Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s),
from 10.05.2008 to 28.06.2008
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Contains | |||||||||||||
| Interactive Voice Response | 54,79 % | 43,37 % | -11,42 % |
|
| Dates | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 54,79 |
| 17.05.2008 | 62,21 |
| 24.05.2008 | 45,47 |
| 31.05.2008 | 48,44 |
| 07.06.2008 | 47,34 |
| 14.06.2008 | 48,25 |
| 21.06.2008 | 48,7 |
| 28.06.2008 | 43,37 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||
| Employee Perspective | 53,5 % | 27,78 % | -25,72% | Interactive Voice Response |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 10.05.2008 | 53,5 | 3 |
| 17.05.2008 | 45,85 | 3 |
| 24.05.2008 | 51,31 | 3 |
| 31.05.2008 | 28,16 | 3 |
| 07.06.2008 | 60,61 | 3 |
| 14.06.2008 | 44,04 | 3 |
| 21.06.2008 | 52,02 | 3 |
| 28.06.2008 | 27,78 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Agent satisfaction | 94,3 | 58,24 | -36,06 | % | Maximize | Employee Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 94,3 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 77,14 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 57,76 |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 45,88 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 84,52 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 50,62 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 91,54 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 58,24 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Agent occupancy | 80,53 | 87,01 | + 6,48 | % | Minimize | Employee Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 2 | 70 | 100 | 80,53 |
| 17.05.2008 | 2 | 70 | 100 | 78,28 |
| 24.05.2008 | 2 | 70 | 100 | 83,2 |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 70 | 100 | 88,03 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 70 | 100 | 91,39 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 70 | 100 | 98,32 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 70 | 100 | 84,64 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 70 | 100 | 87,01 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Agent utilization | 45,34 | 48,88 | + 3,54 | % | Maximize | Employee Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 45,34 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 47,26 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 81,94 |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 63,22 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 80,98 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 97,6 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 51,22 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 48,88 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||
| Customer Perspective | 30,2 % | 18,64 % | -11,56% | Interactive Voice Response |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 10.05.2008 | 30,2 | 4 |
| 17.05.2008 | 73,16 | 4 |
| 24.05.2008 | 60,61 | 4 |
| 31.05.2008 | 57,29 | 4 |
| 07.06.2008 | 52,21 | 4 |
| 14.06.2008 | 54,84 | 4 |
| 21.06.2008 | 54,96 | 4 |
| 28.06.2008 | 18,64 | 4 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| First-call resolution | 71,36 | 61,68 | -9,68 | % | Maximize | Customer Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 60 | 100 | 71,36 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 60 | 100 | 97,12 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 60 | 100 | 87,96 |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 60 | 100 | 74,56 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 60 | 100 | 63,64 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 60 | 100 | 95,92 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 60 | 100 | 89,76 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 60 | 100 | 61,68 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Customer satisfaction | 68,96 | 61,96 | -7 | % | Maximize | Customer Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 4 | 60 | 100 | 68,96 |
| 17.05.2008 | 4 | 60 | 100 | 85,6 |
| 24.05.2008 | 4 | 60 | 100 | 89,32 |
| 31.05.2008 | 4 | 60 | 100 | 93,28 |
| 07.06.2008 | 4 | 60 | 100 | 86,04 |
| 14.06.2008 | 4 | 60 | 100 | 75,28 |
| 21.06.2008 | 4 | 60 | 100 | 79,8 |
| 28.06.2008 | 4 | 60 | 100 | 61,96 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Agent monitoring | 3,03 | 2,644 | -0,386 | Weeks | Minimize | Customer Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3,03 |
| 17.05.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,76 |
| 24.05.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3,574 |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3,264 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,178 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3,286 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3,266 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,644 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||
| Internal Processes Perspective | 47,77 % | 36,64 % | -11,13% | Interactive Voice Response |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 10.05.2008 | 47,77 | 2 |
| 17.05.2008 | 70,23 | 2 |
| 24.05.2008 | 21,76 | 2 |
| 31.05.2008 | 57,39 | 2 |
| 07.06.2008 | 54,51 | 2 |
| 14.06.2008 | 59,8 | 2 |
| 21.06.2008 | 51,41 | 2 |
| 28.06.2008 | 36,64 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Default to agent | 45,65 | 27,02 | -18,63 | % | Minimize | Internal Processes Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 50 | 45,65 |
| 17.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 50 | 27,89 |
| 24.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 50 | 39,05 |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 20 | 50 | 38,15 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 50 | 33,02 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 50 | 49,88 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 50 | 37,49 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 20 | 50 | 27,02 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Call length | 27,32 | 34,495 | + 7,175 | Seconds | Minimize | Internal Processes Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 2 | 15 | 50 | 27,32 |
| 17.05.2008 | 2 | 15 | 50 | 16,12 |
| 24.05.2008 | 2 | 15 | 50 | 49,825 |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 15 | 50 | 27,495 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 15 | 50 | 45,66 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 15 | 50 | 19,41 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 15 | 50 | 30,33 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 15 | 50 | 34,495 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Customer delay time | 42,42 | 58,53 | + 16,11 | Seconds | Minimize | Internal Processes Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 30 | 60 | 42,42 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 30 | 60 | 44,94 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 30 | 60 | 52,17 |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 30 | 60 | 40,59 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 30 | 60 | 35,64 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 30 | 60 | 35,7 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 30 | 60 | 43,59 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 30 | 60 | 58,53 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||
| IVR Performance | 57,4 % | 54 % | -3,4% | Interactive Voice Response |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 10.05.2008 | 57,4 | 3 |
| 17.05.2008 | 37,35 | 3 |
| 24.05.2008 | 70,55 | 3 |
| 31.05.2008 | 40,6 | 3 |
| 07.06.2008 | 20,9 | 3 |
| 14.06.2008 | 44,3 | 3 |
| 21.06.2008 | 56,8 | 3 |
| 28.06.2008 | 54 | 3 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Transaction failure rate | 2,03 | 7,65 | + 5,62 | % | Minimize | IVR Performance |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 2,03 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 7,96 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 1,8 |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 3,04 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 7,06 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 7,28 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 6,14 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 7,65 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Transactions attempts | 4,596 | 2,62 | -1,976 | Score | Minimize | IVR Performance |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4,596 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3,828 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3,636 |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5,536 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5,504 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3,544 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 2,62 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||
| Abandon rate | 88 % | 63,17 % | -24,83% | Interactive Voice Response |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 10.05.2008 | 88 | 2 |
| 17.05.2008 | 88,73 | 2 |
| 24.05.2008 | 22,33 | 2 |
| 31.05.2008 | 18,13 | 2 |
| 07.06.2008 | 50,43 | 2 |
| 14.06.2008 | 48,17 | 2 |
| 21.06.2008 | 49,03 | 2 |
| 28.06.2008 | 63,17 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| IVR Abandoned rate | 8,264 | 14,144 | + 5,88 | % | Minimize | Abandon rate |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 8,264 |
| 17.05.2008 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 11,42 |
| 24.05.2008 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 16,412 |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 16,94 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 12,296 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 13,46 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 16,736 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 14,144 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Agent queue abandon rate | 11,8 | 14,95 | + 3,15 | % | Minimize | Abandon rate |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 11,8 |
| 17.05.2008 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 11,25 |
| 24.05.2008 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 34,5 |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 31,375 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 27,55 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 15,45 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 14,9 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 14,95 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Time to abandon in agent queue | 72,02 | 68,15 | -3,87 | Seconds | Maximize | Abandon rate |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 2 | 50 | 80 | 72,02 |
| 17.05.2008 | 2 | 50 | 80 | 79,91 |
| 24.05.2008 | 2 | 50 | 80 | 60,53 |
| 31.05.2008 | 2 | 50 | 80 | 54,32 |
| 07.06.2008 | 2 | 50 | 80 | 67,19 |
| 14.06.2008 | 2 | 50 | 80 | 53,54 |
| 21.06.2008 | 2 | 50 | 80 | 61,85 |
| 28.06.2008 | 2 | 50 | 80 | 68,15 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||
| Financial Perspective | 65,31 % | 65,3 % | -0,01% | Interactive Voice Response |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 10.05.2008 | 65,31 | 4 |
| 17.05.2008 | 64,9 | 4 |
| 24.05.2008 | 30,57 | 4 |
| 31.05.2008 | 71,37 | 4 |
| 07.06.2008 | 47,21 | 4 |
| 14.06.2008 | 42,03 | 4 |
| 21.06.2008 | 32,34 | 4 |
| 28.06.2008 | 65,3 | 4 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Cost per call | 9,492 | 10,635 | + 1,143 | USD | Minimize | Financial Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 9,492 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 7,467 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 12,228 |
| 31.05.2008 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 10,14 |
| 07.06.2008 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 10,977 |
| 14.06.2008 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 12,534 |
| 21.06.2008 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 10,788 |
| 28.06.2008 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 10,635 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Return on investment | 117,36 | 121,16 | + 3,8 | Score | Maximize | Financial Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 10.05.2008 | 4 | 90 | 130 | 117,36 |
| 17.05.2008 | 4 | 90 | 130 | 110,32 |
| 24.05.2008 | 4 | 90 | 130 | 102,16 |
| 31.05.2008 | 4 | 90 | 130 | 123,76 |
| 07.06.2008 | 4 | 90 | 130 | 109,64 |
| 14.06.2008 | 4 | 90 | 130 | 111,2 |
| 21.06.2008 | 4 | 90 | 130 | 98,6 |
| 28.06.2008 | 4 | 90 | 130 | 121,16 |