Functional Software Testing Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 21.11.2008 to 09.01.2009

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Contains
	Functional Software Testing Scorecard	51,85 %	51,41 %	-0,44 %	Quality Assurance and Resource Allocation Perspective (67,9%, -1,79%) Testing and Performance Perspective (61,9%, 21,94%) Testing Methods Perspective (19,8%, -32,34%) Testing skills and Learning Perspective (42,5%, -0,07%)

Graph for Functional Software Testing Scorecard

Data for Functional Software Testing Scorecard

Quality Assurance and Resource Allocation Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Quality Assurance and Resource Allocation Perspective	69,74 %	67,95 %	-1,79%	Functional Software Testing Scorecard	Indicators Probability of quality and functional errors Number of Quality Assurance Techniques used % of automated testing processes % resources properly allocated *

Graph for Quality Assurance and Resource Allocation Perspective

Data for Quality Assurance and Resource Allocation Perspective

Probability of quality and functional errors

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Probability of quality and functional errors	22,5	23,7	+ 1,2	%	Maximize	Quality Assurance and Resource Allocation Perspective

Graph for Probability of quality and functional errors

Data for Probability of quality and functional errors

Number of Quality Assurance Techniques used

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Quality Assurance Techniques used	10,804	10,329	-0,475	#	Maximize	Quality Assurance and Resource Allocation Perspective

Graph for Number of Quality Assurance Techniques used

Data for Number of Quality Assurance Techniques used

% of automated testing processes

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% of automated testing processes	83,4	83,65	+ 0,25	%	Maximize	Quality Assurance and Resource Allocation Perspective

Graph for % of automated testing processes

Data for % of automated testing processes

Testing and Performance Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Testing and Performance Perspective	39,94 %	61,88 %	+ 21,94%	Functional Software Testing Scorecard	Indicators Test Coverage % Reduction in Turn Around Time Number of Reworks Number of Tests per unit size *

Graph for Testing and Performance Perspective

Data for Testing and Performance Perspective

Test Coverage

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Test Coverage	88,72	76,9	-11,82	%	Maximize	Testing and Performance Perspective

Graph for Test Coverage

Data for Test Coverage

% Reduction in Turn Around Time

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% Reduction in Turn Around Time	23,32	47,98	+ 24,66	%	Maximize	Testing and Performance Perspective

Graph for % Reduction in Turn Around Time

Data for % Reduction in Turn Around Time

Number of Reworks

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Reworks	4,125	3,96	-0,165	#	Minimize	Testing and Performance Perspective

Graph for Number of Reworks

Data for Number of Reworks

Testing Methods Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Testing Methods Perspective	52,15 %	19,81 %	-32,34%	Functional Software Testing Scorecard	Indicators Number of Black Box Testing techniques used Number of White Box testing methods used Number of Grey Box testing methods used Number of testing procedures initiated with complete conceptualization *

Graph for Testing Methods Perspective

Data for Testing Methods Perspective

Number of Black Box Testing techniques used

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Black Box Testing techniques used	8,398	1,567	-6,831	#	Maximize	Testing Methods Perspective

Graph for Number of Black Box Testing techniques used

Data for Number of Black Box Testing techniques used

Number of White Box testing methods used

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of White Box testing methods used	2,368	2,112	-0,256	#	Maximize	Testing Methods Perspective

Graph for Number of White Box testing methods used

Data for Number of White Box testing methods used

Number of Grey Box testing methods used

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Grey Box testing methods used	2,588	1,18	-1,408	#	Maximize	Testing Methods Perspective

Graph for Number of Grey Box testing methods used

Data for Number of Grey Box testing methods used

Testing skills and Learning Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Testing skills and Learning Perspective	42,58 %	42,51 %	-0,07%	Functional Software Testing Scorecard	Indicators Number of training sessions Communication Level % testers equipped with necessary testing skills Number of time constrained testing projects completed successfully *

Graph for Testing skills and Learning Perspective

Data for Testing skills and Learning Perspective

Number of training sessions

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of training sessions	3,004	2,78	-0,224	#	Maximize	Testing skills and Learning Perspective

Graph for Number of training sessions

Data for Number of training sessions

Communication Level

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Communication Level	3,205	8,479	+ 5,274	Score	Maximize	Testing skills and Learning Perspective

Graph for Communication Level

Data for Communication Level

% testers equipped with necessary testing skills

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	% testers equipped with necessary testing skills	83,17	70,12	-13,05	%	Maximize	Testing skills and Learning Perspective

Graph for % testers equipped with necessary testing skills

Data for % testers equipped with necessary testing skills

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.