|
This is a Intellectual Property Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Intellectual Property scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics. |
Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s),
from 02.05.2008 to 20.06.2008
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Contains | |||||||||||
| Intellectual Property | 46,88 % | 50,16 % | + 3,28 % |
|
| Dates | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 46,88 |
| 09.05.2008 | 53,23 |
| 16.05.2008 | 64,36 |
| 23.05.2008 | 43,09 |
| 30.05.2008 | 47,96 |
| 06.06.2008 | 48,05 |
| 13.06.2008 | 49,57 |
| 20.06.2008 | 50,16 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||
| Cost | 46,57 % | 19,93 % | -26,64% | Intellectual Property |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.05.2008 | 46,57 | 3 |
| 09.05.2008 | 23,93 | 3 |
| 16.05.2008 | 65,33 | 3 |
| 23.05.2008 | 40,7 | 3 |
| 30.05.2008 | 46,53 | 3 |
| 06.06.2008 | 33,47 | 3 |
| 13.06.2008 | 63,13 | 3 |
| 20.06.2008 | 19,93 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Total internal cost | 29,18 | 37,28 | + 8,1 | USD | Minimize | Cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 29,18 |
| 09.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 38,7 |
| 16.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 28,72 |
| 23.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 28,66 |
| 30.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 31,58 |
| 06.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 36,08 |
| 13.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 22,84 |
| 20.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 37,28 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Total external cost | 23,7 | 23,48 | -0,22 | Score | Minimize | Cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 23,7 |
| 09.05.2008 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 18,24 |
| 16.05.2008 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 13,36 |
| 23.05.2008 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 28,26 |
| 30.05.2008 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 18,92 |
| 06.06.2008 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 17,76 |
| 13.06.2008 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 26,44 |
| 20.06.2008 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 23,48 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Attorney Productivity | 42,12 % | 54,47 % | + 12,35% | Intellectual Property |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.05.2008 | 42,12 | 2 |
| 09.05.2008 | 54,16 | 2 |
| 16.05.2008 | 81,86 | 2 |
| 23.05.2008 | 67,01 | 2 |
| 30.05.2008 | 36,02 | 2 |
| 06.06.2008 | 65,37 | 2 |
| 13.06.2008 | 55,04 | 2 |
| 20.06.2008 | 54,47 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of filings per legal assistant | 5,16 | 5,835 | + 0,675 | Score | Minimize | Attorney Productivity |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5,16 |
| 09.05.2008 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5,075 |
| 16.05.2008 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3,31 |
| 23.05.2008 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3,065 |
| 30.05.2008 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2,48 |
| 06.06.2008 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2,745 |
| 13.06.2008 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 1,19 |
| 20.06.2008 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5,835 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Number of filings per attorney | 1,66 | 1,066 | -0,594 | Score | Minimize | Attorney Productivity |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1,66 |
| 09.05.2008 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2,851 |
| 16.05.2008 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1,018 |
| 23.05.2008 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1,024 |
| 30.05.2008 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2,974 |
| 06.06.2008 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1,348 |
| 13.06.2008 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3,364 |
| 20.06.2008 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1,066 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Internal hours | 177,25 | 131,82 | -45,43 | Score | Minimize | Attorney Productivity |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 2 | 130 | 200 | 177,25 |
| 09.05.2008 | 2 | 130 | 200 | 138,26 |
| 16.05.2008 | 2 | 130 | 200 | 143,65 |
| 23.05.2008 | 2 | 130 | 200 | 138,19 |
| 30.05.2008 | 2 | 130 | 200 | 188,66 |
| 06.06.2008 | 2 | 130 | 200 | 150,23 |
| 13.06.2008 | 2 | 130 | 200 | 164,3 |
| 20.06.2008 | 2 | 130 | 200 | 131,82 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Cycle Time | 34,49 % | 68,7 % | + 34,21% | Intellectual Property |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.05.2008 | 34,49 | 3 |
| 09.05.2008 | 60,67 | 3 |
| 16.05.2008 | 63,5 | 3 |
| 23.05.2008 | 49,88 | 3 |
| 30.05.2008 | 50,89 | 3 |
| 06.06.2008 | 46,8 | 3 |
| 13.06.2008 | 43,05 | 3 |
| 20.06.2008 | 68,7 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Average number of hours per internal attorneys | 64,2 | 54,96 | -9,24 | Score | Minimize | Cycle Time |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 80 | 64,2 |
| 09.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 80 | 63,6 |
| 16.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 80 | 68,56 |
| 23.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 80 | 69,56 |
| 30.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 80 | 46,36 |
| 06.06.2008 | 3 | 40 | 80 | 52,52 |
| 13.06.2008 | 3 | 40 | 80 | 62,24 |
| 20.06.2008 | 3 | 40 | 80 | 54,96 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Average number of hours per internal legal assistants | 36,88 | 22,66 | -14,22 | Score | Minimize | Cycle Time |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 36,88 |
| 09.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 26,06 |
| 16.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 27,06 |
| 23.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 34,96 |
| 30.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 30,42 |
| 06.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 40 |
| 13.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 35,02 |
| 20.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 40 | 22,66 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Average number of hours per external attorneys | 38,96 | 34,4 | -4,56 | Score | Minimize | Cycle Time |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 3 | 20 | 60 | 38,96 |
| 09.05.2008 | 3 | 20 | 60 | 26,76 |
| 16.05.2008 | 3 | 20 | 60 | 23,2 |
| 23.05.2008 | 3 | 20 | 60 | 35,24 |
| 30.05.2008 | 3 | 20 | 60 | 49,92 |
| 06.06.2008 | 3 | 20 | 60 | 51,64 |
| 13.06.2008 | 3 | 20 | 60 | 47,88 |
| 20.06.2008 | 3 | 20 | 60 | 34,4 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||
| Efficiency | 62,53 % | 62,37 % | -0,16% | Intellectual Property |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.05.2008 | 62,53 | 3 |
| 09.05.2008 | 64,33 | 3 |
| 16.05.2008 | 51,5 | 3 |
| 23.05.2008 | 32,93 | 3 |
| 30.05.2008 | 46,2 | 3 |
| 06.06.2008 | 48,33 | 3 |
| 13.06.2008 | 33,83 | 3 |
| 20.06.2008 | 62,37 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Alternative fee arrangements | 51,86 | 58,61 | + 6,75 | % | Minimize | Efficiency |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 3 | 50 | 80 | 51,86 |
| 09.05.2008 | 3 | 50 | 80 | 62,9 |
| 16.05.2008 | 3 | 50 | 80 | 65,69 |
| 23.05.2008 | 3 | 50 | 80 | 79,61 |
| 30.05.2008 | 3 | 50 | 80 | 59,6 |
| 06.06.2008 | 3 | 50 | 80 | 56,33 |
| 13.06.2008 | 3 | 50 | 80 | 78,92 |
| 20.06.2008 | 3 | 50 | 80 | 58,61 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Hours by internal attorneys to legal assistants | 35,94 | 39,82 | + 3,88 | % | Minimize | Efficiency |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 3 | 30 | 50 | 35,94 |
| 09.05.2008 | 3 | 30 | 50 | 42,42 |
| 16.05.2008 | 3 | 30 | 50 | 36,08 |
| 23.05.2008 | 3 | 30 | 50 | 44,76 |
| 30.05.2008 | 3 | 30 | 50 | 45,9 |
| 06.06.2008 | 3 | 30 | 50 | 44,4 |
| 13.06.2008 | 3 | 30 | 50 | 46,68 |
| 20.06.2008 | 3 | 30 | 50 | 39,82 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Hours by external attorneys to legal assistants | 44,125 | 33,775 | -10,35 | % | Minimize | Efficiency |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 3 | 25 | 50 | 44,125 |
| 09.05.2008 | 3 | 25 | 50 | 25,475 |
| 16.05.2008 | 3 | 25 | 50 | 40,7 |
| 23.05.2008 | 3 | 25 | 50 | 32,175 |
| 30.05.2008 | 3 | 25 | 50 | 37,475 |
| 06.06.2008 | 3 | 25 | 50 | 40,475 |
| 13.06.2008 | 3 | 25 | 50 | 29,675 |
| 20.06.2008 | 3 | 25 | 50 | 33,775 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||
| Average Cost | 47,2 % | 45,1 % | -2,1% | Intellectual Property |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 02.05.2008 | 47,2 | 2 |
| 09.05.2008 | 68,4 | 2 |
| 16.05.2008 | 66 | 2 |
| 23.05.2008 | 27,8 | 2 |
| 30.05.2008 | 60,3 | 2 |
| 06.06.2008 | 54,03 | 2 |
| 13.06.2008 | 57,17 | 2 |
| 20.06.2008 | 45,1 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Average internal cost | 2,2605 | 2,409 | + 0,148 | USD | Minimize | Average Cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 2 | 1,5 | 3 | 2,2605 |
| 09.05.2008 | 2 | 1,5 | 3 | 2,718 |
| 16.05.2008 | 2 | 1,5 | 3 | 2,073 |
| 23.05.2008 | 2 | 1,5 | 3 | 2,733 |
| 30.05.2008 | 2 | 1,5 | 3 | 1,7205 |
| 06.06.2008 | 2 | 1,5 | 3 | 2,076 |
| 13.06.2008 | 2 | 1,5 | 3 | 2,835 |
| 20.06.2008 | 2 | 1,5 | 3 | 2,409 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Average cost using standard billing system | 1,6348 | 1,99 | + 0,355 | USD | Minimize | Average Cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 2 | 1,3 | 2,5 | 1,6348 |
| 09.05.2008 | 2 | 1,3 | 2,5 | 1,408 |
| 16.05.2008 | 2 | 1,3 | 2,5 | 1,9324 |
| 23.05.2008 | 2 | 1,3 | 2,5 | 2,1736 |
| 30.05.2008 | 2 | 1,3 | 2,5 | 1,9084 |
| 06.06.2008 | 2 | 1,3 | 2,5 | 1,3612 |
| 13.06.2008 | 2 | 1,3 | 2,5 | 1,4932 |
| 20.06.2008 | 2 | 1,3 | 2,5 | 1,99 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Average cost using alternative fee arrangements | 3,596 | 2,932 | -0,664 | USD | Minimize | Average Cost |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 02.05.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3,596 |
| 09.05.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,092 |
| 16.05.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,222 |
| 23.05.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3,232 |
| 30.05.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3,074 |
| 06.06.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3,888 |
| 13.06.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,468 |
| 20.06.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,932 |
Copyright © 2000-2008 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.