This is a Productivity Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Productivity scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Work Productivity Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 06.04.2008 to 25.05.2008

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Work Productivity Scorecard 49,58 % 55,52 % + 5,94 %
Financial impact of Productivity(53,7%, 13,48%Up)
Productivity in Internal Process(76,7%, -7,38%Down)
Productivity and Customers(38,8%, 19,2%Up)
Better education and Growth(43,3%, 1,39%Up)

Graph for Work Productivity Scorecard

Graph for Work Productivity Scorecard

Data for Work Productivity Scorecard

DatesValue
06.04.200849,58
13.04.200850,6
20.04.200843,54
27.04.200851,61
04.05.200837,13
11.05.200848,65
18.05.200863,23
25.05.200855,52

Financial impact of Productivity

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Financial impact of Productivity 40,18 % 53,66 % + 13,48% Work Productivity Scorecard
Indicators
Finance Saved
Time Saved
Target costs
Target time *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description The productivity in your company's workplace has high impact on whether or not your business or organization succeeds financially.

Graph for Financial impact of Productivity

Graph for Financial impact of Productivity

Data for Financial impact of Productivity

DatesValueWeight
06.04.200840,183
13.04.200868,413
20.04.200854,523
27.04.200861,563
04.05.200818,023
11.05.200845,373
18.05.200864,683
25.05.200853,663

Finance Saved

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Finance Saved 102,9 52,35 -50,55 Score Maximize Financial impact of Productivity
Description Additional $ saved/spent per employee as a result of high or low productivity.
Target description US$

Graph for Finance Saved

Graph for Finance Saved

Data for Finance Saved

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
06.04.200820150102,9
13.04.20082015041,85
20.04.200820150135,6
27.04.20082015067,05
04.05.20082015035,4
11.05.20082015096,9
18.05.200820150111,75
25.05.20082015052,35

Time Saved

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Time Saved 2,725 4,505 + 1,78 Score Maximize Financial impact of Productivity
Description Additional time spent/saved in hours per employee per week, as a result of high/low work productivity.
Target description hours per employee per week

Graph for Time Saved

Graph for Time Saved

Data for Time Saved

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
06.04.20084052,725
13.04.20084053,855
20.04.20084050,74
27.04.20084053,495
04.05.20084050,595
11.05.20084052,375
18.05.20084052,17
25.05.20084054,505

Target costs

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Target costs 562,64 589,28 + 26,64 Score Minimize Financial impact of Productivity
Description Target costs: in $ , being met, or trying to be met as a result of productivity.
Target description US$

Graph for Target costs

Graph for Target costs

Data for Target costs

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
06.04.20081500590562,64
13.04.20081500590571,28
20.04.20081500590520,79
27.04.20081500590513,59
04.05.20081500590528,53
11.05.20081500590501,08
18.05.20081500590512,87
25.05.20081500590589,28

Productivity in Internal Process

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Productivity in Internal Process 84,08 % 76,7 % -7,38% Work Productivity Scorecard
Indicators
Morale Improvement
Goals efficiency
Problems solving efficiency
Projects Success Rate *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description What internal processes must be improved upon within your company, in order to satisfy and retain customers, clients, and shareholders?

Graph for Productivity in Internal Process

Graph for Productivity in Internal Process

Data for Productivity in Internal Process

DatesValueWeight
06.04.200884,083
13.04.200826,083
20.04.200843,473
27.04.200840,323
04.05.200831,283
11.05.200862,123
18.05.200851,33
25.05.200876,73

Morale Improvement

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Morale Improvement 72,675 10,965 -61,71 % Maximize Productivity in Internal Process
Description In terms of staff morale, measure % of staff who seemed satisfied or unsatisfied with work.

Graph for Morale Improvement

Graph for Morale Improvement

Data for Morale Improvement

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
06.04.2008108572,675
13.04.2008108537,06
20.04.2008108533,66
27.04.2008108516,065
04.05.200810855,695
11.05.2008108582,025
18.05.2008108579,39
25.05.2008108510,965

Goals efficiency

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Goals efficiency 78,68 68,36 -10,32 % Maximize Productivity in Internal Process
Description Are tasks well organized? Measure with a ratio of tasks:employees.

Graph for Goals efficiency

Graph for Goals efficiency

Data for Goals efficiency

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
06.04.20083408078,68
13.04.20083408046,08
20.04.20083408072,44
27.04.20083408072,2
04.05.20083408061,88
11.05.20083408076,36
18.05.20083408043,52
25.05.20083408068,36

Problems solving efficiency

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Problems solving efficiency 1,108 1,436 + 0,328 Score Minimize Productivity in Internal Process
Description Time it takes to resolve and discuss problems; measured in hours, as a result of efficient management.
Target description hours

Graph for Problems solving efficiency

Graph for Problems solving efficiency

Data for Problems solving efficiency

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
06.04.20084151,108
13.04.20084154,316
20.04.20084154,868
27.04.20084154,336
04.05.20084154,844
11.05.20084152,7
18.05.20084152,804
25.05.20084151,436

Productivity and Customers

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Productivity and Customers 19,58 % 38,78 % + 19,2% Work Productivity Scorecard
Indicators
Customer Support Efficiency
Customer Satisfaction Ratio
Description Although at a first glance, customers are not exactly involved in work productivity, however, they are affected by your company's staff, depending on how focused their efforts are.

Graph for Productivity and Customers

Graph for Productivity and Customers

Data for Productivity and Customers

DatesValueWeight
06.04.200819,582
13.04.200862,12
20.04.200833,362
27.04.200826,762
04.05.200875,842
11.05.200830,982
18.05.200877,42
25.05.200838,782

Customer Support Efficiency

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Customer Support Efficiency 3,678 3,698 + 0,02 Score Minimize Productivity and Customers
Description Average time spent answering emails, phone calls, or complaint/comment letters.
Target description hours

Graph for Customer Support Efficiency

Graph for Customer Support Efficiency

Data for Customer Support Efficiency

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
06.04.20086243,678
13.04.20086242,802
20.04.20086243,168
27.04.20086243,392
04.05.20086242,316
11.05.20086243,47
18.05.20086242,288
25.05.20086243,698

Customer Satisfaction Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Customer Satisfaction Ratio 51,16 73,435 + 22,28 % Maximize Productivity and Customers
Description Measure % of customers satisfied with answers given; or % of customers that ask to speak with management, or need to be referred elsewhere for answers.

Graph for Customer Satisfaction Ratio

Graph for Customer Satisfaction Ratio

Data for Customer Satisfaction Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
06.04.20084408551,16
13.04.20084408569,43
20.04.20084408549,45
27.04.20084408549,585
04.05.20084408568,485
11.05.20084408556,965
18.05.20084408569,295
25.05.20084408573,435

Better education and Growth

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Better education and Growth 41,91 % 43,3 % + 1,39% Work Productivity Scorecard
Indicators
Implementation Speed
New Opportunities Ratio
Courses Efficiency
Description Here you will measure the improvement of your staff, and sustaining your company's ability to consistently evolve and change.

Graph for Better education and Growth

Graph for Better education and Growth

Data for Better education and Growth

DatesValueWeight
06.04.200841,912
13.04.200849,152
20.04.200837,352
27.04.200878,472
04.05.200835,842
11.05.200851,052
18.05.200864,762
25.05.200843,32

Implementation Speed

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Implementation Speed 7,076 2,939 -4,137 Score Minimize Better education and Growth
Description Cycle of implementation by the staff, after they have been educated; how fast are they applying what they've learned to take on new, and more challenging tasks.
Target description weeks

Graph for Implementation Speed

Graph for Implementation Speed

Data for Implementation Speed

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
06.04.20084187,076
13.04.20084183,331
20.04.20084185,459
27.04.20084182,12
04.05.20084185,823
11.05.20084185,193
18.05.20084182,848
25.05.20084182,939

New Opportunities Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root New Opportunities Ratio 5,402 2,804 -2,598 Score Maximize Better education and Growth
Description Time saved/spent by high or low work productivity that can be used for further training or education.
Target description hours

Graph for New Opportunities Ratio

Graph for New Opportunities Ratio

Data for New Opportunities Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
06.04.20085285,402
13.04.20085284,1
20.04.20085283,584
27.04.20085286,398
04.05.20085284,034
11.05.20085286,182
18.05.20085285,576
25.05.20085282,804

Courses Efficiency

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Courses Efficiency 57,96 53,76 -4,2 % Maximize Better education and Growth
Description Numbers of courses offered by your company for further education vs. how many courses are actually implemented and taken by the staff.

Graph for Courses Efficiency

Graph for Courses Efficiency

Data for Courses Efficiency

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
06.04.2008107057,96
13.04.2008107034,79
20.04.2008107067,41
27.04.2008107057,54
04.05.2008107045,15
11.05.200810701,12
18.05.2008107038,64
25.05.2008107053,76
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 29.04.2008 0:01:13

Copyright © 2000-2008 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.