This is a Web Application Testing Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Web Application Testing scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Web Application Software Testing Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 14.11.2008 to 02.01.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Web Application Software Testing Scorecard 40,74 % 46,59 % + 5,85 %
Stress Testing Perspective(28,1%, -23,94%Down)
Load Testing Perspective(52,9%, 25,42%Up)
Structure Perspective(54,5%, -12,76%Down)
Quality Perspective(56,8%, 39,81%Up)

Graph for Web Application Software Testing Scorecard

Graph for Web Application Software Testing Scorecard

Data for Web Application Software Testing Scorecard

DatesValue
14.11.200840,74
21.11.200856,18
28.11.200849,03
05.12.200862,79
12.12.200852,33
19.12.200847,59
26.12.200854,27
02.01.200946,59

Stress Testing Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Stress Testing Perspective 52,08 % 28,14 % -23,94% Web Application Software Testing Scorecard
Indicators
Number of memory leaks
Bandwidth
Transactional Problem Tolerance
Number of Hardware limitations and synchronization problems Bearing level *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category of indicators is to discover the upper benchmark up to which system can work under stress. This type of evaluation helps in enabling the system to recover from the problems by itself.

Graph for Stress Testing Perspective

Graph for Stress Testing Perspective

Data for Stress Testing Perspective

DatesValueWeight
14.11.200852,083
21.11.200870,623
28.11.200854,973
05.12.200860,483
12.12.200873,783
19.12.200846,223
26.12.200859,743
02.01.200928,143

Number of memory leaks

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of memory leaks 0,89 1,775 + 0,885 # Maximize Stress Testing Perspective
Description This indicator counts the total number of instances of 'memory leakages' which the system can stand.

Graph for Number of memory leaks

Graph for Number of memory leaks

Data for Number of memory leaks

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.20083050,89
21.11.20083051,38
28.11.20083054,425
05.12.20083052,295
12.12.20083054,73
19.12.20083052,625
26.12.20083053,61
02.01.20093051,775

Bandwidth

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Bandwidth 67150 49850 -1,73E004 bits per second Maximize Stress Testing Perspective
Description This indicator is used to know the range in which the web application software can operate. By analysing suitable factors, expansion or contraction can be done.

Graph for Bandwidth

Graph for Bandwidth

Data for Bandwidth

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.20082300008000067150
21.11.20082300008000070800
28.11.20082300008000047200
05.12.20082300008000052000
12.12.20082300008000065800
19.12.20082300008000076400
26.12.20082300008000059550
02.01.20092300008000049850

Transactional Problem Tolerance

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Transactional Problem Tolerance 0,9512 0,9309 -0,0203 # Maximize Stress Testing Perspective
Description This index will give the strength of the system in tolerating the difficulties encountered in transactions.

Graph for Transactional Problem Tolerance

Graph for Transactional Problem Tolerance

Data for Transactional Problem Tolerance

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.200830,910,9512
21.11.200830,910,9966
28.11.200830,910,9102
05.12.200830,910,9717
12.12.200830,910,981
19.12.200830,910,9215
26.12.200830,910,95
02.01.200930,910,9309

Load Testing Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Load Testing Perspective 27,51 % 52,93 % + 25,42% Web Application Software Testing Scorecard
Indicators
Cut experienced in scripting time
End-user response time
% Reduction in testing time
Throughput level *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This aspect helps in evaluating the scalability and performance issues of web application software and services.

Graph for Load Testing Perspective

Graph for Load Testing Perspective

Data for Load Testing Perspective

DatesValueWeight
14.11.200827,513
21.11.200846,163
28.11.200837,73
05.12.200888,613
12.12.200829,183
19.12.200856,463
26.12.200844,713
02.01.200952,933

Cut experienced in scripting time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Cut experienced in scripting time 21,6 58,4 + 36,8 % Maximize Load Testing Perspective
Description This indicates the % reduction experienced in the scripting time. Suitable reduction in this value can decrease the project completion time by weeks.

Graph for Cut experienced in scripting time

Graph for Cut experienced in scripting time

Data for Cut experienced in scripting time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.20083206021,6
21.11.20083206059,84
28.11.20083206025,08
05.12.20083206053,16
12.12.20083206029,28
19.12.20083206035,56
26.12.20083206037,44
02.01.20093206058,4

End-user response time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root End-user response time 2,845 2,062 -0,783 secs. Minimize Load Testing Perspective
Description This is an indication of the pace at which problems are identified and addressed.

Graph for End-user response time

Graph for End-user response time

Data for End-user response time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.200821102,845
21.11.200821107,354
28.11.200821105,644
05.12.200821101,81
12.12.200821108,335
19.12.200821102,458
26.12.200821109,271
02.01.200921102,062

% Reduction in testing time

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % Reduction in testing time 12,95 12,35 -0,6 % Maximize Load Testing Perspective
Description It refers to the % reductionThis indicator is possible by collaboration with test results via web in real time.

Graph for % Reduction in testing time

Graph for % Reduction in testing time

Data for % Reduction in testing time

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.20082106012,95
21.11.20082106011,45
28.11.20082106017,2
05.12.20082106059,9
12.12.20082106045,75
19.12.20082106059,7
26.12.20082106028,3
02.01.20092106012,35

Structure Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Structure Perspective 67,26 % 54,5 % -12,76% Web Application Software Testing Scorecard
Indicators
Number of Scripting Capabilities
Portability Index
Number of built-in functions
Number of Reporting Capabilities provided *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category can be used to evaluate the capabilities of the software that is being employed for testing.

Graph for Structure Perspective

Graph for Structure Perspective

Data for Structure Perspective

DatesValueWeight
14.11.200867,262
21.11.200859,952
28.11.200856,012
05.12.200854,622
12.12.200840,962
19.12.200845,442
26.12.200866,82
02.01.200954,52

Number of Scripting Capabilities

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of Scripting Capabilities 5,962 5,044 -0,918 # Maximize Structure Perspective
Description There can be a number of such capabilities that are stuffed in the testing software. Some are- the simplicity of scripting, whether it is driven by keyword and/or data, Unicode support, pattern matching facility etc.

Graph for Number of Scripting Capabilities

Graph for Number of Scripting Capabilities

Data for Number of Scripting Capabilities

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.200834105,962
21.11.200834104,126
28.11.200834108,692
05.12.200834108,08
12.12.200834104,132
19.12.200834105,5
26.12.200834107,024
02.01.200934105,044

Portability Index

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Portability Index 9,625 9,16 -0,465 # Maximize Structure Perspective
Description This indicator gives the number of features which are in the software package to make it portable. These may comprise the ability to use many databases like SQL server, enabling to play the scripts recorded in Windows to be replayed in Linux.

Graph for Portability Index

Graph for Portability Index

Data for Portability Index

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.200835109,625
21.11.200835109,5
28.11.200835106,555
05.12.200835106,83
12.12.200835108,04
19.12.200835108,41
26.12.200835108,79
02.01.200935109,16

Number of built-in functions

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of built-in functions 8,725 8,7 -0,025 # Maximize Structure Perspective
Description These functions enable generating function calls for easy handling of files, data, database and screen.

Graph for Number of built-in functions

Graph for Number of built-in functions

Data for Number of built-in functions

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.200825108,725
21.11.200825108,265
28.11.200825106,56
05.12.200825107,59
12.12.200825109,26
19.12.200825105,445
26.12.200825108,09
02.01.200925108,7

Quality Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Quality Perspective 17,04 % 56,85 % + 39,81% Web Application Software Testing Scorecard
Indicators
Number of visitors who can be served efficiently on a concurrent basis
Number of virtual users who were involved in the testing
% increase in number of users
Re-work: Work Ratio *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description Indicators grouped under this category take care that the whole task of testing is accomplished with acceptable quality levels. KPIs too, are according to the aim.

Graph for Quality Perspective

Graph for Quality Perspective

Data for Quality Perspective

DatesValueWeight
14.11.200817,042
21.11.200845,772
28.11.200850,142
05.12.200835,692
12.12.200866,232
19.12.200838,492
26.12.200847,892
02.01.200956,852

Number of visitors who can be served efficiently on a concurrent basis

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of visitors who can be served efficiently on a concurrent basis 1441 8920 + 7479 # Maximize Quality Perspective
Description This is to know the potency of server in handling the traffic on the website.

Graph for Number of visitors who can be served efficiently on a concurrent basis

Graph for Number of visitors who can be served efficiently on a concurrent basis

Data for Number of visitors who can be served efficiently on a concurrent basis

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.200831000100001441
21.11.200831000100007948
28.11.200831000100008461
05.12.200831000100003547
12.12.200831000100005842
19.12.200831000100006337
26.12.200831000100003043
02.01.200931000100008920

Number of virtual users who were involved in the testing

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of virtual users who were involved in the testing 105,92 283,52 + 177,6 # Maximize Quality Perspective
Description This is an important parameter to judge the effectiveness of web application software.

Graph for Number of virtual users who were involved in the testing

Graph for Number of virtual users who were involved in the testing

Data for Number of virtual users who were involved in the testing

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.2008320500105,92
21.11.2008320500100,16
28.11.2008320500233,6
05.12.2008320500129,44
12.12.2008320500391,04
19.12.2008320500142,88
26.12.2008320500421,28
02.01.2009320500283,52

% increase in number of users

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root % increase in number of users 59,52 52,16 -7,36 % Maximize Quality Perspective
Description This indicator tells whether the web application is capable of efficiently serving the users (over the last 6 months).

Graph for % increase in number of users

Graph for % increase in number of users

Data for % increase in number of users

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
14.11.200822010059,52
21.11.200822010086,32
28.11.200822010055,04
05.12.200822010084,48
12.12.200822010078,4
19.12.200822010054,4
26.12.200822010082,56
02.01.200922010052,16
Created by: AKS-Labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 07.12.2008 16:20:38

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.