|
This is a Customer Loyalty Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Customer Loyalty scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics. |
Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s),
from 31.01.2009 to 21.03.2009
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Contains | |||||||||
| Customer Loyalty Scorecard | 61,06 % | 68,28 % | + 7,22 % |
|
| Dates | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 61,06 |
| 07.02.2009 | 47,96 |
| 14.02.2009 | 53,26 |
| 21.02.2009 | 59,97 |
| 28.02.2009 | 65,03 |
| 07.03.2009 | 54,66 |
| 14.03.2009 | 47,12 |
| 21.03.2009 | 68,28 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Customer Care Perspective | 69,88 % | 77,21 % | + 7,33% | Customer Loyalty Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.01.2009 | 69,88 | 3 |
| 07.02.2009 | 64,59 | 3 |
| 14.02.2009 | 27,94 | 3 |
| 21.02.2009 | 76,08 | 3 |
| 28.02.2009 | 75,4 | 3 |
| 07.03.2009 | 47 | 3 |
| 14.03.2009 | 53,24 | 3 |
| 21.03.2009 | 77,21 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Training per Employee | 144,39 | 148,13 | + 3,74 | hr | Maximize | Customer Care Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 144,39 |
| 07.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 139,33 |
| 14.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 83,56 |
| 21.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 124,92 |
| 28.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 129,32 |
| 07.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 62,33 |
| 14.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 74,98 |
| 21.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 150 | 148,13 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of Additional Benefits provided | 4,052 | 5,144 | + 1,092 | # | Maximize | Customer Care Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 4,052 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 5,684 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 2,54 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 7,094 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 7,802 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 4,526 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 5,348 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 5,144 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Customer Expectation Meeting Ratio | 0,9286 | 0,9397 | + 0,0111 | # | Maximize | Customer Care Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,9286 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,7879 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,7936 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,9595 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,8035 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,9127 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,8398 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 0,7 | 1 | 0,9397 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Financial and Process Perspective | 68,61 % | 67,46 % | -1,15% | Customer Loyalty Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.01.2009 | 68,61 | 3 |
| 07.02.2009 | 27,02 | 3 |
| 14.02.2009 | 53,54 | 3 |
| 21.02.2009 | 32,42 | 3 |
| 28.02.2009 | 51,92 | 3 |
| 07.03.2009 | 58,06 | 3 |
| 14.03.2009 | 14,28 | 3 |
| 21.03.2009 | 67,46 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Types of Communication Systems | 3,122 | 3,791 | + 0,669 | # | Maximize | Financial and Process Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3,122 |
| 07.02.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2,306 |
| 14.02.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4,064 |
| 21.02.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3,089 |
| 28.02.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4,007 |
| 07.03.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2,645 |
| 14.03.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2,249 |
| 21.03.2009 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3,791 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Fall in Customers’ Grievances Redressal | 84,16 | 94,24 | + 10,08 | % | Maximize | Financial and Process Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 84,16 |
| 07.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 42,76 |
| 14.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 84,46 |
| 21.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 67,6 |
| 28.02.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 57,52 |
| 07.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 90,94 |
| 14.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 40,78 |
| 21.03.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 94,24 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| ROI Jump | 122,7 | 123,68 | + 0,98 | % | Maximize | Financial and Process Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 122,7 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 50,18 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 96,24 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 38,84 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 135,58 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 65,72 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 25,54 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 150 | 123,68 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Feedback Perspective | 56,47 % | 57,11 % | + 0,64% | Customer Loyalty Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.01.2009 | 56,47 | 2 |
| 07.02.2009 | 52,62 | 2 |
| 14.02.2009 | 83,43 | 2 |
| 21.02.2009 | 65,22 | 2 |
| 28.02.2009 | 53,25 | 2 |
| 07.03.2009 | 73,46 | 2 |
| 14.03.2009 | 77,44 | 2 |
| 21.03.2009 | 57,11 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Complaints Decline | 65,26 | 49,24 | -16,02 | % | Maximize | Feedback Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 65,26 |
| 07.02.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 55,72 |
| 14.02.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 71,92 |
| 21.02.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 85,33 |
| 28.02.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 70,12 |
| 07.03.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 60,4 |
| 14.03.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 64,18 |
| 21.03.2009 | 2 | 10 | 100 | 49,24 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % drop in Lapsed Customer | 57,52 | 78,49 | + 20,97 | % | Maximize | Feedback Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 57,52 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 84,34 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 90,28 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 44,74 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 33,31 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 83,98 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 89,11 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 78,49 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of Software Used for Monitoring and Analyzing the Follow-ups | 3,356 | 4,784 | + 1,428 | # | Maximize | Feedback Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3,356 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3,248 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5,732 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5,568 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4,328 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5,24 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4,612 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4,784 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Customer Loyalty Assessment Perspective | 41,08 % | 67,29 % | + 26,21% | Customer Loyalty Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 31.01.2009 | 41,08 | 2 |
| 07.02.2009 | 49,75 | 2 |
| 14.02.2009 | 60,66 | 2 |
| 21.02.2009 | 71,88 | 2 |
| 28.02.2009 | 80,91 | 2 |
| 07.03.2009 | 42,25 | 2 |
| 14.03.2009 | 56,87 | 2 |
| 21.03.2009 | 67,29 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of Loyalty Schemes Run | 9,598 | 8,494 | -1,104 | # | Maximize | Customer Loyalty Assessment Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 9,598 |
| 07.02.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 5,92 |
| 14.02.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 8,548 |
| 21.02.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 9,316 |
| 28.02.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 7,834 |
| 07.03.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 5,542 |
| 14.03.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 6,094 |
| 21.03.2009 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 8,494 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| ‘Highly Profitable Customer Base’ Expansion | 73,27 | 196,96 | + 123,7 | % | Maximize | Customer Loyalty Assessment Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 73,27 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 178,91 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 123,81 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 157,25 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 196,39 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 159,34 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 154,21 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 10 | 200 | 196,96 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of Tactics being Employed for Raising Customer Loyalty | 2,407 | 3,541 | + 1,134 | # | Maximize | Customer Loyalty Assessment Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 2,407 |
| 07.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 3,926 |
| 14.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7,181 |
| 21.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7,321 |
| 28.02.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 5,732 |
| 07.03.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 2,351 |
| 14.03.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 5,886 |
| 21.03.2009 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 3,541 |
Copyright © 2000-2010 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.