Aluminum Production Balanced Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 26.11.2008 to 14.01.2009

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Contains
	Aluminum Production Balanced Scorecard	52,32 %	44,25 %	-8,07 %	Financial Perspective (72%, 10,71%) Production Perspective (17,1%, -39,22%) Internal Processes Perspective (47,8%, 0,72%) Environmental and Employees Perspective (39,7%, 1,66%)

Graph for Aluminum Production Balanced Scorecard

Data for Aluminum Production Balanced Scorecard

Financial Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Financial Perspective	61,33 %	72,04 %	+ 10,71%	Aluminum Production Balanced Scorecard	Indicators Revenues Operating profit Free cash flow Return on Capital employed *

Graph for Financial Perspective

Data for Financial Perspective

Revenues

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Revenues	2495,1	2624,7	+ 129,6	$ million	Maximize	Financial Perspective

Graph for Revenues

Data for Revenues

Operating profit

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Operating profit	775,9	473,5	-302,4	$ million	Maximize	Financial Perspective

Graph for Operating profit

Data for Operating profit

Free cash flow

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Free cash flow	2440	2851	+ 411	$ million	Maximize	Financial Perspective

Graph for Free cash flow

Data for Free cash flow

Production Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Production Perspective	56,3 %	17,08 %	-39,22%	Aluminum Production Balanced Scorecard	Indicators Production Unit cost % Site utilization % reduction in metal losses *

Graph for Production Perspective

Data for Production Perspective

Production

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Production	668,5	461,1	-207,4	Kilo Tonne	Maximize	Production Perspective

Graph for Production

Data for Production

Unit cost

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Unit cost	1617,2	1995,2	+ 378	$ per tonne	Minimize	Production Perspective

Graph for Unit cost

Data for Unit cost

% Site utilization

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% Site utilization	80,14	78,76	-1,38	%	Maximize	Production Perspective

Graph for % Site utilization

Data for % Site utilization

Internal Processes Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Internal Processes Perspective	47,09 %	47,81 %	+ 0,72%	Aluminum Production Balanced Scorecard	Indicators Number of sectors served Inventory turns Energy mix usage including renewable resources Number of shipment delays experienced *

Graph for Internal Processes Perspective

Data for Internal Processes Perspective

Number of sectors served

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of sectors served	8,18	4,638	-3,542	#	Maximize	Internal Processes Perspective

Graph for Number of sectors served

Data for Number of sectors served

Inventory turns

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Inventory turns	10,72	17,82	+ 7,1	%	Maximize	Internal Processes Perspective

Graph for Inventory turns

Data for Inventory turns

Energy mix usage including renewable resources

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Energy mix usage including renewable resources	45,72	48,75	+ 3,03	%	Maximize	Internal Processes Perspective

Graph for Energy mix usage including renewable resources

Data for Energy mix usage including renewable resources

Environmental and Employees Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Environmental and Employees Perspective	38,08 %	39,74 %	+ 1,66%	Aluminum Production Balanced Scorecard	Indicators Reduction in PFC (Perfluorocarbon) greenhouse gas emissions for per tonne of aluminum produced Reduction in fluoride emissions for per tonne of aluminum produced Reduction in smelting energy usage for per tonne of aluminum produced Number of employee exposure assessments and medical surveillance programs conducted in a year * Lost time injury frequency rate *

Graph for Environmental and Employees Perspective

Data for Environmental and Employees Perspective

Reduction in PFC (Perfluorocarbon) greenhouse gas emissions for per tonne of aluminum produced

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Reduction in PFC (Perfluorocarbon) greenhouse gas emissions for per tonne of aluminum produced	79,91	60,31	-19,6	%	Maximize	Environmental and Employees Perspective

Graph for Reduction in PFC (Perfluorocarbon) greenhouse gas emissions for per tonne of aluminum produced

Data for Reduction in PFC (Perfluorocarbon) greenhouse gas emissions for per tonne of aluminum produced

Reduction in fluoride emissions for per tonne of aluminum produced

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Reduction in fluoride emissions for per tonne of aluminum produced	31,6	68,23	+ 36,63	%	Maximize	Environmental and Employees Perspective

Graph for Reduction in fluoride emissions for per tonne of aluminum produced

Data for Reduction in fluoride emissions for per tonne of aluminum produced

Reduction in smelting energy usage for per tonne of aluminum produced

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Reduction in smelting energy usage for per tonne of aluminum produced	37,11	13,74	-23,37	%	Maximize	Environmental and Employees Perspective

Graph for Reduction in smelting energy usage for per tonne of aluminum produced

Data for Reduction in smelting energy usage for per tonne of aluminum produced

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.