This is a Data Integrity Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Data Integrity scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.

Data Integrity Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 14.02.2009 to 04.04.2009

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Contains

Data Integrity Scorecard

50,66 %

40,56 %

-10,1 %

Data Loss Prevention Perspective	(37,3%, -6,7%)
Technical Competence Assessment Perspective	(45,3%, -15,7%)
Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective	(33,8%, -24,74%)
Failure Assessment Perspective	(45,1%, 7,8%)

Graph for Data Integrity Scorecard

Data for Data Integrity Scorecard

Dates	Value
14.02.2009	50,66
21.02.2009	51,73
28.02.2009	60,73
07.03.2009	56,05
14.03.2009	59,29
21.03.2009	41,9
28.03.2009	51,85
04.04.2009	40,56

Data Loss Prevention Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Data Loss Prevention Perspective

43,99 %

37,29 %

-6,7%

Data Integrity Scorecard

Indicators

Number of Back-ups Used

Number of Security Mechanisms Adopted

User-Interface Capability Value

Software Ability for Error Detection and Correction *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category of indicators is to have an idea about the structure that has been constructed for preventing data loss.

Graph for Data Loss Prevention Perspective

Data for Data Loss Prevention Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
14.02.2009	43,99	3
21.02.2009	56,87	3
28.02.2009	73,51	3
07.03.2009	59,31	3
14.03.2009	53,33	3
21.03.2009	45,29	3
28.03.2009	30,19	3
04.04.2009	37,29	3

Number of Back-ups Used

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Back-ups Used	4,404	1,816	-2,588	#	Maximize	Data Loss Prevention Perspective

Description This gives the attempts being taken by the management in ensuring that files are copied at other locations to avoid the chaos at times of losing data.

Graph for Number of Back-ups Used

Data for Number of Back-ups Used

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	3	1	5	4,404
21.02.2009	3	1	5	3,556
28.02.2009	3	1	5	4,892
07.03.2009	3	1	5	3,664
14.03.2009	3	1	5	3,752
21.03.2009	3	1	5	1,848
28.03.2009	3	1	5	1,656
04.04.2009	3	1	5	1,816

Number of Security Mechanisms Adopted

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Security Mechanisms Adopted	2,45	4,532	+ 2,082	#	Maximize	Data Loss Prevention Perspective

Description This gives the number of mechanisms that are used for ensuring security of data.

Graph for Number of Security Mechanisms Adopted

Data for Number of Security Mechanisms Adopted

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	2	5	2,45
21.02.2009	2	2	5	3,719
28.02.2009	2	2	5	2,564
07.03.2009	2	2	5	2,822
14.03.2009	2	2	5	3,578
21.03.2009	2	2	5	2,12
28.03.2009	2	2	5	4,286
04.04.2009	2	2	5	4,532

User-Interface Capability Value

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	User-Interface Capability Value	4,366	1,369	-2,997	Score	Maximize	Data Loss Prevention Perspective

Description Often, user interfaces are such that these keep a check on the data being entered. Consequently, automated blocks to invalid data occur. The number for this KPI can be had by using a scale labeled from 1-10.

Graph for User-Interface Capability Value

Data for User-Interface Capability Value

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	3	1	10	4,366
21.02.2009	3	1	10	7,642
28.02.2009	3	1	10	9,37
07.03.2009	3	1	10	9,577
14.03.2009	3	1	10	7,597
21.03.2009	3	1	10	8,569
28.03.2009	3	1	10	2,719
04.04.2009	3	1	10	1,369

Technical Competence Assessment Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Technical Competence Assessment Perspective

61,01 %

45,31 %

-15,7%

Data Integrity Scorecard

Indicators

'Inaccurate or Inconsistent Data' Index

Capability Score of Tools and Techniques used to Access Data

Techniques' Syncing with Organizational Operations

Implementation Timeframe *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This is needed to ensure that the procedures for maintaining data are occurring as per the desired manner and levels.

Graph for Technical Competence Assessment Perspective

Data for Technical Competence Assessment Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
14.02.2009	61,01	3
21.02.2009	45,8	3
28.02.2009	55,86	3
07.03.2009	68,25	3
14.03.2009	58,6	3
21.03.2009	35,55	3
28.03.2009	51,85	3
04.04.2009	45,31	3

'Inaccurate or Inconsistent Data' Index

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	'Inaccurate or Inconsistent Data' Index	0,0298	0,092	+ 0,0622	#	Minimize	Technical Competence Assessment Perspective

Description This KPI shows the instances when the data retrieved was not accurate or was inconsistent in nature with regard to the requirements.

Graph for 'Inaccurate or Inconsistent Data' Index

Data for 'Inaccurate or Inconsistent Data' Index

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	3	0	0,2	0,0298
21.02.2009	3	0	0,2	0,064
28.02.2009	3	0	0,2	0,1332
07.03.2009	3	0	0,2	0,0474
14.03.2009	3	0	0,2	0,0988
21.03.2009	3	0	0,2	0,1952
28.03.2009	3	0	0,2	0,124
04.04.2009	3	0	0,2	0,092

Capability Score of Tools and Techniques used to Access Data

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Capability Score of Tools and Techniques used to Access Data	3,925	6,355	+ 2,43	Score	Maximize	Technical Competence Assessment Perspective

Description Not only is the implementation of the technology important but also it must be apt enough to fulfill the needs it was supposed to. This indicator is to know the latter. Positioning the KPI on a scale of 1-10 can be used to have the value.

Graph for Capability Score of Tools and Techniques used to Access Data

Data for Capability Score of Tools and Techniques used to Access Data

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	1	10	3,925
21.02.2009	2	1	10	1,261
28.02.2009	2	1	10	9,64
07.03.2009	2	1	10	5,851
14.03.2009	2	1	10	5,788
21.03.2009	2	1	10	7,363
28.03.2009	2	1	10	5,5
04.04.2009	2	1	10	6,355

Techniques' Syncing with Organizational Operations

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Techniques' Syncing with Organizational Operations	7,462	1,387	-6,075	Score	Maximize	Technical Competence Assessment Perspective

Description This gives the level at which the integration between the techniques and organizational systems occur. For instance, the solutions have to be well understood by the employees. Scale numbered from 1-10 can be used for this.

Graph for Techniques' Syncing with Organizational Operations

Data for Techniques' Syncing with Organizational Operations

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	3	1	10	7,462
21.02.2009	3	1	10	7,894
28.02.2009	3	1	10	5,086
07.03.2009	3	1	10	7,102
14.03.2009	3	1	10	7,84
21.03.2009	3	1	10	5,311
28.03.2009	3	1	10	4,213
04.04.2009	3	1	10	1,387

Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective

58,52 %

33,78 %

-24,74%

Data Integrity Scorecard

Indicators

Competence of the Data Model used

Unification Level with Stakeholders

Cost: Benefit Ratio

Fraction of Infrastructure Covered by Security Mechanisms *

Vulnerability Ratio *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is for judging the structure of database.

Graph for Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective

Data for Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
14.02.2009	58,52	2
21.02.2009	41,18	2
28.02.2009	59,44	2
07.03.2009	32,28	2
14.03.2009	69,64	2
21.03.2009	37,32	2
28.03.2009	59,7	2
04.04.2009	33,78	2

Competence of the Data Model used

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Competence of the Data Model used	5,374	5,617	+ 0,243	Score	Maximize	Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective

Description This KPI shows the extent to which the data model that has been adopted is immune to the 'loss of data integrity'. Scale of 1-10 can be used for this.

Graph for Competence of the Data Model used

Data for Competence of the Data Model used

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	1	10	5,374
21.02.2009	2	1	10	8,029
28.02.2009	2	1	10	2,575
07.03.2009	2	1	10	5,221
14.03.2009	2	1	10	5,302
21.03.2009	2	1	10	1,117
28.03.2009	2	1	10	4,033
04.04.2009	2	1	10	5,617

Unification Level with Stakeholders

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Unification Level with Stakeholders	0,9934	0,8252	-0,168	#	Maximize	Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective

Description This indicator gives the extent to which the data integrity solutions are compatible with those of stakeholders.

Graph for Unification Level with Stakeholders

Data for Unification Level with Stakeholders

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	0,8	1	0,9934
21.02.2009	2	0,8	1	0,8492
28.02.2009	2	0,8	1	0,9352
07.03.2009	2	0,8	1	0,8388
14.03.2009	2	0,8	1	0,966
21.03.2009	2	0,8	1	0,9116
28.03.2009	2	0,8	1	0,955
04.04.2009	2	0,8	1	0,8252

Cost: Benefit Ratio

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Cost: Benefit Ratio	0,1242	0,201	+ 0,0768	#	Minimize	Data Infrastructure Assesment Perspective

Description The amount invested in bringing the required technologies in the organization can be huge. So, it is necessary to evaluate the cost borne in the light of benefits experienced.

Graph for Cost: Benefit Ratio

Data for Cost: Benefit Ratio

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	0	0,3	0,1242
21.02.2009	2	0	0,3	0,2484
28.02.2009	2	0	0,3	0,1503
07.03.2009	2	0	0,3	0,2319
14.03.2009	2	0	0,3	0,1341
21.03.2009	2	0	0,3	0,1461
28.03.2009	2	0	0,3	0,213
04.04.2009	2	0	0,3	0,201

Failure Assessment Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Failure Assessment Perspective

37,3 %

45,1 %

+ 7,8%

Data Integrity Scorecard

Indicators

Proportion of Unauthorized Accesses

Number of Issues that Come-up in one Year

Time that goes into Fixing the Problems

% Drop in Resolution Time *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category helps in analyzing the failure aspect of the whole subject of Data integrity.

Graph for Failure Assessment Perspective

Data for Failure Assessment Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
14.02.2009	37,3	2
21.02.2009	63,47	2
28.02.2009	50,16	2
07.03.2009	56,61	2
14.03.2009	58,94	2
21.03.2009	50,94	2
28.03.2009	76,48	2
04.04.2009	45,1	2

Proportion of Unauthorized Accesses

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Proportion of Unauthorized Accesses	0,1608	0,1322	-0,0286	#	Minimize	Failure Assessment Perspective

Description This is to know the fraction of accesses that was found to be �illegal�. It reflects the potency of the technological solutions.

Graph for Proportion of Unauthorized Accesses

Data for Proportion of Unauthorized Accesses

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	0	0,2	0,1608
21.02.2009	2	0	0,2	0,048
28.02.2009	2	0	0,2	0,0568
07.03.2009	2	0	0,2	0,0702
14.03.2009	2	0	0,2	0,1722
21.03.2009	2	0	0,2	0,0344
28.03.2009	2	0	0,2	0,0716
04.04.2009	2	0	0,2	0,1322

Number of Issues that Come-up in one Year

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Issues that Come-up in one Year	4,6	2,73	-1,87	#	Minimize	Failure Assessment Perspective

Description One must keep a check on the number of data security issues that have come up in the last one year. The management should also aim at increasing the time lapse that goes into two successive 'problem emergence' incidents.

Graph for Number of Issues that Come-up in one Year

Data for Number of Issues that Come-up in one Year

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	3	0	10	4,6
21.02.2009	3	0	10	2,86
28.02.2009	3	0	10	7,54
07.03.2009	3	0	10	0,41
14.03.2009	3	0	10	6,93
21.03.2009	3	0	10	7,3
28.03.2009	3	0	10	4,47
04.04.2009	3	0	10	2,73

Time that goes into Fixing the Problems

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Time that goes into Fixing the Problems	36,378	28,097	-8,281	hr	Minimize	Failure Assessment Perspective

Description This is to have an idea about the time period that is needed, on an average basis to bring the things back in place.

Graph for Time that goes into Fixing the Problems

Data for Time that goes into Fixing the Problems

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	3	1	50	36,378
21.02.2009	3	1	50	17,709
28.02.2009	3	1	50	25,892
07.03.2009	3	1	50	45,884
14.03.2009	3	1	50	5,851
21.03.2009	3	1	50	22,364
28.03.2009	3	1	50	1,833
04.04.2009	3	1	50	28,097

Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 09.03.2009 23:08:07