Forestry Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 06.12.2009 to 24.01.2010

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Contains

Forestry Scorecard

37,17 %

43,81 %

+ 6,64 %

Financial Perspective	(63%, 16,57%)
Internal Operations Perspective	(49,8%, 9,24%)
Compliance Perspective	(29,2%, -3,2%)
Enviroment Perspective	(31%, 3,89%)

Graph for Forestry Scorecard

Data for Forestry Scorecard

Dates	Value
06.12.2009	37,17
13.12.2009	50,57
20.12.2009	47,67
27.12.2009	48,53
03.01.2010	41,01
10.01.2010	46,74
17.01.2010	58,98
24.01.2010	43,81

Financial Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Financial Perspective

46,41 %

62,98 %

+ 16,57%

Forestry Scorecard

Indicators

Percentage Increase in Annual Revenues

Ratio of Budget allocated for introducing new technologies

Percentage Increase in Profits

Ratio of Budget allocated for conservation tasks *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs forms the basis of calculating the financial aspects of company engaged in the forestry industry

Graph for Financial Perspective

Data for Financial Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
06.12.2009	46,41	3
13.12.2009	51,83	3
20.12.2009	47,6	3
27.12.2009	44,64	3
03.01.2010	63,04	3
10.01.2010	64,29	3
17.01.2010	58,38	3
24.01.2010	62,98	3

Percentage Increase in Annual Revenues

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Percentage Increase in Annual Revenues	62,2	62,9	+ 0,7	%	Maximize	Financial Perspective

Description The indicator looks at the increase in revenue in a given financial year over its previous year

Graph for Percentage Increase in Annual Revenues

Data for Percentage Increase in Annual Revenues

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	2	0	100	62,2
13.12.2009	2	0	100	59,4
20.12.2009	2	0	100	3
27.12.2009	2	0	100	1,9
03.01.2010	2	0	100	98,5
10.01.2010	2	0	100	96
17.01.2010	2	0	100	0,7
24.01.2010	2	0	100	62,9

Ratio of Budget allocated for introducing new technologies

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Ratio of Budget allocated for introducing new technologies	0,3372	0,1372	-0,2	#	Maximize	Financial Perspective

Description The indicator is designed to calculate the ratio of budget allocated for introducing new technologies

Graph for Ratio of Budget allocated for introducing new technologies

Data for Ratio of Budget allocated for introducing new technologies

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	2	0,1	0,5	0,3372
13.12.2009	2	0,1	0,5	0,2864
20.12.2009	2	0,1	0,5	0,2144
27.12.2009	2	0,1	0,5	0,4368
03.01.2010	2	0,1	0,5	0,1292
10.01.2010	2	0,1	0,5	0,3316
17.01.2010	2	0,1	0,5	0,342
24.01.2010	2	0,1	0,5	0,1372

Percentage Increase in Profits

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Percentage Increase in Profits	8,4	93,1	+ 84,7	%	Maximize	Financial Perspective

Description The indicator looks at the increase in profits in a given financial year over its previous year

Graph for Percentage Increase in Profits

Data for Percentage Increase in Profits

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	3	0	100	8,4
13.12.2009	3	0	100	74,4
20.12.2009	3	0	100	66,4
27.12.2009	3	0	100	4,1
03.01.2010	3	0	100	44,2
10.01.2010	3	0	100	43,9
17.01.2010	3	0	100	61,1
24.01.2010	3	0	100	93,1

Internal Operations Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Internal Operations Perspective

40,54 %

49,78 %

+ 9,24%

Forestry Scorecard

Indicators

Predicted timber yield versus actual timber yield

Achieved thinning versus prescribed

Time utilized to regenerate harvested areas

Area of forest cut over annually in the operational area *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs forms the basis of calculating the efficiency of the internal operations of the company engaged in the forestry industry

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Data for Internal Operations Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
06.12.2009	40,54	2
13.12.2009	54,51	2
20.12.2009	53,26	2
27.12.2009	28,74	2
03.01.2010	26,84	2
10.01.2010	53,2	2
17.01.2010	30,43	2
24.01.2010	49,78	2

Predicted timber yield versus actual timber yield

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Predicted timber yield versus actual timber yield	0,436	0,613	+ 0,177	#	Maximize	Internal Operations Perspective

Description This perspective aims to calculate the volume of timber that is removed in harvesting against the volume that had been predicted or planned for removal.

Graph for Predicted timber yield versus actual timber yield

Data for Predicted timber yield versus actual timber yield

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	2	0,25	1	0,436
13.12.2009	2	0,25	1	0,95125
20.12.2009	2	0,25	1	0,547
27.12.2009	2	0,25	1	0,433
03.01.2010	2	0,25	1	0,6295
10.01.2010	2	0,25	1	0,76975
17.01.2010	2	0,25	1	0,2905
24.01.2010	2	0,25	1	0,613

Achieved thinning versus prescribed

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Achieved thinning versus prescribed	0,64225	0,6235	-0,0187	%	Maximize	Internal Operations Perspective

Description The indicator calculates the ratio achieved thinning against the prescribed value in silviculture schedules

Graph for Achieved thinning versus prescribed

Data for Achieved thinning versus prescribed

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	3	0,25	1	0,64225
13.12.2009	3	0,25	1	0,37225
20.12.2009	3	0,25	1	0,8965
27.12.2009	3	0,25	1	0,63925
03.01.2010	3	0,25	1	0,346
10.01.2010	3	0,25	1	0,69775
17.01.2010	3	0,25	1	0,5455
24.01.2010	3	0,25	1	0,6235

Time utilized to regenerate harvested areas

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Time utilized to regenerate harvested areas	3,244	3,684	+ 0,44	Score	Maximize	Internal Operations Perspective

Description It calculates the time taken(calculated in months) between completion of native forest harvesting of a coupe for regeneration and the completion of post-harvest regeneration treatment.

Graph for Time utilized to regenerate harvested areas

Data for Time utilized to regenerate harvested areas

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	2	1	12	3,244
13.12.2009	2	1	12	10,251
20.12.2009	2	1	12	9,371
27.12.2009	2	1	12	2,771
03.01.2010	2	1	12	2,474
10.01.2010	2	1	12	11,912
17.01.2010	2	1	12	2,144
24.01.2010	2	1	12	3,684

Compliance Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Compliance Perspective

32,39 %

29,19 %

-3,2%

Forestry Scorecard

Indicators

Total percentage of excess removal of firewood compared to the authorised removal

Level of soil damage resulting from timber harvesting

Percentage of operational activities achieving the specified compliance parameters

Number of training sessions held to make staff aware of compliance requirements *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs forms the basis of calculating the extent to which the company has been able to meet the regulations specified

Graph for Compliance Perspective

Data for Compliance Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
06.12.2009	32,39	3
13.12.2009	43,17	3
20.12.2009	50,45	3
27.12.2009	61,9	3
03.01.2010	28,13	3
10.01.2010	26,26	3
17.01.2010	70,67	3
24.01.2010	29,19	3

Total percentage of excess removal of firewood compared to the authorised removal

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Total percentage of excess removal of firewood compared to the authorised removal	74,1	10	-64,1	%	Minimize	Compliance Perspective

Description The indicator calculates the percentage of total excess removals of firewood compared to the authorised removal through contract and license.

Graph for Total percentage of excess removal of firewood compared to the authorised removal

Data for Total percentage of excess removal of firewood compared to the authorised removal

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	2	0	100	74,1
13.12.2009	2	0	100	65,5
20.12.2009	2	0	100	89,7
27.12.2009	2	0	100	33,6
03.01.2010	2	0	100	34,5
10.01.2010	2	0	100	92,2
17.01.2010	2	0	100	11,7
24.01.2010	2	0	100	10

Level of soil damage resulting from timber harvesting

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Level of soil damage resulting from timber harvesting	6,949	9,082	+ 2,133	Score	Minimize	Compliance Perspective

Description This indicator determines the scale of soil damage from timber harvesting calculated on scale of 1 to 10.

Graph for Level of soil damage resulting from timber harvesting

Data for Level of soil damage resulting from timber harvesting

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	3	1	10	6,949
13.12.2009	3	1	10	9,199
20.12.2009	3	1	10	8,011
27.12.2009	3	1	10	3,871
03.01.2010	3	1	10	8,83
10.01.2010	3	1	10	4,807
17.01.2010	3	1	10	1,927
24.01.2010	3	1	10	9,082

Percentage of operational activities achieving the specified compliance parameters

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Percentage of operational activities achieving the specified compliance parameters	64,7	53,2	-11,5	%	Maximize	Compliance Perspective

Description This critical compliance indicator determines the percentage of operational activities achieving the specified compliance parameters

Graph for Percentage of operational activities achieving the specified compliance parameters

Data for Percentage of operational activities achieving the specified compliance parameters

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	4	50	100	64,7
13.12.2009	4	50	100	88,9
20.12.2009	4	50	100	98,95
27.12.2009	4	50	100	75,75
03.01.2010	4	50	100	58,1
10.01.2010	4	50	100	53,8
17.01.2010	4	50	100	73,7
24.01.2010	4	50	100	53,2

Enviroment Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Enviroment Perspective

27,12 %

31,01 %

+ 3,89%

Forestry Scorecard

Indicators

Deforestation rate

Percentage of forest areas under protected status

Percentage of average man-hours per person allocated to conservation tasks

Percentage of water bodies with significant variance of biodiversity *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs forms the basis of tracking the enviromental factors in the area of the operation of the company

Graph for Enviroment Perspective

Data for Enviroment Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
06.12.2009	27,12	2
13.12.2009	55,86	2
20.12.2009	38	2
27.12.2009	54,12	2
03.01.2010	41,46	2
10.01.2010	44,66	2
17.01.2010	70,91	2
24.01.2010	31,01	2

Deforestation rate

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Deforestation rate	87,5	45,8	-41,7	%	Minimize	Enviroment Perspective

Description This calculates the average rate at which forest cover is being lost in the areas of operation of the company

Graph for Deforestation rate

Data for Deforestation rate

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	3	0	100	87,5
13.12.2009	3	0	100	50,6
20.12.2009	3	0	100	66,3
27.12.2009	3	0	100	82,9
03.01.2010	3	0	100	54,4
10.01.2010	3	0	100	73,7
17.01.2010	3	0	100	1,7
24.01.2010	3	0	100	45,8

Percentage of forest areas under protected status

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Percentage of forest areas under protected status	28,4	94,9	+ 66,5	%	Minimize	Enviroment Perspective

Description The indicator calculates the % of forest areas under protected status in the area of operation of the company

Graph for Percentage of forest areas under protected status

Data for Percentage of forest areas under protected status

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	2	0	100	28,4
13.12.2009	2	0	100	98,2
20.12.2009	2	0	100	76,7
27.12.2009	2	0	100	76,2
03.01.2010	2	0	100	28,2
10.01.2010	2	0	100	85,3
17.01.2010	2	0	100	8,6
24.01.2010	2	0	100	94,9

Percentage of average man-hours per person allocated to conservation tasks

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Percentage of average man-hours per person allocated to conservation tasks	1,3	9,9	+ 8,6	%	Maximize	Enviroment Perspective

Description The indicator calculates the percentage of average man-hours per person allocated to conservation tasks in the areas under the operation of the company.

Graph for Percentage of average man-hours per person allocated to conservation tasks

Data for Percentage of average man-hours per person allocated to conservation tasks

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
06.12.2009	3	0	100	1,3
13.12.2009	3	0	100	71,8
20.12.2009	3	0	100	51,9
27.12.2009	3	0	100	98,7
03.01.2010	3	0	100	32,8
10.01.2010	3	0	100	56,9
17.01.2010	3	0	100	48,8
24.01.2010	3	0	100	9,9

Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with BSC Designer PRO at 29.12.2009 11:25:04