This is a Conference Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Conference scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Conference KPI

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 11.10.2008 to 29.11.2008

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Conference KPI 44,43 % 44,2 % -0,23 %
Financial Perspective(56,1%, -0,78%Down)
Planning Perspective(45,3%, 0,09%Up)
Logistics Perspective(33,9%, -3,64%Down)
Brand Building Perspective(34,9%, 3,52%Up)

Graph for Conference KPI

Graph for Conference KPI

Data for Conference KPI

DatesValue
11.10.200844,43
18.10.200843,17
25.10.200853,9
01.11.200867,48
08.11.200849,68
15.11.200851,84
22.11.200848,32
29.11.200844,2

Financial Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Financial Perspective 56,89 % 56,11 % -0,78% Conference KPI
Indicators
Cost per Attendee
Lodging: Total cost Ratio
Actual Number of attendees: Expected Attendees Ratio
Amount spent on publicity: Budget *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This aspect takes care that the act is completed in an economical manner.

Graph for Financial Perspective

Graph for Financial Perspective

Data for Financial Perspective

DatesValueWeight
11.10.200856,893
18.10.200847,323
25.10.200843,53
01.11.200861,873
08.11.200857,33
15.11.200862,243
22.11.200835,83
29.11.200856,113

Cost per Attendee

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Cost per Attendee 41,7 39,9 -1,8 $ Minimize Financial Perspective
Description This indicator shows the financial spread on the attendees.

Graph for Cost per Attendee

Graph for Cost per Attendee

Data for Cost per Attendee

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.20083010041,7
18.10.20083010033,2
25.10.20083010018
01.11.20083010030,9
08.11.20083010023,6
15.11.20083010078,7
22.11.20083010083,4
29.11.20083010039,9

Lodging: Total cost Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Lodging: Total cost Ratio 0,3215 0,4259 + 0,104 # Maximize Financial Perspective
Description This reflects the portion of budget spent in accommodation etc.

Graph for Lodging: Total cost Ratio

Graph for Lodging: Total cost Ratio

Data for Lodging: Total cost Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.200820,20,50,3215
18.10.200820,20,50,2996
25.10.200820,20,50,4031
01.11.200820,20,50,2582
08.11.200820,20,50,2891
15.11.200820,20,50,3401
22.11.200820,20,50,2261
29.11.200820,20,50,4259

Actual Number of attendees: Expected Attendees Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Actual Number of attendees: Expected Attendees Ratio 0,9412 0,8782 -0,063 # Maximize Financial Perspective
Description This reflects the success of efforts done to draw crowd.

Graph for Actual Number of attendees: Expected Attendees Ratio

Graph for Actual Number of attendees: Expected Attendees Ratio

Data for Actual Number of attendees: Expected Attendees Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.200830,710,9412
18.10.200830,710,8032
25.10.200830,710,7132
01.11.200830,710,9424
08.11.200830,710,8422
15.11.200830,710,9667
22.11.200830,710,973
29.11.200830,710,8782

Planning Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Planning Perspective 45,25 % 45,34 % + 0,09% Conference KPI
Indicators
Number of back-up plans
Space: People Ratio
% extension possible in Budget
Number of informative-means shared *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This aspect is needed to move in structured manner and minimize wastage of time.

Graph for Planning Perspective

Graph for Planning Perspective

Data for Planning Perspective

DatesValueWeight
11.10.200845,253
18.10.200833,233
25.10.200863,373
01.11.200872,533
08.11.200874,363
15.11.200845,823
22.11.200840,043
29.11.200845,343

Number of back-up plans

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of back-up plans 8,936 7,669 -1,267 # Maximize Planning Perspective
Description This will include arrangements done for tackling problems like lack of space, alternate site if planned venue does not work, power cuts etc.

Graph for Number of back-up plans

Graph for Number of back-up plans

Data for Number of back-up plans

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.200833108,936
18.10.200833104,68
25.10.200833107,235
01.11.200833106,059
08.11.200833108,782
15.11.200833103,938
22.11.200833108,663
29.11.200833107,669

Space: People Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Space: People Ratio 4,084 3,656 -0,428 sq. metre per person Maximize Planning Perspective
Description This is to ensure that people sit and move around comfortably without feeling any kind of congestion.

Graph for Space: People Ratio

Graph for Space: People Ratio

Data for Space: People Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.20082154,084
18.10.20082153,32
25.10.20082152,488
01.11.20082154,124
08.11.20082154,884
15.11.20082152,708
22.11.20082152,328
29.11.20082153,656

% extension possible in Budget

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % extension possible in Budget 18,82 27,64 + 8,82 % Maximize Planning Perspective
Description Stretching in the pre-decided budget can be needed to make up for situations such as when more than expected people reach the venue.

Graph for % extension possible in Budget

Graph for % extension possible in Budget

Data for % extension possible in Budget

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.200821010018,82
18.10.200821010011,08
25.10.200821010099,55
01.11.200821010073,99
08.11.200821010025,03
15.11.200821010044,11
22.11.200821010030,16
29.11.200821010027,64

Logistics Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Logistics Perspective 37,55 % 33,91 % -3,64% Conference KPI
Indicators
Number of ways to communicate
Ways to Register
Ways to monitor schedule
Number of means for entertainment *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This set of indicators takes care of a number of issues such as monitoring of schedules and sources for entertainment.

Graph for Logistics Perspective

Graph for Logistics Perspective

Data for Logistics Perspective

DatesValueWeight
11.10.200837,552
18.10.200837,792
25.10.200845,162
01.11.200866,492
08.11.200824,642
15.11.200842,732
22.11.200864,942
29.11.200833,912

Number of ways to communicate

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of ways to communicate 1,496 4,028 + 2,532 # Maximize Logistics Perspective
Description This includes audio, video components of conveying information to listeners.

Graph for Number of ways to communicate

Graph for Number of ways to communicate

Data for Number of ways to communicate

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.20082151,496
18.10.20082153,936
25.10.20082154,036
01.11.20082151,888
08.11.20082153,984
15.11.20082152,42
22.11.20082152
29.11.20082154,028

Ways to Register

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Ways to Register 3,876 4,9 + 1,024 # Maximize Logistics Perspective
Description This covers registration by telephone, e-mail, fax and on-line.

Graph for Ways to Register

Graph for Ways to Register

Data for Ways to Register

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.20081153,876
18.10.20081151,276
25.10.20081154,664
01.11.20081154,364
08.11.20081151,588
15.11.20081153,344
22.11.20081151,056
29.11.20081154,9

Ways to monitor schedule

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Ways to monitor schedule 2,341 1,339 -1,002 # Maximize Logistics Perspective
Description This indicator ensures that everything occurs in timely manner.

Graph for Ways to monitor schedule

Graph for Ways to monitor schedule

Data for Ways to monitor schedule

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.20087142,341
18.10.20087141,756
25.10.20087141,894
01.11.20087143,466
08.11.20087141,384
15.11.20087142,101
22.11.20087143,445
29.11.20087141,339

Brand Building Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Brand Building Perspective 31,4 % 34,92 % + 3,52% Conference KPI
Indicators
Number of known personalities hired
Hours spent in Publicity
% of attendees that participated in follow-up
Time spent in Press Release *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This is to ensure that enough efforts are being done to create brand awareness.

Graph for Brand Building Perspective

Graph for Brand Building Perspective

Data for Brand Building Perspective

DatesValueWeight
11.10.200831,42
18.10.200857,222
25.10.200864,012
01.11.200869,32
08.11.200826,292
15.11.200854,392
22.11.200862,912
29.11.200834,922

Number of known personalities hired

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of known personalities hired 3,443 3,182 -0,261 # Maximize Brand Building Perspective
Description This indicator reflects the efforts of management team to widen the affect of conference. This is because when known faces are made a part of the act, it exhibits greater affect.

Graph for Number of known personalities hired

Graph for Number of known personalities hired

Data for Number of known personalities hired

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.20082253,443
18.10.20082254,607
25.10.20082252,897
01.11.20082254,445
08.11.20082252,378
15.11.20082254,907
22.11.20082252,378
29.11.20082253,182

Hours spent in Publicity

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Hours spent in Publicity 44,8 46,68 + 1,88 hrs Maximize Brand Building Perspective
Description This shows the time devoted to ensure that the conference/ exhibition are a success.

Graph for Hours spent in Publicity

Graph for Hours spent in Publicity

Data for Hours spent in Publicity

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.20087406044,8
18.10.20087406052,48
25.10.20087406056,24
01.11.20087406055,26
08.11.20087406042,9
15.11.20087406048,4
22.11.20087406057,78
29.11.20087406046,68

% of attendees that participated in follow-up

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % of attendees that participated in follow-up 57,52 43,6 -13,92 % Maximize Brand Building Perspective
Description This shows how successful the event was in influencing people.

Graph for % of attendees that participated in follow-up

Graph for % of attendees that participated in follow-up

Data for % of attendees that participated in follow-up

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
11.10.200812010057,52
18.10.200812010022,8
25.10.200812010034,32
01.11.200812010031,44
08.11.200812010079,52
15.11.200812010072,88
22.11.200812010027,84
29.11.200812010043,6
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 03.11.2008 23:20:07

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.