Awards Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 15.08.2008 to 03.10.2008

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Contains
	Awards Scorecard	44,7 %	51,4 %	+ 6,7 %	Performance based (45,6%, 2,05%) Quality and Attitude based (48,2%, -6,61%) Loyalty based (76,6%, 43,68%) Responsibility based (39,6%, -3,37%)

Graph for Awards Scorecard

Data for Awards Scorecard

Performance based

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Performance based	43,57 %	45,62 %	+ 2,05%	Awards Scorecard	Indicators % increase in individual output Adherence to schedule % of tasks completed before time Overall effectiveness as a part of team *

Graph for Performance based

Data for Performance based

% increase in individual output

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% increase in individual output	59,52	45,44	-14,08	%	Maximize	Performance based

Graph for % increase in individual output

Data for % increase in individual output

Adherence to schedule

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Adherence to schedule	5,563	7,75	+ 2,187	Score	Maximize	Performance based

Graph for Adherence to schedule

Data for Adherence to schedule

% of tasks completed before time

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% of tasks completed before time	57,7	37,3	-20,4	%	Maximize	Performance based

Graph for % of tasks completed before time

Data for % of tasks completed before time

Quality and Attitude based

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Quality and Attitude based	54,85 %	48,24 %	-6,61%	Awards Scorecard	Indicators Number of quality complaints. Complaints reported by colleagues Number of operational delays Number of positive feedbacks *

Graph for Quality and Attitude based

Data for Quality and Attitude based

Number of quality complaints.

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of quality complaints.	4,58	4,33	-0,25	Score	Minimize	Quality and Attitude based

Graph for Number of quality complaints.

Data for Number of quality complaints.

Complaints reported by colleagues

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Complaints reported by colleagues	4,33	4,51	+ 0,18	Score	Minimize	Quality and Attitude based

Graph for Complaints reported by colleagues

Data for Complaints reported by colleagues

Number of operational delays

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of operational delays	4,28	4,76	+ 0,48	Score	Minimize	Quality and Attitude based

Graph for Number of operational delays

Data for Number of operational delays

Loyalty based

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Loyalty based	32,92 %	76,6 %	+ 43,68%	Awards Scorecard	Indicators Time of service Number of referrals provided Number of confidential matters handled effectively % attendance *

Graph for Loyalty based

Data for Loyalty based

Time of service

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Time of service	9,296	24,528	+ 15,23	years	Maximize	Loyalty based

Graph for Time of service

Data for Time of service

Number of referrals provided

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of referrals provided	4,438	5,995	+ 1,557	#	Maximize	Loyalty based

Graph for Number of referrals provided

Data for Number of referrals provided

Number of confidential matters handled effectively

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of confidential matters handled effectively	3,835	9,28	+ 5,445	#	Maximize	Loyalty based

Graph for Number of confidential matters handled effectively

Data for Number of confidential matters handled effectively

Responsibility based

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Responsibility based	42,97 %	39,6 %	-3,37%	Awards Scorecard	Indicators Team conflict management initiatives Number of failure analysis activities handled Number of inter-departmental operations handled Number of international operations handled *

Graph for Responsibility based

Data for Responsibility based

Team conflict management initiatives

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Team conflict management initiatives	4,564	1,352	-3,212	#	Maximize	Responsibility based

Graph for Team conflict management initiatives

Data for Team conflict management initiatives

Number of failure analysis activities handled

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of failure analysis activities handled	2,764	1,801	-0,963	Score	Maximize	Responsibility based

Graph for Number of failure analysis activities handled

Data for Number of failure analysis activities handled

Number of inter-departmental operations handled

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of inter-departmental operations handled	3,268	6,796	+ 3,528	Score	Maximize	Responsibility based

Graph for Number of inter-departmental operations handled

Data for Number of inter-departmental operations handled

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.