This is a Leasing Company Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Leasing Company scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Leasing Company Balanced Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 26.11.2008 to 14.01.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Leasing Company Balanced Scorecard  50,18 % 34,27 % -15,91 %
Financial Perspective(43%, -6,15%Down)
Customer Perspective(13,5%, -30,1%Down)
Internal Processes Perspective(41,2%, -41,76%Down)
Lease Terms and Payments Perspective(45,5%, 16,57%Up)

Graph for Leasing Company Balanced Scorecard

Graph for Leasing Company Balanced Scorecard

Data for Leasing Company Balanced Scorecard

DatesValue
26.11.200850,18
03.12.200841,42
10.12.200856,92
17.12.200834,91
24.12.200839,5
31.12.200853,97
07.01.200953,15
14.01.200934,27


Financial Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Financial Perspective  49,12 % 42,97 % -6,15% Leasing Company Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
Investment in Equipments done
Equipment Leasing Volume
Market penetration Rate
Debt: Equity Ratio *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This is for making arrangements to have substantial amounts of monetary benefits from the organization.

Graph for Financial Perspective

Graph for Financial Perspective

Data for Financial Perspective

DatesValueWeight
26.11.200849,123
03.12.200832,153
10.12.200878,043
17.12.200811,353
24.12.200835,963
31.12.200856,373
07.01.200939,523
14.01.200942,973


Investment in Equipments done

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Investment in Equipments done  0,5419 0,2737 -0,268 $ billion Maximize Financial Perspective
Description This KPI is a measure of the opportunities which the company received as part of the Leasing Industry, calculated on yearly basis.


Graph for Investment in Equipments done

Graph for Investment in Equipments done

Data for Investment in Equipments done

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.200830,110,5419
03.12.200830,110,3772
10.12.200830,110,7444
17.12.200830,110,2377
24.12.200830,110,505
31.12.200830,110,4618
07.01.200930,110,3979
14.01.200930,110,2737


Equipment Leasing Volume

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Equipment Leasing Volume   0,387561 0,197544 -0,19 $ billion Maximize Financial Perspective
Description This is the amount of investment done by the company in leasing of equipments on an annual basis.

Graph for Equipment Leasing Volume

Graph for Equipment Leasing Volume

Data for Equipment Leasing Volume

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.200830,0090,50,387561
03.12.200830,0090,50,026185
10.12.200830,0090,50,374304
17.12.200830,0090,50,017838
24.12.200830,0090,50,159246
31.12.200830,0090,50,409165
07.01.200930,0090,50,242225
14.01.200930,0090,50,197544


Market penetration Rate

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Market penetration Rate   1,4579 2,3861 + 0,928 % Maximize Financial Perspective
Description This is to have the extent to which the concerned company got into the market of Leasing.

Graph for Market penetration Rate

Graph for Market penetration Rate

Data for Market penetration Rate

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.200820,82,51,4579
03.12.200820,82,52,3691
10.12.200820,82,52,16
17.12.200820,82,51,1978
24.12.200820,82,51,2335
31.12.200820,82,52,4235
07.01.200920,82,51,4239
14.01.200920,82,52,3861


Customer Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Customer Perspective  43,55 % 13,45 % -30,1% Leasing Company Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
% rise in Customer Base
Customer Return Rate
% Dip in the number of fraudulent cases
Complaints Reduction Ratio *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is to ensure that not only the customer base increase but also that the clients are provided satisfactory services.

Graph for Customer Perspective

Graph for Customer Perspective

Data for Customer Perspective

DatesValueWeight
26.11.200843,553
03.12.200853,083
10.12.200846,633
17.12.200826,83
24.12.200829,493
31.12.200892,193
07.01.200968,243
14.01.200913,453


% rise in Customer Base

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % rise in Customer Base  37,24 20,74 -16,5 % Maximize Customer Perspective
Description This gives the degree of extension of customer base over the last 1 year.

Graph for % rise in Customer Base

Graph for % rise in Customer Base

Data for % rise in Customer Base

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.20083107037,24
03.12.20083107019,96
10.12.20083107016,9
17.12.20083107021,04
24.12.20083107025,24
31.12.20083107068,74
07.01.20093107040,48
14.01.20093107020,74


Customer Return Rate

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Customer Return Rate  0,3385 0,109 -0,23 # Maximize Customer Perspective
Description This can be calculated as the fraction of total customers who come to the organization for similar transactions.

Graph for Customer Return Rate

Graph for Customer Return Rate

Data for Customer Return Rate

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.200820,110,3385
03.12.200820,110,7903
10.12.200820,110,8659
17.12.200820,110,5869
24.12.200820,110,6121
31.12.200820,110,9505
07.01.200920,110,9784
14.01.200920,110,109


% Dip in the number of fraudulent cases

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % Dip in the number of fraudulent cases  61,85 34,2 -27,65 % Maximize Customer Perspective
Description This is to have the increase in efficiency of the staff as moving meticulously will lead to decrease in such instances.

Graph for % Dip in the number of fraudulent cases

Graph for % Dip in the number of fraudulent cases

Data for % Dip in the number of fraudulent cases

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.200833010061,85
03.12.200833010074,94
10.12.200833010077,46
17.12.200833010031,4
24.12.200833010039,87
31.12.200833010099,02
07.01.200933010068,22
14.01.200933010034,2


Internal Processes Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Internal Processes Perspective  82,93 % 41,17 % -41,76% Leasing Company Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
Average Loans and Leases to Deposit Ratio
Average cost of core deposits
Loans and Leases receivable
Number of sectors the company caters *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category caters those KPIs that helps in making judging the efficiency of the internal processes.

Graph for Internal Processes Perspective

Graph for Internal Processes Perspective

Data for Internal Processes Perspective

DatesValueWeight
26.11.200882,932
03.12.200838,452
10.12.200853,752
17.12.200860,452
24.12.200832,252
31.12.200834,232
07.01.200945,992
14.01.200941,172


Average Loans and Leases to Deposit Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Average Loans and Leases to Deposit Ratio  0,7338 0,6549 -0,0789 # Maximize Internal Processes Perspective
Description The value of this KPI can be calculated by dividing the total value of net loans and lease-financing receivables by total amount of deposits.

Graph for Average Loans and Leases to Deposit Ratio

Graph for Average Loans and Leases to Deposit Ratio

Data for Average Loans and Leases to Deposit Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.200820,60,90,7338
03.12.200820,60,90,729
10.12.200820,60,90,8571
17.12.200820,60,90,7503
24.12.200820,60,90,6972
31.12.200820,60,90,6201
07.01.200920,60,90,6501
14.01.200920,60,90,6549


Average cost of core deposits

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Average cost of core deposits  3,8125 3,665 -0,147 $ billion Maximize Internal Processes Perspective
Description This KPI is to have the value of core deposits. It includes the major sources of funds that are available for a company.

Graph for Average cost of core deposits

Graph for Average cost of core deposits

Data for Average cost of core deposits

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.200831,543,8125
03.12.200831,543,205
10.12.200831,543,1475
17.12.200831,542,7025
24.12.200831,542,695
31.12.200831,541,7175
07.01.200931,542,5775
14.01.200931,543,665


Loans and Leases receivable

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Loans and Leases receivable  146,04 48,03 -98,01 $ thousand Maximize Internal Processes Perspective
Description The magnitude can be obtained by adding up the total amount of loans and leases. It can be calculated on yearly basis.

Graph for Loans and Leases receivable

Graph for Loans and Leases receivable

Data for Loans and Leases receivable

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.2008340150146,04
03.12.200834015041,21
10.12.200834015046,16
17.12.2008340150102,48
24.12.200834015052,65
31.12.2008340150131,08
07.01.2009340150110,62
14.01.200934015048,03


Lease Terms and Payments Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Lease Terms and Payments Perspective  28,97 % 45,54 % + 16,57% Leasing Company Balanced Scorecard
Indicators
Average Lease term the organization provides
Fraction of instances when the up-front security payments exceeded 10%
Advance Payments Index
Number of factors considered to decide the amount of payment *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This is to ensure that the duration of lease term and payments are practical magnitudes and received in time.

Graph for Lease Terms and Payments Perspective

Graph for Lease Terms and Payments Perspective

Data for Lease Terms and Payments Perspective

DatesValueWeight
26.11.200828,972
03.12.200840,812
10.12.200843,832
17.12.200856,852
24.12.200867,082
31.12.200812,792
07.01.200958,122
14.01.200945,542


Average Lease term the organization provides

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Average Lease term the organization provides  68,6 84,16 + 15,56 % Maximize Lease Terms and Payments Perspective
Description This can be calculated in reference to the total economic life of the asset.

Graph for Average Lease term the organization provides

Graph for Average Lease term the organization provides

Data for Average Lease term the organization provides

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.200836010068,6
03.12.200836010068,68
10.12.200836010076,12
17.12.200836010091,2
24.12.200836010096,72
31.12.200836010073,28
07.01.200936010080,48
14.01.200936010084,16


Fraction of instances when the up-front security payments exceeded 10%

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Fraction of instances when the up-front security payments exceeded 10%  0,08896 0,07576 -0,0132 # Minimize Lease Terms and Payments Perspective
Description This is a way to minimize risk of the lease agreements.

Graph for Fraction of instances when the up-front security payments exceeded 10%

Graph for Fraction of instances when the up-front security payments exceeded 10%

Data for Fraction of instances when the up-front security payments exceeded 10%

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.200820,040,120,08896
03.12.200820,040,120,0772
10.12.200820,040,120,07688
17.12.200820,040,120,09408
24.12.200820,040,120,04752
31.12.200820,040,120,11296
07.01.200920,040,120,0452
14.01.200920,040,120,07576


Advance Payments Index

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Advance Payments Index  0,2989 0,4699 + 0,171 # Maximize Lease Terms and Payments Perspective
Description The value can be had by dividing the amount received in advance by the total value of lease.


Graph for Advance Payments Index

Graph for Advance Payments Index

Data for Advance Payments Index

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
26.11.200830,0510,2989
03.12.200830,0510,1982
10.12.200830,0510,4642
17.12.200830,0510,76345
24.12.200830,0510,4414
31.12.200830,0510,07945
07.01.200930,0510,3103
14.01.200930,0510,4699
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 19.12.2008 22:34:23

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.