This is a Network Security Metric Dashboard (Diamond) Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Network Security KPI. With this software you can also design your own scorecards, KPIs and metrics.


Network Security Scorecard

Report includes: 2 day(s), from 03.04.2009 to 04.04.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Network Security Scorecard  49,79 % 51,01 % + 1,22 %
Security Measures Structure Perspective(41,8%, -28,15%Down)
Internal Operations Perspective(77%, 46,67%Up)
Network Assessment Perspective(38,4%, -14,7%Down)
Mechanisms Performance Perspective(38,6%, -7%Down)

Graph for Network Security Scorecard

Graph for Network Security Scorecard

Data for Network Security Scorecard

DatesValue
03.04.200949,79
04.04.200951,01


Security Measures Structure Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Security Measures Structure Perspective SLYellow 69,92 % 41,77 % -28,15% Network Security Scorecard
Indicators
Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools
OS- Specific Security Equipment
Intrusion Detection Status
Authentication Tools’ Potency *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This set of metrics is for having knowledge about the tools and devices used for securing the network.

Graph for Security Measures Structure Perspective

Graph for Security Measures Structure Perspective

Data for Security Measures Structure Perspective

DatesValueWeight
03.04.200969,923
04.04.200941,773


Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools DownRed 6,416 2,564 -3,852 # Maximize Security Measures Structure Perspective
Description This gives the number of monitoring tools that have been used by the network administrator. Some of these can be- ISS tools, password testing and cracking etc.

Graph for Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools

Graph for Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools

Data for Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.20093286,416
04.04.20093282,564


OS- Specific Security Equipment

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root OS- Specific Security Equipment UpGreenSLYellow 5,702 5,984 + 0,282 # Maximize Security Measures Structure Perspective
Description This KPI is to know the number of tools that are particularly designed for the operating systems.

Graph for OS- Specific Security Equipment

Graph for OS- Specific Security Equipment

Data for OS- Specific Security Equipment

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.20092285,702
04.04.20092285,984


Intrusion Detection Status

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Intrusion Detection Status UpGreenSLYellow 5,716 8,173 + 2,457 Score Maximize Security Measures Structure Perspective
Description This KPI shows the potency of the intrusion detection tools that have been put into place. One can use a scale numbered from 1-10.

Graph for Intrusion Detection Status

Graph for Intrusion Detection Status

Data for Intrusion Detection Status

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.200931105,716
04.04.200931108,173


Internal Operations Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Internal Operations Perspective SLYellow 30,3 % 76,97 % + 46,67% Network Security Scorecard
Indicators
Security Policy Compliance
Network Coverage Ratio
Updates Frequency
Equipment and Devices Investment *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category of indicators is to make the assessment of ‘internal operations’ possible.

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Data for Internal Operations Perspective

DatesValueWeight
03.04.200930,33
04.04.200976,973


Security Policy Compliance

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Security Policy Compliance UpGreenSLYellow 0,6256 0,92 + 0,294 # Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description A set of guidelines to be followed for ensuring network security should be in place. One should keep a track on the degree to which it is complied with.

Graph for Security Policy Compliance

Graph for Security Policy Compliance

Data for Security Policy Compliance

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.200930,610,6256
04.04.200930,610,92


Network Coverage Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Network Coverage Ratio UpGreenSLYellow 0,9016 0,9574 + 0,0558 # Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description This KPI reflects the degree to which the whole network is covered by security mechanisms. One can assign a value to this indicator by looking at the fraction of the network that is equipped with security measures.

Graph for Network Coverage Ratio

Graph for Network Coverage Ratio

Data for Network Coverage Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.200930,810,9016
04.04.200930,810,9574


Updates Frequency

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Updates Frequency UpGreenSLYellow 2,105 4,217 + 2,112 # Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description This gives the pace at which one updates the security structure. It can be equal to the number of times the up-dation is done in one year.

Graph for Updates Frequency

Graph for Updates Frequency

Data for Updates Frequency

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.20092252,105
04.04.20092254,217


Network Assessment Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Network Assessment Perspective SLYellow 53,06 % 38,36 % -14,7% Network Security Scorecard
Indicators
Node Synchronization Degree
Frequency of Password Change
SUS Potential
Frequency of Security Tests *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This gives a way to assess the network on various grounds.

Graph for Network Assessment Perspective

Graph for Network Assessment Perspective

Data for Network Assessment Perspective

DatesValueWeight
03.04.200953,062
04.04.200938,362


Node Synchronization Degree

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Node Synchronization Degree DownRedSLYellow 0,977 0,8166 -0,16 # Maximize Network Assessment Perspective
Description This is to make sure that all the nodes of the network receive secured services and resources.

Graph for Node Synchronization Degree

Graph for Node Synchronization Degree

Data for Node Synchronization Degree

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.200930,810,977
04.04.200930,810,8166


Frequency of Password Change

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Frequency of Password Change UpGreenSLYellow 7,56 7,78 + 0,22 # Maximize Network Assessment Perspective
Description Changing the password is often adopted to make the network secure in a year.

Graph for Frequency of Password Change

Graph for Frequency of Password Change

Data for Frequency of Password Change

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.200925107,56
04.04.200925107,78


SUS Potential

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root SUS Potential UpGreenSLYellow 7,876 8,398 + 0,522 Score Maximize Network Assessment Perspective
Description Software Update Server is used to make sure that installation of automatic security updates is done in the network smoothly. The value can be had by using scale of 1-10.

Graph for SUS Potential

Graph for SUS Potential

Data for SUS Potential

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.200921107,876
04.04.200921108,398


Mechanisms Performance Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Mechanisms Performance Perspective SLYellow 45,57 % 38,57 % -7% Network Security Scorecard
Indicators
Drop in Data Leakage Instances
Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario
Feedback Degree
Security Awareness Rise *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This helps in knowing the extent to which the mechanisms are performing in the ‘intended’ manner.

Graph for Mechanisms Performance Perspective

Graph for Mechanisms Performance Perspective

Data for Mechanisms Performance Perspective

DatesValueWeight
03.04.200945,572
04.04.200938,572


Drop in Data Leakage Instances

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Drop in Data Leakage Instances DownRedSLYellow 59,95 36,625 -23,33 % Maximize Mechanisms Performance Perspective
Description This is equal to the decrease experienced in data leakages.

Graph for Drop in Data Leakage Instances

Graph for Drop in Data Leakage Instances

Data for Drop in Data Leakage Instances

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.200932510059,95
04.04.200932510036,625


Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario UpGreenSLYellow 91,275 98,8 + 7,525 % Maximize Mechanisms Performance Perspective
Description This reflects the decline seen in cost borne by the management related to data loss in ‘pre’ and ‘post’ security mechanisms installation’s scenario.

Graph for Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario

Graph for Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario

Data for Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.200927510091,275
04.04.200927510098,8


Feedback Degree

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Feedback Degree DownRed 4,267 2,566 -1,701 Score Maximize Mechanisms Performance Perspective
Description The value of this KPI is useful in knowing the extent to which the administration is paying attention to the feedback aspect of the network. The value can be had on a scale of 1-10.

Graph for Feedback Degree

Graph for Feedback Degree

Data for Feedback Degree

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
03.04.200921104,267
04.04.200921102,566
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 30.03.2009 19:46:01

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.