This is a Winery Balanced Scorecard Report, it is one of reports that Balanced Scorecard Designer can generate for Winery scorecard. With this software you can also design your own KPIs, Balanced Scorecards and metrics.


Winery Scorecard

Report includes: 1 month(s) 49 day(s), from 30.08.2009 to 18.10.2009

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Contains
Root Winery Scorecard  50,7 % 37,1 % -13,6 %
Architecture Perspective (49,6%, 4,52%Up)
Innovation Perspective(41,4%, -24,18%Down)
Internal Operations Perspective(22,4%, -4,73%Down)
Functioning Perspective (26,5%, -33,78%Down)

Graph for Winery Scorecard

Graph for Winery Scorecard

Data for Winery Scorecard

DatesValue
30.08.200950,7
06.09.200957,73
13.09.200942,73
20.09.200948,83
27.09.200952,57
04.10.200944,65
11.10.200930,2
18.10.200937,1


Architecture Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Architecture Perspective   45,12 % 49,64 % + 4,52% Winery Scorecard
Indicators
Production area
Yearly rise in production volume
Fraction of grapes from ‘own vineyards’
‘Waste systems’ placement *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of KPIs is to know about the structure of winery as has been developed by the manufacturers.

Graph for Architecture Perspective

Graph for Architecture Perspective

Data for Architecture Perspective

DatesValueWeight
30.08.200945,123
06.09.200984,133
13.09.200948,33
20.09.200939,743
27.09.200939,553
04.10.200932,53
11.10.200917,973
18.10.200949,643


Production area

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Production area   69,6 96,6 + 27 ha Maximize Architecture Perspective
Description This is equal to the area of ‘vineyard’ owned by the company.

Graph for Production area

Graph for Production area

Data for Production area

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.200935015069,6
06.09.2009350150144,5
13.09.2009350150146,1
20.09.200935015067
27.09.200935015051,7
04.10.200935015078,7
11.10.200935015061,5
18.10.200935015096,6


Yearly rise in production volume

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Yearly rise in production volume   64,6 90 + 25,4 % Maximize Architecture Perspective
Description This is the amount of wine that is produced by the concerned company.

Graph for Yearly rise in production volume

Graph for Yearly rise in production volume

Data for Yearly rise in production volume

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.20093010064,6
06.09.20093010076,2
13.09.20093010010,7
20.09.20093010033
27.09.20093010059,4
04.10.20093010011,3
11.10.20093010033,2
18.10.20093010090


Fraction of grapes from ‘own vineyards’

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Fraction of grapes from ‘own vineyards’  17,29 46,27 + 28,98 % Maximize Architecture Perspective
Description This KPI reflects the extent to which the grapes being used in wine production are from own farms. The greater is the proportion, lesser will be the troubles needed for transporting the raw material to the point-of-production.

Graph for Fraction of grapes from ‘own vineyards’

Graph for Fraction of grapes from ‘own vineyards’

Data for Fraction of grapes from ‘own vineyards’

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.200921010017,29
06.09.200921010087,76
13.09.200921010035,65
20.09.200921010078,31
27.09.200921010041,23
04.10.200921010060,76
11.10.200921010029,17
18.10.200921010046,27


Innovation Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Innovation Perspective  65,6 % 41,42 % -24,18% Winery Scorecard
Indicators
‘Novel products’ introduced
Lab and equipment expenditure
‘Appreciation’ scale
Learning and experience grading *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description A field like that of winery asks for continuous ‘make-up’ for itself. Thus, one is required to keep working on ‘re-inventing’ the products.

Graph for Innovation Perspective

Graph for Innovation Perspective

Data for Innovation Perspective

DatesValueWeight
30.08.200965,63
06.09.200929,793
13.09.200936,293
20.09.200936,613
27.09.200940,853
04.10.200957,253
11.10.200932,473
18.10.200941,423


‘Novel products’ introduced

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root ‘Novel products’ introduced   4,946 5,912 + 0,966 number Maximize Innovation Perspective
Description This will be equal to the number of products that were brought in the market by this particular winery.

Graph for ‘Novel products’ introduced

Graph for ‘Novel products’ introduced

Data for ‘Novel products’ introduced

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.200933104,946
06.09.200933106,451
13.09.200933104,05
20.09.200933104,708
27.09.200933105,59
04.10.200933107,354
11.10.200933103,336
18.10.200933105,912


Lab and equipment expenditure

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Lab and equipment expenditure   7,903 8,902 + 0,999 Score Maximize Innovation Perspective
Description This is to know about the expenditure being incurred in order to pursue ‘innovative aims’. A 1-10 numbered scale can be used for this purpose.

Graph for Lab and equipment expenditure

Graph for Lab and equipment expenditure

Data for Lab and equipment expenditure

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.200921107,903
06.09.200921101,351
13.09.200921108,812
20.09.200921102,143
27.09.200921101,972
04.10.200921103,421
11.10.200921107,273
18.10.200921108,902


‘Appreciation’ scale

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root ‘Appreciation’ scale   9,604 1,828 -7,776 Score Maximize Innovation Perspective
Description The value for this KPI can be had by using a scale of 1-10 and arrive at a number that is seen as logical with regard to the efforts taken for gauging the ‘innovative approach’.

Graph for ‘Appreciation’ scale

Graph for ‘Appreciation’ scale

Data for ‘Appreciation’ scale

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.200921109,604
06.09.200921102,971
13.09.200921103,025
20.09.200921106,787
27.09.200921105,788
04.10.200921105,428
11.10.200921107,786
18.10.200921101,828


Internal Operations Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Internal Operations Perspective  27,17 % 22,44 % -4,73% Winery Scorecard
Indicators
Number of wine makers employed
Types of wines produced
Quality position
‘Safety programs’ adherence *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This group of metrics is for knowing about the way internal processes have been going on.

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Graph for Internal Operations Perspective

Data for Internal Operations Perspective

DatesValueWeight
30.08.200927,172
06.09.200972,952
13.09.200941,842
20.09.200962,982
27.09.200968,562
04.10.200936,232
11.10.200925,912
18.10.200922,442


Number of wine makers employed

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Number of wine makers employed   63,37 28,09 -35,28 number Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description It is equal to the number of winemakers who have been employed for taking the business ahead.

Graph for Number of wine makers employed

Graph for Number of wine makers employed

Data for Number of wine makers employed

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.200921010063,37
06.09.200921010097,93
13.09.200921010092,62
20.09.200921010070,21
27.09.200921010078,67
04.10.200921010064,9
11.10.200921010054,82
18.10.200921010028,09


Types of wines produced

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Types of wines produced   4,029 3,372 -0,657 number Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description Wine can be manufactured from a number of fruits such as ‘apples, strawberry, dandelion, pineapple’ etc. Thus, by having such a KPI in the scorecard, one can get an idea about the expanse of the operations.

Graph for Types of wines produced

Graph for Types of wines produced

Data for Types of wines produced

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.20093364,029
06.09.20093365,877
13.09.20093365,106
20.09.20093364,761
27.09.20093364,35
04.10.20093363,324
11.10.20093363,585
18.10.20093363,372


Quality position

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Quality position   2,449 2,161 -0,288 Score Maximize Internal Operations Perspective
Description A scale of 1-10 can be used for knowing the value of this KPI, with regard to the quality of output that is being manufactured.

Graph for Quality position

Graph for Quality position

Data for Quality position

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.200921102,449
06.09.200921102,692
13.09.200921101,576
20.09.200921102,53
27.09.200921106,922
04.10.200921107,831
11.10.200921102,575
18.10.200921102,161


Functioning Perspective

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Parent Contains
Root Functioning Perspective   60,27 % 26,49 % -33,78% Winery Scorecard
Indicators
‘Visitor: Taster’ conversion ratio
Rise on ‘per order’ basis
Cancellation Rate
Tasting room adequacy *
* - Information for this metric is limited in sample report Description This category of KPIs is for making sure that the winery functions properly.

Graph for Functioning Perspective

Graph for Functioning Perspective

Data for Functioning Perspective

DatesValueWeight
30.08.200960,272
06.09.200944,822
13.09.200944,922
20.09.200966,662
27.09.200973,682
04.10.200952,392
11.10.200949,452
18.10.200926,492


‘Visitor: Taster’ conversion ratio

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root ‘Visitor: Taster’ conversion ratio  0,461 0,46 -0,001 fraction Minimize Functioning Perspective
Description This indicator is used to know the rate at which visitors get converted into tasters.

Graph for ‘Visitor: Taster’ conversion ratio

Graph for ‘Visitor: Taster’ conversion ratio

Data for ‘Visitor: Taster’ conversion ratio

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.200920,30,80,461
06.09.200920,30,80,647
13.09.200920,30,80,6065
20.09.200920,30,80,582
27.09.200920,30,80,636
04.10.200920,30,80,3005
11.10.200920,30,80,344
18.10.200920,30,80,46


Rise on ‘per order’ basis

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Rise on ‘per order’ basis   75,88 13,96 -61,92 % Maximize Functioning Perspective
Description This is equal to the rise as it occurs on ‘per order’ basis.

Graph for Rise on ‘per order’ basis

Graph for Rise on ‘per order’ basis

Data for Rise on ‘per order’ basis

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.200931010075,88
06.09.200931010072,55
13.09.200931010041,68
20.09.200931010082,36
27.09.200931010096,13
04.10.200931010072,73
11.10.200931010013,06
18.10.200931010013,96


Cancellation Rate

  Name Start value End value Dynamic Measure units Optimization method Parent
Root Cancellation Rate   6,07 7,07 + 1 % Minimize Functioning Perspective
Description This reflects the degree of cancellations that had to be tolerated due to poor quality of wines. It is helpful in knowing the pool of ‘loyal customers’.

Graph for Cancellation Rate

Graph for Cancellation Rate

Data for Cancellation Rate

DatesWeightMinMaxValue
30.08.200930106,07
06.09.200930106,99
13.09.200930103,16
20.09.200930102,8
27.09.200930103,01
04.10.200930106,22
11.10.200930106,41
18.10.200930107,07
Created by: AKS-labs
Report created with Balanced Scorecard Designer at 22.09.2009 20:11:46

Copyright © 2000-2012 AKS-Labs. All rights reserved.