|
This is a Financial Crisis Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Financial Crisis scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics. |
Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s),
from 30.09.2008 to 18.11.2008
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Contains | |||||||||
| Scorecard for Performance Management During Financial Crisis | 48,18 % | 40,33 % | -7,85 % |
|
| Dates | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 48,18 |
| 07.10.2008 | 55,85 |
| 14.10.2008 | 54,3 |
| 21.10.2008 | 53,57 |
| 28.10.2008 | 33,95 |
| 04.11.2008 | 53,26 |
| 11.11.2008 | 53,52 |
| 18.11.2008 | 40,33 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||||
| Financial Perspective | 39,59 % | 16,88 % | -22,71% | Scorecard for Performance Management During Financial Crisis |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 30.09.2008 | 39,59 | 3 |
| 07.10.2008 | 68,7 | 3 |
| 14.10.2008 | 52,87 | 3 |
| 21.10.2008 | 50,05 | 3 |
| 28.10.2008 | 12,13 | 3 |
| 04.11.2008 | 67,27 | 3 |
| 11.11.2008 | 34,24 | 3 |
| 18.11.2008 | 16,88 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % increase in Credit Days | 65,71 | 13,15 | -52,56 | % | Maximize | Financial Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 65,71 |
| 07.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 60,22 |
| 14.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 35,02 |
| 21.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 57,61 |
| 28.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 12,43 |
| 04.11.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 88,39 |
| 11.11.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 76,33 |
| 18.11.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 13,15 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % decrease in debtor days | 33,76 | 29,44 | -4,32 | % | Maximize | Financial Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 33,76 |
| 07.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 83,08 |
| 14.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 47,98 |
| 21.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 36,01 |
| 28.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 40,42 |
| 04.11.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 56,62 |
| 11.11.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 27,1 |
| 18.11.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 29,44 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Liquidity Ratio | 66,7 | 54,34 | -12,36 | % | Maximize | Financial Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 2 | 50 | 70 | 66,7 |
| 07.10.2008 | 2 | 50 | 70 | 59,28 |
| 14.10.2008 | 2 | 50 | 70 | 69,26 |
| 21.10.2008 | 2 | 50 | 70 | 67,72 |
| 28.10.2008 | 2 | 50 | 70 | 53,06 |
| 04.11.2008 | 2 | 50 | 70 | 62,4 |
| 11.11.2008 | 2 | 50 | 70 | 53,64 |
| 18.11.2008 | 2 | 50 | 70 | 54,34 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Business Development Perspective | 64,6 % | 50,87 % | -13,73% | Scorecard for Performance Management During Financial Crisis |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 30.09.2008 | 64,6 | 3 |
| 07.10.2008 | 40,58 | 3 |
| 14.10.2008 | 48,6 | 3 |
| 21.10.2008 | 50,92 | 3 |
| 28.10.2008 | 30,02 | 3 |
| 04.11.2008 | 45,92 | 3 |
| 11.11.2008 | 67,08 | 3 |
| 18.11.2008 | 50,87 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of new long-term contracts initiated | 4,892 | 3,892 | -1 | # | Maximize | Business Development Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4,892 |
| 07.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4,212 |
| 14.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1,56 |
| 21.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2,928 |
| 28.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1,708 |
| 04.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2,688 |
| 11.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4,852 |
| 18.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3,892 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Client oriented products and services introduced | 6,166 | 4,996 | -1,17 | # | Maximize | Business Development Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6,166 |
| 07.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 2,17 |
| 14.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9,46 |
| 21.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 1,126 |
| 28.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 2,125 |
| 04.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7,48 |
| 11.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8,119 |
| 18.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4,996 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Lead generation effectiveness | 5,518 | 5,635 | + 0,117 | Score | Maximize | Business Development Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5,518 |
| 07.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4,564 |
| 14.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5,734 |
| 21.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7,813 |
| 28.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6,31 |
| 04.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 3,043 |
| 11.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4,564 |
| 18.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5,635 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Operational Perspective | 47,09 % | 21,54 % | -25,55% | Scorecard for Performance Management During Financial Crisis |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 30.09.2008 | 47,09 | 2 |
| 07.10.2008 | 69,48 | 2 |
| 14.10.2008 | 51,92 | 2 |
| 21.10.2008 | 87,27 | 2 |
| 28.10.2008 | 46,71 | 2 |
| 04.11.2008 | 44,11 | 2 |
| 11.11.2008 | 71,77 | 2 |
| 18.11.2008 | 21,54 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % Reduction in decision-making and lead time | 13,06 | 13,51 | + 0,45 | % | Maximize | Operational Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 13,06 |
| 07.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 97,93 |
| 14.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 93,97 |
| 21.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 83,44 |
| 28.10.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 59,86 |
| 04.11.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 27,1 |
| 11.11.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 88,57 |
| 18.11.2008 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 13,51 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % decrease in cycle time to resolve adjustments | 78,74 | 68,45 | -10,29 | % | Maximize | Operational Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 2 | 10 | 80 | 78,74 |
| 07.10.2008 | 2 | 10 | 80 | 30,02 |
| 14.10.2008 | 2 | 10 | 80 | 17,49 |
| 21.10.2008 | 2 | 10 | 80 | 68,03 |
| 28.10.2008 | 2 | 10 | 80 | 24,35 |
| 04.11.2008 | 2 | 10 | 80 | 61,73 |
| 11.11.2008 | 2 | 10 | 80 | 73,91 |
| 18.11.2008 | 2 | 10 | 80 | 68,45 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Simplification of lending conditions | 6,355 | 1,216 | -5,139 | Score | Maximize | Operational Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6,355 |
| 07.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8,02 |
| 14.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 1,729 |
| 21.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9,892 |
| 28.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4,501 |
| 04.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 3,349 |
| 11.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9,469 |
| 18.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 1,216 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||||
| Workforce Management Perspective | 37,52 % | 78,5 % | + 40,98% | Scorecard for Performance Management During Financial Crisis |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 30.09.2008 | 37,52 | 2 |
| 07.10.2008 | 45,85 | 2 |
| 14.10.2008 | 67,39 | 2 |
| 21.10.2008 | 29,1 | 2 |
| 28.10.2008 | 59,8 | 2 |
| 04.11.2008 | 52,37 | 2 |
| 11.11.2008 | 43,85 | 2 |
| 18.11.2008 | 78,5 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % decrease in Staff turnover rate | 16,88 | 39,56 | + 22,68 | % | Maximize | Workforce Management Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 3 | 0 | 40 | 16,88 |
| 07.10.2008 | 3 | 0 | 40 | 3,96 |
| 14.10.2008 | 3 | 0 | 40 | 39,48 |
| 21.10.2008 | 3 | 0 | 40 | 3,72 |
| 28.10.2008 | 3 | 0 | 40 | 34,28 |
| 04.11.2008 | 3 | 0 | 40 | 24,88 |
| 11.11.2008 | 3 | 0 | 40 | 12,36 |
| 18.11.2008 | 3 | 0 | 40 | 39,56 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Training Uptake | 6,13 | 3,682 | -2,448 | Score | Maximize | Workforce Management Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6,13 |
| 07.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4,303 |
| 14.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 1,261 |
| 21.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 1,234 |
| 28.10.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 3,259 |
| 04.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8,596 |
| 11.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7,795 |
| 18.11.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 3,682 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| % decrease in Sickness/Absence Level | 52,16 | 93,92 | + 41,76 | % | Maximize | Workforce Management Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 30.09.2008 | 2 | 20 | 100 | 52,16 |
| 07.10.2008 | 2 | 20 | 100 | 57,92 |
| 14.10.2008 | 2 | 20 | 100 | 92,16 |
| 21.10.2008 | 2 | 20 | 100 | 30 |
| 28.10.2008 | 2 | 20 | 100 | 68,64 |
| 04.11.2008 | 2 | 20 | 100 | 90 |
| 11.11.2008 | 2 | 20 | 100 | 82,16 |
| 18.11.2008 | 2 | 20 | 100 | 93,92 |
Copyright © 2000-2010 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.