This is a Car Safety Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Car Safety scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.

Car Safety Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 02.03.2009 to 20.04.2009

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Contains

Car Safety Scorecard

42,74 %

46,68 %

+ 3,94 %

Research and Compliance Perspective	(52,2%, 2,81%)
Crash Avoidance Systems Perspective	(60,4%, 37,99%)
Driver Assistance Systems Perspective	(41,3%, 6,21%)
Crashworthiness Systems Perspective	(28,6%, -49,44%)

Graph for Car Safety Scorecard

Data for Car Safety Scorecard

Dates	Value
02.03.2009	42,74
09.03.2009	48,53
16.03.2009	44,69
23.03.2009	57,42
30.03.2009	50,26
06.04.2009	47,95
13.04.2009	40,18
20.04.2009	46,68

Research and Compliance Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Research and Compliance Perspective

49,36 %

52,17 %

+ 2,81%

Car Safety Scorecard

Indicators

% Share of Revenues put in Research

Automobile Design Rating

Technical Standards Meeting Index for Fuel System Integrity

Number of Checks Initiated *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This perspective aims at the research and compliance activities initiated by the car manufacturer to improve car safety.

Graph for Research and Compliance Perspective

Data for Research and Compliance Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
02.03.2009	49,36	2
09.03.2009	38,68	2
16.03.2009	46,25	2
23.03.2009	51,31	2
30.03.2009	61,33	2
06.04.2009	52,12	2
13.04.2009	39,83	2
20.04.2009	52,17	2

% Share of Revenues put in Research

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% Share of Revenues put in Research	16,97	30,445	+ 13,48	%	Maximize	Research and Compliance Perspective

Description It refers to the percentage of revenues that are spent in research activities to provide optimum safety to car users.

Graph for % Share of Revenues put in Research

Data for % Share of Revenues put in Research

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	2	5	40	16,97
09.03.2009	2	5	40	13,75
16.03.2009	2	5	40	31,88
23.03.2009	2	5	40	36,675
30.03.2009	2	5	40	36,92
06.04.2009	2	5	40	27,89
13.04.2009	2	5	40	29,255
20.04.2009	2	5	40	30,445

Automobile Design Rating

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Automobile Design Rating	3,664	6,895	+ 3,231	Score	Maximize	Research and Compliance Perspective

Description It indicates the rating given to the cars manufactured in terms automobile design (on a scale of 1 to 10).

Graph for Automobile Design Rating

Data for Automobile Design Rating

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	3	1	10	3,664
09.03.2009	3	1	10	4,807
16.03.2009	3	1	10	2,674
23.03.2009	3	1	10	4,699
30.03.2009	3	1	10	7,741
06.04.2009	3	1	10	5,806
13.04.2009	3	1	10	4,438
20.04.2009	3	1	10	6,895

Technical Standards Meeting Index for Fuel System Integrity

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Technical Standards Meeting Index for Fuel System Integrity	0,8878	0,832	-0,0558	#	Maximize	Research and Compliance Perspective

Description It refers to the level of technical standards that are met in case of fuel system integrity for cars. It largely helps in minimizing the chances of post-crash instances like fire.

Graph for Technical Standards Meeting Index for Fuel System Integrity

Data for Technical Standards Meeting Index for Fuel System Integrity

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	2	0,7	1	0,8878
09.03.2009	2	0,7	1	0,9523
16.03.2009	2	0,7	1	0,91
23.03.2009	2	0,7	1	0,7171
30.03.2009	2	0,7	1	0,7438
06.04.2009	2	0,7	1	0,8005
13.04.2009	2	0,7	1	0,7975
20.04.2009	2	0,7	1	0,832

Crash Avoidance Systems Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Crash Avoidance Systems Perspective

22,43 %

60,42 %

+ 37,99%

Car Safety Scorecard

Indicators

Clarity Level of Headlamps and Mirrors used

Level of Stability Control

Quality level of Anti-lock Brakes

Lane-keeping Technology Grading *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This perspective talks about the techniques and systems used in cars to avoid any instance of accidents while driving.

Graph for Crash Avoidance Systems Perspective

Data for Crash Avoidance Systems Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
02.03.2009	22,43	3
09.03.2009	68,95	3
16.03.2009	54,49	3
23.03.2009	49,31	3
30.03.2009	34,67	3
06.04.2009	54,06	3
13.04.2009	24,86	3
20.04.2009	60,42	3

Clarity Level of Headlamps and Mirrors used

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Clarity Level of Headlamps and Mirrors used	3,007	2,674	-0,333	Score	Maximize	Crash Avoidance Systems Perspective

Description It refers to the clarity level of headlamps and mirrors used in cars to allow users a proper vision while driving (on a scale of 1 to 10).

Graph for Clarity Level of Headlamps and Mirrors used

Data for Clarity Level of Headlamps and Mirrors used

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	3	1	10	3,007
09.03.2009	3	1	10	6,616
16.03.2009	3	1	10	9,694
23.03.2009	3	1	10	1,054
30.03.2009	3	1	10	3,421
06.04.2009	3	1	10	3,088
13.04.2009	3	1	10	2,584
20.04.2009	3	1	10	2,674

Level of Stability Control

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Level of Stability Control	3,052	5,851	+ 2,799	Score	Maximize	Crash Avoidance Systems Perspective

Description It indicates the level of stability control offered in cars which intervenes in between in case the driver is about to lose the control. Electronic stability control automatically detects and prevents skids while driving.

Graph for Level of Stability Control

Data for Level of Stability Control

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	2	1	10	3,052
09.03.2009	2	1	10	4,825
16.03.2009	2	1	10	6,688
23.03.2009	2	1	10	5,815
30.03.2009	2	1	10	4,483
06.04.2009	2	1	10	6,463
13.04.2009	2	1	10	1,171
20.04.2009	2	1	10	5,851

Quality level of Anti-lock Brakes

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Quality level of Anti-lock Brakes	2,872	9,838	+ 6,966	Score	Maximize	Crash Avoidance Systems Perspective

Description This KPI shows the quality level of anti-lock brakes used in cars to ensure that they don't stuck in between.

Graph for Quality level of Anti-lock Brakes

Data for Quality level of Anti-lock Brakes

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	3	1	10	2,872
09.03.2009	3	1	10	9,559
16.03.2009	3	1	10	3,259
23.03.2009	3	1	10	8,137
30.03.2009	3	1	10	5,842
06.04.2009	3	1	10	8,902
13.04.2009	3	1	10	1,702
20.04.2009	3	1	10	9,838

Driver Assistance Systems Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Driver Assistance Systems Perspective

35,09 %

41,3 %

+ 6,21%

Car Safety Scorecard

Indicators

Accuracy Level of Tire Pressure Monitoring system

% improvement in Traction Control System

Emergency Brake Assistance Level

Adaptive Cruise Control Accuracy Ratings *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This perspective takes into account systems that assist the driver about the vehicle functions and helps in gaining fine control while driving.

Graph for Driver Assistance Systems Perspective

Data for Driver Assistance Systems Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
02.03.2009	35,09	3
09.03.2009	40,13	3
16.03.2009	23,26	3
23.03.2009	83,28	3
30.03.2009	58,25	3
06.04.2009	42,66	3
13.04.2009	53,98	3
20.04.2009	41,3	3

Accuracy Level of Tire Pressure Monitoring system

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Accuracy Level of Tire Pressure Monitoring system	3,223	8,713	+ 5,49	Score	Maximize	Driver Assistance Systems Perspective

Description It indicates the accuracy level of tire pressure monitoring systems used in cars (on a scale of 1 to 10).

Graph for Accuracy Level of Tire Pressure Monitoring system

Data for Accuracy Level of Tire Pressure Monitoring system

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	3	1	10	3,223
09.03.2009	3	1	10	2,332
16.03.2009	3	1	10	1,999
23.03.2009	3	1	10	8,227
30.03.2009	3	1	10	9,262
06.04.2009	3	1	10	3,907
13.04.2009	3	1	10	5,167
20.04.2009	3	1	10	8,713

% improvement in Traction Control System

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% improvement in Traction Control System	40,1	47,95	+ 7,85	%	Maximize	Driver Assistance Systems Perspective

Description Traction control system allows the driver in restoring traction in case the wheels start to spin on rough surfaces. This KPI shows the improvement in traction control system embedded in cars.

Graph for % improvement in Traction Control System

Data for % improvement in Traction Control System

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	3	30	80	40,1
09.03.2009	3	30	80	57,05
16.03.2009	3	30	80	39,25
23.03.2009	3	30	80	73,65
30.03.2009	3	30	80	55,15
06.04.2009	3	30	80	34,25
13.04.2009	3	30	80	68,05
20.04.2009	3	30	80	47,95

Emergency Brake Assistance Level

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Emergency Brake Assistance Level	5,887	1,36	-4,527	Score	Maximize	Driver Assistance Systems Perspective

Description It refers to the assistance level of emergency brakes to avoid accidents (on a scale of 1 to 10).

Graph for Emergency Brake Assistance Level

Data for Emergency Brake Assistance Level

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	2	1	10	5,887
09.03.2009	2	1	10	2,845
16.03.2009	2	1	10	4,654
23.03.2009	2	1	10	9,514
30.03.2009	2	1	10	1,135
06.04.2009	2	1	10	8,47
13.04.2009	2	1	10	8,254
20.04.2009	2	1	10	1,36

Crashworthiness Systems Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Crashworthiness Systems Perspective

78,08 %

28,64 %

-49,44%

Car Safety Scorecard

Indicators

Stretch Level of Seatbelts

Quality level of Laminated Windshields

Test Ratings of Airbags

Pedestrian Safety Score *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This perspective caters to the safety mechanism used in cars to minimize the severity of injuries to vehicle occupants during a crash.

Graph for Crashworthiness Systems Perspective

Data for Crashworthiness Systems Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
02.03.2009	78,08	2
09.03.2009	40,36	2
16.03.2009	60,6	2
23.03.2009	36,92	2
30.03.2009	50,57	2
06.04.2009	42,57	2
13.04.2009	42,82	2
20.04.2009	28,64	2

Stretch Level of Seatbelts

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Stretch Level of Seatbelts	7,885	2,332	-5,553	Score	Maximize	Crashworthiness Systems Perspective

Description It indicates the stretch level of safety belts which keep the occupants safe from hitting the vehicle steering or the front glass (on a scale of 1 to 10).

Graph for Stretch Level of Seatbelts

Data for Stretch Level of Seatbelts

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	3	1	10	7,885
09.03.2009	3	1	10	5,104
16.03.2009	3	1	10	7,651
23.03.2009	3	1	10	8,668
30.03.2009	3	1	10	1,099
06.04.2009	3	1	10	5,986
13.04.2009	3	1	10	1,531
20.04.2009	3	1	10	2,332

Quality level of Laminated Windshields

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Quality level of Laminated Windshields	6,724	5,608	-1,116	Score	Maximize	Crashworthiness Systems Perspective

Description This KPI helps in measuring the quality level of laminated windshield which helps in keeping the glass into one piece during accidents.

Graph for Quality level of Laminated Windshields

Data for Quality level of Laminated Windshields

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	2	1	10	6,724
09.03.2009	2	1	10	7,615
16.03.2009	2	1	10	1,369
23.03.2009	2	1	10	3,538
30.03.2009	2	1	10	7,759
06.04.2009	2	1	10	2,008
13.04.2009	2	1	10	7,399
20.04.2009	2	1	10	5,608

Test Ratings of Airbags

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Test Ratings of Airbags	9,919	4,366	-5,553	Score	Maximize	Crashworthiness Systems Perspective

Description It refers to the test ratings given to the airbags used in cars.

Graph for Test Ratings of Airbags

Data for Test Ratings of Airbags

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.03.2009	2	1	10	9,919
09.03.2009	2	1	10	3,475
16.03.2009	2	1	10	9,055
23.03.2009	2	1	10	1,441
30.03.2009	2	1	10	6,481
06.04.2009	2	1	10	3,097
13.04.2009	2	1	10	1,801
20.04.2009	2	1	10	4,366

Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 25.03.2009 21:51:26