This is a Continuous Improvement Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Continuous Improvement scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Continuous Improvement

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 05.04.2008 to 24.05.2008

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Continuous Improvement 32,68 % 58 % + 25,32 %
Maintenance Effectiveness (79,4%, 37,61%Up)
Equipment Effectiveness (38,5%, 7,02%Up)
Quality Loss(47,9%, 19,9%Up)
Non-Operating Time(67,4%, 32,08%Up)
Cycle Effectiveness(56,8%, 30%Up)

Graph for Continuous Improvement

Graph for Continuous Improvement

Data for Continuous Improvement

DatesValue
05.04.200832,68
12.04.200859,5
19.04.200846,35
26.04.200860,52
03.05.200849,27
10.05.200839,02
17.05.200845,7
24.05.200858

Maintenance Effectiveness

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Maintenance Effectiveness 41,83 % 79,44 % + 37,61% Continuous Improvement
Indicators
Mean Time Between Failures
Percent Reactive Maintenance
Percent Proactive Maintenance
Mean time to repair (MTTR) *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Maintenance Effectiveness

Graph for Maintenance Effectiveness

Data for Maintenance Effectiveness

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200841,832
12.04.200865,132
19.04.200828,462
26.04.200861,12
03.05.200872,042
10.05.200846,692
17.05.200874,22
24.05.200879,442

Mean Time Between Failures

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Mean Time Between Failures 10,35 270,9 + 260,5 % Maximize Maintenance Effectiveness
Description The average time between failures of a system
Target description [Hours]

Graph for Mean Time Between Failures

Graph for Mean Time Between Failures

Data for Mean Time Between Failures

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20083045010,35
12.04.20083045043,2
19.04.200830450136,8
26.04.200830450297,45
03.05.200830450343,35
10.05.200830450310,5
17.05.200830450405,45
24.05.200830450270,9

Percent Reactive Maintenance

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Percent Reactive Maintenance 29,56 21,76 -7,8 % Minimize Maintenance Effectiveness
Description The Number of Reactive Maintenance hours divided by the Total Number of Maintenance hours, multiplied by 100

Graph for Percent Reactive Maintenance

Graph for Percent Reactive Maintenance

Data for Percent Reactive Maintenance

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20083107029,56
12.04.20083107020,74
19.04.20083107049,24
26.04.20083107042,58
03.05.20083107017,26
10.05.20083107051,7
17.05.20083107033,22
24.05.20083107021,76

Percent Proactive Maintenance

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Percent Proactive Maintenance 55,56 87,06 + 31,5 % Maximize Maintenance Effectiveness
Description The Number of Proactive Maintenance hours divided by the Total Number of Maintenance hours, multiplied by 100

Graph for Percent Proactive Maintenance

Graph for Percent Proactive Maintenance

Data for Percent Proactive Maintenance

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20082309055,56
12.04.20082309087,84
19.04.20082309040,2
26.04.20082309081,12
03.05.20082309039,12
10.05.20082309064,56
17.05.20082309080,76
24.05.20082309087,06

Equipment Effectiveness

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Equipment Effectiveness 31,46 % 38,48 % + 7,02% Continuous Improvement
Indicators
Availability
Performance
Quality
Overall Equipment Effectiveness *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Equipment Effectiveness

Graph for Equipment Effectiveness

Data for Equipment Effectiveness

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200831,462
12.04.200862,322
19.04.200843,512
26.04.200847,682
03.05.200843,472
10.05.200838,912
17.05.200833,352
24.05.200838,482

Availability

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Availability 67,08 74,8 + 7,72 % Maximize Equipment Effectiveness
Description The Operating Time divided by the Planned Production Time multiplied by 100

Graph for Availability

Graph for Availability

Data for Availability

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200836010067,08
12.04.200836010095,16
19.04.200836010061,76
26.04.200836010068,08
10.05.200836010074
17.05.200836010075,8
24.05.200836010074,8

Performance

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Performance 73 69,36 -3,64 % Maximize Equipment Effectiveness
Description The Total Number of Units divided by the Operating Time divided by the Design Run Rate

Graph for Performance

Graph for Performance

Data for Performance

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200836010073
12.04.200836010074,6
19.04.200836010081,56
26.04.200836010088,32
03.05.200836010077,4
10.05.200836010089,8
17.05.200836010066,24
24.05.200836010069,36

Quality

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Quality 90,2 94,64 + 4,44 % Maximize Equipment Effectiveness
Description The Number of Good Units divided by the Total Number of Units, multiplied by 100

Graph for Quality

Graph for Quality

Data for Quality

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200828010090,2
12.04.200828010089,92
19.04.200828010092,56
26.04.200828010086,66
03.05.200828010091,52
10.05.200828010081,18
17.05.200828010088,98
24.05.200828010094,64

Quality Loss

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Quality Loss 28,01 % 47,91 % + 19,9% Continuous Improvement
Indicators
Rework Units
Reject Units
Unit Quality Loss

Graph for Quality Loss

Graph for Quality Loss

Data for Quality Loss

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200828,012
12.04.200865,432
19.04.200848,22
26.04.200870,392
03.05.200844,312
10.05.200855,042
17.05.200821,432
24.05.200847,912

Rework Units

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Rework Units 29,35 11,55 -17,8 % Minimize Quality Loss
Description The Number of Reworked Units divided by the Total Number of Units, multiplied by 100

Graph for Rework Units

Graph for Rework Units

Data for Rework Units

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008453029,35
12.04.200845306
19.04.2008453016,525
26.04.200845306,35
03.05.2008453026,475
10.05.2008453014,05
17.05.2008453029,525
24.05.2008453011,55

Reject Units

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Reject Units 26,6 34,4 + 7,8 % Maximize Quality Loss
Description The Number of Rejected Units divided by the Total Number of Units, multiplied by 100

Graph for Reject Units

Graph for Reject Units

Data for Reject Units

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20083010026,6
12.04.20083010088,9
19.04.20083010024,6
26.04.20083010063
03.05.20083010078,4
10.05.20083010020,6
17.05.20083010016,3
24.05.20083010034,4

Unit Quality Loss

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Unit Quality Loss 4,303 7,579 + 3,276 % Minimize Quality Loss
Description The Number Of Units of bad quality divided by the Total Number of Units, multiplied by 100

Graph for Unit Quality Loss

Graph for Unit Quality Loss

Data for Unit Quality Loss

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200831104,303
12.04.200831109,892
19.04.200831104,222
26.04.200831105,905
03.05.200831105,455
10.05.200831102,998
17.05.200831105,266
24.05.200831107,579

Non-Operating Time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Non-Operating Time 35,34 % 67,42 % + 32,08% Continuous Improvement
Indicators
Changeover Time
Breakdowns
Setup and Adjustments

Graph for Non-Operating Time

Graph for Non-Operating Time

Data for Non-Operating Time

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200835,342
12.04.200857,442
19.04.200841,732
26.04.200845,352
03.05.200828,272
10.05.200826,942
17.05.200862,192
24.05.200867,422

Changeover Time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Changeover Time 6,064 1,864 -4,2 % Minimize Non-Operating Time
Description The Number of Hours Lost swapping equipment divided by the Total Number of Hours, multiplied by 100

Graph for Changeover Time

Graph for Changeover Time

Data for Changeover Time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20084176,064
12.04.20084171,066
19.04.20084173,238
26.04.20084175,35
03.05.20084176,022
10.05.20084175,524
17.05.20084172,464
24.05.20084171,864

Breakdowns

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Breakdowns 11,124 10,704 -0,42 % Minimize Non-Operating Time
Description The Number of Hours Lost due to equipment failure divided by the Total Number of Hours, multiplied by 100

Graph for Breakdowns

Graph for Breakdowns

Data for Breakdowns

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008331511,124
12.04.2008331512,144
19.04.2008331513,14
26.04.200833159,54
03.05.2008331511,76
10.05.2008331510,092
17.05.200833157,284
24.05.2008331510,704

Setup and Adjustments

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Setup and Adjustments 8,354 6,536 -1,818 % Minimize Non-Operating Time
Description The Number of Hours Lost configuring equipment divided by the Total Number of Hours, multiplied by 100

Graph for Setup and Adjustments

Graph for Setup and Adjustments

Data for Setup and Adjustments

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200832208,354
12.04.2008322013,556
19.04.2008322012,8
26.04.200832207,58
03.05.2008322011,81
10.05.2008322017,102
17.05.2008322012,404
24.05.200832206,536

Cycle Effectiveness

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Cycle Effectiveness 26,75 % 56,75 % + 30% Continuous Improvement
Indicators
Run Rate
Actual Cycle Time
Reduced Speed Threshold

Graph for Cycle Effectiveness

Graph for Cycle Effectiveness

Data for Cycle Effectiveness

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200826,752
12.04.200847,22
19.04.200869,862
26.04.200878,082
03.05.200858,262
10.05.200827,532
17.05.200837,332
24.05.200856,752

Run Rate

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Run Rate 40,85 60,8 + 19,95 % Maximize Cycle Effectiveness
Description The Total Number of Units divided by Operating Time
Target description [Units per Minute]

Graph for Run Rate

Graph for Run Rate

Data for Run Rate

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20084409040,85
12.04.20084409060,6
19.04.20084409069,8
26.04.20084409066,95
03.05.20084409067
10.05.20084409044,75
17.05.20084409062,1
24.05.20084409060,8

Actual Cycle Time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Actual Cycle Time 1,4716 0,8402 -0,631 % Minimize Cycle Effectiveness
Description The Operating Time divided by the Total Number of Units
Target description [Seconds]

Graph for Actual Cycle Time

Graph for Actual Cycle Time

Data for Actual Cycle Time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200830,51,91,4716
12.04.200830,51,90,8962
19.04.200830,51,90,9774
26.04.200830,51,90,5924
03.05.200830,51,90,9998
10.05.200830,51,91,8132
17.05.200830,51,91,4884
24.05.200830,51,90,8402

Reduced Speed Threshold

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Reduced Speed Threshold 36,89 37,4 + 0,51 % Maximize Cycle Effectiveness
Description A dividing point between a standard cycle and the Reduced Speed cycle.
Target description [Units per Minute]

Graph for Reduced Speed Threshold

Graph for Reduced Speed Threshold

Data for Reduced Speed Threshold

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20083205036,89
12.04.20083205029,21
19.04.20083205046,25
26.04.20083205048,5
03.05.20083205037,37
10.05.20083205041,87
17.05.20083205030,83
24.05.20083205037,4
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 28.04.2008 23:49:41

Copyright © 2000-2008 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.