This is a 6 Sigma Metrics Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for 6 Sigma Metrics scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


6 Sigma Metrics

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 05.04.2008 to 24.05.2008

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root 6 Sigma Metrics 49,87 % 50,02 % + 0,15 %
Financial perspective(64,2%, -16,3%Down)
Customer Perspective(49,1%, 23,74%Up)
Employee Perspective(46,5%, -5,42%Down)
Sigma Perspective(55,5%, -5,99%Down)
Process Perspective(34,8%, 4,74%Up)

Graph for 6 Sigma Metrics

Graph for 6 Sigma Metrics

Data for 6 Sigma Metrics

DatesValue
05.04.200849,87
12.04.200837,79
19.04.200843,5
26.04.200844,27
03.05.200863,69
10.05.200841,76
17.05.200863,86
24.05.200850,02

Financial perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Financial perspective 80,53 % 64,23 % -16,3% 6 Sigma Metrics
Indicators
Cost of poor quality (COPQ)
Activity Based Costing (ABC)

Graph for Financial perspective

Graph for Financial perspective

Data for Financial perspective

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200880,531
12.04.200855,571
19.04.200822,371
26.04.200847,31
03.05.200864,631
10.05.20088,31
17.05.200862,11
24.05.200864,231

Cost of poor quality (COPQ)

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Cost of poor quality (COPQ) 20,42 27,42 + 7 Score Minimize Financial perspective
Description The number of defects per period of time multiplied by the average unit cost to fix a defect (labour and materials)
Target description [USD*1000]

Graph for Cost of poor quality (COPQ)

Graph for Cost of poor quality (COPQ)

Data for Cost of poor quality (COPQ)

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20082204020,42
12.04.20082204027,16
19.04.20082204037,32
26.04.20082204032,5
03.05.20082204026,86
10.05.20082204039,06
17.05.20082204025,42
24.05.20082204027,42

Activity Based Costing (ABC)

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Activity Based Costing (ABC) 20,42 18,31 -2,11 % Minimize Financial perspective
Description Cost accounting that includes the costs of performing specific functions (processes, activities, tasks, etc.)
Target description [USD*1000]

Graph for Activity Based Costing (ABC)

Graph for Activity Based Costing (ABC)

Data for Activity Based Costing (ABC)

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20081152520,42
12.04.20081152521,17
19.04.20081152520,97
26.04.20081152518,31
03.05.20081152518,75
10.05.20081152523,45
17.05.20081152520,95
24.05.20081152518,31

Customer Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Customer Perspective 25,33 % 49,07 % + 23,74% 6 Sigma Metrics
Indicators
Customer Satisfaction
On Time Delivery

Graph for Customer Perspective

Graph for Customer Perspective

Data for Customer Perspective

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200825,331
12.04.200812,271
19.04.200870,071
26.04.200852,731
03.05.200884,571
10.05.200849,41
17.05.200853,131
24.05.200849,071

Customer Satisfaction

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Customer Satisfaction 63,16 88,76 + 25,6 % Maximize Customer Perspective
Description The number of satisfied customers divided by the total number of surveyed customers, multiplied by 100

Graph for Customer Satisfaction

Graph for Customer Satisfaction

Data for Customer Satisfaction

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200826010063,16
12.04.200826010064,72
19.04.200826010096,68
26.04.200826010085,96
03.05.200826010094,32
10.05.200826010071,72
17.05.200826010090,92
24.05.200826010088,76

On Time Delivery

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root On Time Delivery 84,08 61,36 -22,72 % Maximize Customer Perspective
Description The number of units delivered on time divided by the total number of units, multiplied by 100

Graph for On Time Delivery

Graph for On Time Delivery

Data for On Time Delivery

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200816010084,08
12.04.200816010065,28
19.04.200816010070,72
26.04.200816010071,36
03.05.200816010092,84
10.05.200816010095,84
17.05.200816010061,92
24.05.200816010061,36

Employee Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Employee Perspective 51,9 % 46,48 % -5,42% 6 Sigma Metrics
Indicators
Total Trained in Six Sigma
Number of Projects Completed
Lessons Learned

Graph for Employee Perspective

Graph for Employee Perspective

Data for Employee Perspective

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200851,91
12.04.200829,921
19.04.200844,931
26.04.200826,51
03.05.200853,951
10.05.200855,71
17.05.200892,881
24.05.200846,481

Total Trained in Six Sigma

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Total Trained in Six Sigma 50,85 71,85 + 21 % Maximize Employee Perspective
Description The number of employees trained in 6 Sigma divided by the total number of employees, multiplied by 100

Graph for Total Trained in Six Sigma

Graph for Total Trained in Six Sigma

Data for Total Trained in Six Sigma

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200815010050,85
12.04.200815010058,25
19.04.200815010054,7
26.04.200815010051,2
03.05.200815010099,7
10.05.200815010065,65
17.05.200815010089,3
24.05.200815010071,85

Number of Projects Completed

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Projects Completed 93,28 75,76 -17,52 % Maximize Employee Perspective
Description The number of projects completed in 6 Sigma divided by the total number of developed projects, multiplied by 100

Graph for Number of Projects Completed

Graph for Number of Projects Completed

Data for Number of Projects Completed

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200826010093,28
12.04.200826010072,4
19.04.200826010083,68
26.04.200826010078,8
03.05.200826010080,24
10.05.200826010090,76
17.05.200826010099,88
24.05.200826010075,76

Lessons Learned

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Lessons Learned 13,95 16,34 + 2,39 Score Maximize Employee Perspective
Description The average number of lessons learned by all employees
Target description [Lessons]

Graph for Lessons Learned

Graph for Lessons Learned

Data for Lessons Learned

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20081102013,95
12.04.20081102014,12
19.04.20081102015,19
26.04.20081102010,96
03.05.20081102011,52
10.05.20081102013,77
17.05.20081102019,35
24.05.20081102016,34

Sigma Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Sigma Perspective 61,51 % 55,52 % -5,99% 6 Sigma Metrics
Indicators
Sigma Level
Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)
Defects per million opportunities (DPMO)
First Time Yield (FTY) *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Sigma Perspective

Graph for Sigma Perspective

Data for Sigma Perspective

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200861,511
12.04.200851,731
19.04.200836,041
26.04.200846,981
03.05.200835,761
10.05.200834,781
17.05.200873,741
24.05.200855,521

Sigma Level

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Sigma Level 5,372 4,842 -0,53 Score Maximize Sigma Perspective
Description The statistical term that measures how much a process varies from perfection, based on the number of defects per million units
Target description [Sigma Level]

Graph for Sigma Level

Graph for Sigma Level

Data for Sigma Level

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20083465,372
12.04.20083464,08
19.04.20083464,136
26.04.20083465,224
03.05.20083464,436
10.05.20083464,532
17.05.20083465,494
24.05.20083464,842

Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY) 6,1638E-5 1,5093E-5 -4,65E-005 Score Minimize Sigma Perspective
Description The average number of defects and reworks per unit observed during an average production run divided by the number of units.
Target description [Defects]

Graph for Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)

Graph for Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)

Data for Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200823E-69E-56,1638E-5
12.04.200823E-69E-52,6751E-5
19.04.200823E-69E-57,26E-5
26.04.200823E-69E-55,8593E-5
03.05.200823E-69E-57,8516E-5
10.05.200823E-69E-54,8414E-5
17.05.200823E-69E-51,953E-5
24.05.200823E-69E-51,5093E-5

Defects per million opportunities (DPMO)

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Defects per million opportunities (DPMO) 9,453 8,076 -1,377 Score Minimize Sigma Perspective
Description The average number of defects per unit observed during an average production run divided by the number of opportunities to make a defect on the product under study during that run normalized to one million.
Target description [Defects]

Graph for Defects per million opportunities (DPMO)

Graph for Defects per million opportunities (DPMO)

Data for Defects per million opportunities (DPMO)

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200823309,453
12.04.2008233011,181
19.04.2008233020,469
26.04.2008233021,981
03.05.200823305,673
10.05.2008233028,65
17.05.2008233014,178
24.05.200823308,076

Process Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Process Perspective 30,07 % 34,81 % + 4,74% 6 Sigma Metrics
Indicators
Cycle time
Lead Time
Mean time to repair (MTTR)
Capacity *
Rework Hours *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Process Perspective

Graph for Process Perspective

Data for Process Perspective

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200830,071
12.04.200839,441
19.04.200844,111
26.04.200847,811
03.05.200879,561
10.05.200860,61
17.05.200837,471
24.05.200834,811

Cycle time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Cycle time 34,315 32,905 -1,41 Score Minimize Process Perspective
Description The total elapsed time to move a unit of work from the beginning to the end of a physical process
Target description [Hours]

Graph for Cycle time

Graph for Cycle time

Data for Cycle time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20082254034,315
12.04.20082254030,385
19.04.20082254035,08
26.04.20082254035,455
03.05.20082254026,185
10.05.20082254030,055
17.05.20082254038,05
24.05.20082254032,905

Lead Time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Lead Time 14,3 8,973 -5,327 Score Minimize Process Perspective
Description The amount of time that is required to meet a customer request or demand.
Target description [Hours]

Graph for Lead Time

Graph for Lead Time

Data for Lead Time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008181514,3
12.04.200818158,665
19.04.2008181510,877
26.04.2008181511,381
03.05.2008181510,856
10.05.2008181512,606
17.05.200818159,687
24.05.200818158,973

Mean time to repair (MTTR)

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Mean time to repair (MTTR) 90,16 117,99 + 27,83 Score Minimize Process Perspective
Description The average time to repair a machine back to acceptable operating conditions.
Target description [Minutes]

Graph for Mean time to repair (MTTR)

Graph for Mean time to repair (MTTR)

Data for Mean time to repair (MTTR)

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200814015090,16
12.04.2008140150142,63
19.04.2008140150129,87
26.04.200814015060,79
03.05.200814015074,87
10.05.200814015048,58
17.05.2008140150113,7
24.05.2008140150117,99
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 28.04.2008 23:59:21

Copyright © 2000-2008 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.