This is a Programming Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Programming scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.

Software Programming and Coding Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 14.02.2009 to 04.04.2009

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Contains

Software Programming and Coding Scorecard

36,49 %

45,59 %

+ 9,1 %

Coding Evaluation Perspective	(32,9%, -2,54%)
Analyzing the Software Programming Process Perspective	(58,6%, 26,85%)
Performance Perspective	(43,6%, 6,65%)
Assessing Output of Software Programming and Coding Process Perspective	(47,2%, 2,36%)

Graph for Software Programming and Coding Scorecard

Data for Software Programming and Coding Scorecard

Dates	Value
14.02.2009	36,49
21.02.2009	49,13
28.02.2009	50,41
07.03.2009	57,29
14.03.2009	58,65
21.03.2009	63,94
28.03.2009	45,96
04.04.2009	45,59

Coding Evaluation Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Coding Evaluation Perspective

35,4 %

32,86 %

-2,54%

Software Programming and Coding Scorecard

Indicators

Standards Compliance Index

Drop in the Average Number of Bugs Identified

Mean Time Taken in De-bugging

Number of Certifications Held *

Number of Tools Used in the Coding Process *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category of indicators is for judging the coding aspect of Software Engineering.

Graph for Coding Evaluation Perspective

Data for Coding Evaluation Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
14.02.2009	35,4	3
21.02.2009	58,66	3
28.02.2009	56,78	3
07.03.2009	45,7	3
14.03.2009	62,84	3
21.03.2009	70,18	3
28.03.2009	47,74	3
04.04.2009	32,86	3

Standards Compliance Index

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Standards Compliance Index	0,838	0,8002	-0,0378	#	Maximize	Coding Evaluation Perspective

Description This gives the degree to which the software developing and coding process confirms to the pre-set guidelines. This is needed to ensure that minimal errors occur in the development process.

Graph for Standards Compliance Index

Data for Standards Compliance Index

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	0,8	1	0,838
21.02.2009	2	0,8	1	0,9558
28.02.2009	2	0,8	1	0,975
07.03.2009	2	0,8	1	0,9282
14.03.2009	2	0,8	1	0,9534
21.03.2009	2	0,8	1	0,8886
28.03.2009	2	0,8	1	0,8302
04.04.2009	2	0,8	1	0,8002

Drop in the Average Number of Bugs Identified

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Drop in the Average Number of Bugs Identified	71,02	82,54	+ 11,52	%	Maximize	Coding Evaluation Perspective

Description This gives an idea about the learning effects drawn from the process of developing and coding software.

Graph for Drop in the Average Number of Bugs Identified

Data for Drop in the Average Number of Bugs Identified

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	40	100	71,02
21.02.2009	2	40	100	52,12
28.02.2009	2	40	100	54,04
07.03.2009	2	40	100	45,16
14.03.2009	2	40	100	64,9
21.03.2009	2	40	100	81,1
28.03.2009	2	40	100	88,24
04.04.2009	2	40	100	82,54

Mean Time Taken in De-bugging

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Mean Time Taken in De-bugging	21,06	58,761	+ 37,7	hr	Minimize	Coding Evaluation Perspective

Description This indicates the complexity of the bugs that were found in the software.

Graph for Mean Time Taken in De-bugging

Data for Mean Time Taken in De-bugging

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	1	60	21,06
21.02.2009	2	1	60	10,027
28.02.2009	2	1	60	16,812
07.03.2009	2	1	60	9,791
14.03.2009	2	1	60	41,297
21.03.2009	2	1	60	15,101
28.03.2009	2	1	60	53,333
04.04.2009	2	1	60	58,761

Analyzing the Software Programming Process Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Analyzing the Software Programming Process Perspective

31,75 %

58,6 %

+ 26,85%

Software Programming and Coding Scorecard

Indicators

Schedule Adherence Index

Earnings per Project

Average Data Collection Cycle Duration

Number of Areas Covered *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of parameters is for evaluating the back drop structure of the software programming and coding process. This gives an idea about the way the process is heading.

Graph for Analyzing the Software Programming Process Perspective

Data for Analyzing the Software Programming Process Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
14.02.2009	31,75	3
21.02.2009	53,2	3
28.02.2009	55,48	3
07.03.2009	89,26	3
14.03.2009	69,17	3
21.03.2009	66,44	3
28.03.2009	48,62	3
04.04.2009	58,6	3

Schedule Adherence Index

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Schedule Adherence Index	86,44	91,015	+ 4,575	%	Maximize	Analyzing the Software Programming Process Perspective

Description This is to have the fraction of tasks in which the projects were completed within the deadlines.

Graph for Schedule Adherence Index

Data for Schedule Adherence Index

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	3	85	100	86,44
21.02.2009	3	85	100	87,145
28.02.2009	3	85	100	91,54
07.03.2009	3	85	100	99,475
14.03.2009	3	85	100	99,94
21.03.2009	3	85	100	95,575
28.03.2009	3	85	100	90,61
04.04.2009	3	85	100	91,015

Earnings per Project

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Earnings per Project	12592	7816	-4776	USD	Maximize	Analyzing the Software Programming Process Perspective

Description This shows the amount gathered on per developer basis.

Graph for Earnings per Project

Data for Earnings per Project

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	1000	25000	12592
21.02.2009	2	1000	25000	15160
28.02.2009	2	1000	25000	14800
07.03.2009	2	1000	25000	23248
14.03.2009	2	1000	25000	22312
21.03.2009	2	1000	25000	7768
28.03.2009	2	1000	25000	9424
04.04.2009	2	1000	25000	7816

Average Data Collection Cycle Duration

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Average Data Collection Cycle Duration	6,2	3,816	-2,384	weeks	Minimize	Analyzing the Software Programming Process Perspective

Description This is equal to the time that goes into gathering the required data for projects.

Graph for Average Data Collection Cycle Duration

Data for Average Data Collection Cycle Duration

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	3	2	10	6,2
21.02.2009	3	2	10	3,32
28.02.2009	3	2	10	5,568
07.03.2009	3	2	10	2,456
14.03.2009	3	2	10	5,784
21.03.2009	3	2	10	3,016
28.03.2009	3	2	10	5,984
04.04.2009	3	2	10	3,816

Performance Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Performance Perspective

36,93 %

43,58 %

+ 6,65%

Software Programming and Coding Scorecard

Indicators

Cost Budget Improvement

Time Frame Drop

Learning Curve Benefits

Increase in 'Number of Projects Handled� *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This class of metrics is for knowing the way the process is improving. Values of these KPIs can be had on yearly basis.

Graph for Performance Perspective

Data for Performance Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
14.02.2009	36,93	2
21.02.2009	24,12	2
28.02.2009	40,7	2
07.03.2009	14,25	2
14.03.2009	45,72	2
21.03.2009	49,8	2
28.03.2009	57,88	2
04.04.2009	43,58	2

Cost Budget Improvement

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Cost Budget Improvement	52,16	44,96	-7,2	%	Maximize	Performance Perspective

Description This KPI indicates the extent to which the software programming and coding processes are being completed within the cost provided.

Graph for Cost Budget Improvement

Data for Cost Budget Improvement

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	20	100	52,16
21.02.2009	2	20	100	24,88
28.02.2009	2	20	100	38,64
07.03.2009	2	20	100	47,2
14.03.2009	2	20	100	72,72
21.03.2009	2	20	100	31,84
28.03.2009	2	20	100	29,92
04.04.2009	2	20	100	44,96

Time Frame Drop

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Time Frame Drop	22,32	37,88	+ 15,56	%	Maximize	Performance Perspective

Description This gives the fall realized in the time adherence of the projects' structure.

Graph for Time Frame Drop

Data for Time Frame Drop

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	3	10	50	22,32
21.02.2009	3	10	50	24,84
28.02.2009	3	10	50	21,2
07.03.2009	3	10	50	12,64
14.03.2009	3	10	50	39,04
21.03.2009	3	10	50	33,88
28.03.2009	3	10	50	38,2
04.04.2009	3	10	50	37,88

Learning Curve Benefits

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Learning Curve Benefits	5,698	6,949	+ 1,251	Score	Maximize	Performance Perspective

Description This indicator is a way to have an overall hinting for the benefits that developer accrues due to �recurrent activities�. A scale numbered from 1-10 can be used for this.

Graph for Learning Curve Benefits

Data for Learning Curve Benefits

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	1	10	5,698
21.02.2009	2	1	10	4,123
28.02.2009	2	1	10	2,044
07.03.2009	2	1	10	1,693
14.03.2009	2	1	10	3,142
21.03.2009	2	1	10	9,793
28.03.2009	2	1	10	3,412
04.04.2009	2	1	10	6,949

Assessing Output of Software Programming and Coding Process Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Assessing Output of Software Programming and Coding Process Perspective

44,81 %

47,17 %

+ 2,36%

Software Programming and Coding Scorecard

Indicators

Reliability Ratio

Usability Index

Portability Position

Robustness Ratio *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs helps in gaining an insight into the outcome of the software that is programmed.

Graph for Assessing Output of Software Programming and Coding Process Perspective

Data for Assessing Output of Software Programming and Coding Process Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
14.02.2009	44,81	2
21.02.2009	53,73	2
28.02.2009	42,98	2
07.03.2009	69,75	2
14.03.2009	49,53	2
21.03.2009	64,97	2
28.03.2009	27,4	2
04.04.2009	47,17	2

Reliability Ratio

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Reliability Ratio	0,9775	0,895	-0,0825	#	Maximize	Assessing Output of Software Programming and Coding Process Perspective

Description This KPI gives the extent to which the developed software is reliable i.e. how often the results obtained are accurate. It is all about prevention of errors.

Graph for Reliability Ratio

Data for Reliability Ratio

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	2	0,7	1	0,9775
21.02.2009	2	0,7	1	0,9328
28.02.2009	2	0,7	1	0,8773
07.03.2009	2	0,7	1	0,8248
14.03.2009	2	0,7	1	0,7927
21.03.2009	2	0,7	1	0,9739
28.03.2009	2	0,7	1	0,8263
04.04.2009	2	0,7	1	0,895

Usability Index

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Usability Index	0,973	0,9588	-0,0142	#	Maximize	Assessing Output of Software Programming and Coding Process Perspective

Description This is to know the degree of usefulness of the software. It should be able to fulfill the aims it was created for.

Graph for Usability Index

Data for Usability Index

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	3	0,9	1	0,973
21.02.2009	3	0,9	1	0,9445
28.02.2009	3	0,9	1	0,9997
14.03.2009	3	0,9	1	0,9214
21.03.2009	3	0,9	1	0,9648
28.03.2009	3	0,9	1	0,9148
04.04.2009	3	0,9	1	0,9588

Portability Position

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Portability Position	1,783	5,131	+ 3,348	Score	Maximize	Assessing Output of Software Programming and Coding Process Perspective

Description This is an important determinant in deciding the success of the software. It indicates the platforms and operating systems on which the source code of the software can be compiled. The value can be had using a scale numbered from 1-10.

Graph for Portability Position

Data for Portability Position

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
14.02.2009	3	1	10	1,783
21.02.2009	3	1	10	3,448
28.02.2009	3	1	10	1,153
07.03.2009	3	1	10	8,452
14.03.2009	3	1	10	6,229
21.03.2009	3	1	10	3,619
28.03.2009	3	1	10	3,106
04.04.2009	3	1	10	5,131

Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 09.03.2009 23:36:33