Airport safety

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 14.05.2008 to 02.07.2008

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Contains
	Airport safety	52,65 %	50,7 %	-1,95 %	Financial Perspective (46,9%, -20,35%) Customer Perspective (27,7%, -10,94%) Security measures (46,2%, -0,33%) Efficiency (86,1%, 32,21%)

Graph for Airport safety

Data for Airport safety

Financial Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Financial Perspective	67,21 %	46,86 %	-20,35%	Airport safety	Indicators Compensation Explosives detection systems Training costs % of Funds allocated on security *

Graph for Financial Perspective

Data for Financial Perspective

Compensation

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Compensation	74030	31120	-4,291E004	$	Maximize	Financial Perspective

Graph for Compensation

Data for Compensation

Explosives detection systems

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Explosives detection systems	165750	150250	-1,55E004	$	Maximize	Financial Perspective

Graph for Explosives detection systems

Data for Explosives detection systems

Training costs

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Training costs	1376	995	-381	$	Maximize	Financial Perspective

Graph for Training costs

Data for Training costs

Customer Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Customer Perspective	38,68 %	27,74 %	-10,94%	Airport safety	Indicators Carry-on baggage weight limit Pre-arrival check-in time Number of thefts and baggage loss Number of emergency measures *

Graph for Customer Perspective

Data for Customer Perspective

Carry-on baggage weight limit

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Carry-on baggage weight limit	1,45	3	+ 1,55	pounds	Maximize	Customer Perspective

Graph for Carry-on baggage weight limit

Data for Carry-on baggage weight limit

Pre-arrival check-in time

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Pre-arrival check-in time	86,4	95,1	+ 8,7	minutes	Maximize	Customer Perspective

Graph for Pre-arrival check-in time

Data for Pre-arrival check-in time

Number of thefts and baggage loss

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of thefts and baggage loss	565	246	-319	#	Maximize	Customer Perspective

Graph for Number of thefts and baggage loss

Data for Number of thefts and baggage loss

Security measures

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Security measures	46,56 %	46,23 %	-0,33%	Airport safety	Indicators Number of security checks Number of technical support teams Number of surveillance cameras Number of security staff * Number of baggage scanners * Surprise security visits * Digital I-cards *

Graph for Security measures

Data for Security measures

Number of security checks

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of security checks	9,037	6,571	-2,466	#	Maximize	Security measures

Graph for Number of security checks

Data for Number of security checks

Number of technical support teams

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of technical support teams	1,256	2,432	+ 1,176	#	Maximize	Security measures

Graph for Number of technical support teams

Data for Number of technical support teams

Number of surveillance cameras

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of surveillance cameras	447,2	473,8	+ 26,6	#	Maximize	Security measures

Graph for Number of surveillance cameras

Data for Number of surveillance cameras

Efficiency

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Efficiency	53,91 %	86,12 %	+ 32,21%	Airport safety	Indicators Number of suspicious cases Time taken for security checks Number of incidents due to security failure Number of bags scanned per hour *

Graph for Efficiency

Data for Efficiency

Number of suspicious cases

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of suspicious cases	9,48	0,075	-9,405	#	Minimize	Efficiency

Graph for Number of suspicious cases

Data for Number of suspicious cases

Time taken for security checks

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Time taken for security checks	5,81	7,4	+ 1,59	minutes	Minimize	Efficiency

Graph for Time taken for security checks

Data for Time taken for security checks

Number of incidents due to security failure

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of incidents due to security failure	1,551	0,042	-1,509	%	Minimize	Efficiency

Graph for Number of incidents due to security failure

Data for Number of incidents due to security failure