |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 1,64 |
| 03.01.2010 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 3,48 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Cost Of Hardware Engineers To Company |
4,19 | 6,07 | + 1,88 | scale | Minimize | Hardware asset value |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4,19 |
| 03.01.2010 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 6,07 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Access Of Software |
64,47 % | 38,76 % | -25,71% | ITIL Asset management |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.01.2010 | 64,47 | 4 |
| 03.01.2010 | 38,76 | 4 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| User Interface User-friendliness |
7,552 | 7,507 | -0,045 | scale | Maximize | Access Of Software |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 7,552 |
| 03.01.2010 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 7,507 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Software Access Cost Per user |
536,1 | 330,3 | -205,8 | number | Minimize | Access Of Software |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 1 | 100 | 5000 | 536,1 |
| 03.01.2010 | 1 | 100 | 5000 | 330,3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Training Sessions Held |
6,409 | 1,054 | -5,355 | number | Maximize | Access Of Software |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2010 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 6,409 |
| 03.01.2010 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 1,054 |
Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.