This is a HR Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for HR scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.

HR Balanced Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 05.04.2008 to 24.05.2008

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Contains

HR Balanced Scorecard

50,01 %

67,82 %

+ 17,81 %

Employee turnover	(36,5%, -27,89%)
Recruiting	(76,9%, 27,32%)
Retention	(83,4%, 51,88%)
Training and Development	(65,5%, 10,42%)

Graph for HR Balanced Scorecard

Data for HR Balanced Scorecard

Dates	Value
05.04.2008	50,01
12.04.2008	51,14
19.04.2008	56,19
26.04.2008	42,11
03.05.2008	56,68
10.05.2008	50,44
17.05.2008	40,42
24.05.2008	67,82

Employee turnover

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Employee turnover

64,36 %

36,47 %

-27,89%

HR Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

Cost per Hire

Turnover Cost

Turnover Rate

Time to Fill *

Length of Employment *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Employee turnover

Data for Employee turnover

Dates	Value	Weight
05.04.2008	64,36	2
12.04.2008	33,01	2
19.04.2008	45,21	2
26.04.2008	33,81	2
03.05.2008	69,6	2
10.05.2008	67,37	2
17.05.2008	34,49	2
24.05.2008	36,47	2

Cost per Hire

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Cost per Hire	69,7	67,6	-2,1	%	Maximize	Employee turnover

Description Calculation of advertising, agency fees, employee referrals, relocation, recruiter pay and benefits costs and the number of hires

Graph for Cost per Hire

Data for Cost per Hire

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	1	0	100	69,7
12.04.2008	1	0	100	15,4
19.04.2008	1	0	100	47,3
26.04.2008	1	0	100	26,8
03.05.2008	1	0	100	63,6
10.05.2008	1	0	100	76,3
17.05.2008	1	0	100	65,4
24.05.2008	1	0	100	67,6

Turnover Cost

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Turnover Cost	33,6	14,3	-19,3	%	Maximize	Employee turnover

Description Calculation of termination, new hire, vacancy and learning curve costs

Graph for Turnover Cost

Data for Turnover Cost

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	3	0	100	33,6
12.04.2008	3	0	100	25,3
19.04.2008	3	0	100	42,9
26.04.2008	3	0	100	15,4
03.05.2008	3	0	100	57
10.05.2008	3	0	100	83,8
17.05.2008	3	0	100	40,7
24.05.2008	3	0	100	14,3

Turnover Rate

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Turnover Rate	31,9	14,6	-17,3	%	Maximize	Employee turnover

Description Rate of the employees leaving an organization

Graph for Turnover Rate

Data for Turnover Rate

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	1	0	100	31,9
12.04.2008	1	0	100	5,3
19.04.2008	1	0	100	12,9
26.04.2008	1	0	100	50,2
03.05.2008	1	0	100	33,9
10.05.2008	1	0	100	75,8
17.05.2008	1	0	100	6,6
24.05.2008	1	0	100	14,6

Recruiting

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Recruiting

49,54 %

76,86 %

+ 27,32%

HR Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

Vacant Period

New Hires Performance Appraisal

Manager Satisfaction

Turnover Rates of New Hires *

Financial Impact of Bad Hire *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Recruiting

Data for Recruiting

Dates	Value	Weight
05.04.2008	49,54	4
12.04.2008	62,24	4
19.04.2008	78,6	4
26.04.2008	41,38	4
03.05.2008	44,22	4
10.05.2008	38,96	4
17.05.2008	48,59	4
24.05.2008	76,86	4

Vacant Period

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Vacant Period	59,1	55	-4,1	%	Maximize	Recruiting

Description Number of overall days the positions were vacant

Graph for Vacant Period

Data for Vacant Period

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	2	0	100	59,1
12.04.2008	2	0	100	62,9
19.04.2008	2	0	100	77,9
26.04.2008	2	0	100	5,5
03.05.2008	2	0	100	86,7
10.05.2008	2	0	100	39,5
17.05.2008	2	0	100	14,6
24.05.2008	2	0	100	55

New Hires Performance Appraisal

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	New Hires Performance Appraisal	55,5	99,2	+ 43,7	%	Maximize	Recruiting

Description Average performance appraisal of new hires, compared to previous period

Graph for New Hires Performance Appraisal

Data for New Hires Performance Appraisal

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	4	0	100	55,5
12.04.2008	4	0	100	48,9
19.04.2008	4	0	100	79,7
26.04.2008	4	0	100	33,4
03.05.2008	4	0	100	23,8
10.05.2008	4	0	100	30,6
17.05.2008	4	0	100	90,4
24.05.2008	4	0	100	99,2

Manager Satisfaction

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Manager Satisfaction	21,2	99,3	+ 78,1	%	Maximize	Recruiting

Description According to the survey of hiring managers, compared to previous period

Graph for Manager Satisfaction

Data for Manager Satisfaction

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	1	0	100	21,2
12.04.2008	1	0	100	96,8
19.04.2008	1	0	100	99,3
26.04.2008	1	0	100	48,9
03.05.2008	1	0	100	74,6
10.05.2008	1	0	100	78
17.05.2008	1	0	100	16,8
24.05.2008	1	0	100	99,3

Retention

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Retention

31,56 %

83,44 %

+ 51,88%

HR Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

Preventable Turnover

Diversity Turnover

Financial Impact of Employee Turnover

Graph for Retention

Data for Retention

Dates	Value	Weight
05.04.2008	31,56	2
12.04.2008	57,56	2
19.04.2008	27,84	2
26.04.2008	47,82	2
03.05.2008	74,36	2
10.05.2008	45,14	2
17.05.2008	16,56	2
24.05.2008	83,44	2

Preventable Turnover

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Preventable Turnover	38,1	86,1	+ 48	%	Maximize	Retention

Description This indicator considers the reasons the employee left the organizations and what measures may be taken to prevent it

Graph for Preventable Turnover

Data for Preventable Turnover

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	4	0	100	38,1
12.04.2008	4	0	100	59,8
19.04.2008	4	0	100	44,9
26.04.2008	4	0	100	17,8
03.05.2008	4	0	100	64,7
10.05.2008	4	0	100	67,5
17.05.2008	4	0	100	19,5
24.05.2008	4	0	100	86,1

Diversity Turnover

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Diversity Turnover	54,6	95,8	+ 41,2	%	Maximize	Retention

Description Turnover rate in professional, managerial, and technical positions

Graph for Diversity Turnover

Data for Diversity Turnover

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	2	0	100	54,6
12.04.2008	2	0	100	7,2
19.04.2008	2	0	100	15,8
26.04.2008	2	0	100	85,7
03.05.2008	2	0	100	81
10.05.2008	2	0	100	82,7
17.05.2008	2	0	100	14
24.05.2008	2	0	100	95,8

Financial Impact of Employee Turnover

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Financial Impact of Employee Turnover	13,5	74,6	+ 61,1	%	Maximize	Retention

Description Financial Impact of Employee Turnover

Graph for Financial Impact of Employee Turnover

Data for Financial Impact of Employee Turnover

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	4	0	100	13,5
12.04.2008	4	0	100	80,5
19.04.2008	4	0	100	16,8
26.04.2008	4	0	100	58,9
03.05.2008	4	0	100	80,7
10.05.2008	4	0	100	4
17.05.2008	4	0	100	14,9
24.05.2008	4	0	100	74,6

Training and Development

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Training and Development

55,04 %

65,46 %

+ 10,42%

HR Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

Learning and Growth Opportunities

On-the-job learning Contentment

Opportunities for New Hires

Graph for Training and Development

Data for Training and Development

Dates	Value	Weight
05.04.2008	55,04	2
12.04.2008	40,67	2
19.04.2008	50,7	2
26.04.2008	46,18	2
03.05.2008	51,01	2
10.05.2008	61,78	2
17.05.2008	53,88	2
24.05.2008	65,46	2

Learning and Growth Opportunities

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Learning and Growth Opportunities	85,7	19,8	-65,9	%	Maximize	Training and Development

Description Percentage of employees who are satisfied with the learning and growth opportunities in the organization

Graph for Learning and Growth Opportunities

Data for Learning and Growth Opportunities

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	4	0	100	85,7
12.04.2008	4	0	100	67,7
19.04.2008	4	0	100	53,4
26.04.2008	4	0	100	0,4
03.05.2008	4	0	100	52,9
10.05.2008	4	0	100	51,1
17.05.2008	4	0	100	91,5
24.05.2008	4	0	100	19,8

On-the-job learning Contentment

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	On-the-job learning Contentment	11,3	93,2	+ 81,9	%	Maximize	Training and Development

Description Percentage of employees who are satisfied with on-the-job learning, project assignments for growth and development, and job rotations

Graph for On-the-job learning Contentment

Data for On-the-job learning Contentment

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	3	0	100	11,3
12.04.2008	3	0	100	33,5
19.04.2008	3	0	100	73
26.04.2008	3	0	100	63,2
03.05.2008	3	0	100	43,9
10.05.2008	3	0	100	60
17.05.2008	3	0	100	49,8
24.05.2008	3	0	100	93,2

Opportunities for New Hires

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Opportunities for New Hires	57,9	98,6	+ 40,7	%	Maximize	Training and Development

Description Percentage of employees who report training opportunities among the top three reasons they accepted the job

Graph for Opportunities for New Hires

Data for Opportunities for New Hires

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
05.04.2008	3	0	100	57,9
12.04.2008	3	0	100	11,8
19.04.2008	3	0	100	24,8
26.04.2008	3	0	100	90,2
03.05.2008	3	0	100	55,6
10.05.2008	3	0	100	77,8
17.05.2008	3	0	100	7,8
24.05.2008	3	0	100	98,6

Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 28.04.2008 23:51:50