This is a Network Security Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Network Security scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Network Security Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 07.03.2009 to 25.04.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Network Security Scorecard  47,32 % 48,4 % + 1,08 %
Security Measures Structure Perspective(48,6%, -22,47%Down)
Internal Operations Perspective(56,9%, 23,14%Up)
Network Assessment Perspective(59,6%, 4,78%Up)
Mechanisms Performance Perspective(24,1%, -0,37%Down)

Graph for Network Security Scorecard

Graph for Network Security Scorecard

Data for Network Security Scorecard

DatesValue
07.03.200947,32
14.03.200959,34
21.03.200953,79
28.03.200955,87
04.04.200943,92
11.04.200932,99
18.04.200947,78
25.04.200948,4


Security Measures Structure Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Security Measures Structure Perspective  71,08 % 48,61 % -22,47% Network Security Scorecard
Indicators
Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools
OS- Specific Security Equipment
Intrusion Detection Status
Authentication Tools’ Potency *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This set of metrics is for having knowledge about the tools and devices used for securing the network.

Graph for Security Measures Structure Perspective

Graph for Security Measures Structure Perspective

Data for Security Measures Structure Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200971,083
14.03.200952,433
21.03.200952,573
28.03.200941,053
04.04.200932,043
11.04.200914,313
18.04.2009483
25.04.200948,613


Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools  6,668 3,644 -3,024 # Maximize Security Measures Structure Perspective
Description This gives the number of monitoring tools that have been used by the network administrator. Some of these can be- ISS tools, password testing and cracking etc.

Graph for Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools

Graph for Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools

Data for Number of Security Monitoring and Auditing Tools

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.20093286,668
14.03.20093283,188
21.03.20093285,78
28.03.20093283,644
04.04.20093283,608
11.04.20093282,69
18.04.20093282,414
25.04.20093283,644


OS- Specific Security Equipment

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root OS- Specific Security Equipment  7,82 5,906 -1,914 # Maximize Security Measures Structure Perspective
Description This KPI is to know the number of tools that are particularly designed for the operating systems.

Graph for OS- Specific Security Equipment

Graph for OS- Specific Security Equipment

Data for OS- Specific Security Equipment

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.20092287,82
14.03.20092284,952
21.03.20092282,396
28.03.20092286,074
04.04.20092284,37
11.04.20092283,062
18.04.20092282,486
25.04.20092285,906


Intrusion Detection Status

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Intrusion Detection Status  4,924 5,545 + 0,621 Score Maximize Security Measures Structure Perspective
Description This KPI shows the potency of the intrusion detection tools that have been put into place. One can use a scale numbered from 1-10.

Graph for Intrusion Detection Status

Graph for Intrusion Detection Status

Data for Intrusion Detection Status

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200931104,924
14.03.200931108,317
21.03.200931109,559
28.03.200931102,917
04.04.200931102,44
11.04.200931102,944
18.04.200931109,577
25.04.200931105,545


Internal Operations Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Internal Operations Perspective  33,77 % 56,91 % + 23,14% Network Security Scorecard
Indicators
Security Policy Compliance
Network Coverage Ratio
Updates Frequency
Equipment and Devices Investment *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category of indicators is to make the assessment of ‘internal operations’ possible.

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Data for Internal Operations Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200933,773
14.03.200976,963
21.03.200949,583
28.03.200969,433
04.04.200949,493
11.04.200926,753
18.04.200942,873
25.04.200956,913


Security Policy Compliance

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Security Policy Compliance  0,658 0,7848 + 0,127 # Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description A set of guidelines to be followed for ensuring network security should be in place. One should keep a track on the degree to which it is complied with.

Graph for Security Policy Compliance

Graph for Security Policy Compliance

Data for Security Policy Compliance

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200930,610,658
14.03.200930,610,7852
21.03.200930,610,8416
28.03.200930,610,9392
04.04.200930,610,9904
11.04.200930,610,7476
18.04.200930,610,8052
25.04.200930,610,7848


Network Coverage Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Network Coverage Ratio  0,834 0,9662 + 0,132 # Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description This KPI reflects the degree to which the whole network is covered by security mechanisms. One can assign a value to this indicator by looking at the fraction of the network that is equipped with security measures.

Graph for Network Coverage Ratio

Graph for Network Coverage Ratio

Data for Network Coverage Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200930,810,834
14.03.200930,810,9902
21.03.200930,810,8796
28.03.200930,810,8462
04.04.200930,810,8382
11.04.200930,810,8232
18.04.200930,810,8824
25.04.200930,810,9662


Updates Frequency

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Updates Frequency  3,968 2,48 -1,488 # Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description This gives the pace at which one updates the security structure. It can be equal to the number of times the up-dation is done in one year.

Graph for Updates Frequency

Graph for Updates Frequency

Data for Updates Frequency

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.20092253,968
14.03.20092254,67
21.03.20092252,657
28.03.20092254,823
04.04.20092253,677
11.04.20092252,072
18.04.20092252,543
25.04.20092252,48


Network Assessment Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Network Assessment Perspective  54,84 % 59,62 % + 4,78% Network Security Scorecard
Indicators
Node Synchronization Degree
Frequency of Password Change
SUS Potential
Frequency of Security Tests *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This gives a way to assess the network on various grounds.

Graph for Network Assessment Perspective

Graph for Network Assessment Perspective

Data for Network Assessment Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200954,842
14.03.200947,362
21.03.200975,392
28.03.200954,22
04.04.2009402
11.04.200940,592
18.04.200947,142
25.04.200959,622


Node Synchronization Degree

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Node Synchronization Degree  0,988 0,9504 -0,0376 # Maximize Network Assessment Perspective
Description This is to make sure that all the nodes of the network receive secured services and resources.

Graph for Node Synchronization Degree

Graph for Node Synchronization Degree

Data for Node Synchronization Degree

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200930,810,988
14.03.200930,810,9866
21.03.200930,810,9836
28.03.200930,810,943
04.04.200930,810,8164
11.04.200930,810,8562
18.04.200930,810,9228
25.04.200930,810,9504


Frequency of Password Change

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Frequency of Password Change  9,95 5,11 -4,84 # Maximize Network Assessment Perspective
Description Changing the password is often adopted to make the network secure in a year.

Graph for Frequency of Password Change

Graph for Frequency of Password Change

Data for Frequency of Password Change

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200925109,95
14.03.200925105,215
21.03.200925107,77
28.03.200925106,075
04.04.200925108,375
11.04.200925105,655
18.04.200925106,685
25.04.200925105,11


SUS Potential

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root SUS Potential  2,134 7,435 + 5,301 Score Maximize Network Assessment Perspective
Description Software Update Server is used to make sure that installation of automatic security updates is done in the network smoothly. The value can be had by using scale of 1-10.

Graph for SUS Potential

Graph for SUS Potential

Data for SUS Potential

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200921102,134
14.03.200921102,971
21.03.200921107,813
28.03.200921101,45
04.04.200921109,847
11.04.200921106,112
18.04.200921102,224
25.04.200921107,435


Mechanisms Performance Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Mechanisms Performance Perspective  24,47 % 24,1 % -0,37% Network Security Scorecard
Indicators
Drop in Data Leakage Instances
Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario
Feedback Degree
Security Awareness Rise *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This helps in knowing the extent to which the mechanisms are performing in the ‘intended’ manner.

Graph for Mechanisms Performance Perspective

Graph for Mechanisms Performance Perspective

Data for Mechanisms Performance Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200924,472
14.03.200955,262
21.03.200940,322
28.03.200959,422
04.04.200957,32
11.04.200962,772
18.04.200955,452
25.04.200924,12


Drop in Data Leakage Instances

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Drop in Data Leakage Instances  57,775 27,85 -29,92 % Maximize Mechanisms Performance Perspective
Description This is equal to the decrease experienced in data leakages.

Graph for Drop in Data Leakage Instances

Graph for Drop in Data Leakage Instances

Data for Drop in Data Leakage Instances

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200932510057,775
14.03.200932510088,675
21.03.200932510036,775
28.03.200932510074,8
04.04.200932510092,95
11.04.200932510050,275
18.04.200932510038,05
25.04.200932510027,85


Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario  81,75 90,1 + 8,35 % Maximize Mechanisms Performance Perspective
Description This reflects the decline seen in cost borne by the management related to data loss in ‘pre’ and ‘post’ security mechanisms installation’s scenario.

Graph for Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario

Graph for Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario

Data for Pre: Post Security Mechanisms Scenario

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200927510081,75
14.03.200927510096,025
21.03.200927510081,975
28.03.200927510080,525
04.04.200927510079,325
11.04.200927510093,225
18.04.200927510093,925
25.04.200927510090,1


Feedback Degree

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Feedback Degree  2,143 4,708 + 2,565 Score Maximize Mechanisms Performance Perspective
Description The value of this KPI is useful in knowing the extent to which the administration is paying attention to the feedback aspect of the network. The value can be had on a scale of 1-10.

Graph for Feedback Degree

Graph for Feedback Degree

Data for Feedback Degree

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200921102,143
14.03.200921101,747
21.03.200921104,105
28.03.200921103,745
04.04.200921106,733
11.04.200921107,714
18.04.200921107,246
25.04.200921104,708
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 30.03.2009 19:45:42

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.