This is a Benchmarking Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Benchmarking scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.

Benchmarking

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 02.07.2008 to 20.08.2008

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Contains

Benchmarking

55,08 %

68,67 %

+ 13,59 %

Market Analysis	(83%, 35,37%)
Risk Profile	(89,1%, 10,7%)
Project Cost	(82,5%, 27,2%)
Investment	(29%, 5,93%)
Performance	(16,4%, -54,9%)

Graph for Benchmarking

Data for Benchmarking

Dates	Value
02.07.2008	55,08
09.07.2008	21,79
16.07.2008	57,82
23.07.2008	49,95
30.07.2008	33,03
06.08.2008	45,23
13.08.2008	44,55
20.08.2008	68,67

Market Analysis

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Market Analysis

47,6 %

82,97 %

+ 35,37%

Benchmarking

Indicators

Market share

Market demand growth

Graph for Market Analysis

Data for Market Analysis

Dates	Value	Weight
02.07.2008	47,6	3
09.07.2008	27	3
16.07.2008	66,97	3
23.07.2008	47,9	3
30.07.2008	23,87	3
06.08.2008	36,4	3
13.08.2008	47,3	3
20.08.2008	82,97	3

Market share

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Market share	1,128	1,3745	+ 0,247	%	Maximize	Market Analysis

Description Market share estimate

Graph for Market share

Data for Market share

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	6	1	1,5	1,128
09.07.2008	6	1	1,5	1,02
16.07.2008	6	1	1,5	1,354
23.07.2008	6	1	1,5	1,237
30.07.2008	6	1	1,5	1,1045
06.08.2008	6	1	1,5	1,2115
13.08.2008	6	1	1,5	1,3155
20.08.2008	6	1	1,5	1,3745

Market demand growth

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Market demand growth	114,16	114,91	+ 0,75	%	Maximize	Market Analysis

Description Market demand growth forecast

Graph for Market demand growth

Data for Market demand growth

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	3	105	115	114,16
09.07.2008	3	105	115	112,3
16.07.2008	3	105	115	110,93
23.07.2008	3	105	115	109,89
30.07.2008	3	105	115	107,98
06.08.2008	3	105	115	107,46
13.08.2008	3	105	115	106,57
20.08.2008	3	105	115	114,91

Risk Profile

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Risk Profile

78,38 %

89,08 %

+ 10,7%

Indicators

Graph for Risk Profile

Data for Risk Profile

Dates	Value	Weight
02.07.2008	78,38	3
09.07.2008	23,16	3
16.07.2008	57,81	3
23.07.2008	16,25	3
30.07.2008	51,95	3
06.08.2008	49,26	3
13.08.2008	69,19	3
20.08.2008	89,08	3

Value-at-Risk

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Value-at-Risk	25,23	25,36	+ 0,13	USD*1000	Minimize	Risk Profile

Description The maximum loss over a month horizon

Graph for Value-at-Risk

Data for Value-at-Risk

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	7	25	35	25,23
09.07.2008	7	25	35	34,66
16.07.2008	7	25	35	28,09
23.07.2008	7	25	35	34,9
30.07.2008	7	25	35	30,25
06.08.2008	7	25	35	31,16
13.08.2008	7	25	35	27,48
20.08.2008	7	25	35	25,36

Expected Exposure

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Expected Exposure	63,56	90,4	+ 26,84	USD*1000	Minimize	Risk Profile

Description The expected mean value of the probability distribution for replacement cost at a specified point in the future.

Graph for Expected Exposure

Data for Expected Exposure

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	1	60	100	63,56
09.07.2008	1	60	100	61,36
16.07.2008	1	60	100	98,24
23.07.2008	1	60	100	91,48
30.07.2008	1	60	100	79,84
06.08.2008	1	60	100	72,8
13.08.2008	1	60	100	86,44
20.08.2008	1	60	100	90,4

Unexpected loss

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Unexpected loss	9,736	4,24	-5,496	USD*1000	Minimize	Risk Profile

Description The unexpected loss over the past month

Graph for Unexpected loss

Data for Unexpected loss

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	2	4	10	9,736
09.07.2008	2	4	10	6,664
16.07.2008	2	4	10	7,3
23.07.2008	2	4	10	5,974
30.07.2008	2	4	10	5,902
06.08.2008	2	4	10	5,326
13.08.2008	2	4	10	6,052
20.08.2008	2	4	10	4,24

Project Cost

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Project Cost

55,28 %

82,48 %

+ 27,2%

Benchmarking

Indicators

Avg. Monthly Labor Cost

Downtime cost

Cost of defect

Graph for Project Cost

Data for Project Cost

Dates	Value	Weight
02.07.2008	55,28	2
09.07.2008	9,56	2
16.07.2008	75,2	2
23.07.2008	45,61	2
30.07.2008	36,38	2
06.08.2008	18,11	2
13.08.2008	21,43	2
20.08.2008	82,48	2

Avg. Monthly Labor Cost

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Avg. Monthly Labor Cost	82,1515	56,153	-26	USD*1000	Minimize	Project Cost

Description Total labor cost per month divided by the number of staff

Graph for Avg. Monthly Labor Cost

Data for Avg. Monthly Labor Cost

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	2	18,5	100	82,1515
09.07.2008	2	18,5	100	86,634
16.07.2008	2	18,5	100	65,8515
23.07.2008	2	18,5	100	59,6575
30.07.2008	2	18,5	100	68,378
06.08.2008	2	18,5	100	45,069
13.08.2008	2	18,5	100	80,6845
20.08.2008	2	18,5	100	56,153

Downtime cost

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Downtime cost	58,3631	35,2205	-23,14	USD*1000	Minimize	Project Cost

Description Cost of 1 hour's downtime of equipment

Graph for Downtime cost

Data for Downtime cost

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	1	1,1	100	58,3631
09.07.2008	1	1,1	100	71,1212
16.07.2008	1	1,1	100	64,2971
23.07.2008	1	1,1	100	76,3629
30.07.2008	1	1,1	100	10,7922
06.08.2008	1	1,1	100	66,6707
13.08.2008	1	1,1	100	33,9348
20.08.2008	1	1,1	100	35,2205

Cost of defect

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Cost of defect	80,994	76,242	-4,752	Score	Minimize	Project Cost

Description Total dollar amount spent on defects elimination divided by the number of defects

Graph for Cost of defect

Data for Cost of defect

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	7	75	93	80,994
09.07.2008	7	75	93	92,136
16.07.2008	7	75	93	76,746
23.07.2008	7	75	93	84,432
30.07.2008	7	75	93	87,96
06.08.2008	7	75	93	92,676
13.08.2008	7	75	93	90,426
20.08.2008	7	75	93	76,242

Investment

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Investment

23,03 %

28,96 %

+ 5,93%

Benchmarking

Indicators

Return on investment

Investment efficiency

Investment growth

Graph for Investment

Data for Investment

Dates	Value	Weight
02.07.2008	23,03	2
09.07.2008	12,49	2
16.07.2008	34,93	2
23.07.2008	92,67	2
30.07.2008	13,21	2
06.08.2008	78,25	2
13.08.2008	27,04	2
20.08.2008	28,96	2

Return on investment

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Return on investment	116,4	119,12	+ 2,72	%	Maximize	Investment

Description Return On Investment divided by the cost of the investment, multiplied by 100

Graph for Return on investment

Data for Return on investment

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	2	90	130	116,4
09.07.2008	2	90	130	98,16
16.07.2008	2	90	130	124,44
23.07.2008	2	90	130	127,92
30.07.2008	2	90	130	104,32
06.08.2008	2	90	130	100,16
13.08.2008	2	90	130	93,04
20.08.2008	2	90	130	119,12

Investment efficiency

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Investment efficiency	0,03192	0,0334	+ 0,00148	USD	Maximize	Investment

Description Total number of units divided by investment amount

Graph for Investment efficiency

Data for Investment efficiency

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	7	0,03	0,07	0,03192
09.07.2008	7	0,03	0,07	0,03032
16.07.2008	7	0,03	0,07	0,03716
23.07.2008	7	0,03	0,07	0,06848
30.07.2008	7	0,03	0,07	0,03344
06.08.2008	7	0,03	0,07	0,06964
13.08.2008	7	0,03	0,07	0,03996
20.08.2008	7	0,03	0,07	0,0334

Investment growth

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Investment growth	106,47	108,45	+ 1,98	%	Maximize	Investment

Description Current investment divided by the future investment, multiplied by 100

Graph for Investment growth

Data for Investment growth

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	1	100	110	106,47
09.07.2008	1	100	110	107,85
16.07.2008	1	100	110	105,18
23.07.2008	1	100	110	106,37
30.07.2008	1	100	110	100,03
06.08.2008	1	100	110	103,8
13.08.2008	1	100	110	108,09
20.08.2008	1	100	110	108,45

Performance

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Performance

71,27 %

16,37 %

-54,9%

Indicators

Graph for Performance

Data for Performance

Dates	Value	Weight
02.07.2008	71,27	1
09.07.2008	45,1	1
16.07.2008	41,47	1
23.07.2008	80,43	1
30.07.2008	36,67	1
06.08.2008	47,83	1
13.08.2008	43,63	1
20.08.2008	16,37	1

Productivity

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Productivity	905,16	889,56	-15,6	Score	Maximize	Performance

Description Total number of units produced daily

Graph for Productivity

Data for Productivity

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	1	880	920	905,16
09.07.2008	1	880	920	905,08
16.07.2008	1	880	920	899,68
23.07.2008	1	880	920	914,6
30.07.2008	1	880	920	904,56
06.08.2008	1	880	920	888,92
13.08.2008	1	880	920	883,48
20.08.2008	1	880	920	889,56

Time to market

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Time to market	16,428	19,676	+ 3,248	Days	Minimize	Performance

Description Average time to reach the market

Graph for Time to market

Data for Time to market

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	1	16	20	16,428
09.07.2008	1	16	20	19,568
16.07.2008	1	16	20	19,472
23.07.2008	1	16	20	17,388
30.07.2008	1	16	20	19,164
06.08.2008	1	16	20	18,772
13.08.2008	1	16	20	16,32
20.08.2008	1	16	20	19,676

Defect detection

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Defect detection	89,24	82,565	-6,675	%	Maximize	Performance

Description Number of defects detected at the test stage divided by the total number of defects, multiplied by 100

Graph for Defect detection

Data for Defect detection

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.07.2008	1	80	95	89,24
09.07.2008	1	80	95	89,27
16.07.2008	1	80	95	89,3
23.07.2008	1	80	95	93,425
30.07.2008	1	80	95	84,155
06.08.2008	1	80	95	93,575
13.08.2008	1	80	95	84,53
20.08.2008	1	80	95	82,565

Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 25.07.2008 12:55:47