This is a Tennis Club Metric Dashboard (Diamond) Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Tennis Club KPI. With this software you can also design your own scorecards, KPIs and metrics.

Tennis Club Scorecard

Report includes: 2 day(s), from 12.04.2009 to 13.04.2009

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Contains

Tennis Club Scorecard

47,73 %

51,36 %

+ 3,63 %

Infrastructure Perspective	(49,6%, 6,55%)
Process Perspective	(61,1%, 28,4%)
Maintenance and Compliance Perspective	(43,8%, -6,89%)
Improvement Gauging	(47%, -27,41%)

Graph for Tennis Club Scorecard

Data for Tennis Club Scorecard

Dates	Value
12.04.2009	47,73
13.04.2009	51,36

ď»ż

Infrastructure Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Infrastructure Perspective

43,01 %

49,56 %

+ 6,55%

Tennis Club Scorecard

Indicators

Type of Courts

Number of Courts

Lightning Aspect

Equipment Quality *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs enables gathering knowledge about the structure of the tennis club.

Graph for Infrastructure Perspective

Data for Infrastructure Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
12.04.2009	43,01	3
13.04.2009	49,56	3

ď»ż

Type of Courts

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Type of Courts	5,89	6,45	+ 0,56	#	Maximize	Infrastructure Perspective

Description There are a variety of courts used in Lawn Tennis. Tennis clubs need to construct all of these in the clubs if the club is to be made successful.

Graph for Type of Courts

Data for Type of Courts

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	3	3	8	5,89
13.04.2009	3	3	8	6,45

ď»ż

Number of Courts

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Courts	11	13,31	+ 2,31	#	Maximize	Infrastructure Perspective

Description This gives the number of courts that are in the club. This indicator is important for knowing the number of players that can be accommodated at any given time.

Graph for Number of Courts

Data for Number of Courts

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	2	5	20	11
13.04.2009	2	5	20	13,31

ď»ż

Lightning Aspect

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Lightning Aspect	15064	15504	+ 440	watts	Maximize	Infrastructure Perspective

Description Appropriate lightning systems are to be in place to make the play effective. The value of this KPI is equal to the power (in watts) that is used.

Graph for Lightning Aspect

Data for Lightning Aspect

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	3	12000	20000	15064
13.04.2009	3	12000	20000	15504

ď»ż

Process Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Process Perspective

32,72 %

61,12 %

+ 28,4%

Tennis Club Scorecard

Indicators

Training Sessions’ Duration

Number of Tournaments

Number of Coaches

Technical Competence *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category makes it possible to know the measurable ways of how things are occurring in the club.

Graph for Process Perspective

Data for Process Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
12.04.2009	32,72	3
13.04.2009	61,12	3

ď»ż

Training Sessions’ Duration

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Training Sessions’ Duration	14,564	14,78	+ 0,216	hrs	Maximize	Process Perspective

Description This indicator is equal to the period for which training is imparted to the members, on an average and daily basis.

Graph for Training Sessions’ Duration

Data for Training Sessions’ Duration

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	3	8	20	14,564
13.04.2009	3	8	20	14,78

ď»ż

Number of Tournaments

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Tournaments	11,312	19,22	+ 7,908	#	Maximize	Process Perspective

Description This KPI is equal to the number of tournaments that are arranged in the club in one year.

Graph for Number of Tournaments

Data for Number of Tournaments

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	2	8	20	11,312
13.04.2009	2	8	20	19,22

ď»ż

Number of Coaches

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Coaches	7,138	9,31	+ 2,172	#	Maximize	Process Perspective

Description Coaches are hired for imparting training to both the members and professional players. The number and capability of coaches is a factor worth considering in this subject.

Graph for Number of Coaches

Data for Number of Coaches

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	2	4	10	7,138
13.04.2009	2	4	10	9,31

ď»ż

Maintenance and Compliance Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Maintenance and Compliance Perspective

50,68 %

43,79 %

-6,89%

Tennis Club Scorecard

Indicators

‘Rolling Frequency’

Synthetic Court Brooming Frequency

Claying Frequency

Guideline Compliance Index *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs gives an idea about the condition of the courts and the extent of compliance with the guidelines.

Graph for Maintenance and Compliance Perspective

Data for Maintenance and Compliance Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
12.04.2009	50,68	2
13.04.2009	43,79	2

ď»ż

‘Rolling Frequency’

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	‘Rolling Frequency’	3,472	2,524	-0,948	#	Maximize	Maintenance and Compliance Perspective

Description Courts are to be rolled-over to keep them in playable conditions. For a ‘clay court’, it is of utmost importance. So, by framing this fact in the form of a KPI, one can have an idea about the maintenance aspect of the court.

Graph for ‘Rolling Frequency’

Data for ‘Rolling Frequency’

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	2	1	4	3,472
13.04.2009	2	1	4	2,524

ď»ż

Synthetic Court Brooming Frequency

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Synthetic Court Brooming Frequency	4,634	2,192	-2,442	#	Maximize	Maintenance and Compliance Perspective

Description Synthetic Courts are to be cleaned on regular basis to keep those in workable conditions.

Graph for Synthetic Court Brooming Frequency

Data for Synthetic Court Brooming Frequency

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	3	2	5	4,634
13.04.2009	3	2	5	2,192

ď»ż

Claying Frequency

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Claying Frequency	7,89	13,011	+ 5,121	#	Maximize	Maintenance and Compliance Perspective

Description Clay courts need to be ‘clayed’ few times. The number of times this is done can be an important indicator to know about the maintenance aspect of the club. The value can be had on yearly basis.

Graph for Claying Frequency

Data for Claying Frequency

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	3	6	15	7,89
13.04.2009	3	6	15	13,011

ď»ż

Improvement Gauging

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Improvement Gauging

74,39 %

46,98 %

-27,41%

Tennis Club Scorecard

Indicators

Percentage Increase in Participation

Number of Successful Professionals Emerging

Decline in ‘Non-availability’ of Court

Revenue Generation Rise *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This set of indicators is to have quantitative ways of knowing the progress club is making in different directions.

Graph for Improvement Gauging

Data for Improvement Gauging

Dates	Value	Weight
12.04.2009	74,39	2
13.04.2009	46,98	2

ď»ż

Percentage Increase in Participation

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Percentage Increase in Participation	89,92	37,44	-52,48	%	Maximize	Improvement Gauging

Description This indicator is to know the degree of rise in participation in tournaments and other events organized in the club.

Graph for Percentage Increase in Participation

Data for Percentage Increase in Participation

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	2	20	100	89,92
13.04.2009	2	20	100	37,44

ď»ż

Number of Successful Professionals Emerging

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Successful Professionals Emerging	42,87	28,012	-14,86	%	Maximize	Improvement Gauging

Description The value of this metric is equal to the number of professionals who made it big in the last one year.

Graph for Number of Successful Professionals Emerging

Data for Number of Successful Professionals Emerging

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	3	4	50	42,87
13.04.2009	3	4	50	28,012

ď»ż

Decline in ‘Non-availability’ of Court

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Decline in ‘Non-availability’ of Court	74,38	61,78	-12,6	%	Maximize	Improvement Gauging

Description This KPI is to know the portion of instances that were declined due to non-availability of equipments or court.

Graph for Decline in ‘Non-availability’ of Court

Data for Decline in ‘Non-availability’ of Court

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
12.04.2009	3	30	100	74,38
13.04.2009	3	30	100	61,78

Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 08.04.2009 21:38:48