|
This is a Cost Management Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Cost Management scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics. |
Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s),
from 31.05.2008 to 19.07.2008
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Contains | |||||||||||||
| Cost Management | 54,96 % | 46,74 % | -8,22 % |
|
| Dates | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 54,96 |
| 07.06.2008 | 62,3 |
| 14.06.2008 | 40,94 |
| 21.06.2008 | 57,95 |
| 28.06.2008 | 52,59 |
| 05.07.2008 | 57,63 |
| 12.07.2008 | 53,38 |
| 19.07.2008 | 46,74 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||
| Labor cost | 38,57 % | 43,73 % | + 5,16% | Cost Management |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.05.2008 | 38,57 | 3 |
| 07.06.2008 | 47,23 | 3 |
| 14.06.2008 | 29,63 | 3 |
| 21.06.2008 | 58,63 | 3 |
| 28.06.2008 | 69,9 | 3 |
| 05.07.2008 | 41,2 | 3 |
| 12.07.2008 | 35,13 | 3 |
| 19.07.2008 | 43,73 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Avg. Monthly Labor Cost | 21,9825 | 20,5055 | -1,477 | USD*1000 | Minimize | Labor cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 18,5 | 22 | 21,9825 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 18,5 | 22 | 20,684 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 18,5 | 22 | 20,6175 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 18,5 | 22 | 19,361 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 18,5 | 22 | 19,4625 |
| 05.07.2008 | 2 | 18,5 | 22 | 19,9945 |
| 12.07.2008 | 2 | 18,5 | 22 | 21,6885 |
| 19.07.2008 | 2 | 18,5 | 22 | 20,5055 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Hours per Year | 1702,75 | 1776,75 | + 74 | Score | Minimize | Labor cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 1550 | 1800 | 1702,75 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 1550 | 1800 | 1594,5 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 1550 | 1800 | 1765 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 1550 | 1800 | 1681,5 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 1550 | 1800 | 1693,75 |
| 05.07.2008 | 2 | 1550 | 1800 | 1757,5 |
| 12.07.2008 | 2 | 1550 | 1800 | 1660,25 |
| 19.07.2008 | 2 | 1550 | 1800 | 1776,75 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of Project Staff | 12,711 | 12,624 | -0,087 | Score | Minimize | Labor cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 12 | 15 | 12,711 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 12 | 15 | 14,343 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 12 | 15 | 13,938 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 12 | 15 | 13,407 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 12 | 15 | 12,159 |
| 05.07.2008 | 2 | 12 | 15 | 13,521 |
| 12.07.2008 | 2 | 12 | 15 | 13,782 |
| 19.07.2008 | 2 | 12 | 15 | 12,624 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||
| Equipment Cost | 49,8 % | 76,9 % | + 27,1% | Cost Management |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.05.2008 | 49,8 | 2 |
| 07.06.2008 | 63,3 | 2 |
| 14.06.2008 | 33,25 | 2 |
| 21.06.2008 | 64,65 | 2 |
| 28.06.2008 | 48,05 | 2 |
| 05.07.2008 | 11,7 | 2 |
| 12.07.2008 | 67,6 | 2 |
| 19.07.2008 | 76,9 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| New equipment cost | 27,61 | 23,02 | -4,59 | USD*1000 | Minimize | Equipment Cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 30 | 27,61 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 30 | 22,28 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 30 | 27,74 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 30 | 22,67 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 30 | 23,27 |
| 05.07.2008 | 2 | 20 | 30 | 28,26 |
| 12.07.2008 | 2 | 20 | 30 | 25,79 |
| 19.07.2008 | 2 | 20 | 30 | 23,02 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Downtime cost | 1,3187 | 1,244 | -0,0747 | USD*1000 | Minimize | Equipment Cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 1,1 | 2 | 1,3187 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 1,1 | 2 | 1,5554 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 1,1 | 2 | 1,6049 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 1,1 | 2 | 1,496 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 1,1 | 2 | 1,7408 |
| 05.07.2008 | 2 | 1,1 | 2 | 1,946 |
| 12.07.2008 | 2 | 1,1 | 2 | 1,1621 |
| 19.07.2008 | 2 | 1,1 | 2 | 1,244 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||
| Project Time | 48,93 % | 47,57 % | -1,36% | Cost Management |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.05.2008 | 48,93 | 2 |
| 07.06.2008 | 38,1 | 2 |
| 14.06.2008 | 52,3 | 2 |
| 21.06.2008 | 47,87 | 2 |
| 28.06.2008 | 36,4 | 2 |
| 05.07.2008 | 46,3 | 2 |
| 12.07.2008 | 44,8 | 2 |
| 19.07.2008 | 47,57 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Time Spent on Specification | 14,28 | 10,664 | -3,616 | % | Minimize | Project Time |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 10 | 18 | 14,28 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 10 | 18 | 16,92 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 10 | 18 | 11,632 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 10 | 18 | 15,896 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 10 | 18 | 15,872 |
| 05.07.2008 | 3 | 10 | 18 | 13,096 |
| 12.07.2008 | 3 | 10 | 18 | 11,944 |
| 19.07.2008 | 3 | 10 | 18 | 10,664 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Time Spent on Project Design | 23,832 | 26,808 | + 2,976 | % | Minimize | Project Time |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 23 | 27 | 23,832 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 23 | 27 | 24,824 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 23 | 27 | 26,92 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 23 | 27 | 23,424 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 23 | 27 | 26,892 |
| 05.07.2008 | 3 | 23 | 27 | 24,056 |
| 12.07.2008 | 3 | 23 | 27 | 25,528 |
| 19.07.2008 | 3 | 23 | 27 | 26,808 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Time Spent on Testing | 16,945 | 15,69 | -1,255 | % | Minimize | Project Time |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 13 | 18 | 16,945 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 13 | 18 | 15,68 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 13 | 18 | 14,235 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 13 | 18 | 16,605 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 13 | 18 | 14,005 |
| 05.07.2008 | 3 | 13 | 18 | 17,8 |
| 12.07.2008 | 3 | 13 | 18 | 16,905 |
| 19.07.2008 | 3 | 13 | 18 | 15,69 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||
| Quality Metrics | 67,94 % | 16,27 % | -51,67% | Cost Management |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.05.2008 | 67,94 | 3 |
| 07.06.2008 | 42,51 | 3 |
| 14.06.2008 | 45,19 | 3 |
| 21.06.2008 | 77,79 | 3 |
| 28.06.2008 | 32,9 | 3 |
| 05.07.2008 | 67,44 | 3 |
| 12.07.2008 | 56,1 | 3 |
| 19.07.2008 | 16,27 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of defects | 22,95 | 36,875 | + 13,92 | Score | Minimize | Quality Metrics |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 15 | 40 | 22,95 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 15 | 40 | 20,75 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 15 | 40 | 21,625 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 15 | 40 | 16,825 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 15 | 40 | 36,175 |
| 05.07.2008 | 3 | 15 | 40 | 26,175 |
| 12.07.2008 | 3 | 15 | 40 | 33,225 |
| 19.07.2008 | 3 | 15 | 40 | 36,875 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Cost of defect | 78,78 | 87,492 | + 8,712 | Score | Minimize | Quality Metrics |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 75 | 93 | 78,78 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 75 | 93 | 90,39 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 75 | 93 | 89,85 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 75 | 93 | 77,304 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 75 | 93 | 88,734 |
| 05.07.2008 | 2 | 75 | 93 | 77,574 |
| 12.07.2008 | 2 | 75 | 93 | 80,22 |
| 19.07.2008 | 2 | 75 | 93 | 87,492 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Hours per defect | 3,87 | 4,848 | + 0,978 | Score | Minimize | Quality Metrics |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3,87 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4,624 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4,392 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4,08 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3,63 |
| 05.07.2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3,652 |
| 12.07.2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3,306 |
| 19.07.2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4,848 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||
| Actual vs Planned | 68,1 % | 55,66 % | -12,44% | Cost Management |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.05.2008 | 68,1 | 3 |
| 07.06.2008 | 97,52 | 3 |
| 14.06.2008 | 21,1 | 3 |
| 21.06.2008 | 34,42 | 3 |
| 28.06.2008 | 52,7 | 3 |
| 05.07.2008 | 91,16 | 3 |
| 12.07.2008 | 43,36 | 3 |
| 19.07.2008 | 55,66 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Total cost | 100,21 | 107,47 | + 7,26 | % | Minimize | Actual vs Planned |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 100 | 130 | 100,21 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 100 | 130 | 101,08 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 100 | 130 | 126,25 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 100 | 130 | 127,99 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 100 | 130 | 123,19 |
| 05.07.2008 | 3 | 100 | 130 | 103,6 |
| 12.07.2008 | 3 | 100 | 130 | 123,94 |
| 19.07.2008 | 3 | 100 | 130 | 107,47 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Labor cost | 111,805 | 111,025 | -0,78 | % | Minimize | Actual vs Planned |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 100 | 115 | 111,805 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 100 | 115 | 100,12 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 100 | 115 | 109,9 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 100 | 115 | 103,6 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 100 | 115 | 100,345 |
| 05.07.2008 | 2 | 100 | 115 | 100,615 |
| 12.07.2008 | 2 | 100 | 115 | 103,285 |
| 19.07.2008 | 2 | 100 | 115 | 111,025 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||
| Product Cost | 52,7 % | 50,65 % | -2,05% | Cost Management |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.05.2008 | 52,7 | 3 |
| 07.06.2008 | 77,4 | 3 |
| 14.06.2008 | 65,4 | 3 |
| 21.06.2008 | 63,2 | 3 |
| 28.06.2008 | 68,7 | 3 |
| 05.07.2008 | 68,9 | 3 |
| 12.07.2008 | 75,15 | 3 |
| 19.07.2008 | 50,65 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Cost per Unit | 0,03791 | 0,03536 | -0,00255 | USD*1000 | Minimize | Product Cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 0,02 | 0,05 | 0,03791 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 0,02 | 0,05 | 0,03005 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 0,02 | 0,05 | 0,03593 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 0,02 | 0,05 | 0,02327 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 0,02 | 0,05 | 0,03764 |
| 05.07.2008 | 3 | 0,02 | 0,05 | 0,023 |
| 12.07.2008 | 3 | 0,02 | 0,05 | 0,03377 |
| 19.07.2008 | 3 | 0,02 | 0,05 | 0,03536 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Units per Hour | 415,1 | 402,5 | -12,6 | Score | Maximize | Product Cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 350 | 450 | 415,1 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 350 | 450 | 438,3 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 350 | 450 | 433,9 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 350 | 450 | 387,3 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 350 | 450 | 446,2 |
| 05.07.2008 | 3 | 350 | 450 | 397,8 |
| 12.07.2008 | 3 | 350 | 450 | 446,2 |
| 19.07.2008 | 3 | 350 | 450 | 402,5 |
Copyright © 2000-2008 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.