This is a Communication Measurements Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Communication Measurements scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Communication Measurements

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 05.04.2008 to 24.05.2008

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Communication Measurements 49,36 % 45,8 % -3,56 %
Communication Systems(39,7%, 32,8%Up)
Communication Practices(66,7%, 16,44%Up)
Practice Maturity(38,7%, -4,42%Down)
Strategy Implementation(54,1%, -0,6%Down)
Integrated Communication(59,1%, -4,05%Down)
Internal Processes(27,8%, -41,69%Down)

Graph for Communication Measurements

Graph for Communication Measurements

Data for Communication Measurements

DatesValue
05.04.200849,36
12.04.200851,94
19.04.200852,43
26.04.200852,18
03.05.200861,01
10.05.200861,08
17.05.200852,31
24.05.200845,8

Communication Systems

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Communication Systems 6,9 % 39,7 % + 32,8% Communication Measurements
Indicators
Unified Communications
Communications Mechanisms and Outlets

Graph for Communication Systems

Graph for Communication Systems

Data for Communication Systems

DatesValueWeight
05.04.20086,91
12.04.200844,41
19.04.200847,151
26.04.200850,951
03.05.200867,71
10.05.200848,91
17.05.200865,651
24.05.200839,71

Unified Communications

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Unified Communications 0,148 0,168 + 0,02 Score Maximize Communication Systems
Description Assessment of unified communications systems and practices in place (based on employee survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Unified Communications

Graph for Unified Communications

Data for Unified Communications

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20085040,148
12.04.20085042,68
19.04.20085040,296
26.04.20085042,436
03.05.20085042,828
10.05.20085043,136
17.05.20085043,304
24.05.20085040,168

Communications Mechanisms and Outlets

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Communications Mechanisms and Outlets 0,404 3,008 + 2,604 Score Maximize Communication Systems
Description Assessment of Communications Mechanisms and Outlets in place (based on employee survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Communications Mechanisms and Outlets

Graph for Communications Mechanisms and Outlets

Data for Communications Mechanisms and Outlets

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20085040,404
12.04.20085040,872
19.04.20085043,476
26.04.20085041,64
03.05.20085042,588
10.05.20085040,776
17.05.20085041,948
24.05.20085043,008

Communication Practices

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Communication Practices 50,28 % 66,72 % + 16,44% Communication Measurements
Indicators
Developing Messages
Selecting Target Audiences
Identifying Credible Messengers

Graph for Communication Practices

Graph for Communication Practices

Data for Communication Practices

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200850,282
12.04.200835,642
19.04.200829,562
26.04.20089,72
03.05.200839,52
10.05.200865,52
17.05.200863,222
24.05.200866,722

Developing Messages

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Developing Messages 1,536 3,44 + 1,904 Score Maximize Communication Practices
Description Assessment of an organization's practices of developing corporate messages (based on employee survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Developing Messages

Graph for Developing Messages

Data for Developing Messages

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20082041,536
12.04.20082043,416
19.04.20082043,544
26.04.20082041,196
03.05.20082040,868
10.05.20082040,9
17.05.20082041,74
24.05.20082043,44

Selecting Target Audiences

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Selecting Target Audiences 3,112 3,232 + 0,12 Score Maximize Communication Practices
Description Assessment of an organization's practices of selecting target audiences (based on employee survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Selecting Target Audiences

Graph for Selecting Target Audiences

Data for Selecting Target Audiences

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20084043,112
12.04.20084040,816
19.04.20084040,248
26.04.20084040,024
03.05.20084041,264
10.05.20084042,796
17.05.20084041,468
24.05.20084043,232

Identifying Credible Messengers

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Identifying Credible Messengers 1,148 1,72 + 0,572 Score Maximize Communication Practices
Description Assessment of an organization's practices of identifying credible messengers (based on employee survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Identifying Credible Messengers

Graph for Identifying Credible Messengers

Data for Identifying Credible Messengers

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20084041,148
12.04.20084041,04
19.04.20084040,936
26.04.20084040,348
03.05.20084042,252
10.05.20084043,304
17.05.20084043,984
24.05.20084041,72

Practice Maturity

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Practice Maturity 43,12 % 38,7 % -4,42% Communication Measurements
Indicators
Number of Ad Hoc Activities
Number of Planned Activities
Number of Institutionalized Activities
Number of Optimized Activities *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Practice Maturity

Graph for Practice Maturity

Data for Practice Maturity

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200843,123
12.04.200859,63
19.04.200866,43
26.04.200862,423
03.05.200870,43
10.05.200869,683
17.05.200861,13
24.05.200838,73

Number of Ad Hoc Activities

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Ad Hoc Activities 20,365 39,93 + 19,56 % Minimize Practice Maturity
Description Percentage of Ad Hoc Activities in organization's workflow.

Graph for Number of Ad Hoc Activities

Graph for Number of Ad Hoc Activities

Data for Number of Ad Hoc Activities

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008254020,365
12.04.2008254020,505
19.04.2008254020,68
26.04.2008254020,61
03.05.2008254034,925
10.05.200825406,82
17.05.2008254014,065
24.05.2008254039,93

Number of Planned Activities

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Planned Activities 40,14 46,52 + 6,38 % Maximize Practice Maturity
Description Percentage of Deliberately Planned Activities in organization's workflow.

Graph for Number of Planned Activities

Graph for Number of Planned Activities

Data for Number of Planned Activities

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20082305040,14
12.04.20082305044,56
19.04.20082305041,4
26.04.20082305038,08
03.05.20082305045,18
10.05.20082305049,16
17.05.20082305046,78
24.05.20082305046,52

Number of Institutionalized Activities

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Institutionalized Activities 26,56 23,35 -3,21 % Maximize Practice Maturity
Description Percentage of Institutionalized and Evaluated Activities in organization's workflow.

Graph for Number of Institutionalized Activities

Graph for Number of Institutionalized Activities

Data for Number of Institutionalized Activities

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20082104026,56
12.04.20082104034,81
19.04.20082104016,48
26.04.20082104020,35
03.05.20082104030,94
10.05.20082104016,78
17.05.20082104010,03
24.05.20082104023,35

Strategy Implementation

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Strategy Implementation 54,7 % 54,1 % -0,6% Communication Measurements
Indicators
Building Valuable Partnerships
Identifying the Vision

Graph for Strategy Implementation

Graph for Strategy Implementation

Data for Strategy Implementation

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200854,71
12.04.200867,91
19.04.200848,41
26.04.200884,451
03.05.200857,51
10.05.200850,751
17.05.200840,651
24.05.200854,11

Building Valuable Partnerships

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Building Valuable Partnerships 2,584 0,812 -1,772 Score Maximize Strategy Implementation
Description Assessment of an organization's ability to use communication for creating long-term partnership (based on employee survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Building Valuable Partnerships

Graph for Building Valuable Partnerships

Data for Building Valuable Partnerships

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20085042,584
12.04.20085042,172
19.04.20085040,168
26.04.20085043,056
03.05.20085042,044
10.05.20085041,396
17.05.20085040,888
24.05.20085040,812

Identifying the Vision

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Identifying the Vision 1,792 3,516 + 1,724 Score Maximize Strategy Implementation
Description Assessment of an organization's ability to use communication for identifying the vision (based on employee survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Identifying the Vision

Graph for Identifying the Vision

Data for Identifying the Vision

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20085041,792
12.04.20085043,26
19.04.20085043,704
26.04.20085043,7
03.05.20085042,556
10.05.20085042,664
17.05.20085042,364
24.05.20085043,516

Integrated Communication

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Integrated Communication 63,15 % 59,1 % -4,05% Communication Measurements
Indicators
Communication at Leadership Level
Staff Involvement

Graph for Integrated Communication

Graph for Integrated Communication

Data for Integrated Communication

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200863,151
12.04.200826,551
19.04.200880,551
26.04.200876,31
03.05.200858,41
10.05.200840,81
17.05.200871
24.05.200859,11

Communication at Leadership Level

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Communication at Leadership Level 1,984 2,776 + 0,792 Score Maximize Integrated Communication
Description Assessment of Communication at Leadership Level (based on organization's leadership survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Communication at Leadership Level

Graph for Communication at Leadership Level

Data for Communication at Leadership Level

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20085041,984
12.04.20085040,064
19.04.20085043,132
26.04.20085042,592
03.05.20085041,52
10.05.20085042,572
17.05.20085040,076
24.05.20085042,776

Staff Involvement

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Staff Involvement 3,068 1,952 -1,116 Score Maximize Integrated Communication
Description Assessment of staff involvement in communications at all levels (based on employee survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Staff Involvement

Graph for Staff Involvement

Data for Staff Involvement

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20085043,068
12.04.20085042,06
19.04.20085043,312
26.04.20085043,512
03.05.20085043,152
10.05.20085040,692
17.05.20085040,484
24.05.20085041,952

Internal Processes

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Internal Processes 69,48 % 27,79 % -41,69% Communication Measurements
Indicators
Resource Allocation
Monitoring and Evaluation
Scanning Competition

Graph for Internal Processes

Graph for Internal Processes

Data for Internal Processes

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200869,482
12.04.200865,222
19.04.200844,952
26.04.200851,722
03.05.200868,162
10.05.200865,152
17.05.200850,032
24.05.200827,792

Resource Allocation

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Resource Allocation 1,248 0,58 -0,668 Score Maximize Internal Processes
Description Assessment of an organization's ability to use communication for resource allocation (based on employee survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Resource Allocation

Graph for Resource Allocation

Data for Resource Allocation

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20084041,248
12.04.20084043,372
19.04.20084040,628
26.04.20084041,056
03.05.20084043,984
10.05.20084041,46
17.05.20084042,624
24.05.20084040,58

Monitoring and Evaluation

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Monitoring and Evaluation 3,892 2,82 -1,072 Score Maximize Internal Processes
Description Assessment of an organization's ability to use communication for monitoring and evaluation (based on employee survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Monitoring and Evaluation

Graph for Monitoring and Evaluation

Data for Monitoring and Evaluation

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20083043,892
12.04.20083041,276
19.04.20083043,42
26.04.20083042,94
03.05.20083040,396
10.05.20083043,788
17.05.20083042,208
24.05.20083042,82

Scanning Competition

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Scanning Competition 3,708 0,112 -3,596 Score Maximize Internal Processes
Description Assessment of an organization's ability to use communication for evaluating current market position and analyzing competition (based on employee survey).
Target description 1-Ad Hoc; 2-Planed; 3-Institutionalized; 4-Optimized

Graph for Scanning Competition

Graph for Scanning Competition

Data for Scanning Competition

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20083043,708
12.04.20083042,924
19.04.20083041,736
26.04.20083042,548
03.05.20083043,38
10.05.20083042,952
17.05.20083040,964
24.05.20083040,112
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 28.04.2008 23:50:13

Copyright © 2000-2008 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.