|
This is a Inventory and Warehousing Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Inventory and Warehousing scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics. |
Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s),
from 05.04.2008 to 24.05.2008
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Contains | |||||||||||
| Inventory Balanced Scorecard | 41,9 % | 38,73 % | -3,17 % |
|
| Dates | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 41,9 |
| 12.04.2008 | 48,76 |
| 19.04.2008 | 42,77 |
| 26.04.2008 | 37,56 |
| 03.05.2008 | 57,28 |
| 10.05.2008 | 49,7 |
| 17.05.2008 | 40,46 |
| 24.05.2008 | 38,73 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Process Perspective | 54,54 % | 19,48 % | -35,06% | Inventory Balanced Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 05.04.2008 | 54,54 | 2 |
| 12.04.2008 | 41,74 | 2 |
| 19.04.2008 | 43,43 | 2 |
| 26.04.2008 | 43,37 | 2 |
| 03.05.2008 | 52,17 | 2 |
| 10.05.2008 | 44,15 | 2 |
| 17.05.2008 | 58,4 | 2 |
| 24.05.2008 | 19,48 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Part Count Accuracy | 84,15 | 69,8 | -14,35 | % | Maximize | Process Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 2 | 60 | 110 | 84,15 |
| 12.04.2008 | 2 | 60 | 110 | 97,05 |
| 19.04.2008 | 2 | 60 | 110 | 79,3 |
| 26.04.2008 | 2 | 60 | 110 | 82,85 |
| 03.05.2008 | 2 | 60 | 110 | 89,8 |
| 10.05.2008 | 2 | 60 | 110 | 77,2 |
| 17.05.2008 | 2 | 60 | 110 | 68,6 |
| 24.05.2008 | 2 | 60 | 110 | 69,8 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Days of Supply | 18,05 | 57,45 | + 39,4 | Score | Minimize | Process Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 18,05 |
| 12.04.2008 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 40,2 |
| 19.04.2008 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 16,65 |
| 26.04.2008 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 45,65 |
| 03.05.2008 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 29,2 |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 27 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 11,65 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 10 | 60 | 57,45 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Lead time | 60,22 | 58,78 | -1,44 | % | Maximize | Process Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 60,22 |
| 12.04.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 68,68 |
| 19.04.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 46,6 |
| 26.04.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 90,64 |
| 03.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 53,98 |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 62,74 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 62,98 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 58,78 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Financial Perspective | 30,34 % | 38,67 % | + 8,33% | Inventory Balanced Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 05.04.2008 | 30,34 | 2 |
| 12.04.2008 | 28,11 | 2 |
| 19.04.2008 | 40,4 | 2 |
| 26.04.2008 | 31,56 | 2 |
| 03.05.2008 | 44,17 | 2 |
| 10.05.2008 | 29,46 | 2 |
| 17.05.2008 | 27,64 | 2 |
| 24.05.2008 | 38,67 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Insurance | 12,215 | 19,79 | + 7,575 | % | Minimize | Financial Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 12,215 |
| 12.04.2008 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 14,375 |
| 19.04.2008 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 19,235 |
| 26.04.2008 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 10,73 |
| 03.05.2008 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 16,475 |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 17,72 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 17,15 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 19,79 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Gross margin ROI | 1,696 | 2,857 | + 1,161 | Score | Maximize | Financial Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1,696 |
| 12.04.2008 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1,456 |
| 19.04.2008 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 3,328 |
| 26.04.2008 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1,339 |
| 03.05.2008 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2,635 |
| 10.05.2008 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1,498 |
| 17.05.2008 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2,02 |
| 24.05.2008 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2,857 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Avg. cost per order | 40,4 | 37,32 | -3,08 | % | Minimize | Financial Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 40,4 |
| 12.04.2008 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 40,76 |
| 19.04.2008 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 35,4 |
| 26.04.2008 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 38,8 |
| 03.05.2008 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 24,28 |
| 10.05.2008 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 17,64 |
| 17.05.2008 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 37,92 |
| 24.05.2008 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 37,32 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | ||||
| Storage efficiency | 22,61 % | 63,63 % | + 41,02% | Inventory Balanced Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 05.04.2008 | 22,61 | 2 |
| 12.04.2008 | 91,06 | 2 |
| 19.04.2008 | 32,03 | 2 |
| 26.04.2008 | 53,39 | 2 |
| 03.05.2008 | 46,52 | 2 |
| 10.05.2008 | 77,45 | 2 |
| 17.05.2008 | 50,72 | 2 |
| 24.05.2008 | 63,63 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Inventory turnover rate | 18,73 | 13,032 | -5,698 | Score | Maximize | Storage efficiency |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 18,73 |
| 12.04.2008 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 24,516 |
| 19.04.2008 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 9,798 |
| 26.04.2008 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 14,924 |
| 03.05.2008 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 10,876 |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 19,522 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 20,864 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 13,032 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Inventory Levels | 20,96 | 119,48 | + 98,52 | Score | Maximize | Storage efficiency |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 3 | 20 | 140 | 20,96 |
| 12.04.2008 | 3 | 20 | 140 | 108,32 |
| 19.04.2008 | 3 | 20 | 140 | 38,24 |
| 26.04.2008 | 3 | 20 | 140 | 127,4 |
| 03.05.2008 | 3 | 20 | 140 | 46,16 |
| 10.05.2008 | 3 | 20 | 140 | 85,76 |
| 17.05.2008 | 3 | 20 | 140 | 66,56 |
| 24.05.2008 | 3 | 20 | 140 | 119,48 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Space Utilization | 41,265 | 74,485 | + 33,22 | % | Maximize | Storage efficiency |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 4 | 40 | 95 | 41,265 |
| 12.04.2008 | 4 | 40 | 95 | 94,505 |
| 19.04.2008 | 4 | 40 | 95 | 65,025 |
| 26.04.2008 | 4 | 40 | 95 | 54,135 |
| 03.05.2008 | 4 | 40 | 95 | 80,205 |
| 10.05.2008 | 4 | 40 | 95 | 92,91 |
| 17.05.2008 | 4 | 40 | 95 | 60,24 |
| 24.05.2008 | 4 | 40 | 95 | 74,485 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||
| Customer Perspective | 48,28 % | 22,88 % | -25,4% | Inventory Balanced Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 05.04.2008 | 48,28 | 2 |
| 12.04.2008 | 25,34 | 2 |
| 19.04.2008 | 34,9 | 2 |
| 26.04.2008 | 23,46 | 2 |
| 03.05.2008 | 72,64 | 2 |
| 10.05.2008 | 49,48 | 2 |
| 17.05.2008 | 1,62 | 2 |
| 24.05.2008 | 22,88 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Return rate | 5,598 | 19,392 | + 13,79 | % | Minimize | Customer Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 6 | 1 | 20 | 5,598 |
| 12.04.2008 | 6 | 1 | 20 | 19,563 |
| 19.04.2008 | 6 | 1 | 20 | 10,975 |
| 26.04.2008 | 6 | 1 | 20 | 16,561 |
| 03.05.2008 | 6 | 1 | 20 | 3,356 |
| 10.05.2008 | 6 | 1 | 20 | 10,196 |
| 17.05.2008 | 6 | 1 | 20 | 19,791 |
| 24.05.2008 | 6 | 1 | 20 | 19,392 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Cancellation rate | 14,02 | 7,664 | -6,356 | % | Minimize | Customer Perspective |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 14,02 |
| 12.04.2008 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 6,614 |
| 19.04.2008 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 12,76 |
| 26.04.2008 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 10,59 |
| 03.05.2008 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 7,972 |
| 10.05.2008 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 8,518 |
| 17.05.2008 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 14,664 |
| 24.05.2008 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 7,664 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Parent | Contains | |||||
| Non-conformance analysis | 53,74 % | 49 % | -4,74% | Inventory Balanced Scorecard |
|
| Dates | Value | Weight |
| 05.04.2008 | 53,74 | 2 |
| 12.04.2008 | 57,56 | 2 |
| 19.04.2008 | 63,08 | 2 |
| 26.04.2008 | 36,04 | 2 |
| 03.05.2008 | 70,88 | 2 |
| 10.05.2008 | 47,98 | 2 |
| 17.05.2008 | 63,9 | 2 |
| 24.05.2008 | 49 | 2 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Pilferage and spoilage | 3,898 | 4,024 | + 0,126 | % | Minimize | Non-conformance analysis |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 3,898 |
| 12.04.2008 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 12,508 |
| 19.04.2008 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 14,328 |
| 26.04.2008 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 6,474 |
| 03.05.2008 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 7,09 |
| 10.05.2008 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 8,294 |
| 17.05.2008 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 11,22 |
| 24.05.2008 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 4,024 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Price of Non-Conformance (PONC) | 7,228 | 9,352 | + 2,124 | % | Minimize | Non-conformance analysis |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7,228 |
| 12.04.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8,614 |
| 19.04.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5,068 |
| 26.04.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7,696 |
| 03.05.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 2,548 |
| 10.05.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6,886 |
| 17.05.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6,175 |
| 24.05.2008 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9,352 |
| Name | Start value | End value | Dynamic | Measure units | Optimization method | Parent | |
| Target PONC improvement | 105,05 | 99,1 | -5,95 | % | Minimize | Non-conformance analysis |
| Dates | Weight | Min | Max | Value |
| 05.04.2008 | 4 | 70 | 120 | 105,05 |
| 12.04.2008 | 4 | 70 | 120 | 76,45 |
| 19.04.2008 | 4 | 70 | 120 | 70,2 |
| 26.04.2008 | 4 | 70 | 120 | 118,1 |
| 03.05.2008 | 4 | 70 | 120 | 86,3 |
| 10.05.2008 | 4 | 70 | 120 | 102,05 |
| 17.05.2008 | 4 | 70 | 120 | 73,3 |
| 24.05.2008 | 4 | 70 | 120 | 99,1 |
Copyright © 2000-2008 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.