Customer Loyalty Scorecard | Balanced Scorecard Report
|
This is a Customer Loyalty Balanced Scorecard Report,
it is one of reports that
Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for
Customer Loyalty scorecard. With this
software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.
|
Customer Loyalty Scorecard
Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s),
from 31.01.2009 to 21.03.2009
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Contains |
 |
Customer Loyalty Scorecard |
61,06 % |
68,28 % |
+ 7,22 % |
| Customer Care Perspective | (77,2%, 7,33% ) |
| Financial and Process Perspective | (67,5%, -1,15% ) |
| Feedback Perspective | (57,1%, 0,64% ) |
| Customer Loyalty Assessment Perspective | (67,3%, 26,21% ) |
|
Graph for Customer Loyalty Scorecard
Data for Customer Loyalty Scorecard
| Dates | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 61,06 |
| 07.02.2009 | 47,96 |
| 14.02.2009 | 53,26 |
| 21.02.2009 | 59,97 |
| 28.02.2009 | 65,03 |
| 07.03.2009 | 54,66 |
| 14.03.2009 | 47,12 |
| 21.03.2009 | 68,28 |

Customer Care Perspective
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report
Description
This group of indicators is for ensuring that customers are given the required additional benefits to make them come back to the concerned company’s products and services.
Graph for Customer Care Perspective
Data for Customer Care Perspective
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.01.2009 | 69,88 | 3 |
| 07.02.2009 | 64,59 | 3 |
| 14.02.2009 | 27,94 | 3 |
| 21.02.2009 | 76,08 | 3 |
| 28.02.2009 | 75,4 | 3 |
| 07.03.2009 | 47 | 3 |
| 14.03.2009 | 53,24 | 3 |
| 21.03.2009 | 77,21 | 3 |

Training per Employee
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Measure units |
Optimization method |
Parent |
 |
Training per Employee |
144,39 |
148,13 |
+ 3,74 |
hr |
Maximize |
Customer Care Perspective |
Description
This is needed to be assured that employees imbibe the needed skills to make customers comfortable during their visit at the PoS. The value can be had on yearly basis.
Graph for Training per Employee
Data for Training per Employee
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 144,39 |
| 07.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 139,33 |
| 14.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 83,56 |
| 21.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 124,92 |
| 28.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 129,32 |
| 07.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 62,33 |
| 14.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 74,98 |
| 21.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 148,13 |

Number of Additional Benefits provided
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Measure units |
Optimization method |
Parent |
 |
Number of Additional Benefits provided |
4,052 |
5,144 |
+ 1,092 |
# |
Maximize |
Customer Care Perspective |
Description
This is to have the number of benefits that flank the core ‘aim’. For instance, ‘car parking’ facility provided by a retailer falls in this category.
Graph for Number of Additional Benefits provided
Data for Number of Additional Benefits provided
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 4,052 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 5,684 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 2,54 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 7,094 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 7,802 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 4,526 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 5,348 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 5,144 |

Customer Expectation Meeting Ratio
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Measure units |
Optimization method |
Parent |
 |
Customer Expectation Meeting Ratio |
0,9286 |
0,9397 |
+ 0,0111 |
# |
Maximize |
Customer Care Perspective |
Description
The true use of this KPI is seen when the management exceeds ‘what was expected by the customer’. For instance, one can start with delivering the product in 8 days instead of the prior promised 10 days.
Graph for Customer Expectation Meeting Ratio
Data for Customer Expectation Meeting Ratio
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,9286 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,7879 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,7936 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,9595 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,8035 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,9127 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,8398 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,9397 |

Financial and Process Perspective
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Parent |
Contains |
 |
Financial and Process Perspective |
68,61 % |
67,46 % |
-1,15% |
Customer Loyalty Scorecard |
|
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report
Description
This class of KPIs is to have the communication systems in place and also to evaluate those.
Graph for Financial and Process Perspective
Data for Financial and Process Perspective
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.01.2009 | 68,61 | 3 |
| 07.02.2009 | 27,02 | 3 |
| 14.02.2009 | 53,54 | 3 |
| 21.02.2009 | 32,42 | 3 |
| 28.02.2009 | 51,92 | 3 |
| 07.03.2009 | 58,06 | 3 |
| 14.03.2009 | 14,28 | 3 |
| 21.03.2009 | 67,46 | 3 |

Types of Communication Systems
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Measure units |
Optimization method |
Parent |
 |
Types of Communication Systems |
3,122 |
3,791 |
+ 0,669 |
# |
Maximize |
Financial and Process Perspective |
Description
Value of this KPI depends on the number of groups in which the customer base has been segmented into. A different communication type must be used for each of those. For instance, the groups can be- ‘potential customers who have yet not purchased anything’, ‘customers who have made a purchase’ and ‘premium customers as they always buy from the concerned company’.
Graph for Types of Communication Systems
Data for Types of Communication Systems
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3,122 |
| 07.02.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2,306 |
| 14.02.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4,064 |
| 21.02.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3,089 |
| 28.02.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4,007 |
| 07.03.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2,645 |
| 14.03.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2,249 |
| 21.03.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3,791 |

Fall in Customers’ Grievances Redressal
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Measure units |
Optimization method |
Parent |
 |
Fall in Customers’ Grievances Redressal |
84,16 |
94,24 |
+ 10,08 |
% |
Maximize |
Financial and Process Perspective |
Description
This shows the degree to which the efforts aimed at taking care of customers’ problems are in place.
Graph for Fall in Customers’ Grievances Redressal
Data for Fall in Customers’ Grievances Redressal
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 84,16 |
| 07.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 42,76 |
| 14.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 84,46 |
| 21.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 67,6 |
| 28.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 57,52 |
| 07.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 90,94 |
| 14.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 40,78 |
| 21.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 94,24 |

ROI Jump
Description
This gives the extent to which the Return on Investment shows an increase.
Graph for ROI Jump
Data for ROI Jump
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 122,7 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 50,18 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 96,24 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 38,84 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 135,58 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 65,72 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 25,54 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 123,68 |

Feedback Perspective
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report
Description
This group of KPIs lets the management know how the efforts are faring.
Graph for Feedback Perspective
Data for Feedback Perspective
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.01.2009 | 56,47 | 2 |
| 07.02.2009 | 52,62 | 2 |
| 14.02.2009 | 83,43 | 2 |
| 21.02.2009 | 65,22 | 2 |
| 28.02.2009 | 53,25 | 2 |
| 07.03.2009 | 73,46 | 2 |
| 14.03.2009 | 77,44 | 2 |
| 21.03.2009 | 57,11 | 2 |

Complaints Decline
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Measure units |
Optimization method |
Parent |
 |
Complaints Decline |
65,26 |
49,24 |
-16,02 |
% |
Maximize |
Feedback Perspective |
Description
This is to know the drop occurring in the complaints section.
Graph for Complaints Decline
Data for Complaints Decline
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 65,26 |
| 07.02.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 55,72 |
| 14.02.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 71,92 |
| 21.02.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 85,33 |
| 28.02.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 70,12 |
| 07.03.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 60,4 |
| 14.03.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 64,18 |
| 21.03.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 49,24 |

% drop in Lapsed Customer
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Measure units |
Optimization method |
Parent |
 |
% drop in Lapsed Customer |
57,52 |
78,49 |
+ 20,97 |
% |
Maximize |
Feedback Perspective |
Description
A ‘Lapsed Customer’ is one who has stopped opting for the concerned company’s product. This KPI goes into showing the fall in such group of customers.
Graph for % drop in Lapsed Customer
Data for % drop in Lapsed Customer
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 57,52 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 84,34 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 90,28 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 44,74 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 33,31 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 83,98 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 89,11 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 78,49 |

Number of Software Used for Monitoring and Analyzing the Follow-ups
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Measure units |
Optimization method |
Parent |
 |
Number of Software Used for Monitoring and Analyzing the Follow-ups |
3,356 |
4,784 |
+ 1,428 |
# |
Maximize |
Feedback Perspective |
Description
Software are used for objectives like ‘hit analysis’, ‘call analysis’ etc. These help in gauging customer satisfaction.
Graph for Number of Software Used for Monitoring and Analyzing the Follow-ups
Data for Number of Software Used for Monitoring and Analyzing the Follow-ups
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3,356 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3,248 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5,732 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5,568 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4,328 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5,24 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4,612 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4,784 |

Customer Loyalty Assessment Perspective
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Parent |
Contains |
 |
Customer Loyalty Assessment Perspective |
41,08 % |
67,29 % |
+ 26,21% |
Customer Loyalty Scorecard |
|
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report
Description
This is to have the evaluation of ‘customer loyalty’ as a process.
Graph for Customer Loyalty Assessment Perspective
Data for Customer Loyalty Assessment Perspective
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.01.2009 | 41,08 | 2 |
| 07.02.2009 | 49,75 | 2 |
| 14.02.2009 | 60,66 | 2 |
| 21.02.2009 | 71,88 | 2 |
| 28.02.2009 | 80,91 | 2 |
| 07.03.2009 | 42,25 | 2 |
| 14.03.2009 | 56,87 | 2 |
| 21.03.2009 | 67,29 | 2 |

Number of Loyalty Schemes Run
Description
This is equal to the number of reward schemes (such as a retrospective discount, loyalty cards etc) that are run by the organization.
Graph for Number of Loyalty Schemes Run
Data for Number of Loyalty Schemes Run
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 9,598 |
| 07.02.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 5,92 |
| 14.02.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 8,548 |
| 21.02.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 9,316 |
| 28.02.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 7,834 |
| 07.03.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 5,542 |
| 14.03.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 6,094 |
| 21.03.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 8,494 |

‘Highly Profitable Customer Base’ Expansion
Description
This indicator is equal to the rate at which the ‘creamy layer’ of customers is increasing. The value can be had on yearly basis.
Graph for ‘Highly Profitable Customer Base’ Expansion
Data for ‘Highly Profitable Customer Base’ Expansion
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 73,27 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 178,91 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 123,81 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 157,25 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 196,39 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 159,34 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 154,21 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 196,96 |

Number of Tactics being Employed for Raising Customer Loyalty
| |
Name |
Start value |
End value |
Dynamic |
Measure units |
Optimization method |
Parent |
 |
Number of Tactics being Employed for Raising Customer Loyalty |
2,407 |
3,541 |
+ 1,134 |
# |
Maximize |
Customer Loyalty Assessment Perspective |
Description
This indicates the number of systems like Relationship marketing, permission marketing, CRM and Database marketing being used to give customer loyalty a thrust.
Graph for Number of Tactics being Employed for Raising Customer Loyalty
Data for Number of Tactics being Employed for Raising Customer Loyalty
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 2,407 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 3,926 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7,181 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7,321 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 5,732 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 2,351 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 5,886 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 3,541 |
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 23.02.2009 22:55:33
Copyright © 2000-2010
AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.