This is a Police Services Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Police Services scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.

Police Services Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 02.01.2009 to 20.02.2009

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Contains

Police Services Scorecard

62,28 %

41,73 %

-20,55 %

Resource Allocation Perspective	(38,4%, -11,62%)
Public Satisfaction and Efficacy Evaluation perspective	(39,7%, -34,65%)
Internal Operations Perspective	(44,2%, -39,08%)
Crime Reduction Perspective	(47,4%, 5,72%)

Graph for Police Services Scorecard

Data for Police Services Scorecard

Dates	Value
02.01.2009	62,28
09.01.2009	58,83
16.01.2009	46,17
23.01.2009	30,02
30.01.2009	63,22
06.02.2009	49,13
13.02.2009	52,79
20.02.2009	41,73

Resource Allocation Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Resource Allocation Perspective

49,99 %

38,37 %

-11,62%

Police Services Scorecard

Indicators

Amount spent on equipments

Cash: Non-Cash Resource Ratio

Amount spent on training, supplies, materials and uniforms

Share for Facilities and fleet maintenance *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs helps in knowing the areas, where the funds are being put. By using the information, one can allocate a uniform proportion of the available monetary sources.

Graph for Resource Allocation Perspective

Data for Resource Allocation Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
02.01.2009	49,99	3
09.01.2009	66,33	3
16.01.2009	45,06	3
23.01.2009	23,04	3
30.01.2009	69,48	3
06.02.2009	58,73	3
13.02.2009	32,43	3
20.02.2009	38,37	3

Amount spent on equipments

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Amount spent on equipments	2804000	2336000	-4,68E005	$	Maximize	Resource Allocation Perspective

Description There are various kinds of devices and tools that command significant expenditure to be done. By obtaining the value on yearly basis, one can manage the financial aspect in a better way.

Graph for Amount spent on equipments

Data for Amount spent on equipments

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	3	500000	5000000	2804000
09.01.2009	3	500000	5000000	4748000
16.01.2009	3	500000	5000000	4208000
23.01.2009	3	500000	5000000	1292000
30.01.2009	3	500000	5000000	3650000
06.02.2009	3	500000	5000000	2543000
13.02.2009	3	500000	5000000	3902000
20.02.2009	3	500000	5000000	2336000

Cash: Non-Cash Resource Ratio

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Cash: Non-Cash Resource Ratio	0,1711	0,5653	+ 0,394	#	Maximize	Resource Allocation Perspective

Description This KPI reflects the ratio borne by cash resources to non-cash resources.

Graph for Cash: Non-Cash Resource Ratio

Data for Cash: Non-Cash Resource Ratio

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	2	0,1	1	0,1711
09.01.2009	2	0,1	1	0,3142
16.01.2009	2	0,1	1	0,9829
23.01.2009	2	0,1	1	0,4285
30.01.2009	2	0,1	1	0,6373
06.02.2009	2	0,1	1	0,3322
13.02.2009	2	0,1	1	0,2575
20.02.2009	2	0,1	1	0,5653

Amount spent on training, supplies, materials and uniforms

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Amount spent on training, supplies, materials and uniforms	5364700	2535700	-2,829E006	$	Maximize	Resource Allocation Perspective

Description This indicator shows the fraction of funds that is put into procuring of training, supplies, uniforms and materials, on annual basis.

Graph for Amount spent on training, supplies, materials and uniforms

Data for Amount spent on training, supplies, materials and uniforms

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	3	100000	7000000	5364700
09.01.2009	3	100000	7000000	4798900
16.01.2009	3	100000	7000000	224200
23.01.2009	3	100000	7000000	1507600
30.01.2009	3	100000	7000000	5454400
06.02.2009	3	100000	7000000	4895500
13.02.2009	3	100000	7000000	1445500
20.02.2009	3	100000	7000000	2535700

Public Satisfaction and Efficacy Evaluation perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Public Satisfaction and Efficacy Evaluation perspective

74,32 %

39,67 %

-34,65%

Police Services Scorecard

Indicators

Satisfied Residents Percentage

Counter Terrorism Index

Overall criminal offence clearance rate

% reduction in complaints against police personnel *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description KPIs grouped under this category enable the management in knowing the parameters through which efficiency aspect can be judged.

Graph for Public Satisfaction and Efficacy Evaluation perspective

Data for Public Satisfaction and Efficacy Evaluation perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
02.01.2009	74,32	3
09.01.2009	61,88	3
16.01.2009	43,52	3
23.01.2009	37,22	3
30.01.2009	56,73	3
06.02.2009	46,01	3
13.02.2009	53,79	3
20.02.2009	39,67	3

Satisfied Residents Percentage

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Satisfied Residents Percentage	92,58	84,44	-8,14	%	Maximize	Public Satisfaction and Efficacy Evaluation perspective

Description This KPI is equal to the percentage of people who are of the opinion that the Police of their area are doing the job, in prescribed way.

Graph for Satisfied Residents Percentage

Data for Satisfied Residents Percentage

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	3	80	100	92,58
09.01.2009	3	80	100	92,92
16.01.2009	3	80	100	87,72
23.01.2009	3	80	100	90,88
30.01.2009	3	80	100	96,82
06.02.2009	3	80	100	86,1
13.02.2009	3	80	100	96,46
20.02.2009	3	80	100	84,44

Counter Terrorism Index

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Counter Terrorism Index	95,545	95,605	+ 0,06	%	Maximize	Public Satisfaction and Efficacy Evaluation perspective

Description This KPI is equal to the degree of compliance with the Terrorism Plan that has been provided to effectively tackle the terrorism activities, to the staff.

Graph for Counter Terrorism Index

Data for Counter Terrorism Index

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	3	85	100	95,545
09.01.2009	3	85	100	97,99
16.01.2009	3	85	100	90,37
23.01.2009	3	85	100	85,09
30.01.2009	3	85	100	90,19
06.02.2009	3	85	100	94,15
13.02.2009	3	85	100	89,59
20.02.2009	3	85	100	95,605

Overall criminal offence clearance rate

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Overall criminal offence clearance rate	91,48	82,84	-8,64	%	Maximize	Public Satisfaction and Efficacy Evaluation perspective

Description This KPI helps in knowing the clearance rate of overall criminal offences occured in the city.

Graph for Overall criminal offence clearance rate

Data for Overall criminal offence clearance rate

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	2	60	100	91,48
09.01.2009	2	60	100	66,24
16.01.2009	2	60	100	65,08
23.01.2009	2	60	100	69
30.01.2009	2	60	100	71,44
06.02.2009	2	60	100	76,08
13.02.2009	2	60	100	63,64
20.02.2009	2	60	100	82,84

Internal Operations Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Internal Operations Perspective

83,27 %

44,19 %

-39,08%

Police Services Scorecard

Indicators

Average Response Time

Case resolving Success ratio

Number of training sessions for skill development

% decrease in service calls *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category of indicators helps in making sure that proceedings keep occurring at fast pace, with minimum back-log portion.

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Data for Internal Operations Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
02.01.2009	83,27	2
09.01.2009	60,83	2
16.01.2009	42,07	2
23.01.2009	22,64	2
30.01.2009	67,5	2
06.02.2009	36,04	2
13.02.2009	62,06	2
20.02.2009	44,19	2

Average Response Time

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Average Response Time	5,34	17,9	+ 12,56	minutes	Minimize	Internal Operations Perspective

Description The value of this parameter shows the time that goes into, when the staff is able to reach the place where the problem has occured.

Graph for Average Response Time

Data for Average Response Time

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	3	5	25	5,34
09.01.2009	3	5	25	5,44
16.01.2009	3	5	25	23,02
23.01.2009	3	5	25	17,18
30.01.2009	3	5	25	7,9
06.02.2009	3	5	25	11,66
13.02.2009	3	5	25	16,8
20.02.2009	3	5	25	17,9

Case resolving Success ratio

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Case resolving Success ratio	97,55	87,8	-9,75	%	Maximize	Internal Operations Perspective

Description This KPI is equal to the ratio borne by �number of serious cases brought to agreements or judgments� to �total number of cases reported�.

Graph for Case resolving Success ratio

Data for Case resolving Success ratio

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	3	75	100	97,55
09.01.2009	3	75	100	75,625
16.01.2009	3	75	100	92,55
23.01.2009	3	75	100	75,225
30.01.2009	3	75	100	88,775
06.02.2009	3	75	100	86,275
13.02.2009	3	75	100	98
20.02.2009	3	75	100	87,8

Number of training sessions for skill development

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of training sessions for skill development	18,096	9,04	-9,056	#	Maximize	Internal Operations Perspective

Description This indicator is to know the number of training sessions imparted, over one year time. This is needed to keep them updated of the latest developments.

Graph for Number of training sessions for skill development

Data for Number of training sessions for skill development

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	2	4	20	18,096
09.01.2009	2	4	20	19,744
16.01.2009	2	4	20	4,416
23.01.2009	2	4	20	9,136
30.01.2009	2	4	20	16,56
06.02.2009	2	4	20	5,712
13.02.2009	2	4	20	7,728
20.02.2009	2	4	20	9,04

Crime Reduction Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Crime Reduction Perspective

41,68 %

47,4 %

+ 5,72%

Police Services Scorecard

Indicators

Dip in Crime against person

�Crimes against Property� reduction

Lowering of Criminal Code Violations

% drop in criminal activities during major events *

% dip in youth involved in crimes *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs gives the degree of drop in various sources, from which crime stems.

Graph for Crime Reduction Perspective

Data for Crime Reduction Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
02.01.2009	41,68	2
09.01.2009	41	2
16.01.2009	55,92	2
23.01.2009	37,08	2
30.01.2009	59,28	2
06.02.2009	52,5	2
13.02.2009	72,56	2
20.02.2009	47,4	2

Dip in Crime against person

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Dip in Crime against person	47,53	11,35	-36,18	%	Maximize	Crime Reduction Perspective

Description This KPI considers the extent to which the instances of murders, abduction, kidnappings, assaults etc were brought down over one year period.

Graph for Dip in Crime against person

Data for Dip in Crime against person

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	2	10	100	47,53
09.01.2009	2	10	100	23,77
16.01.2009	2	10	100	69,22
23.01.2009	2	10	100	27,46
30.01.2009	2	10	100	63,64
06.02.2009	2	10	100	85,51
13.02.2009	2	10	100	50,5
20.02.2009	2	10	100	11,35

�Crimes against Property� reduction

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	�Crimes against Property� reduction	24,8	71	+ 46,2	%	Maximize	Crime Reduction Perspective

Description This indicator is to have the drop in cases of stealing, theft, fraud etc. that occur in the city, in one year time.

Graph for �Crimes against Property� reduction

Data for �Crimes against Property� reduction

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	2	0	100	24,8
09.01.2009	2	0	100	96
16.01.2009	2	0	100	10,3
23.01.2009	2	0	100	20,1
30.01.2009	2	0	100	21,7
06.02.2009	2	0	100	18,1
13.02.2009	2	0	100	89,8
20.02.2009	2	0	100	71

Lowering of Criminal Code Violations

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Lowering of Criminal Code Violations	82,5	68,2	-14,3	%	Maximize	Crime Reduction Perspective

Description This KPI takes the decrease in number of instances, in which explosives, gaming, betting etc were noticed, in one year�s time.

Graph for Lowering of Criminal Code Violations

Data for Lowering of Criminal Code Violations

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
02.01.2009	2	0	100	82,5
09.01.2009	2	0	100	44,4
16.01.2009	2	0	100	98,2
23.01.2009	2	0	100	19,8
30.01.2009	2	0	100	67,4
06.02.2009	2	0	100	18,3
13.02.2009	2	0	100	36,7
20.02.2009	2	0	100	68,2

Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 25.01.2009 20:40:33