This is a VOIP Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for VOIP scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


VOIP Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 07.03.2009 to 25.04.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root VOIP Scorecard  55,79 % 54,46 % -1,33 %
Network Quality Perspective(56,7%, -8,23%Down)
Cost Savings Perspective(59,1%, 10,99%Up)
VOIP Service Efficiency Perspective(70,2%, -5,09%Down)
Customer Service Perspective(28,4%, -5,74%Down)

Graph for VOIP Scorecard

Graph for VOIP Scorecard

Data for VOIP Scorecard

DatesValue
07.03.200955,79
14.03.200939,75
21.03.200947,43
28.03.200952,63
04.04.200947,67
11.04.200951,38
18.04.200945,17
25.04.200954,46


Network Quality Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Network Quality Perspective  64,95 % 56,72 % -8,23% VOIP Scorecard
Indicators
Connection Success Rate
Reduction in Connection Delays
Network Efficiency Ratio
Call Setup Time *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This perspective allows the VOIP users to analyze the quality of VOIP network connection provided by their service provider.

Graph for Network Quality Perspective

Graph for Network Quality Perspective

Data for Network Quality Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200964,953
14.03.200947,193
21.03.200957,473
28.03.200937,023
04.04.200959,173
11.04.200967,023
18.04.200932,763
25.04.200956,723


Connection Success Rate

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Connection Success Rate  95,6 93,76 -1,84 % Maximize Network Quality Perspective
Description It refers to the % of events when the users are successful in making the VOIP connection out of the total attempts made.

Graph for Connection Success Rate

Graph for Connection Success Rate

Data for Connection Success Rate

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200939010095,6
14.03.200939010098,55
21.03.200939010096,46
28.03.200939010090,24
04.04.200939010094,09
11.04.200939010099,06
18.04.200939010090,51
25.04.200939010093,76


Reduction in Connection Delays

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Reduction in Connection Delays  88,12 90,8 + 2,68 % Maximize Network Quality Perspective
Description It indicates the % reduction experienced in time spent in securing a connection through VOIP.

Graph for Reduction in Connection Delays

Graph for Reduction in Connection Delays

Data for Reduction in Connection Delays

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200926010088,12
14.03.200926010082,64
21.03.200926010097,92
28.03.200926010060,48
04.04.200926010077,12
11.04.200926010096,32
18.04.200926010065,28
25.04.200926010090,8


Network Efficiency Ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Network Efficiency Ratio  98,43 97,5 -0,93 % Maximize Network Quality Perspective
Description It means the % of successful and easy allocation of a voice circuit. It also indicates the congestion level on the VOIP network.

Graph for Network Efficiency Ratio

Graph for Network Efficiency Ratio

Data for Network Efficiency Ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200939010098,43
14.03.200939010092,92
21.03.200939010095,21
28.03.200939010096,4
11.04.200939010096,42
18.04.200939010097,67
25.04.200939010097,5


Cost Savings Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Cost Savings Perspective  48,06 % 59,05 % + 10,99% VOIP Scorecard
Indicators
% Reduction in Phone Costs
% Reduction in Bandwidth Costs
% Dip in Personnel Costs used for Handling Call Operations
% Rise in Savings in Infrastructure and Maintenance Redundancies *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This perspective shows the cost savings experienced by the users after the installation of VOIP connection.

Graph for Cost Savings Perspective

Graph for Cost Savings Perspective

Data for Cost Savings Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200948,063
14.03.200917,933
21.03.200930,33
28.03.200955,713
04.04.200926,83
11.04.200930,553
18.04.200963,363
25.04.200959,053


% Reduction in Phone Costs

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % Reduction in Phone Costs  49,75 32,7 -17,05 % Maximize Cost Savings Perspective
Description It refers to the % reduction in the phone cost after the introduction of VOIP technique in the company.

Graph for % Reduction in Phone Costs

Graph for % Reduction in Phone Costs

Data for % Reduction in Phone Costs

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.20093106049,75
14.03.20093106022
21.03.20093106010,15
28.03.20093106049,75
04.04.20093106028,25
11.04.20093106015
18.04.20093106039,9
25.04.20093106032,7


% Reduction in Bandwidth Costs

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % Reduction in Bandwidth Costs  13,03 31,93 + 18,9 % Maximize Cost Savings Perspective
Description It means the % savings in bandwidth costs seen due to VOIP connection.

Graph for % Reduction in Bandwidth Costs

Graph for % Reduction in Bandwidth Costs

Data for % Reduction in Bandwidth Costs

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.20093104013,03
14.03.20093104013,39
21.03.20093104012,49
28.03.20093104033,22
04.04.20093104012,73
11.04.20093104029,05
18.04.20093104027,22
25.04.20093104031,93


% Dip in Personnel Costs used for Handling Call Operations

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % Dip in Personnel Costs used for Handling Call Operations  58 53,48 -4,52 % Maximize Cost Savings Perspective
Description It indicates the % dip in costs incurred by the company on keeping the personnel for handling call operations.

Graph for % Dip in Personnel Costs used for Handling Call Operations

Graph for % Dip in Personnel Costs used for Handling Call Operations

Data for % Dip in Personnel Costs used for Handling Call Operations

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.20092206058
14.03.20092206023,84
21.03.20092206049,8
28.03.20092206024,92
04.04.20092206042,24
11.04.20092206025,08
18.04.20092206047,68
25.04.20092206053,48


VOIP Service Efficiency Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root VOIP Service Efficiency Perspective  75,32 % 70,23 % -5,09% VOIP Scorecard
Indicators
% of Calls with One or More DSQ Event
% of Time Segments when the Call Quality was Inappropriate
% of Calls with Listening/Conversational Quality less than Desired
Security Level Score *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This perspective helps in measuring the efficiency level of VOIP service on different grounds.

Graph for VOIP Service Efficiency Perspective

Graph for VOIP Service Efficiency Perspective

Data for VOIP Service Efficiency Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200975,322
14.03.200952,832
21.03.200951,82
28.03.200954,812
04.04.200966,452
11.04.200965,132
18.04.200958,822
25.04.200970,232


% of Calls with One or More DSQ Event

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % of Calls with One or More DSQ Event  0,75 0,85 + 0,1 % Minimize VOIP Service Efficiency Perspective
Description It refers to the % of total calls in which one of more DSQ Events like packet loss, jitter, etc was faced.

Graph for % of Calls with One or More DSQ Event

Graph for % of Calls with One or More DSQ Event

Data for % of Calls with One or More DSQ Event

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200930100,75
14.03.200930104,32
21.03.200930102,87
28.03.200930106,8
04.04.200930102,82
11.04.200930100,4
18.04.200930105,64
25.04.200930100,85


% of Time Segments when the Call Quality was Inappropriate

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % of Time Segments when the Call Quality was Inappropriate  6,864 1,476 -5,388 % Minimize VOIP Service Efficiency Perspective
Description It indicates the % of time segments in which the call quality of the VOIP service was not up to the mark. A time frame of 6 months can be considered to find out the value of this parameter.

Graph for % of Time Segments when the Call Quality was Inappropriate

Graph for % of Time Segments when the Call Quality was Inappropriate

Data for % of Time Segments when the Call Quality was Inappropriate

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200920126,864
21.03.200920126,204
28.03.200920128,652
04.04.200920121,932
11.04.200920129,66
18.04.200920123,204
25.04.200920121,476


% of Calls with Listening/Conversational Quality less than Desired

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % of Calls with Listening/Conversational Quality less than Desired  1,665 6,24 + 4,575 % Minimize VOIP Service Efficiency Perspective
Description It states the % of calls in which the listening or conversational quality was lacking in areas like echo, speech level, noise level, delay, etc.

Graph for % of Calls with Listening/Conversational Quality less than Desired

Graph for % of Calls with Listening/Conversational Quality less than Desired

Data for % of Calls with Listening/Conversational Quality less than Desired

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200930151,665
14.03.2009301510,305
21.03.200930157,335
28.03.200930151,875
04.04.200930159,585
11.04.200930154,785
18.04.200930158,04
25.04.200930156,24


Customer Service Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Customer Service Perspective  34,14 % 28,4 % -5,74% VOIP Scorecard
Indicators
% Reduction in Network Problems Resolution Time
Number of Associated Features Provided by the VOIP Service Provider
Service Access Level
Average Service Response Time *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This perspective takes into consideration factors through which level of customer service related to the VOIP service can be judged.

Graph for Customer Service Perspective

Graph for Customer Service Perspective

Data for Customer Service Perspective

DatesValueWeight
07.03.200934,142
14.03.200948,252
21.03.200953,692
28.03.200969,232
04.04.200942,962
11.04.200945,392
18.04.200922,862
25.04.200928,42


% Reduction in Network Problems Resolution Time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % Reduction in Network Problems Resolution Time  8,815 14,17 + 5,355 % Maximize Customer Service Perspective
Description It states the % dip in the network problems resolution time experienced by the VOIP users.

Graph for % Reduction in Network Problems Resolution Time

Graph for % Reduction in Network Problems Resolution Time

Data for % Reduction in Network Problems Resolution Time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200935408,815
14.03.2009354034,715
21.03.2009354038,985
28.03.2009354036,92
04.04.2009354029,465
11.04.2009354015,29
18.04.2009354010,985
25.04.2009354014,17


Number of Associated Features Provided by the VOIP Service Provider

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Associated Features Provided by the VOIP Service Provider  11,795 8,57 -3,225 # Maximize Customer Service Perspective
Description It indicates the number of other associated features offered to the users by the VOIP service provider. It may include services like conference calling, call forwarding, caller ID features, automatic redial facility, Interactive Voice Response, video conferencing, etc.

Graph for Number of Associated Features Provided by the VOIP Service Provider

Graph for Number of Associated Features Provided by the VOIP Service Provider

Data for Number of Associated Features Provided by the VOIP Service Provider

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.2009352011,795
14.03.2009352012,59
21.03.2009352011,63
28.03.2009352015,485
04.04.200935208,645
11.04.200935209,785
18.04.200935206,395
25.04.200935208,57


Service Access Level

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Service Access Level  2,512 5,113 + 2,601 Score Maximize Customer Service Perspective
Description This KPI helps in judging the service access level on a scale of 1 to 10.

Graph for Service Access Level

Graph for Service Access Level

Data for Service Access Level

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
07.03.200921102,512
14.03.200921102,341
21.03.200921105,914
28.03.200921105,311
04.04.200921104,924
11.04.200921108,452
18.04.200921107,453
25.04.200921105,113
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 30.03.2009 20:47:36

Copyright © 2000-2010 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.