This is a Network Management Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Network Management scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Network Management Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 07.03.2009 to 25.04.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Network Management Scorecard  52,9 % 51,92 % -0,98 %
Operation Perspective(64%, -13,71%Down)
Administration Perspective(50,3%, 16,46%Up)
Maintenance Perspective(41,3%, -20,32%Down)
Network Performance Assessment Perspective(46,7%, 11,28%Up)

Graph for Network Management Scorecard

Graph for Network Management Scorecard

Data for Network Management Scorecard

DatesValue
07.03.200952,9
14.03.200944,82
21.03.200958,54
28.03.200950,57
04.04.200952,96
11.04.200958,52
18.04.200963,01
25.04.200951,92


Operation Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Operation Perspective  77,74 % 64,03 % -13,71% Network Management Scorecard
Indicators
Frequency of Monitoring Checks
Number of Users Affected on an Average Basis
Services Smoothness Index
Expansion Probability *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs is to make sure that everything in the network goes smoothly.

Graph for Operation Perspective

Graph for Operation Perspective

Data for Operation Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200977,743
14.03.200971,723
21.03.200973,013
28.03.200967,613
04.04.200971,873
11.04.200966,883
18.04.200970,483
25.04.200964,033


Frequency of Monitoring Checks

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Frequency of Monitoring Checks  25,225 28,825 + 3,6 # Maximize Operation Perspective
Description Monitoring is required to identify the problems as soon as possible to be fixed. The value of this KPI will be equal to the number of times monitoring is done in one year.

Graph for Frequency of Monitoring Checks

Graph for Frequency of Monitoring Checks

Data for Frequency of Monitoring Checks

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.20092154025,225
14.03.20092154034,8
21.03.20092154039,2
28.03.20092154022,925
04.04.20092154029,7
11.04.20092154030,725
18.04.20092154036,775
25.04.20092154028,825


Number of Users Affected on an Average Basis

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Users Affected on an Average Basis  1,3 52,6 + 51,3 # Minimize Operation Perspective
Description This gives the number of users who bear the consequences of the operations not being looked after efficiently. The value can be had on yearly basis.

Graph for Number of Users Affected on an Average Basis

Graph for Number of Users Affected on an Average Basis

Data for Number of Users Affected on an Average Basis

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.2009301001,3
14.03.20093010028,9
21.03.20093010033,6
28.03.20093010011,7
04.04.2009301001,4
11.04.20093010012,1
18.04.20093010031,6
25.04.20093010052,6


Services Smoothness Index

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Services Smoothness Index  7,219 9,793 + 2,574 Score Maximize Operation Perspective
Description This KPI is to know, on the whole how well the services have been performing. The value can be had by using a scale numbered from 1-10.

Graph for Services Smoothness Index

Graph for Services Smoothness Index

Data for Services Smoothness Index

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200931107,219
14.03.200931109,901
21.03.200931107,381
28.03.200931109,388
04.04.200931108,209
11.04.200931104,699
18.04.200931105,5
25.04.200931109,793


Administration Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Administration Perspective  33,89 % 50,35 % + 16,46% Network Management Scorecard
Indicators
Resource Allocation Aptness
‘Network Control Aspect’
Data Collection Mechanisms
Data Infrastructure Potency *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This is to construct an appropriate administration structure for the network.

Graph for Administration Perspective

Graph for Administration Perspective

Data for Administration Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200933,893
14.03.200930,013
21.03.200941,843
28.03.200944,83
04.04.200928,063
11.04.200963,743
18.04.200967,833
25.04.200950,353


Resource Allocation Aptness

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Resource Allocation Aptness  2,539 4,888 + 2,349 Score Maximize Administration Perspective
Description This is to know the appropriateness of ‘resource allocation’ in the network. The value can be obtained by using scale numbered from 1-10.

Graph for Resource Allocation Aptness

Graph for Resource Allocation Aptness

Data for Resource Allocation Aptness

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200931102,539
14.03.200931104,177
21.03.200931104,717
28.03.200931103,079
04.04.200931101,549
11.04.200931108,497
18.04.200931106,463
25.04.200931104,888


‘Network Control Aspect’

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root ‘Network Control Aspect’  5,491 9,046 + 3,555 Score Maximize Administration Perspective
Description The value of this indicator can be attained on a scale of 1-10 that depends on the extent to which the network is seen to be under control.

Graph for ‘Network Control Aspect’

Graph for ‘Network Control Aspect’

Data for ‘Network Control Aspect’

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200921105,491
14.03.200921106,319
21.03.200921104,231
28.03.200921105,743
04.04.200921103,268
11.04.200921108,38
18.04.200921102,017
25.04.200921109,046


Data Collection Mechanisms

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Data Collection Mechanisms  8,418 8,894 + 0,476 # Maximize Administration Perspective
Description This KPI is equal to the number of data collection mechanisms that are used by the network. Some of these include- agents that are installed on infrastructure, synthetic monitoring for simulation of transactions, sniffers and real user monitoring.

Graph for Data Collection Mechanisms

Graph for Data Collection Mechanisms

Data for Data Collection Mechanisms

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200923108,418
14.03.200923105,114
21.03.200923104,043
28.03.200923106,444
04.04.200923105,66
11.04.200923109,993
18.04.200923109,601
25.04.200923108,894


Maintenance Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Maintenance Perspective  61,61 % 41,29 % -20,32% Network Management Scorecard
Indicators
Average Equipment Replacement Time
Device Configuration Positioning
Performance Gauging
Number of Access Methods Used *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This is to take care of the maintenance aspect of the network.

Graph for Maintenance Perspective

Graph for Maintenance Perspective

Data for Maintenance Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200961,612
14.03.200940,752
21.03.200954,642
28.03.200933,42
04.04.200940,632
11.04.200938,852
18.04.200955,212
25.04.200941,292


Average Equipment Replacement Time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Average Equipment Replacement Time  1,715 3,67 + 1,955 days Minimize Maintenance Perspective
Description This is equal to the average time duration after which the spoilt equipment is replaced. This reflects the pace at which the ‘problem fixing issues’ are tackled.

Graph for Average Equipment Replacement Time

Graph for Average Equipment Replacement Time

Data for Average Equipment Replacement Time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.20092051,715
14.03.20092054,24
21.03.20092054,815
28.03.20092054,33
04.04.20092050,54
11.04.20092053,575
18.04.20092053,895
25.04.20092053,67


Device Configuration Positioning

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Device Configuration Positioning  3,628 2,557 -1,071 Score Maximize Maintenance Perspective
Description The value of this KPI enables one in getting the position of the device architecture of the network. One can attain this by utilizing a scale labelled from 1-10.

Graph for Device Configuration Positioning

Graph for Device Configuration Positioning

Data for Device Configuration Positioning

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200931103,628
14.03.200931104,726
21.03.200931109,001
28.03.200931101,054
04.04.200931105,68
11.04.200931101,612
18.04.200931107,084
25.04.200931102,557


Performance Gauging

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Performance Gauging  8,443 7,084 -1,359 Score Maximize Maintenance Perspective
Description This indicator shows the extent to which the efforts have paid in better performance of the network. Again, the scale numbered from 1-10 comes to help.

Graph for Performance Gauging

Graph for Performance Gauging

Data for Performance Gauging

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200931108,443
14.03.200931105,815
21.03.200931106,067
28.03.200931108,254
04.04.200931102,143
11.04.200931104,879
18.04.200931106,355
25.04.200931107,084


Network Performance Assessment Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Network Performance Assessment Perspective  35,44 % 46,72 % + 11,28% Network Management Scorecard
Indicators
Overhead Percentage
% Dip in Network Attacks
Throughput
Network Bandwidth Utilization Level *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is useful to know the metrics that can be used for analyzing the performance of the network.

Graph for Network Performance Assessment Perspective

Graph for Network Performance Assessment Perspective

Data for Network Performance Assessment Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200935,442
14.03.200930,772
21.03.200965,772
28.03.200950,822
04.04.200974,282
11.04.200957,812
18.04.200952,362
25.04.200946,722


Overhead Percentage

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Overhead Percentage  9,38 14,3 + 4,92 % Minimize Network Performance Assessment Perspective
Description This gives the percentage overhead incurred in managing the network.

Graph for Overhead Percentage

Graph for Overhead Percentage

Data for Overhead Percentage

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200920209,38
14.03.200920207,54
21.03.200920200,04
28.03.2009202010,2
04.04.200920200,66
11.04.200920203,48
18.04.2009202015,3
25.04.2009202014,3


% Dip in Network Attacks

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % Dip in Network Attacks  68,64 45,19 -23,45 % Minimize Network Performance Assessment Perspective
Description This gives the % decrease in the number of attacks that occurred on the network.

Graph for % Dip in Network Attacks

Graph for % Dip in Network Attacks

Data for % Dip in Network Attacks

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200933010068,64
14.03.200933010094,68
21.03.200933010074,73
28.03.200933010065,07
04.04.200933010059,61
11.04.200933010048,97
18.04.200933010093
25.04.200933010045,19


Throughput

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Throughput  996 847,2 -148,8 bits per second Minimize Network Performance Assessment Perspective
Description This is the rate at which data transmission occurs in the network. It is equal to the number of characters received in per unit of time.

Graph for Throughput

Graph for Throughput

Data for Throughput

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200922001000996
14.03.200922001000837,6
21.03.200922001000498,4
28.03.200922001000484,8
04.04.200922001000460,8
11.04.200922001000592,8
18.04.200922001000396,8
25.04.200922001000847,2
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 30.03.2009 19:27:20

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.