This is a HR Hire Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for HR Hire scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


HR Hire Balanced Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 05.04.2008 to 24.05.2008

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root HR Hire Balanced Scorecard 58,86 % 56,24 % -2,62 %
Quantity of Hire(40,1%, 1,42%Up)
Quality of Hire(55%, 4,79%Up)
Recruiting Staff Performance(67,4%, -8,43%Down)
Hiring Strategy/Program(65,1%, -7,41%Down)

Graph for HR Hire Balanced Scorecard

Graph for HR Hire Balanced Scorecard

Data for HR Hire Balanced Scorecard

DatesValue
05.04.200858,86
12.04.200856,33
19.04.200845,99
26.04.200860,56
03.05.200860,47
10.05.200855,56
17.05.200842,51
24.05.200856,24

Quantity of Hire

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Quantity of Hire 38,65 % 40,07 % + 1,42% HR Hire Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
Accession rate
Staffing yield
Internal hires
Referral hires *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Quantity of Hire

Graph for Quantity of Hire

Data for Quantity of Hire

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200838,653
12.04.200871,373
19.04.200834,333
26.04.200875,363
03.05.200864,733
10.05.200846,093
17.05.200837,613
24.05.200840,073

Accession rate

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Accession rate 2,544 2,136 -0,408 % Maximize Quantity of Hire
Description The number of workers hired during the month divided by the average workforce size during the month, multiplied by 100.

Graph for Accession rate

Graph for Accession rate

Data for Accession rate

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20082082,544
12.04.20082081,16
19.04.20082083,416
26.04.20082087,68
03.05.20082083
10.05.20082080,696
17.05.20082084,944
24.05.20082082,136

Staffing yield

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Staffing yield 33,28 18,32 -14,96 % Maximize Quantity of Hire
Description The number or percentage of positions filled vs. the number of vacant positions.

Graph for Staffing yield

Graph for Staffing yield

Data for Staffing yield

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008208033,28
12.04.2008208051,04
19.04.200820809,68
26.04.2008208048,72
03.05.2008208057,92
10.05.2008208037,84
17.05.2008208029,84
24.05.2008208018,32

Internal hires

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Internal hires 19,67 2,065 -17,6 % Maximize Quantity of Hire
Description The number or percentage of positions filled internally; internal hiring reduces the turnover rate.

Graph for Internal hires

Graph for Internal hires

Data for Internal hires

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008303519,67
12.04.2008303532,865
19.04.200830350,63
26.04.2008303523,065
03.05.2008303529,365
10.05.2008303520,125
17.05.2008303515,575
24.05.200830352,065

Quality of Hire

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Quality of Hire 50,17 % 54,96 % + 4,79% HR Hire Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
Organizational fit
Efficiency of new hires
New hires excellence
Retention rate *
Staffing efficiency ratio *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Quality of Hire

Graph for Quality of Hire

Data for Quality of Hire

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200850,172
12.04.200846,592
19.04.200853,432
26.04.200869,252
03.05.200839,022
10.05.200858,612
17.05.200852,42
24.05.200854,962

Organizational fit

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Organizational fit 41,1 55,2 + 14,1 % Maximize Quality of Hire
Description Extent to which new hires match the requirements of a job description and accord with the policy and strategy of the company.

Graph for Organizational fit

Graph for Organizational fit

Data for Organizational fit

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008207541,1
12.04.2008207566,15
19.04.2008207556,55
26.04.2008207526,475
03.05.2008207567,275
10.05.2008207526,475
17.05.2008207542,075
24.05.2008207555,2

Efficiency of new hires

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Efficiency of new hires 79,815 28,305 -51,51 % Maximize Quality of Hire
Description Based on the new hires’ performance reviews and manager overall satisfaction.

Graph for Efficiency of new hires

Graph for Efficiency of new hires

Data for Efficiency of new hires

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008108579,815
12.04.2008108510,71
19.04.2008108574,8
26.04.2008108569,785
03.05.2008108575,31
10.05.2008108578,455
17.05.2008108535,19
24.05.2008108528,305

New hires excellence

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root New hires excellence 16,48 13,2 -3,28 % Maximize Quality of Hire
Description Based on the number and level of competencies / skills, held by the new hires, including the amount of time and training needed for new hires to start working.

Graph for New hires excellence

Graph for New hires excellence

Data for New hires excellence

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008308016,48
12.04.200830802,64
19.04.200830803,6
26.04.2008308051,36
03.05.2008308021,92
10.05.2008308056,96
17.05.2008308062,4
24.05.2008308013,2

Recruiting Staff Performance

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Recruiting Staff Performance 75,8 % 67,37 % -8,43% HR Hire Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
Interview-screen ratio
Hire-Interview ratio
Start/offer ratio
Diversity of hires *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Recruiting Staff Performance

Graph for Recruiting Staff Performance

Data for Recruiting Staff Performance

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200875,83
12.04.200842,083
19.04.200847,043
26.04.200836,693
03.05.200863,983
10.05.200871,773
17.05.200844,493
24.05.200867,373

Interview-screen ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Interview-screen ratio 46,8 48,12 + 1,32 % Maximize Recruiting Staff Performance
Description Shows the ability of a recruiter to determine skill fit; the bigger the ratio the better.

Graph for Interview-screen ratio

Graph for Interview-screen ratio

Data for Interview-screen ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008306046,8
12.04.2008306057,3
19.04.200830607,5
26.04.2008306019,98
03.05.2008306054,78
10.05.2008306030,24
17.05.200830607,2
24.05.2008306048,12

Hire-Interview ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Hire-Interview ratio 62,72 15,05 -47,67 % Maximize Recruiting Staff Performance
Description The bigger the ratio the more substantial the cost savings of the company.

Graph for Hire-Interview ratio

Graph for Hire-Interview ratio

Data for Hire-Interview ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008107062,72
12.04.2008107031,29
19.04.2008107011,69
26.04.2008107039,9
03.05.2008107053,27
10.05.2008107052,85
17.05.2008107061,25
24.05.2008107015,05

Start/offer ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Start/offer ratio 20,975 15,075 -5,9 % Maximize Recruiting Staff Performance
Description The bigger ratio is the more substantial financial gain for the company.

Graph for Start/offer ratio

Graph for Start/offer ratio

Data for Start/offer ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008402520,975
12.04.200840250,725
19.04.2008402518,3
26.04.200840258,2
03.05.2008402514,8
10.05.2008402521,275
17.05.2008402519,625
24.05.2008402515,075

Hiring Strategy/Program

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Hiring Strategy/Program 72,47 % 65,06 % -7,41% HR Hire Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
Strategy/Program Efficacy
Sources/tools performance manager
Turnover rate of hiring managers
Continuity *
Selection excellence *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Hiring Strategy/Program

Graph for Hiring Strategy/Program

Data for Hiring Strategy/Program

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200872,472
12.04.200864,92
19.04.200854,472
26.04.200865,452
03.05.200870,282
10.05.200842,422
17.05.200836,992
24.05.200865,062

Strategy/Program Efficacy

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Strategy/Program Efficacy 60 23,34 -36,66 Score Maximize Hiring Strategy/Program
Description The number of resumes per a job posting.

Graph for Strategy/Program Efficacy

Graph for Strategy/Program Efficacy

Data for Strategy/Program Efficacy

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008106060
12.04.2008106048,72
19.04.200810609,18
26.04.200810600,48
03.05.2008106059,28
10.05.2008106029,76
17.05.2008106045,96
24.05.2008106023,34

Sources/tools performance manager

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Sources/tools performance manager 18,279 15,496 -2,783 % Minimize Hiring Strategy/Program
Description Tracking the most efficient hiring sources/tools; This is determined by the number of job applicants, new hires and the number of top performers per source/tool.

Graph for Sources/tools performance manager

Graph for Sources/tools performance manager

Data for Sources/tools performance manager

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20083123518,279
12.04.20083123529,848
19.04.20083123517,382
26.04.20083123513,311
03.05.20083123517,75
10.05.20083123531,159
17.05.20083123517,658
24.05.20083123515,496

Turnover rate of hiring managers

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Turnover rate of hiring managers 86,184 66,208 -19,98 % Minimize Hiring Strategy/Program
Description Low turnover rate of hiring managers results in time savings with respect to placing new hires.

Graph for Turnover rate of hiring managers

Graph for Turnover rate of hiring managers

Data for Turnover rate of hiring managers

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200821210086,184
12.04.200821210024,056
19.04.200821210026,96
26.04.200821210039,984
03.05.200821210017,632
10.05.200821210050,016
17.05.200821210090,848
24.05.200821210066,208
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 28.04.2008 23:52:06

Copyright © 2000-2008 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.