This is a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Greenhouse Gas Reduction scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 13.12.2008 to 31.01.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard  48,62 % 54,62 % + 6 %
Research and Technological Development Perspective(51,2%, -5,61%Down)
Efforts Perspective(70,6%, 33,96%Up)
Internal Processes Perspective(67%, -4,9%Down)
Emission Control Perspective(23,3%, -7,64%Down)

Graph for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

Graph for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

Data for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard

DatesValue
13.12.200848,62
20.12.200855,76
27.12.200835,31
03.01.200946,63
10.01.200952,41
17.01.200933,35
24.01.200954,83
31.01.200954,62


Research and Technological Development Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Research and Technological Development Perspective  56,84 % 51,23 % -5,61% Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
% increase in GHG-reduction innovative solutions and equipments
% R&D Expenditures on renewable resources and energy conservation
% increase in Financial Support from Government and other associates
Research Amount *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This perspective talks about the research and technolgical development expenditure and activities regarding Green House Gases in an ecological organization.

Graph for Research and Technological Development Perspective

Graph for Research and Technological Development Perspective

Data for Research and Technological Development Perspective

DatesValueWeight
13.12.200856,843
20.12.200871,153
27.12.200821,593
03.01.200951,383
10.01.200951,393
17.01.200944,243
24.01.200955,273
31.01.200951,233


% increase in GHG-reduction innovative solutions and equipments

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % increase in GHG-reduction innovative solutions and equipments  28,19 11,12 -17,07 % Maximize Research and Technological Development Perspective

Graph for % increase in GHG-reduction innovative solutions and equipments

Graph for % increase in GHG-reduction innovative solutions and equipments

Data for % increase in GHG-reduction innovative solutions and equipments

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.2008253528,19
20.12.2008253517,69
27.12.200825356,65
03.01.2009253523,27
10.01.200925356,5
17.01.2009253516,76
24.01.2009253529,9
31.01.2009253511,12


% R&D Expenditures on renewable resources and energy conservation

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % R&D Expenditures on renewable resources and energy conservation  10,18 16,72 + 6,54 % Maximize Research and Technological Development Perspective
Description This KPI talks about the R&D

Graph for % R&D Expenditures on renewable resources and energy conservation

Graph for % R&D Expenditures on renewable resources and energy conservation

Data for % R&D Expenditures on renewable resources and energy conservation

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.20083104010,18
20.12.20083104037,06
27.12.20083104015,88
03.01.20093104036,7
10.01.20093104027,94
17.01.20093104012,1
24.01.20093104013,78
31.01.20093104016,72


% increase in Financial Support from Government and other associates

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % increase in Financial Support from Government and other associates  36,1 35,075 -1,025 % Maximize Research and Technological Development Perspective

Graph for % increase in Financial Support from Government and other associates

Graph for % increase in Financial Support from Government and other associates

Data for % increase in Financial Support from Government and other associates

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.20083154036,1
20.12.20083154037,875
27.12.20083154017,325
03.01.20093154020,35
10.01.20093154033,075
17.01.20093154034,55
24.01.20093154037,075
31.01.20093154035,075


Efforts Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Efforts Perspective  36,65 % 70,61 % + 33,96% Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
Social Responsibility Rating
'Average Efficiency level' of solutions
Number of Partners
Number of projects handled *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is to evaluate the attempts being taken by organizations.

Graph for Efforts Perspective

Graph for Efforts Perspective

Data for Efforts Perspective

DatesValueWeight
13.12.200836,653
20.12.200861,483
27.12.200847,033
03.01.200960,733
10.01.200939,73
17.01.200936,113
24.01.200957,133
31.01.200970,613


Social Responsibility Rating

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Social Responsibility Rating  3,56 2,084 -1,476 Score Maximize Efforts Perspective
Description The ecological organizations are included in various indices depending upon their contribution to social, environment and economic performance. Some of these are- DJSI (Dow Jones Sustainability Index), CDP (Carbon Disclosure project) and Goldman Sachs global energy environmental, social and governance index. The value of this KPI can be had by knowing the number of indices of which the organization is a part.

Graph for Social Responsibility Rating

Graph for Social Responsibility Rating

Data for Social Responsibility Rating

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.20082153,56
20.12.20082152,172
27.12.20082151,532
03.01.20092154,728
10.01.20092153,8
17.01.20092153,568
24.01.20092152,088
31.01.20092152,084


'Average Efficiency level' of solutions

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root 'Average Efficiency level' of solutions  35,75 77,2 + 41,45 % Maximize Efforts Perspective
Description This is to have a guess of how 'practical' and 'realistic' the way outs provided by the organization are.

Graph for 'Average Efficiency level' of solutions

Graph for 'Average Efficiency level' of solutions

Data for 'Average Efficiency level' of solutions

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.20083308035,75
20.12.20083308068,85
27.12.20083308055,3
03.01.20093308062,7
10.01.20093308035,4
17.01.20093308038,1
24.01.20093308065,55
31.01.20093308077,2


Number of Partners

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Partners  3,08 4,784 + 1,704 # Maximize Efforts Perspective
Description This is to assess the 'collaboration' the organization is trying for. For instance, to tackle the issue of deforestation, one can establish partnerships with landowners, land trusts etc.

Graph for Number of Partners

Graph for Number of Partners

Data for Number of Partners

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.200822103,08
20.12.200822106,344
27.12.200822107,208
03.01.200922108,936
10.01.200922103,376
17.01.200922104,264
24.01.200922104,784


Internal Processes Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Internal Processes Perspective  71,93 % 67,03 % -4,9% Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
Number of areas in which positive effects are experienced
% increase in use of 'agreed alternatives'
Average reduction achieved
Hurdles overcoming potential *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This KPI set is to know the way the operations of the organization proceed.

Graph for Internal Processes Perspective

Graph for Internal Processes Perspective

Data for Internal Processes Perspective

DatesValueWeight
13.12.200871,932
20.12.200860,822
27.12.200840,332
03.01.200935,572
10.01.200969,82
17.01.200917,282
24.01.200944,92
31.01.200967,032


Number of areas in which positive effects are experienced

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of areas in which positive effects are experienced  7,64 9,968 + 2,328 # Maximize Internal Processes Perspective
Description The value of this indicator can be had by considering that there are a number of issues involved in providing 'eco-friendly solutions'. The organization should try to have positive effects on maximum of these like 'water', 'Land', 'Air', 'Flora and fauna', 'Employment' and 'Human Health'.

Graph for Number of areas in which positive effects are experienced

Graph for Number of areas in which positive effects are experienced

Data for Number of areas in which positive effects are experienced

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.200822107,64
20.12.200822107,176
27.12.200822102,832
03.01.200922102,392
10.01.200922109,696
17.01.200922103,472
24.01.200922104,464
31.01.200922109,968


% increase in use of 'agreed alternatives'

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % increase in use of 'agreed alternatives'   96,56 94,72 -1,84 % Maximize Internal Processes Perspective
Description This reflects the growth of the organization in terms of 'pre-set objectives'.

Graph for % increase in use of 'agreed alternatives'

Graph for % increase in use of 'agreed alternatives'

Data for % increase in use of 'agreed alternatives'

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.200832010096,56
20.12.200832010062
27.12.200832010039,44
03.01.200932010088,48
10.01.200932010043,76
17.01.200932010027,28
24.01.200932010077,6
31.01.200932010094,72


Average reduction achieved

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Average reduction achieved  60,49 18,19 -42,3 % Maximize Internal Processes Perspective
Description This gives the extent to which the organization has succeeded in its aim of obtaining reduction in greenhouse gasses emission. The value can be had on yearly basis.

Graph for Average reduction achieved

Graph for Average reduction achieved

Data for Average reduction achieved

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.200831010060,49
20.12.200831010079,57
27.12.200831010088,84
03.01.200931010020,98
10.01.200931010097,03
17.01.200931010026,29
24.01.200931010021,61
31.01.200931010018,19


Emission Control Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Emission Control Perspective  30,94 % 23,3 % -7,64% Greenhouse Gas Reduction Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
Carbon dioxide Reduction
Drop in Methane volume
Hydrofluoro Carbons emission
Nitrous Oxides *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category of KPIs is to have the amount or decrease in emmision of gases attained.

Graph for Emission Control Perspective

Graph for Emission Control Perspective

Data for Emission Control Perspective

DatesValueWeight
13.12.200830,942
20.12.200819,032
27.12.200833,32
03.01.200929,412
10.01.200955,632
17.01.200928,952
24.01.200960,652
31.01.200923,32


Carbon dioxide Reduction

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Carbon dioxide Reduction  3,504 2,84 -0,664 million tonnes Maximize Emission Control Perspective
Description This KPI is to have the dip in emission of gas, on yearly basis.

Graph for Carbon dioxide Reduction

Graph for Carbon dioxide Reduction

Data for Carbon dioxide Reduction

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.200832103,504
20.12.200832105,68
27.12.200832103,664
03.01.200932102,272
10.01.200932106,72
17.01.200932107,24
24.01.200932106,064
31.01.200932102,84


Drop in Methane volume

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Drop in Methane volume  5,824 3,259 -2,565 % Maximize Emission Control Perspective
Description This is to have the dip in the volume of methane, on per year basis.

Graph for Drop in Methane volume

Graph for Drop in Methane volume

Data for Drop in Methane volume

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.200831105,824
20.12.200831101,405
27.12.200831103,502
03.01.200931107,435
10.01.200931106,751
17.01.200931102,008
24.01.200931108,083
31.01.200931103,259


Hydrofluoro Carbons emission

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Hydrofluoro Carbons emission  40,37 40,91 + 0,54 tonnes Minimize Emission Control Perspective
Description This indicator gives the amount of yet another harmful component i.e. HFCs, on yearly basis.

Graph for Hydrofluoro Carbons emission

Graph for Hydrofluoro Carbons emission

Data for Hydrofluoro Carbons emission

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
13.12.2008255040,37
20.12.2008255041,27
27.12.2008255011,345
03.01.2009255037,4
10.01.2009255013,19
17.01.2009255037,31
24.01.2009255041,045
31.01.2009255040,91
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 05.01.2009 21:32:39

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.