Security and Privacy Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 05.04.2008 to 24.05.2008

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Contains
	Security and Privacy Scorecard	48,31 %	62,65 %	+ 14,34 %	Financial Perspective (65,9%, -2,14%) Employee perspective (57,1%, 11,57%) Security compliance (62,1%, 21,47%) Incident history (67,6%, 33,02%) Security policy effectiveness (60,5%, 7,73%)

Graph for Security and Privacy Scorecard

Data for Security and Privacy Scorecard

Financial Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Financial Perspective	68,07 %	65,93 %	-2,14%	Security and Privacy Scorecard	Indicators Value-at-Risk Return on Investment Collateral damage potential (CDP)

Graph for Financial Perspective

Data for Financial Perspective

Value-at-Risk

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Value-at-Risk	22,425	24,89	+ 2,465	%	Minimize	Financial Perspective

Graph for Value-at-Risk

Data for Value-at-Risk

Return on Investment

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Return on Investment	61,52	75,84	+ 14,32	%	Maximize	Financial Perspective

Graph for Return on Investment

Data for Return on Investment

Collateral damage potential (CDP)

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Collateral damage potential (CDP)	1,191	1,833	+ 0,642	Score	Minimize	Financial Perspective

Graph for Collateral damage potential (CDP)

Data for Collateral damage potential (CDP)

Employee perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Employee perspective	45,5 %	57,07 %	+ 11,57%	Security and Privacy Scorecard	Indicators User compliance Employee attitude Employee awareness Password effectiveness *

Graph for Employee perspective

Data for Employee perspective

User compliance

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	User compliance	87,31	61,12	-26,19	%	Maximize	Employee perspective

Graph for User compliance

Data for User compliance

Employee attitude

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Employee attitude	41,5	18,1	-23,4	%	Maximize	Employee perspective

Graph for Employee attitude

Data for Employee attitude

Employee awareness

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Employee awareness	44,11	74,53	+ 30,42	%	Maximize	Employee perspective

Graph for Employee awareness

Data for Employee awareness

Security compliance

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Security compliance	40,63 %	62,1 %	+ 21,47%	Security and Privacy Scorecard	Indicators Systems Service Level Network Service Level Compliant Devices

Graph for Security compliance

Data for Security compliance

Systems Service Level

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Systems Service Level	79,28	81,12	+ 1,84	%	Maximize	Security compliance

Graph for Systems Service Level

Data for Systems Service Level

Network Service Level

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Network Service Level	19,52	54,08	+ 34,56	%	Maximize	Security compliance

Graph for Network Service Level

Data for Network Service Level

Compliant Devices

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Compliant Devices	31,06	48,07	+ 17,01	%	Maximize	Security compliance

Graph for Compliant Devices

Data for Compliant Devices

Incident history

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Incident history	34,6 %	67,62 %	+ 33,02%	Security and Privacy Scorecard	Indicators Number of Compromises Organizational Impact of Compromises Unauthorized accesses Viruses detected *

Graph for Incident history

Data for Incident history

Number of Compromises

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Number of Compromises	200,24	201,04	+ 0,8	%	Minimize	Incident history

Graph for Number of Compromises

Data for Number of Compromises

Organizational Impact of Compromises

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Organizational Impact of Compromises	1,032	0,939	-0,093	%	Minimize	Incident history

Graph for Organizational Impact of Compromises

Data for Organizational Impact of Compromises

Unauthorized accesses

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Unauthorized accesses	45,394	9,439	-35,96	%	Minimize	Incident history

Graph for Unauthorized accesses

Data for Unauthorized accesses

Security policy effectiveness

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Security policy effectiveness	52,77 %	60,5 %	+ 7,73%	Security and Privacy Scorecard	Indicators Vulnerability Counts Incident Forensics Remediation Time

Graph for Security policy effectiveness

Data for Security policy effectiveness

Vulnerability Counts

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Vulnerability Counts	36,32	38,525	+ 2,205	%	Minimize	Security policy effectiveness

Graph for Vulnerability Counts

Data for Vulnerability Counts

Incident Forensics

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Incident Forensics	10,13	10,51	+ 0,38	%	Minimize	Security policy effectiveness

Graph for Incident Forensics

Data for Incident Forensics

Remediation Time

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Remediation Time	2,001	1,146	-0,855	%	Minimize	Security policy effectiveness

Graph for Remediation Time

Data for Remediation Time

Copyright © 2000-2008 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.