This is a Quality Improvement Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Quality Improvement scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Quality Improvement

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 23.09.2008 to 11.11.2008

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Quality Improvement 44,54 % 58,1 % + 13,56 %
Quality Maintenance Perspective(53,4%, 25,82%Up)
Quality Ingredient Perspective(73,7%, 18,08%Up)
Internal Processes Assessment(64,5%, 27,01%Up)
Training and Continuous Learning (35,3%, -25,07%Down)

Graph for Quality Improvement

Graph for Quality Improvement

Data for Quality Improvement

DatesValue
23.09.200844,54
30.09.200837,38
07.10.200850,8
14.10.200849,78
21.10.200848,44
28.10.200845,16
04.11.200846,71
11.11.200858,1

Quality Maintenance Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Quality Maintenance Perspective 27,59 % 53,41 % + 25,82% Quality Improvement
Indicators
% of products confirming to pre-set quality standards
% of Processes with 'Best Practices'
Number of stages at which Quality is checked.
% increase in Quality Improvement Budget *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This aspect helps in maintaining a particular level of quality in the outputs.

Graph for Quality Maintenance Perspective

Graph for Quality Maintenance Perspective

Data for Quality Maintenance Perspective

DatesValueWeight
23.09.200827,593
30.09.200823,673
07.10.200855,413
14.10.200824,213
21.10.200832,43
28.10.200841,123
04.11.200854,333
11.11.200853,413

% of products confirming to pre-set quality standards

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % of products confirming to pre-set quality standards 90,07 93,14 + 3,07 % Maximize Quality Maintenance Perspective
Description This measure is to know what % of products that confirm to pre-set quality standards.

Graph for % of products confirming to pre-set quality standards

Graph for % of products confirming to pre-set quality standards

Data for % of products confirming to pre-set quality standards

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.200839010090,07
30.09.200839010092,28
07.10.200839010094,42
14.10.200839010096,27
21.10.200839010090,85
28.10.200839010092,09
04.11.200839010090,15
11.11.200839010093,14

% of Processes with 'Best Practices'

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % of Processes with 'Best Practices' 90,87 91,44 + 0,57 % Maximize Quality Maintenance Perspective
Description This helps in knowing % of processes that are going in the way according to Best Practices.

Graph for % of Processes with 'Best Practices'

Graph for % of Processes with 'Best Practices'

Data for % of Processes with 'Best Practices'

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.200829010090,87
30.09.200829010093,47
07.10.200829010097,38
14.10.200829010090,91
21.10.200829010098,33
28.10.200829010095,29
04.11.200829010097,69
11.11.200829010091,44

Number of stages at which Quality is checked.

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of stages at which Quality is checked. 4,784 3,696 -1,088 # Maximize Quality Maintenance Perspective
Description Number of stages at which quality is checked. This measure is to ensure value addition in every possible stage by regular checking,

Graph for Number of stages at which Quality is checked.

Graph for Number of stages at which Quality is checked.

Data for Number of stages at which Quality is checked.

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.20082154,784
30.09.20082151,64
07.10.20082152,248
14.10.20082151,356
21.10.20082152,036
28.10.20082154,444
04.11.20082153,072
11.11.20082153,696

Quality Ingredient Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Quality Ingredient Perspective 55,66 % 73,74 % + 18,08% Quality Improvement
Indicators
Number of Quality Measures in line with Industrial Benchmarks
% of Inputs according to the standards
Pace of information flow
variation in outputs *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This perspective gives an estimate of what makes up 'Quality' and that whether it is being put into the products and processes or not.

Graph for Quality Ingredient Perspective

Graph for Quality Ingredient Perspective

Data for Quality Ingredient Perspective

DatesValueWeight
23.09.200855,663
30.09.200830,233
07.10.200829,033
14.10.200859,113
21.10.200849,293
28.10.200833,833
04.11.200841,443
11.11.200873,743

Number of Quality Measures in line with Industrial Benchmarks

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Quality Measures in line with Industrial Benchmarks 3,097 8,56 + 5,463 Score Maximize Quality Ingredient Perspective
Description It refers to number of quality measures that are in line with industrial benchmarks (on a scale of 1 to 10).

Graph for Number of Quality Measures in line with Industrial Benchmarks

Graph for Number of Quality Measures in line with Industrial Benchmarks

Data for Number of Quality Measures in line with Industrial Benchmarks

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.200831103,097
30.09.200831103,223
07.10.200831103,484
14.10.200831108,713
21.10.200831104,402
28.10.200831106,148
04.11.200831103,034
11.11.200831108,56

% of Inputs according to the standards

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % of Inputs according to the standards 68,36 86,77 + 18,41 % Maximize Quality Ingredient Perspective
Description % of inputs according to the standards for quality improvement.

Graph for % of Inputs according to the standards

Graph for % of Inputs according to the standards

Data for % of Inputs according to the standards

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.200823010068,36
30.09.200823010036,37
07.10.200823010043,65
14.10.200823010078,44
21.10.200823010063,88
28.10.200823010062,62
04.11.200823010030,35
11.11.200823010086,77

Pace of information flow

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Pace of information flow 4,834 7,147 + 2,313 Score Maximize Quality Ingredient Perspective
Description Delays in communication can fall heavy on the organization. So, the flow has to be continuous and fast (on a scale of 1 to 10).

Graph for Pace of information flow

Graph for Pace of information flow

Data for Pace of information flow

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.200821104,834
30.09.200821108,425
07.10.200821107,705
14.10.200821106,886
21.10.200821104,771
28.10.200821101,216
04.11.200821105,752
11.11.200821107,147

Internal Processes Assessment

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Internal Processes Assessment 37,46 % 64,47 % + 27,01% Quality Improvement
Indicators
Number of procedures to share skills
Number of Quality Improvement concepts used
% of total processes that need 'Improvement Measures'
Number of systems and procedures to enhance internal quality assurance level *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This is to correct the internal processes of organization and make them more fruitful.

Graph for Internal Processes Assessment

Graph for Internal Processes Assessment

Data for Internal Processes Assessment

DatesValueWeight
23.09.200837,462
30.09.200856,922
07.10.200867,762
14.10.200873,732
21.10.200873,412
28.10.200868,112
04.11.200855,962
11.11.200864,472

Number of procedures to share skills

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of procedures to share skills 2,816 1,272 -1,544 # Maximize Internal Processes Assessment
Description This informs the management of ways to disperse skills and knowledge, both implicit and explicit.

Graph for Number of procedures to share skills

Graph for Number of procedures to share skills

Data for Number of procedures to share skills

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.20082152,816
30.09.20082151,356
07.10.20082152,724
14.10.20082153,852
21.10.20082154,616
28.10.20082153,472
04.11.20082152,652
11.11.20082151,272

Number of Quality Improvement concepts used

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Quality Improvement concepts used 6,4 9,082 + 2,682 # Maximize Internal Processes Assessment
Description To reach the maximum level of accuracy, the thoughts and ideas like TQM, Six Sigma etc must be incorporated in the workings.

Graph for Number of Quality Improvement concepts used

Graph for Number of Quality Improvement concepts used

Data for Number of Quality Improvement concepts used

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.200821106,4
30.09.200821103,052
07.10.200821108,146
14.10.200821108,767
21.10.200821103,799
28.10.200821108,983
04.11.200821107,237
11.11.200821109,082

% of total processes that need 'Improvement Measures'

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % of total processes that need 'Improvement Measures' 34,24 18,73 -15,51 % Minimize Internal Processes Assessment
Description This helps in figuring out the processes that need improvement.

Graph for % of total processes that need 'Improvement Measures'

Graph for % of total processes that need 'Improvement Measures'

Data for % of total processes that need 'Improvement Measures'

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.20083104034,24
30.09.20083104010,99
07.10.20083104011,05
14.10.20083104016,36
21.10.20083104012,55
28.10.20083104022,33
04.11.20083104014,71
11.11.20083104018,73

Training and Continuous Learning

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Training and Continuous Learning 60,38 % 35,31 % -25,07% Quality Improvement
Indicators
% Employees who participate in Quality enhancing acts
Number of Training Hours
Number of Quality Awareness programs held on a yearly basis
Self quality enhancement sessions conducted yearly *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This is to make sure that a never-ending approach is adopted to built quality in the operations. This also helps in keeping the employees updated of the changes occurring in the environment.

Graph for Training and Continuous Learning

Graph for Training and Continuous Learning

Data for Training and Continuous Learning

DatesValueWeight
23.09.200860,382
30.09.200849,112
07.10.200859,572
14.10.200850,212
21.10.200846,282
28.10.200845,262
04.11.200833,942
11.11.200835,312

% Employees who participate in Quality enhancing acts

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % Employees who participate in Quality enhancing acts 94,48 90,32 -4,16 % Maximize Training and Continuous Learning
Description This measure helps in knowing the fraction of employees who are moving with the managerial attempts of inculcating quality.

Graph for % Employees who participate in Quality enhancing acts

Graph for % Employees who participate in Quality enhancing acts

Data for % Employees who participate in Quality enhancing acts

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.200828010094,48
30.09.200828010087,72
07.10.200828010098,72
14.10.200828010094,26
21.10.200828010082,64
28.10.200828010081,14
04.11.200828010080,12
11.11.200828010090,32

Number of Training Hours

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Training Hours 8,92 1,935 -6,985 # Maximize Training and Continuous Learning
Description This is a quantitative way of expressing the duration for which training was imparted in a month.

Graph for Number of Training Hours

Graph for Number of Training Hours

Data for Number of Training Hours

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.200831128,92
30.09.200831126,709
07.10.200831123,288
14.10.200831124,806
21.10.2008311210,834
28.10.200831121,77
04.11.200831122,034
11.11.200831121,935

Number of Quality Awareness programs held on a yearly basis

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Quality Awareness programs held on a yearly basis 2,488 1,856 -0,632 # Maximize Training and Continuous Learning
Description This is a reflection of initiative from the management of organization.

Graph for Number of Quality Awareness programs held on a yearly basis

Graph for Number of Quality Awareness programs held on a yearly basis

Data for Number of Quality Awareness programs held on a yearly basis

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
23.09.20083152,488
30.09.20083153,192
07.10.20083154,5
14.10.20083153,404
21.10.20083152,296
28.10.20083153,96
04.11.20083154,488
11.11.20083151,856
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 16.10.2008 16:35:05

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.