This is a Publishing Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Publishing scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.

Publishing Balanced Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 30.08.2009 to 18.10.2009

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Contains

Publishing Balanced Scorecard

55,89 %

47,93 %

-7,96 %

Popularity assessment	(68,5%, 11,37%)
Subscription Gauging	(37,4%, -35,8%)
Internal Operations Perspective	(40,3%, 19,59%)
Legal Aspects handling	(39,5%, -27,09%)

Graph for Publishing Balanced Scorecard

Data for Publishing Balanced Scorecard

Dates	Value
30.08.2009	55,89
06.09.2009	41,65
13.09.2009	44,34
20.09.2009	48,21
27.09.2009	54,4
04.10.2009	52,66
11.10.2009	49,89
18.10.2009	47,93

Popularity assessment

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Popularity assessment

57,12 %

68,49 %

+ 11,37%

Publishing Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

Readership share

Number of domains mastered

Accolades Jump

'Publication Fraction' acknowledged *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description The parameters grouped under this category are for to gauge the extent to which the published material has managed acceptance among masses.

Graph for Popularity assessment

Data for Popularity assessment

Dates	Value	Weight
30.08.2009	57,12	3
06.09.2009	42,41	3
13.09.2009	54,33	3
20.09.2009	74,21	3
27.09.2009	66,22	3
04.10.2009	53,12	3
11.10.2009	49,99	3
18.10.2009	68,49	3

Readership share

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Readership share	9,288	6,568	-2,72	Score	Maximize	Popularity assessment

Description This shows the aptness of publishing house in snatching and maintaining a healthy market share. To assign a value to this indicator, one can use a scale numbered from 1-10.

Graph for Readership share

Data for Readership share

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	3	2	10	9,288
06.09.2009	3	2	10	7,64
13.09.2009	3	2	10	9,232
20.09.2009	3	2	10	9,48
27.09.2009	3	2	10	9,792
04.10.2009	3	2	10	4,912
11.10.2009	3	2	10	5,016
18.10.2009	3	2	10	6,568

Number of domains mastered

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of domains mastered	6,376	9,376	+ 3	number	Maximize	Popularity assessment

Description To find a value for this parameter, one can break down the industry being worked into different domains and look as to how many of those are being handled successfully by the concerned organization. A scale of 1-10 can be utilized for this purpose.

Graph for Number of domains mastered

Data for Number of domains mastered

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	2	4	10	6,376
06.09.2009	2	4	10	4,768
13.09.2009	2	4	10	8,356
20.09.2009	2	4	10	4,942
27.09.2009	2	4	10	7,45
04.10.2009	2	4	10	6,472
11.10.2009	2	4	10	8,986
18.10.2009	2	4	10	9,376

Accolades Jump

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Accolades Jump	40,4	63,04	+ 22,64	%	Maximize	Popularity assessment

Description This will be equal to the jump in number of awards that have been received by organization with time. It hints at the way in which the publishing house is climbing the success ladder.

Graph for Accolades Jump

Data for Accolades Jump

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	3	20	100	40,4
06.09.2009	3	20	100	47,36
13.09.2009	3	20	100	32,4
20.09.2009	3	20	100	99,36
27.09.2009	3	20	100	74,4
04.10.2009	3	20	100	99,84
11.10.2009	3	20	100	30,4
18.10.2009	3	20	100	63,04

Subscription Gauging

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Subscription Gauging

73,16 %

37,36 %

-35,8%

Publishing Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

Mean subscription length

Percentage subscriptions exceeding the average length

Annual rise in subscriptions

'Renewal' scale *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description The parameters under this group are for knowing about the subscription progress as being enjoyed by the publishing house.

Graph for Subscription Gauging

Data for Subscription Gauging

Dates	Value	Weight
30.08.2009	73,16	2
06.09.2009	46,09	2
13.09.2009	40,38	2
20.09.2009	63,55	2
27.09.2009	80,72	2
04.10.2009	52,33	2
11.10.2009	46,18	2
18.10.2009	37,36	2

Mean subscription length

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Mean subscription length	28,42	17,62	-10,8	months	Maximize	Subscription Gauging

Description This indicator is for knowing about the average period for which subscription is enjoyed by the publishing house.

Graph for Mean subscription length

Data for Mean subscription length

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	3	10	40	28,42
06.09.2009	3	10	40	29,56
13.09.2009	3	10	40	10,81
20.09.2009	3	10	40	31,06
27.09.2009	3	10	40	28,63
04.10.2009	3	10	40	38,02
11.10.2009	3	10	40	18,61
18.10.2009	3	10	40	17,62

Percentage subscriptions exceeding the average length

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Percentage subscriptions exceeding the average length	79,66	60,46	-19,2	%	Maximize	Subscription Gauging

Description This gives a hint about the success of publishing house's material.

Graph for Percentage subscriptions exceeding the average length

Data for Percentage subscriptions exceeding the average length

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	2	40	100	79,66
06.09.2009	2	40	100	76,24
13.09.2009	2	40	100	61,54
20.09.2009	2	40	100	42,82
27.09.2009	2	40	100	97
04.10.2009	2	40	100	66,22
11.10.2009	2	40	100	59,74
18.10.2009	2	40	100	60,46

Annual rise in subscriptions

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Annual rise in subscriptions	0,7376	0,2768	-0,461	index	Maximize	Subscription Gauging

Description This indicator is for knowing about the way subscriptions have been rising on yearly basis. This is a direct metrics that shows the progress being made.

Graph for Annual rise in subscriptions

Data for Annual rise in subscriptions

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	2	0,2	1	0,7376
06.09.2009	2	0,2	1	0,6328
13.09.2009	2	0,2	1	0,5824
20.09.2009	2	0,2	1	0,968
27.09.2009	2	0,2	1	0,864
04.10.2009	2	0,2	1	0,2624
11.10.2009	2	0,2	1	0,2408
18.10.2009	2	0,2	1	0,2768

Internal Operations Perspective

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Internal Operations Perspective

20,73 %

40,32 %

+ 19,59%

Publishing Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

Number of dealers

Yearly Publication rise

Productivity Expansion

Efficiency Ratio *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description The indicators set under this category are to gather knowledge about the way activities are taking place in the organization.

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Data for Internal Operations Perspective

Dates	Value	Weight
30.08.2009	20,73	2
06.09.2009	61,35	2
13.09.2009	24,91	2
20.09.2009	20	2
27.09.2009	53,85	2
04.10.2009	39,78	2
11.10.2009	45,65	2
18.10.2009	40,32	2

Number of dealers

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of dealers	14,21	8,585	-5,625	number	Maximize	Internal Operations Perspective

Description This is equal to the number of dealers that have been roped in by the publishing house to take their business ahead. It hints at the expansion degree of the business.

Graph for Number of dealers

Data for Number of dealers

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	2	5	20	14,21
06.09.2009	2	5	20	11,33
13.09.2009	2	5	20	19,85
20.09.2009	2	5	20	9,305
27.09.2009	2	5	20	11,795
04.10.2009	2	5	20	18,32
11.10.2009	2	5	20	10,79
18.10.2009	2	5	20	8,585

Yearly Publication rise

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Yearly Publication rise	0,4407	0,4463	+ 0,0056	index	Maximize	Internal Operations Perspective

Description This is equal to the extent to which publication sees a rise in organization.

Graph for Yearly Publication rise

Data for Yearly Publication rise

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	3	0,3	1	0,4407
06.09.2009	3	0,3	1	0,4904
13.09.2009	3	0,3	1	0,3126
20.09.2009	3	0,3	1	0,5842
27.09.2009	3	0,3	1	0,5485
04.10.2009	3	0,3	1	0,3231
11.10.2009	3	0,3	1	0,8586
18.10.2009	3	0,3	1	0,4463

Productivity Expansion

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Productivity Expansion	0,4384	0,9022	+ 0,464	index	Maximize	Internal Operations Perspective

Description The value of this metric will reflect the capability in showing productivity of the publishing business.

Graph for Productivity Expansion

Data for Productivity Expansion

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	3	0,4	1	0,4384
06.09.2009	3	0,4	1	0,9394
13.09.2009	3	0,4	1	0,4042
20.09.2009	3	0,4	1	0,4072
27.09.2009	3	0,4	1	0,8092
04.10.2009	3	0,4	1	0,4366
11.10.2009	3	0,4	1	0,6706
18.10.2009	3	0,4	1	0,9022

Legal Aspects handling

Name

Start value

End value

Dynamic

Parent

Contains

Legal Aspects handling

66,59 %

39,5 %

-27,09%

Publishing Balanced Scorecard

Indicators

Number of cases registered so far

Efforts scaling

Drop observed

Loss due to negative publicity *

* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description Publishing houses are required to take care that no negative publicity hits them, at any point. This will be to avoid the unnecessary 'reputation damage'.

Graph for Legal Aspects handling

Data for Legal Aspects handling

Dates	Value	Weight
30.08.2009	66,59	3
06.09.2009	24,81	3
13.09.2009	49,96	3
20.09.2009	30,78	3
27.09.2009	25,4	3
04.10.2009	61	3
11.10.2009	55,09	3
18.10.2009	39,5	3

Number of cases registered so far

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of cases registered so far	0,22	2,13	+ 1,91	number	Minimize	Legal Aspects handling

Description This is self-explanatory as it is equal to the number of cases that the publishing house has faced so far due to negligence adopted in publishing material.

Graph for Number of cases registered so far

Data for Number of cases registered so far

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	2	0	10	0,22
06.09.2009	2	0	10	4,56
13.09.2009	2	0	10	3,72
20.09.2009	2	0	10	4,62
27.09.2009	2	0	10	6,96
04.10.2009	2	0	10	2,23
11.10.2009	2	0	10	0,38
18.10.2009	2	0	10	2,13

Efforts scaling

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Efforts scaling	9,466	7,9	-1,566	%	Maximize	Legal Aspects handling

Description The value of this indicator will be equal to the number found optimum, when it comes to efforts undertaken by the team concerned with tackling the legal issues.

Graph for Efforts scaling

Data for Efforts scaling

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	3	7	10	9,466
06.09.2009	3	7	10	7,087
13.09.2009	3	7	10	8,704
20.09.2009	3	7	10	8,29
27.09.2009	3	7	10	7,426
04.10.2009	3	7	10	9,529
11.10.2009	3	7	10	9,466
18.10.2009	3	7	10	7,9

Drop observed

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Drop observed	0,8812	0,4288	-0,452	%	Maximize	Legal Aspects handling

Description The value of this parameter informs about the dip that occurred in 'cases thrown on the publishing house for violation of norms'.

Graph for Drop observed

Data for Drop observed

Dates	Weight	Min	Max	Value
30.08.2009	2	0,4	1	0,8812
06.09.2009	2	0,4	1	0,4876
13.09.2009	2	0,4	1	0,8596
20.09.2009	2	0,4	1	0,4876
27.09.2009	2	0,4	1	0,7564
04.10.2009	2	0,4	1	0,7666
11.10.2009	2	0,4	1	0,4072
18.10.2009	2	0,4	1	0,4288

Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 22.09.2009 19:42:14