This is a Global Warming Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Global Warming scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Global Warming Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 20.02.2009 to 10.04.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Global Warming Scorecard  45,38 % 45,22 % -0,16 %
R&D (Research and Development) Perspective(45,5%, 8,59%Up)
Education and Outreach Perspective(47,5%, 1,15%Up)
Ecological Solutions Assessment(39,5%, -10,82%Down)
Performance Evaluation Perspective(47,2%, -4,55%Down)

Graph for Global Warming Scorecard

Graph for Global Warming Scorecard

Data for Global Warming Scorecard

DatesValue
20.02.200945,38
27.02.200956,04
06.03.200935
13.03.200948,61
20.03.200955,68
27.03.200937,84
03.04.200944,06
10.04.200945,22


R&D (Research and Development) Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root R&D (Research and Development) Perspective  36,86 % 45,45 % + 8,59% Global Warming Scorecard
Indicators
% Rise in R&D Share
Average Research Duration
Focus Scaling
Number of Research Projects Underway *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of parameters is to have a peep into the way the R&D activities are proceeding in the organization.

Graph for R&D (Research and Development) Perspective

Graph for R&D (Research and Development) Perspective

Data for R&D (Research and Development) Perspective

DatesValueWeight
20.02.200936,863
27.02.200977,493
06.03.200933,643
13.03.200944,073
20.03.2009523
27.03.200922,833
03.04.200929,393
10.04.200945,453


% Rise in R&D Share

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % Rise in R&D Share  7,175 14,345 + 7,17 % Maximize R&D (Research and Development) Perspective
Description This is an important pointer to know the volume of funds that are going into R&D. The value can be had on yearly basis.

Graph for % Rise in R&D Share

Graph for % Rise in R&D Share

Data for % Rise in R&D Share

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.200935207,175
27.02.2009352019,235
06.03.2009352010,85
13.03.2009352012,245
20.03.2009352012,455
27.03.200935206,05
03.04.2009352013,07
10.04.2009352014,345


Average Research Duration

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Average Research Duration  14,285 12,44 -1,845 yrs Maximize R&D (Research and Development) Perspective
Description This indicator is to have the time period for which the research was carried out. This gives an estimate about the time that was devoted by the organization in studying the factors that led to 'unnatural heat generation on the planet'. It is a significant reflector of the understanding that was developed by the organization in gaining a good grasp on the subject.

Graph for Average Research Duration

Graph for Average Research Duration

Data for Average Research Duration

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.2009352014,285
27.02.2009352019,13
06.03.200935205,54
13.03.2009352018,35
20.03.200935208,255
27.03.200935207,835
03.04.200935207,895
10.04.2009352012,44


Focus Scaling

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Focus Scaling  4,978 1,135 -3,843 Score Maximize R&D (Research and Development) Perspective
Description A general idea about the how focused the R&D activities are will be helpful in guessing the success of the attempts. Scaling method can be used for this.

Graph for Focus Scaling

Graph for Focus Scaling

Data for Focus Scaling

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.200921104,978
27.02.200921107,552
06.03.200921102,665
13.03.200921101,351
20.03.200921106,544
27.03.200921106,517
03.04.200921102,98
10.04.200921101,135


Education and Outreach Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Education and Outreach Perspective  46,38 % 47,53 % + 1,15% Global Warming Scorecard
Indicators
Number of Journals Published
Number of Grants or Fellowships
Media Coverage
Number of Educational Institutions Roped-in *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is for evaluating the organizational attempts of being in the 'educational circle'.

Graph for Education and Outreach Perspective

Graph for Education and Outreach Perspective

Data for Education and Outreach Perspective

DatesValueWeight
20.02.200946,383
27.02.200957,973
06.03.200932,023
13.03.200947,163
20.03.200958,963
27.03.200935,93
03.04.200960,383
10.04.200947,533


Number of Journals Published

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Journals Published   15,394 8,506 -6,888 # Maximize Education and Outreach Perspective
Description This KPI is to know the number of journals that were circulated to spread awareness among the masses regarding the ill-effects of global warming and how they can reduce the environmental damage. (over a period of 1 year)

Graph for Number of Journals Published

Graph for Number of Journals Published

Data for Number of Journals Published

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.2009362015,394
27.02.2009362018,194
06.03.2009362013,672
13.03.2009362012,216
20.03.2009362010,018
27.03.2009362015,632
03.04.2009362015,562
10.04.200936208,506


Number of Grants or Fellowships

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Grants or Fellowships  26,55 23,55 -3 # Maximize Education and Outreach Perspective
Description This KPI is equal to the number of grants or fellowships that were provided by the organization for helping in R&D activities.

Graph for Number of Grants or Fellowships

Graph for Number of Grants or Fellowships

Data for Number of Grants or Fellowships

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.20092106026,55
27.02.20092106012
06.03.20092106037,2
13.03.20092106019,1
20.03.20092106051,8
27.03.20092106014,25
03.04.20092106041,55
10.04.20092106023,55


Media Coverage

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Media Coverage  3,403 7,426 + 4,023 Score Maximize Education and Outreach Perspective
Description This indicator captures the degree to which the organization managed to be in the ‘media eye’. It is important to know this as media does the job of spreading the word in efficient and complete manner. The value can be had using scale numbered from 1-10.

Graph for Media Coverage

Graph for Media Coverage

Data for Media Coverage

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.200931103,403
27.02.200931107,48
06.03.200931101,486
13.03.200931108,83
20.03.200931108,677
27.03.200931104,906
03.04.200931107,633
10.04.200931107,426


Ecological Solutions Assessment

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Ecological Solutions Assessment  50,3 % 39,48 % -10,82% Global Warming Scorecard
Indicators
Average Success Anticipation
Side-Effect Index
Predictability Degree
Ineffectiveness Analysis *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description The indicators brought together under this category will go into judging a given technique in the light of factors that matter.

Graph for Ecological Solutions Assessment

Graph for Ecological Solutions Assessment

Data for Ecological Solutions Assessment

DatesValueWeight
20.02.200950,32
27.02.200940,012
06.03.200929,562
13.03.200952,542
20.03.200957,132
27.03.200938,842
03.04.200961,042
10.04.200939,482


Average Success Anticipation

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Average Success Anticipation  4,915 2,287 -2,628 Score Maximize Ecological Solutions Assessment
Description The value of this indicator is to know the average chances of projects being successful in their aims. It is an important reflector of how well the organization is proceeding with the job entitled to it. A scale numbered from 1-10 can be used for this.

Graph for Average Success Anticipation

Graph for Average Success Anticipation

Data for Average Success Anticipation

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.200921104,915
27.02.200921105,239
06.03.200921105,86
13.03.200921108,227
20.03.200921103,016
27.03.200921108,47
03.04.200921104,411
10.04.200921102,287


Side-Effect Index

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Side-Effect Index  4,177 2,332 -1,845 Score Maximize Ecological Solutions Assessment
Description This parameter is to have a guess at the degree of 'side-effect' that might arise out of the technique. For instance, using 'reflective balloons' can prove to be immensely dangerous for the wild-life of the planet. Again a scale labeled from 1-10 is helpful in this case.

Graph for Side-Effect Index

Graph for Side-Effect Index

Data for Side-Effect Index

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.200931104,177
27.02.200931101,144
06.03.200931101,909
13.03.200931101,405
20.03.200931109,451
27.03.200931105,734
03.04.200931104,96
10.04.200931102,332


Predictability Degree

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Predictability Degree  8,533 8,65 + 0,117 Score Maximize Ecological Solutions Assessment
Description Every approach has its own set of problems pertaining to 'control' and 'prediction' that the outcomes will be the ones that are ought to be there. For instance, 'climate modelling' is not an exact science even when it is used in the most 'predictable' situations.

Graph for Predictability Degree

Graph for Predictability Degree

Data for Predictability Degree

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.200931108,533
27.02.200931106,481
06.03.200931103,655
13.03.200931109,811
20.03.200931106,112
27.03.200931102,134
03.04.200931109,766
10.04.200931108,65


Performance Evaluation Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Performance Evaluation Perspective  51,72 % 47,17 % -4,55% Global Warming Scorecard
Indicators
Cost: Benefit Ratio
Number of Projects Handled Successfully
Network Expansion Ratio
Involvement Rise *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of metrics is for calculating the extent to which the efforts were fruitful.

Graph for Performance Evaluation Perspective

Graph for Performance Evaluation Perspective

Data for Performance Evaluation Perspective

DatesValueWeight
20.02.200951,722
27.02.200937,012
06.03.200946,932
13.03.200953,662
20.03.200954,812
27.03.200962,262
03.04.200924,612
10.04.200947,172


Cost: Benefit Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Cost: Benefit Ratio  0,1124 0,0056 -0,107 # Minimize Performance Evaluation Perspective
Description This is to compare the costs that were incurred in the task of 'making' and 'implementation' of the technique with the benefits that were brought by the technique.

Graph for Cost: Benefit Ratio

Graph for Cost: Benefit Ratio

Data for Cost: Benefit Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.2009200,40,1124
27.02.2009200,40,1392
06.03.2009200,40,0972
13.03.2009200,40,1288
20.03.2009200,40,3968
27.03.2009200,40,1144
03.04.2009200,40,18
10.04.2009200,40,0056


Number of Projects Handled Successfully

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Projects Handled Successfully  3,329 3,028 -0,301 # Maximize Performance Evaluation Perspective
Description In order to have the degree to which the struggle in the direction of lowering down the global warming down, one needs to know the number of assignments that were tackled successfully. It also shows, in usual sense, the potential of the team members at the organization.

Graph for Number of Projects Handled Successfully

Graph for Number of Projects Handled Successfully

Data for Number of Projects Handled Successfully

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.200933103,329
27.02.200933103,462
06.03.200933107,011
13.03.200933104,274
20.03.200933109,398
27.03.200933108,852
03.04.200933103,84
10.04.200933103,028


Network Expansion Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Network Expansion Ratio  0,5272 0,6416 + 0,114 # Maximize Performance Evaluation Perspective
Description This KPI is equal to the spread that occurs in the network of which the organization is a part. Such an act is needed to have an idea about the efforts being made to get more and more people together in the aim of decreasing global warming. The value can be had on yearly basis.

Graph for Network Expansion Ratio

Graph for Network Expansion Ratio

Data for Network Expansion Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
20.02.200920,210,5272
27.02.200920,210,2528
06.03.200920,210,3088
13.03.200920,210,9064
20.03.200920,210,388
27.03.200920,210,5376
03.04.200920,210,5848
10.04.200920,210,6416
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 15.03.2009 16:34:18

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.