This is a Unemployment Metric Dashboard (Diamond) Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Unemployment KPI. With this software you can also design your own scorecards, KPIs and metrics.


Unemployment Scorecard

Report includes: 2 day(s), from 29.03.2009 to 30.03.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Unemployment Scorecard  54,87 % 59,57 % + 4,7 %
Financial Perspective(40,2%, -18,77%Down)
Internal Operations Perspective(80%, 39,65%Up)
Strategy Perspective(63%, 6,1%Up)
Success Evaluation Gauging(54,5%, -13,92%Down)

Graph for Unemployment Scorecard

Graph for Unemployment Scorecard

Data for Unemployment Scorecard

DatesValue
29.03.200954,87
30.03.200959,57


Financial Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Financial Perspective SLYellow 58,94 % 40,17 % -18,77% Unemployment Scorecard
Indicators
Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses
Research Share
Funds Utilization Ratio
Number of Funding Sources *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This gives information about the financial stand of the organization.

Graph for Financial Perspective

Graph for Financial Perspective

Data for Financial Perspective

DatesValueWeight
29.03.200958,943
30.03.200940,173


Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses DownRedSLYellow 0,3881 0,2057 -0,182 # Maximize Financial Perspective
Description Social Services organizations impart training sessions to the unemployed force to make them more capable of grabbing the employment opportunities that come in their way. These can be arranged on yearly basis.

Graph for Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses

Graph for Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses

Data for Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.200930,20,50,3881
30.03.200930,20,50,2057


Research Share

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Research Share DownRedSLYellow 35,73 25,23 -10,5 % Maximize Financial Perspective
Description This KPI reflects the amount of expenditure incurred by the organization for carrying out studies to better understand the forces working behind the concept. The value will be equal to the ratio of Research cost to total amount spent.

Graph for Research Share

Graph for Research Share

Data for Research Share

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.2009254035,73
30.03.2009254025,23


Funds Utilization Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Funds Utilization Ratio UpGreenSLRed 0,7716 0,796 + 0,0244 # Maximize Financial Perspective
Description The funds arranged for should be appropriately used for the purpose. This KPI is a way to show the utility.

Graph for Funds Utilization Ratio

Graph for Funds Utilization Ratio

Data for Funds Utilization Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.200930,610,7716
30.03.200930,610,796


Internal Operations Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Internal Operations Perspective  40,39 % 80,04 % + 39,65% Unemployment Scorecard
Indicators
Frequency of Surveys
Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality'
Employment Time Lag
Number of Factors Considered for Setting the Workers' Pay *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs is a way to have an idea about the internal environment of the organization.

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Data for Internal Operations Perspective

DatesValueWeight
29.03.200940,393
30.03.200980,043


Frequency of Surveys

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Frequency of Surveys UpGreenSLYellow 5,5 7,462 + 1,962 # Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description Surveys are conducted by social services organizations to follow the unemployment rate presently operating in the society. The number of such surveys run by the organization in one year will be the value for this parameter.

Graph for Frequency of Surveys

Graph for Frequency of Surveys

Data for Frequency of Surveys

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.200934105,5
30.03.200934107,462


Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality'

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality' UpGreenSLYellow 1,567 9,397 + 7,83 Score Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description The utility of this metric lies in the fact that it enables to know the extent to which the organization succeeded in getting people find job as per their capabilities. A scale numbered from 1-10 can be used to have the value.

Graph for Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality'

Graph for Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality'

Data for Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality'

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.200931101,567
30.03.200931109,397


Employment Time Lag

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Employment Time Lag UpRedSLYellow 76 102 + 26 days Minimize Internal Operations Perspective
Description The value is equal to the time taken by the organization in getting people employed. In other words, the time lag between 'a person requesting for employment' to 'receiving a suitable vacancy' can be an important factor for having an idea about the operations of the organization.

Graph for Employment Time Lag

Graph for Employment Time Lag

Data for Employment Time Lag

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.200925030076
30.03.2009250300102


Strategy Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Strategy Perspective SLYellow 56,94 % 63,04 % + 6,1% Unemployment Scorecard
Indicators
Policy Alignment
Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration
Number of Target Groups
Percentage Increase in Full-time Employed Strength *
Percentage Rise in Part-time Jobs Provided *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs is to know about the course of action that is being followed by the social service organization.

Graph for Strategy Perspective

Graph for Strategy Perspective

Data for Strategy Perspective

DatesValueWeight
29.03.200956,942
30.03.200963,042


Policy Alignment

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Policy Alignment DownRedSLYellow 9,298 9,01 -0,288 Score Maximize Strategy Perspective
Description There are certain pre-set guidelines that have been formulated for the social services organizations when these venture out on the path of tackling unemployment. Abiding by the rules is an essential prerequisite for carrying out such tasks. Scale labeled from 1-10 can be useful in this sense.

Graph for Policy Alignment

Graph for Policy Alignment

Data for Policy Alignment

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.200921109,298
30.03.200921109,01


Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration UpGreenSLYellow 0,7732 0,9756 + 0,202 # Maximize Strategy Perspective
Description This is equal to the ratio borne by 'number of people who were provided employment' to 'total number of those who applied to the organization'. It can be calculated on yearly basis.

Graph for Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration

Graph for Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration

Data for Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.200920,610,7732
30.03.200920,610,9756


Number of Target Groups

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Target Groups DownRed 4,949 4,667 -0,282 # Maximize Strategy Perspective
Description This is equal to the number of target groups that were catered by the organization. These might include- disabled people, those with incomplete education, school drop-outs.

Graph for Number of Target Groups

Graph for Number of Target Groups

Data for Number of Target Groups

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.20092254,949
30.03.20092254,667


Success Evaluation Gauging

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Success Evaluation Gauging SLYellow 68,42 % 54,5 % -13,92% Unemployment Scorecard
Indicators
'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio
Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations
Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability
Average Skill Enhancement Level *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is for knowing the extent to which the attempts that were followed proved to be successful.

Graph for Success Evaluation Gauging

Graph for Success Evaluation Gauging

Data for Success Evaluation Gauging

DatesValueWeight
29.03.200968,422
30.03.200954,52


'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root 'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio DownRedSLYellow 0,8212 0,7188 -0,102 # Maximize Success Evaluation Gauging
Description The pay at which people are employed should be compared to the 'cost of living' of that area. This is to have an estimate of how capable the job is in giving the person 'monetary relief'.

Graph for 'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio

Graph for 'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio

Data for 'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.200930,610,8212
30.03.200930,610,7188


Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations UpGreenSLYellow 27,65 52,4 + 24,75 % Maximize Success Evaluation Gauging
Description This reflects the potential of the organization in getting people employed, as seen by the needy ones. The value can be obtained on yearly basis.

Graph for Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations

Graph for Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations

Data for Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.20092106027,65
30.03.20092106052,4


Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability DownRed 0,9106 0,5002 -0,41 # Maximize Success Evaluation Gauging
Description This is to know the extent to which the funds availability saw an increase with time. The value can be obtained by using a scale of 1-10.

Graph for Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability

Graph for Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability

Data for Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
29.03.200920,410,9106
30.03.200920,410,5002
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 25.03.2009 19:43:50

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.