|
This is a Electricity Delivery Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Electricity Delivery scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics. |
Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s),
from 13.12.2008 to 31.01.2009
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Contains | |||||||||
| Electricity Delivery Scorecard | 36,55 % | 59,37 % | + 22,82 % |
|
| Dates | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 36,55 |
| 20.12.2008 | 36,45 |
| 27.12.2008 | 52,59 |
| 03.01.2009 | 55,35 |
| 10.01.2009 | 52,96 |
| 17.01.2009 | 49,72 |
| 24.01.2009 | 45,39 |
| 31.01.2009 | 59,37 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Reliability Perspective | 45,16 % | 61,25 % | + 16,09% | Electricity Delivery Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 13.12.2008 | 45,16 | 3 |
| 20.12.2008 | 20,94 | 3 |
| 27.12.2008 | 39,83 | 3 |
| 03.01.2009 | 57,95 | 3 |
| 10.01.2009 | 70,25 | 3 |
| 17.01.2009 | 52,48 | 3 |
| 24.01.2009 | 49,46 | 3 |
| 31.01.2009 | 61,25 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI) | 0,168 | 1,262 | + 1,094 | % | Minimize | Reliability Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0,168 |
| 20.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0,84 |
| 27.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0,88 |
| 03.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0,626 |
| 10.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0,084 |
| 17.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0,614 |
| 24.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1,966 |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1,262 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| System Average Duration Frequency Index (SADFI) | 56,64 | 23,64 | -33 | minutes | Minimize | Reliability Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 56,64 |
| 20.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 55,92 |
| 27.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 22,38 |
| 03.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 20,52 |
| 10.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 34,5 |
| 17.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 46,38 |
| 24.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 31,26 |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 23,64 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of customer to whom sustained power interruptions have been totally eliminated | 41860 | 96400 | +5,454E004 | # | Maximize | Reliability Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 2 | 10000 | 100000 | 41860 |
| 20.12.2008 | 2 | 10000 | 100000 | 15220 |
| 27.12.2008 | 2 | 10000 | 100000 | 10450 |
| 03.01.2009 | 2 | 10000 | 100000 | 64630 |
| 10.01.2009 | 2 | 10000 | 100000 | 82450 |
| 17.01.2009 | 2 | 10000 | 100000 | 38890 |
| 24.01.2009 | 2 | 10000 | 100000 | 80740 |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 10000 | 100000 | 96400 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Financial and Collection Perspective | 41,67 % | 66,72 % | + 25,05% | Electricity Delivery Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 13.12.2008 | 41,67 | 3 |
| 20.12.2008 | 47,63 | 3 |
| 27.12.2008 | 75,41 | 3 |
| 03.01.2009 | 41,11 | 3 |
| 10.01.2009 | 43,43 | 3 |
| 17.01.2009 | 49,17 | 3 |
| 24.01.2009 | 48,08 | 3 |
| 31.01.2009 | 66,72 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % improvement in taken collection | 17,5 | 22,55 | + 5,05 | % | Maximize | Financial and Collection Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 17,5 |
| 20.12.2008 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 25,75 |
| 27.12.2008 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 51,3 |
| 03.01.2009 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 21 |
| 10.01.2009 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 40,95 |
| 17.01.2009 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 17,55 |
| 24.01.2009 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 45,05 |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 22,55 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % reduction in debts over 30 days | 99,55 | 87,05 | -12,5 | % | Maximize | Financial and Collection Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 99,55 |
| 20.12.2008 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 87,7 |
| 27.12.2008 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 88,15 |
| 03.01.2009 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 69,45 |
| 10.01.2009 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 84,5 |
| 17.01.2009 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 85,7 |
| 24.01.2009 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 51,35 |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 87,05 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % reduction in unallocated transactions | 52,24 | 92,38 | + 40,14 | % | Maximize | Financial and Collection Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 52,24 |
| 20.12.2008 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 40,54 |
| 27.12.2008 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 90,94 |
| 03.01.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 51,28 |
| 10.01.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 49,36 |
| 17.01.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 74,14 |
| 24.01.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 81,58 |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 40 | 100 | 92,38 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Operational Perspective | 20,03 % | 41,58 % | + 21,55% | Electricity Delivery Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 13.12.2008 | 20,03 | 2 |
| 20.12.2008 | 42,07 | 2 |
| 27.12.2008 | 42,1 | 2 |
| 03.01.2009 | 62,27 | 2 |
| 10.01.2009 | 45,19 | 2 |
| 17.01.2009 | 44,71 | 2 |
| 24.01.2009 | 33,57 | 2 |
| 31.01.2009 | 41,58 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % increase in subsidized household electric connections | 9,865 | 31,145 | + 21,28 | % | Maximize | Operational Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 3 | 5 | 40 | 9,865 |
| 20.12.2008 | 3 | 5 | 40 | 20,26 |
| 27.12.2008 | 3 | 5 | 40 | 19,42 |
| 03.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 40 | 22,045 |
| 10.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 40 | 32,195 |
| 17.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 40 | 33,28 |
| 24.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 40 | 6,295 |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 5 | 40 | 31,145 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Metering Efficiency | 79,24 | 74,11 | -5,13 | % | Maximize | Operational Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 3 | 70 | 100 | 79,24 |
| 20.12.2008 | 3 | 70 | 100 | 81,61 |
| 27.12.2008 | 3 | 70 | 100 | 85,12 |
| 03.01.2009 | 3 | 70 | 100 | 89,14 |
| 10.01.2009 | 3 | 70 | 100 | 71,8 |
| 17.01.2009 | 3 | 70 | 100 | 75,61 |
| 24.01.2009 | 3 | 70 | 100 | 84,04 |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 70 | 100 | 74,11 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % reduction in number of queries and complaints calls | 26,52 | 31,08 | + 4,56 | % | Maximize | Operational Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 2 | 20 | 60 | 26,52 |
| 20.12.2008 | 2 | 20 | 60 | 52,2 |
| 27.12.2008 | 2 | 20 | 60 | 37 |
| 03.01.2009 | 2 | 20 | 60 | 58,72 |
| 10.01.2009 | 2 | 20 | 60 | 29 |
| 17.01.2009 | 2 | 20 | 60 | 20 |
| 24.01.2009 | 2 | 20 | 60 | 40,2 |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 20 | 60 | 31,08 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Employees Perspective | 32,48 % | 63,29 % | + 30,81% | Electricity Delivery Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 13.12.2008 | 32,48 | 2 |
| 20.12.2008 | 37,34 | 2 |
| 27.12.2008 | 47,98 | 2 |
| 03.01.2009 | 65,87 | 2 |
| 10.01.2009 | 49,07 | 2 |
| 17.01.2009 | 51,39 | 2 |
| 24.01.2009 | 47,07 | 2 |
| 31.01.2009 | 63,29 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Lost time injury Severity Rate | 45,24 | 17,34 | -27,9 | days | Minimize | Employees Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 45,24 |
| 20.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 40,8 |
| 27.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 33,66 |
| 03.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 17,76 |
| 10.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 18,48 |
| 17.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 36,9 |
| 24.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 33,18 |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 17,34 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Lost time injury frequency rate | 0,31 | 0,316 | + 0,006 | % | Minimize | Employees Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 0,5 | 0,31 |
| 20.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 0,5 | 0,414 |
| 27.12.2008 | 3 | 0 | 0,5 | 0,2225 |
| 03.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 0,5 | 0,3565 |
| 10.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 0,5 | 0,3425 |
| 17.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 0,5 | 0,282 |
| 24.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 0,5 | 0,29 |
| 31.01.2009 | 3 | 0 | 0,5 | 0,316 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Average training time per employee | 23,96 | 48,88 | + 24,92 | hours | Maximize | Employees Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 13.12.2008 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 23,96 |
| 20.12.2008 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 26,52 |
| 27.12.2008 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 27,76 |
| 03.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 45,52 |
| 10.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 33,64 |
| 17.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 45,8 |
| 24.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 30,32 |
| 31.01.2009 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 48,88 |
Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.