|
This is a Biofuel Production Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Biofuel Production scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics. |
Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s),
from 02.01.2009 to 20.02.2009
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Contains | |||||||||
| Biofuel Production Scorecard | 56,58 % | 45,98 % | -10,6 % |
|
| Dates | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 56,58 |
| 09.01.2009 | 51,19 |
| 16.01.2009 | 57,85 |
| 23.01.2009 | 42,59 |
| 30.01.2009 | 45,28 |
| 06.02.2009 | 58,56 |
| 13.02.2009 | 49,03 |
| 20.02.2009 | 45,98 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Production and Resources Perspective | 38,55 % | 52,38 % | + 13,83% | Biofuel Production Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.01.2009 | 38,55 | 3 |
| 09.01.2009 | 65,12 | 3 |
| 16.01.2009 | 46,7 | 3 |
| 23.01.2009 | 42,15 | 3 |
| 30.01.2009 | 24,5 | 3 |
| 06.02.2009 | 80,07 | 3 |
| 13.02.2009 | 37,09 | 3 |
| 20.02.2009 | 52,38 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Gallons Produced per Year | 849 | 521,4 | -327,6 | million gallons | Maximize | Production and Resources Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 3 | 100 | 1500 | 849 |
| 09.01.2009 | 3 | 100 | 1500 | 1255 |
| 16.01.2009 | 3 | 100 | 1500 | 1312,4 |
| 23.01.2009 | 3 | 100 | 1500 | 676,8 |
| 30.01.2009 | 3 | 100 | 1500 | 137,8 |
| 06.02.2009 | 3 | 100 | 1500 | 917,6 |
| 13.02.2009 | 3 | 100 | 1500 | 692,2 |
| 20.02.2009 | 3 | 100 | 1500 | 521,4 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Cost per Hectare | 438,8 | 548,6 | + 109,8 | $ | Minimize | Production and Resources Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 3 | 200 | 800 | 438,8 |
| 09.01.2009 | 3 | 200 | 800 | 303,8 |
| 16.01.2009 | 3 | 200 | 800 | 538,4 |
| 23.01.2009 | 3 | 200 | 800 | 557 |
| 30.01.2009 | 3 | 200 | 800 | 731 |
| 06.02.2009 | 3 | 200 | 800 | 205,4 |
| 13.02.2009 | 3 | 200 | 800 | 370,4 |
| 20.02.2009 | 3 | 200 | 800 | 548,6 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Types of Biofuel produced | 2,764 | 9,604 | + 6,84 | # | Maximize | Production and Resources Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 2,764 |
| 09.01.2009 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7,669 |
| 16.01.2009 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 2,17 |
| 23.01.2009 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 3,439 |
| 30.01.2009 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5,77 |
| 06.02.2009 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8,155 |
| 13.02.2009 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 2,116 |
| 20.02.2009 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9,604 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Efficiency and Growth Perspective | 70,52 % | 50,02 % | -20,5% | Biofuel Production Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.01.2009 | 70,52 | 3 |
| 09.01.2009 | 30,62 | 3 |
| 16.01.2009 | 82,21 | 3 |
| 23.01.2009 | 19,74 | 3 |
| 30.01.2009 | 60,58 | 3 |
| 06.02.2009 | 42,36 | 3 |
| 13.02.2009 | 55,83 | 3 |
| 20.02.2009 | 50,02 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % rise in Process Energy Efficiency | 10,335 | 9,532 | -0,803 | % | Maximize | Efficiency and Growth Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 10,335 |
| 09.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 6,562 |
| 16.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 13,734 |
| 23.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 7,486 |
| 30.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 7,959 |
| 06.02.2009 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 6,925 |
| 13.02.2009 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 14,922 |
| 20.02.2009 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 9,532 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % reduction in production Downtime | 67,12 | 25,24 | -41,88 | % | Maximize | Efficiency and Growth Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 70 | 67,12 |
| 09.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 70 | 16,42 |
| 16.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 70 | 56,5 |
| 23.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 70 | 14,74 |
| 30.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 70 | 69,16 |
| 06.02.2009 | 2 | 10 | 70 | 52,12 |
| 13.02.2009 | 2 | 10 | 70 | 43,06 |
| 20.02.2009 | 2 | 10 | 70 | 25,24 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % increase in production capacity | 28,275 | 21,6 | -6,675 | % | Maximize | Efficiency and Growth Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 28,275 |
| 09.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 21,45 |
| 16.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 28,025 |
| 23.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 10,15 |
| 30.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 28,125 |
| 06.02.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 14,375 |
| 13.02.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 9,675 |
| 20.02.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 21,6 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Quality Enhancement and Public Awareness Perspective | 68,83 % | 33,08 % | -35,75% | Biofuel Production Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.01.2009 | 68,83 | 2 |
| 09.01.2009 | 58,01 | 2 |
| 16.01.2009 | 52,88 | 2 |
| 23.01.2009 | 72,49 | 2 |
| 30.01.2009 | 56,58 | 2 |
| 06.02.2009 | 51,78 | 2 |
| 13.02.2009 | 66,43 | 2 |
| 20.02.2009 | 33,08 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Level of compliance with ASTM standards | 5,797 | 1,855 | -3,942 | Score | Maximize | Quality Enhancement and Public Awareness Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 5,797 |
| 09.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 3,385 |
| 16.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 3,853 |
| 23.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 8,686 |
| 30.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 7,849 |
| 06.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 9,478 |
| 13.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 8,938 |
| 20.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 1,855 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of quality management techniques utilized | 3,908 | 1,972 | -1,936 | # | Maximize | Quality Enhancement and Public Awareness Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3,908 |
| 09.01.2009 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4,688 |
| 16.01.2009 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2,236 |
| 23.01.2009 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3,904 |
| 30.01.2009 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3,732 |
| 06.02.2009 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2,06 |
| 13.02.2009 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3,492 |
| 20.02.2009 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1,972 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of biofuel benefits awareness campaigns done | 7,264 | 6,967 | -0,297 | # | Maximize | Quality Enhancement and Public Awareness Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 7,264 |
| 09.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 9,784 |
| 16.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 9,739 |
| 23.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 7,435 |
| 30.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 6,013 |
| 06.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 1,054 |
| 13.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 8,263 |
| 20.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 6,967 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Research and Environmental Perspective | 50,47 % | 43,24 % | -7,23% | Biofuel Production Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.01.2009 | 50,47 | 2 |
| 09.01.2009 | 54,32 | 2 |
| 16.01.2009 | 43,01 | 2 |
| 23.01.2009 | 47,62 | 2 |
| 30.01.2009 | 42,22 | 2 |
| 06.02.2009 | 57,37 | 2 |
| 13.02.2009 | 39,36 | 2 |
| 20.02.2009 | 43,24 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Fraction research budget | 9,275 | 7,175 | -2,1 | % | Maximize | Research and Environmental Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 9,275 |
| 09.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 18,2 |
| 16.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 17,2 |
| 23.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 15,675 |
| 30.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 18,65 |
| 06.02.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 29,175 |
| 13.02.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 8,35 |
| 20.02.2009 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 7,175 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % decrease in carbon emissions during production processes | 24,28 | 24,098 | -0,182 | % | Maximize | Research and Environmental Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 24,28 |
| 09.01.2009 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 24,488 |
| 16.01.2009 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 13,75 |
| 23.01.2009 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 16,246 |
| 30.01.2009 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 4,52 |
| 06.02.2009 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 24,696 |
| 13.02.2009 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 13,62 |
| 20.02.2009 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 24,098 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of potential sources of biofuels developed | 4,955 | 0,2 | -4,755 | # | Maximize | Research and Environmental Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.01.2009 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4,955 |
| 09.01.2009 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0,35 |
| 16.01.2009 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2,64 |
| 23.01.2009 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4,535 |
| 30.01.2009 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1,76 |
| 06.02.2009 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0,91 |
| 13.02.2009 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4,13 |
| 20.02.2009 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0,2 |
Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.