Business Social Responsibility Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 17.09.2008 to 05.11.2008

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Contains
	Business Social Responsibility Scorecard	60,92 %	67,81 %	+ 6,89 %	Employee Perspective (16,7%, -28,93%) Environmental Perspective (76,3%, 20,96%) Social Policies followed (87,9%, 16,56%) Management Perspective (80%, 10,24%)

Graph for Business Social Responsibility Scorecard

Data for Business Social Responsibility Scorecard

Employee Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Employee Perspective	45,67 %	16,74 %	-28,93%	Business Social Responsibility Scorecard	Indicators Health and Security Diversity supportive Ratio Respect Ratio Satisfaction Ratio *

Graph for Employee Perspective

Data for Employee Perspective

Health and Security

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Health and Security	7,165	9,433	+ 2,268	Score	Minimize	Employee Perspective

Graph for Health and Security

Data for Health and Security

Diversity supportive Ratio

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Diversity supportive Ratio	6,985	1,918	-5,067	Score	Maximize	Employee Perspective

Graph for Diversity supportive Ratio

Data for Diversity supportive Ratio

Respect Ratio

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Respect Ratio	85,8	25,7	-60,1	%	Maximize	Employee Perspective

Graph for Respect Ratio

Data for Respect Ratio

Environmental Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Environmental Perspective	55,31 %	76,27 %	+ 20,96%	Business Social Responsibility Scorecard	Indicators Product Recycling Green House gas emissions Quantity of Waste Efficiency in Energy Usage *

Graph for Environmental Perspective

Data for Environmental Perspective

Product Recycling

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Product Recycling	92,8	93,07	+ 0,27	%	Maximize	Environmental Perspective

Graph for Product Recycling

Data for Product Recycling

Green House gas emissions

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Green House gas emissions	66,16	83,04	+ 16,88	%	Maximize	Environmental Perspective

Graph for Green House gas emissions

Data for Green House gas emissions

Quantity of Waste

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Quantity of Waste	629	595	-34	Tonnes	Minimize	Environmental Perspective

Graph for Quantity of Waste

Data for Quantity of Waste

Social Policies followed

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Social Policies followed	71,36 %	87,92 %	+ 16,56%	Business Social Responsibility Scorecard	Indicators Social Contribution Strategic Partners Responsibility Percentage Time spent in volunteering *

Graph for Social Policies followed

Data for Social Policies followed

Social Contribution

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Social Contribution	72,082	99,604	+ 27,52	million $	Maximize	Social Policies followed

Graph for Social Contribution

Data for Social Contribution

Strategic Partners

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Strategic Partners	8,452	8,515	+ 0,063	Score	Maximize	Social Policies followed

Graph for Strategic Partners

Data for Strategic Partners

Responsibility Percentage

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Responsibility Percentage	74,92	91,06	+ 16,14	%	Maximize	Social Policies followed

Graph for Responsibility Percentage

Data for Responsibility Percentage

Management Perspective

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Parent	Contains
	Management Perspective	69,75 %	79,99 %	+ 10,24%	Business Social Responsibility Scorecard	Indicators Management Initiatives Recognition Achieved Effectiveness in communication Number of Social Activities *

Graph for Management Perspective

Data for Management Perspective

Management Initiatives

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Management Initiatives	9,772	8,938	-0,834	#	Maximize	Management Perspective

Graph for Management Initiatives

Data for Management Initiatives

Recognition Achieved

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Recognition Achieved	6,31	8,52	+ 2,21	#	Maximize	Management Perspective

Graph for Recognition Achieved

Data for Recognition Achieved

Effectiveness in communication

	Name	Start value	End value	Dynamic	Measure units	Optimization method	Parent
	Effectiveness in communication	31,85	22,55	-9,3	minutes	Minimize	Management Perspective

Graph for Effectiveness in communication

Data for Effectiveness in communication