This is a HR Training Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for HR Training scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Training and Development Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 05.04.2008 to 24.05.2008

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Training and Development Scorecard 49,47 % 48,81 % -0,66 %
Training Dimensions(45,9%, -4,39%Down)
Training Efficacy(65%, 10,85%Up)
Training Execution(33,4%, -2,25%Down)
Strategic Excellence(44,2%, -10,76%Down)

Graph for Training and Development Scorecard

Graph for Training and Development Scorecard

Data for Training and Development Scorecard

DatesValue
05.04.200849,47
12.04.200829,07
19.04.200847,25
26.04.200835,78
03.05.200836,69
10.05.200838,19
17.05.200840,91
24.05.200848,81

Training Dimensions

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Training Dimensions 50,3 % 45,91 % -4,39% Training and Development Scorecard
Indicators
Time
Quantity
Meeting the needs
Diversity *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Training Dimensions

Graph for Training Dimensions

Data for Training Dimensions

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200850,33
12.04.200833,873
19.04.200830,753
26.04.200814,883
03.05.200814,933
10.05.200838,93
17.05.200821,443
24.05.200845,913

Time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Time 34,64 12,32 -22,32 Score Maximize Training Dimensions
Description the number of training hours per employee per year across the business = previous year's total training course time / the number of the employees

Target description [course time per employee]

Graph for Time

Graph for Time

Data for Time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008408034,64
12.04.2008408022,4
19.04.2008408029,52
26.04.200840800,8
03.05.2008408010
10.05.200840805,76
17.05.2008408014
24.05.2008408012,32

Quantity

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Quantity 69,6 38,08 -31,52 % Maximize Training Dimensions
Description the number of employees gone through training per year

Graph for Quantity

Graph for Quantity

Data for Quantity

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008308069,6
12.04.2008308020,72
19.04.200830808,64
26.04.2008308022,96
03.05.2008308017,68
10.05.2008308020,24
17.05.2008308018,48
24.05.2008308038,08

Meeting the needs

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Meeting the needs 3,51 85,77 + 82,26 % Maximize Training Dimensions
Description the difference between the number of people that need training and the number of people that attend the training

Graph for Meeting the needs

Graph for Meeting the needs

Data for Meeting the needs

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200820903,51
12.04.2008209063,27
19.04.2008209022,5
26.04.2008209026,01
03.05.200820909,54
10.05.2008209088,83
17.05.2008209014,04
24.05.2008209085,77

Training Efficacy

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Training Efficacy 54,17 % 65,02 % + 10,85% Training and Development Scorecard
Indicators
Learning Progress
Behavior Progress
Business Progress
Response *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Training Efficacy

Graph for Training Efficacy

Data for Training Efficacy

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200854,173
12.04.200828,343
19.04.200833,963
26.04.200848,063
03.05.200842,553
10.05.200848,43
17.05.200847,733
24.05.200865,023

Learning Progress

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Learning Progress 102,695 95,795 -6,9 % Maximize Training Efficacy
Description the resulting increase in knowledge or capability; assessed with the help of tests before and after training;

Graph for Learning Progress

Graph for Learning Progress

Data for Learning Progress

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.200830115102,695
12.04.20083011515,755
19.04.20083011532,89
26.04.20083011510,235
03.05.20083011576,36
10.05.200830115103,04
17.05.200830115104,075
24.05.20083011595,795

Behavior Progress

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Behavior Progress 29,54 49,42 + 19,88 % Maximize Training Efficacy
Description increased job confidence; increased customer satisfaction, improved time management, improved morale, reduced stress level;

Graph for Behavior Progress

Graph for Behavior Progress

Data for Behavior Progress

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20082014029,54
12.04.200820140101,22
19.04.20082014045,64
26.04.20082014063,56
03.05.20082014052,22
10.05.20082014034,02
17.05.20082014080,22
24.05.20082014049,42

Business Progress

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Business Progress 38,41 74,52 + 36,11 % Maximize Training Efficacy
Description the assessment of the improved performance - increased sales, quality, productivity, decrease in defects etc.;

Graph for Business Progress

Graph for Business Progress

Data for Business Progress

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20084011538,41
12.04.2008401150,805
19.04.20084011531,51
26.04.20084011586,595
03.05.20084011535,88
10.05.20084011539,56
17.05.2008401158,165
24.05.20084011574,52

Training Execution

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Training Execution 35,69 % 33,44 % -2,25% Training and Development Scorecard
Indicators
Satisfaction
Time efficiency
Accessibility
Durability *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report

Graph for Training Execution

Graph for Training Execution

Data for Training Execution

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200835,692
12.04.200830,152
19.04.200874,472
26.04.200852,412
03.05.200854,452
10.05.200822,282
17.05.200834,052
24.05.200833,442

Satisfaction

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Satisfaction 33,57 69,84 + 36,27 % Maximize Training Execution
Description % of participant satisfaction with training based on the reaction of trainees

Graph for Satisfaction

Graph for Satisfaction

Data for Satisfaction

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008209033,57
12.04.200820909,27
19.04.2008209074,97
26.04.2008209065,79
03.05.200820908,37
10.05.2008209048,42
17.05.2008209054,72
24.05.2008209069,84

Time efficiency

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Time efficiency 105,26 110,32 + 5,06 Score Minimize Training Execution
Description time gap between when a training need is identified and when it is accomplished

Target description [time in months]

Graph for Time efficiency

Graph for Time efficiency

Data for Time efficiency

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.2008410120105,26
12.04.200841012091,4
19.04.200841012035,74
26.04.200841012087,11
03.05.200841012020,45
10.05.2008410120112,3
17.05.200841012078,86
24.05.2008410120110,32

Accessibility

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Accessibility 63 31,4 -31,6 % Maximize Training Execution
Description assesses if training is easily accessible when and where needed

Graph for Accessibility

Graph for Accessibility

Data for Accessibility

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20083010063
12.04.20083010026,6
19.04.20083010083,8
26.04.20083010076,5
03.05.20083010052,1
10.05.2008301003,2
17.05.20083010021,4
24.05.20083010031,4

Strategic Excellence

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Strategic Excellence 54,97 % 44,21 % -10,76% Training and Development Scorecard
Indicators
Targeting
Fulfillment of social contract
Balance

Graph for Strategic Excellence

Graph for Strategic Excellence

Data for Strategic Excellence

DatesValueWeight
05.04.200854,972
12.04.200821,872
19.04.200864,742
26.04.200832,12
03.05.200842,762
10.05.200837,722
17.05.200866,752
24.05.200844,212

Targeting

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Targeting 27,5 26,3 -1,2 % Maximize Strategic Excellence
Description estimates if training addresses the most critical needs of the company

Target description number of critical needs covered with training

Graph for Targeting

Graph for Targeting

Data for Targeting

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20085010027,5
12.04.2008501007,5
19.04.20085010086,3
26.04.2008501008,2
03.05.20085010051,9
10.05.20085010041,9
17.05.20085010076,5
24.05.20085010026,3

Fulfillment of social contract

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Fulfillment of social contract 61,8 48,5 -13,3 % Maximize Strategic Excellence
Description evaluation of the extent to which the company is offering employees an opportunity to grow and remain employable

Graph for Fulfillment of social contract

Graph for Fulfillment of social contract

Data for Fulfillment of social contract

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20082010061,8
12.04.2008201009,9
19.04.20082010015,7
26.04.20082010053,9
03.05.20082010031,4
10.05.20082010081,9
17.05.20082010028,5
24.05.20082010048,5

Balance

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Balance 96,2 71,2 -25 % Maximize Strategic Excellence
Description the right balance between strategic and operational training, i.e. between the skills necessary for today's jobs and those you know your company will need in the future

Graph for Balance

Graph for Balance

Data for Balance

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
05.04.20083010096,2
12.04.20083010053,8
19.04.20083010061,5
26.04.20083010057,4
03.05.20083010035,1
10.05.2008301001,3
17.05.20083010076
24.05.20083010071,2
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 29.04.2008 0:00:09

Copyright © 2000-2008 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.