This is a Intrusion Prevention Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Intrusion Prevention scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 46 day(s), from 31.01.2009 to 18.03.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard  39,53 % 54,74 % + 15,21 %
Selection Criteria perspective(85,4%, 36,73%Up)
Functional Perspective(35,3%, -6,84%Down)
Operational and Results Perspective(50,5%, 21,62%Up)
System Assessment perspective(42,2%, 9,6%Up)

Graph for Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

Graph for Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

Data for Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard

DatesValue
31.01.200939,53
04.02.200960,34
11.02.200951,53
18.02.200955,75
25.02.200943,45
04.03.200948,3
11.03.200956,37
18.03.200954,74


Selection Criteria perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Selection Criteria perspective  48,68 % 85,41 % + 36,73% Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard
Indicators
Reliability Ratio
Scalability Index
Interoperability Ratio
Compatibility Index *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is to get a 'measurable' and 'calculative' way to filter from the options that are available. Also, this category gives an idea of how well the management of the Intrusion system is progressing. One can use this to evaluate the management aspect also.

Graph for Selection Criteria perspective

Graph for Selection Criteria perspective

Data for Selection Criteria perspective

DatesValueWeight
31.01.200948,683
04.02.200962,783
11.02.200969,933
18.02.200943,73
25.02.200934,513
04.03.200954,633
11.03.200960,743
18.03.200985,413


Reliability Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Reliability Ratio  0,923 0,9822 + 0,0592 # Maximize Selection Criteria perspective
Description The security system has to be very reliable in nature to 'get from it what it is supposed to do'.

Graph for Reliability Ratio

Graph for Reliability Ratio

Data for Reliability Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.200930,810,923
04.02.200930,810,9
11.02.200930,810,9798
18.02.200930,810,841
25.02.200930,810,8392
04.03.200930,810,9676
11.03.200930,810,9182
18.03.200930,810,9822


Scalability Index

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Scalability Index  7,201 8,371 + 1,17 Score Maximize Selection Criteria perspective
Description Scalability gives the extent of expansion in the security system. One can assign value to this metric using a scale numbered from 1-10.

Graph for Scalability Index

Graph for Scalability Index

Data for Scalability Index

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.200921107,201
04.02.200921109
11.02.200921108,038
18.02.200921101,441
25.02.200921106,103
04.03.200921102,512
11.03.200921101,189
18.03.200921108,371


Interoperability Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Interoperability Ratio  0,7093 0,928 + 0,219 # Maximize Selection Criteria perspective
Description This parameter shows the degree to which the system is 'interoperable' in nature.

Graph for Interoperability Ratio

Graph for Interoperability Ratio

Data for Interoperability Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.200930,710,7093
04.02.200930,710,9
11.02.200930,710,7978
18.02.200930,710,9505
25.02.200930,710,7351
04.03.200930,710,7729
11.03.200930,710,9685
18.03.200930,710,928


Functional Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Functional Perspective  42,1 % 35,26 % -6,84% Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard
Indicators
Response Time
Fraction of Events in which Action was taken within the Claimed Timeframe
Drop in 'Frequency of Attacks'
'Accuracy of Alerts' Ratio *
Functions' Fulfilling Ratio *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This set of KPIs enables in gaining an insight into the way the system is functioning.

Graph for Functional Perspective

Graph for Functional Perspective

Data for Functional Perspective

DatesValueWeight
31.01.200942,13
04.02.200965,563
11.02.200951,73
18.02.200961,923
25.02.200942,543
04.03.200943,243
11.03.200956,623
18.03.200935,263


Response Time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Response Time  1,66 1,132 -0,528 hr Minimize Functional Perspective
Description This KPI reflects the time-lag that occurs in 'occurrence' and 'reporting' of an unfavorable incident.

Graph for Response Time

Graph for Response Time

Data for Response Time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.20092021,66
04.02.20092020,5
11.02.20092020,05
18.02.20092021,318
25.02.20092020,87
04.03.20092020,09
11.03.20092021,226
18.03.20092021,132


Fraction of Events in which Action was taken within the Claimed Timeframe

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Fraction of Events in which Action was taken within the Claimed Timeframe  0,9008 0,6308 -0,27 # Maximize Functional Perspective
Description This KPI is to cross-check the efficiency of the security system.

Graph for Fraction of Events in which Action was taken within the Claimed Timeframe

Graph for Fraction of Events in which Action was taken within the Claimed Timeframe

Data for Fraction of Events in which Action was taken within the Claimed Timeframe

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.200920,610,9008
04.02.200920,610,8
11.02.200920,610,7576
18.02.200920,610,7456
25.02.200920,610,7264
04.03.200920,610,7396
11.03.200920,610,9648
18.03.200920,610,6308


Drop in 'Frequency of Attacks'

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Drop in 'Frequency of Attacks'  91,76 77,76 -14 % Maximize Functional Perspective
Description This is a useful way of knowing how well the Intrusion Detection and Prevention system is working. The value can be obtained by comparing the situation prior- and post- situations of system deployment.

Graph for Drop in 'Frequency of Attacks'

Graph for Drop in 'Frequency of Attacks'

Data for Drop in 'Frequency of Attacks'

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.200926010091,76
04.02.200926010080
11.02.200926010091,92
18.02.200926010097
25.02.200926010078,48
04.03.200926010088,2
11.03.200926010067,24
18.03.200926010077,76


Operational and Results Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Operational and Results Perspective  28,9 % 50,52 % + 21,62% Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard
Indicators
Number of Technologies Deployed
Integration Degree
Pre-set Aims Meeting Ratio
Cost: Benefit ratio *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This collection of indicators is for obtaining the way the operations are taking place and also in evaluating the outcomes.

Graph for Operational and Results Perspective

Graph for Operational and Results Perspective

Data for Operational and Results Perspective

DatesValueWeight
31.01.200928,92
04.02.2009372
11.02.200923,832
18.02.200973,232
25.02.200936,62
04.03.200953,32
11.03.200964,442
18.03.200950,522


Number of Technologies Deployed

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Technologies Deployed  3,464 2,944 -0,52 # Maximize Operational and Results Perspective
Description This indicator has its value equal to the number of types of technologies that are deployed. Some of the types of software that can be used are- 'network-based', 'wireless', 'network behavior analysis' and 'host-based'.

Graph for Number of Technologies Deployed

Graph for Number of Technologies Deployed

Data for Number of Technologies Deployed

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.20092263,464
04.02.20092263
11.02.20092262,072
18.02.20092262,196
25.02.20092264,236
04.03.20092264,352
11.03.20092265,84
18.03.20092262,944


Integration Degree

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Integration Degree  0,844 0,7894 -0,0546 # Maximize Operational and Results Perspective
Description There are various systems with which the working of 'Intrusion Detection and Prevention system' needs to be aligned with. One of these can be the 'information flow system'. This integration plays an important role in making the systems work as a single entity.

Graph for Integration Degree

Graph for Integration Degree

Data for Integration Degree

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.200930,710,844
04.02.200930,710,8
11.02.200930,710,73
18.02.200930,710,9883
25.02.200930,710,7141
04.03.200930,710,8422
11.03.200930,710,8218
18.03.200930,710,7894


Pre-set Aims Meeting Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Pre-set Aims Meeting Ratio  0,7388 0,7972 + 0,0584 # Maximize Operational and Results Perspective
Description The implementation of an Intrusion system should be started with only after proper aims for doing so have been established. This eases out the process of selecting the one that is most suitable out of the lot available.

Graph for Pre-set Aims Meeting Ratio

Graph for Pre-set Aims Meeting Ratio

Data for Pre-set Aims Meeting Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.200920,610,7388
04.02.200920,610,8
11.02.200920,610,6284
18.02.200920,610,9536
25.02.200920,610,6908
04.03.200920,610,6232
11.03.200920,610,918
18.03.200920,610,7972


System Assessment perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root System Assessment perspective  32,6 % 42,2 % + 9,6% Intrusion Detection and Prevention Scorecard
Indicators
Success Ratio
Up-grading Frequency
Service Grade
Interface- Friendliness Index *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description These indicators are to gauge the quality of service being provided by the Intrusion detection and Prevention System.

Graph for System Assessment perspective

Graph for System Assessment perspective

Data for System Assessment perspective

DatesValueWeight
31.01.200932,62
04.02.200972,222
11.02.200951,382
18.02.200947,082
25.02.200965,12
04.03.200941,392
11.03.200941,372
18.03.200942,22


Success Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Success Ratio  0,6108 0,744 + 0,133 # Maximize System Assessment perspective
Description This is the fraction of total events that were successfully wrapped-up.

Graph for Success Ratio

Graph for Success Ratio

Data for Success Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.200920,610,6108
04.02.200920,610,8
11.02.200920,610,7472
18.02.200920,610,6404
25.02.200920,610,8544
04.03.200920,610,8648
11.03.200920,610,876
18.03.200920,610,744


Up-grading Frequency

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Up-grading Frequency  3,472 3,001 -0,471 year Minimize System Assessment perspective
Description This KPI enables the assessing of the system's up-dation requirements. The value is equal to the number of years after which an up-grading is needed.

Graph for Up-grading Frequency

Graph for Up-grading Frequency

Data for Up-grading Frequency

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.20093143,472
04.02.20093142
11.02.20093141,852
18.02.20093141,93
25.02.20093142,374
04.03.20093142,569
11.03.20093143,739
18.03.20093143,001


Service Grade

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Service Grade  1,198 6,382 + 5,184 Score Maximize System Assessment perspective
Description These indicators are to gauge the quality of service being provided by the Intrusion detection and Prevention System. The value can be obtained on a scale of 1-10.

Graph for Service Grade

Graph for Service Grade

Data for Service Grade

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
31.01.200921101,198
04.02.200921108
11.02.200921108,173
18.02.200921103,943
25.02.200921107,156
04.03.200921106,148
11.03.200921105,374
18.03.200921106,382
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 23.02.2009 21:45:39

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.