This is a Unemployment Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Unemployment scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Unemployment Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 02.03.2009 to 20.04.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Unemployment Scorecard  55,37 % 52,17 % -3,2 %
Financial Perspective(40,4%, -13,24%Down)
Internal Operations Perspective(48,2%, -14,19%Down)
Strategy Perspective(70%, 23,44%Up)
Success Evaluation Gauging(57,8%, 1,73%Up)

Graph for Unemployment Scorecard

Graph for Unemployment Scorecard

Data for Unemployment Scorecard

DatesValue
02.03.200955,37
09.03.200957,22
16.03.200940,23
23.03.200955
30.03.200950,53
06.04.200963,77
13.04.200948,47
20.04.200952,17


Financial Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Financial Perspective  53,67 % 40,43 % -13,24% Unemployment Scorecard
Indicators
Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses
Research Share
Funds Utilization Ratio
Number of Funding Sources *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This gives information about the financial stand of the organization.

Graph for Financial Perspective

Graph for Financial Perspective

Data for Financial Perspective

DatesValueWeight
02.03.200953,673
09.03.200941,843
16.03.200965,113
23.03.200943,93
30.03.200945,093
06.04.200966,53
13.04.200931,053
20.04.200940,433


Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses  0,338 0,3428 + 0,0048 # Maximize Financial Perspective
Description Social Services organizations impart training sessions to the unemployed force to make them more capable of grabbing the employment opportunities that come in their way. These can be arranged on yearly basis.

Graph for Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses

Graph for Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses

Data for Training Expenses Incurred: Total Expenses

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.200930,20,50,338
09.03.200930,20,50,263
16.03.200930,20,50,3437
23.03.200930,20,50,3917
30.03.200930,20,50,4328
06.04.200930,20,50,4274
13.04.200930,20,50,3329
20.04.200930,20,50,3428


Research Share

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Research Share  22,36 30,725 + 8,365 % Maximize Financial Perspective
Description This KPI reflects the amount of expenditure incurred by the organization for carrying out studies to better understand the forces working behind the concept. The value will be equal to the ratio of Research cost to total amount spent.

Graph for Research Share

Graph for Research Share

Data for Research Share

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.2009254022,36
09.03.2009254014,52
16.03.2009254032,335
23.03.200925406,015
30.03.2009254030,935
06.04.2009254028,135
13.04.2009254016,62
20.04.2009254030,725


Funds Utilization Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Funds Utilization Ratio  0,8468 0,6036 -0,243 # Maximize Financial Perspective
Description The funds arranged for should be appropriately used for the purpose. This KPI is a way to show the utility.

Graph for Funds Utilization Ratio

Graph for Funds Utilization Ratio

Data for Funds Utilization Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.200930,610,8468
09.03.200930,610,9128
16.03.200930,610,9112
23.03.200930,610,886
30.03.200930,610,6316
06.04.200930,610,9824
13.04.200930,610,6584
20.04.200930,610,6036


Internal Operations Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Internal Operations Perspective  62,41 % 48,22 % -14,19% Unemployment Scorecard
Indicators
Frequency of Surveys
Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality'
Employment Time Lag
Number of Factors Considered for Setting the Workers' Pay *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs is a way to have an idea about the internal environment of the organization.

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Data for Internal Operations Perspective

DatesValueWeight
02.03.200962,413
09.03.200950,543
16.03.200925,293
23.03.200969,83
30.03.200959,323
06.04.200963,963
13.04.200957,493
20.04.200948,223


Frequency of Surveys

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Frequency of Surveys  8,182 6,202 -1,98 # Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description Surveys are conducted by social services organizations to follow the unemployment rate presently operating in the society. The number of such surveys run by the organization in one year will be the value for this parameter.

Graph for Frequency of Surveys

Graph for Frequency of Surveys

Data for Frequency of Surveys

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.200934108,182
09.03.200934108,404
16.03.200934104,09
23.03.200934109,748
30.03.200934109,094
06.04.200934109,316
13.04.200934108,416
20.04.200934106,202


Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality'

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality'  9,91 4,717 -5,193 Score Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description The utility of this metric lies in the fact that it enables to know the extent to which the organization succeeded in getting people find job as per their capabilities. A scale numbered from 1-10 can be used to have the value.

Graph for Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality'

Graph for Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality'

Data for Mismatch Between 'Expectations' and 'Reality'

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.200931109,91
09.03.200931105,014
16.03.200931106,76
23.03.200931106,22
30.03.200931103,583
06.04.200931109,676
13.04.200931108,317
20.04.200931104,717


Employment Time Lag

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Employment Time Lag  178,5 55,75 -122,8 days Minimize Internal Operations Perspective
Description The value is equal to the time taken by the organization in getting people employed. In other words, the time lag between 'a person requesting for employment' to 'receiving a suitable vacancy' can be an important factor for having an idea about the operations of the organization.

Graph for Employment Time Lag

Graph for Employment Time Lag

Data for Employment Time Lag

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.2009250300178,5
09.03.2009250300188
16.03.2009250300236
23.03.2009250300221
30.03.2009250300149,75
06.04.2009250300245,75
13.04.2009250300236,5
20.04.200925030055,75


Strategy Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Strategy Perspective  46,6 % 70,04 % + 23,44% Unemployment Scorecard
Indicators
Policy Alignment
Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration
Number of Target Groups
Percentage Increase in Full-time Employed Strength *
Percentage Rise in Part-time Jobs Provided *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs is to know about the course of action that is being followed by the social service organization.

Graph for Strategy Perspective

Graph for Strategy Perspective

Data for Strategy Perspective

DatesValueWeight
02.03.200946,62
09.03.200964,822
16.03.200933,842
23.03.200935,142
30.03.200938,62
06.04.200970,622
13.04.200935,842
20.04.200970,042


Policy Alignment

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Policy Alignment  4,492 4,789 + 0,297 Score Maximize Strategy Perspective
Description There are certain pre-set guidelines that have been formulated for the social services organizations when these venture out on the path of tackling unemployment. Abiding by the rules is an essential prerequisite for carrying out such tasks. Scale labeled from 1-10 can be useful in this sense.

Graph for Policy Alignment

Graph for Policy Alignment

Data for Policy Alignment

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.200921104,492
09.03.200921103,268
16.03.200921102,269
23.03.200921103,88
30.03.200921106,337
06.04.200921106,76
13.04.200921105,572
20.04.200921104,789


Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration  0,6476 0,8072 + 0,16 # Maximize Strategy Perspective
Description This is equal to the ratio borne by 'number of people who were provided employment' to 'total number of those who applied to the organization'. It can be calculated on yearly basis.

Graph for Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration

Graph for Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration

Data for Number of People who were Provided Employment: Total Registration

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.200920,610,6476
09.03.200920,610,9452
16.03.200920,610,6208
23.03.200920,610,832
30.03.200920,610,8012
06.04.200920,610,894
13.04.200920,610,6836
20.04.200920,610,8072


Number of Target Groups

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Target Groups  4,481 4,739 + 0,258 # Maximize Strategy Perspective
Description This is equal to the number of target groups that were catered by the organization. These might include- disabled people, those with incomplete education, school drop-outs.

Graph for Number of Target Groups

Graph for Number of Target Groups

Data for Number of Target Groups

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.20092254,481
09.03.20092254,421
16.03.20092252,573
23.03.20092253,017
30.03.20092253,608
06.04.20092253,947
13.04.20092252,996
20.04.20092254,739


Success Evaluation Gauging

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Success Evaluation Gauging  56,12 % 57,85 % + 1,73% Unemployment Scorecard
Indicators
'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio
Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations
Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability
Average Skill Enhancement Level *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of indicators is for knowing the extent to which the attempts that were followed proved to be successful.

Graph for Success Evaluation Gauging

Graph for Success Evaluation Gauging

Data for Success Evaluation Gauging

DatesValueWeight
02.03.200956,122
09.03.200982,712
16.03.200931,732
23.03.200969,292
30.03.200957,452
06.04.200952,532
13.04.200973,72
20.04.200957,852


'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root 'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio  0,6124 0,868 + 0,256 # Maximize Success Evaluation Gauging
Description The pay at which people are employed should be compared to the 'cost of living' of that area. This is to have an estimate of how capable the job is in giving the person 'monetary relief'.

Graph for 'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio

Graph for 'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio

Data for 'Cost of Living Meeting' Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.200930,610,6124
09.03.200930,610,8548
16.03.200930,610,7856
23.03.200930,610,8532
30.03.200930,610,7128
06.04.200930,610,9236
13.04.200930,610,8268
20.04.200930,610,868


Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations  36,7 47,15 + 10,45 % Maximize Success Evaluation Gauging
Description This reflects the potential of the organization in getting people employed, as seen by the needy ones. The value can be obtained on yearly basis.

Graph for Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations

Graph for Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations

Data for Percentage Increase in the Number of Registrations

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.20092106036,7
09.03.20092106051,1
16.03.20092106028,3
23.03.20092106024,3
30.03.20092106030
06.04.20092106034,3
13.04.20092106032
20.04.20092106047,15


Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability  0,8596 0,4054 -0,454 # Maximize Success Evaluation Gauging
Description This is to know the extent to which the funds availability saw an increase with time. The value can be obtained by using a scale of 1-10.

Graph for Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability

Graph for Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability

Data for Percentage Rise in Funds' Availability

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
02.03.200920,410,8596
09.03.200920,410,9346
16.03.200920,410,5374
23.03.200920,410,9832
30.03.200920,410,808
06.04.200920,410,4036
13.04.200920,410,9898
20.04.200920,410,4054
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 25.03.2009 19:43:34

Copyright © 2000-2010 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.